Thread: Tech groups disappointed in immigration vote

http://www.itworld.com/Career/1878/070628tech/

Two IT trade groups, as well as Microsoft Corp., expressed disappointment after the U.S. Senate failed to move ahead with a comprehensive immigration reform bill that would include a higher annual cap on visas for high-skilled workers.

In a vote Thursday, the Senate failed to cut off debate on the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act and move the bill forward for a vote. The bill, which critics say provides amnesty to illegal aliens living in the U.S., also would have expanded exemptions to the cap on the controversial H-1B visa program, a move supported by many tech vendors.

The bill would increase the annual H-1B cap from 65,000 to 115,000 and exempt all foreign students who have earned a master's degree or higher from a U.S. university from the annual cap. Right now, there's a 20,000 annual limit on exemptions for students with master's degree and higher.

The Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), a trade group, called on the U.S. Congress to move ahead with legislation addressing only high-skilled visas, including H-1Bs and EB "green card" visas, not other immigration issues. The ITAA was "tremendously disappointed" by the Senate's failure to move the bill forward, ITAA President and CEO Phil Bond said in a statement.

"Our own immigration system is restricting America's ability to compete, to grow and to prosper," Bond said. "Congress must find a way to remove this chokehold."

The Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA) said it was "profoundly disappointed" in the Senate's action.

Without the immigration bill, the U.S. "high-tech industry will be challenged to find the skilled workers it needs and therefore put at a significant disadvantage to its global competitors," SIIA President Ken Wasch said in a statement.

Companies like Microsoft will be hurt by the failure to pass the bill, said Pamela Passman, the company's vice president for global corporate affairs. Comprehensive immigration reform is "desperately needed," she said in a statement.

U.S.-based tech worker groups such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers-USA (IEEE-USA) have opposed a higher H-1B cap, arguing that companies use the program to hire foreign workers for less money than unemployed U.S. workers would receive.

This month, a video surfaced on the Internet showing lawyers talking about how to cheat the skilled-worker visa system.

gee let me get my tissue box ready

Companies like Microsoft will be hurt by the failure to pass the bill, said Pamela Passman, the company's vice president for global corporate affairs. Comprehensive immigration reform is "desperately needed," she said in a statement.

Gee try investing in America...like you did once when you became a billionaire...and I bet you will still be a billionaire...or maybe being king of the world is not good enough

Tough cookies you greedy bast*rds.

All the above, and...

This month, a video surfaced on the Internet showing lawyers talking about how to cheat the skilled-worker visa system.

Actually, the reporting of the facts here is a little off-base. What the lawyers were really talking about was a presentation to a business group on how to NOT find qualified American workers to do a professional job, and then justify hiring the imported foreigner.

...Which, incidentally, is very borderline ILLEGAL.

OK EEOC, where are you? Have you investigated the named lawfirm? It is National Origin discrimination isn't it?

Mr. Gate$ can kiss my Java programming A$$.

Originally Posted by PhredE

All the above, and...

This month, a video surfaced on the Internet showing lawyers talking about how to cheat the skilled-worker visa system.

Actually, the reporting of the facts here is a little off-base. What the lawyers were really talking about was a presentation to a business group on how to NOT find qualified American workers to do a professional job, and then justify hiring the imported foreigner.

...Which, incidentally, is very borderline ILLEGAL.

OK EEOC, where are you? Have you investigated the named lawfirm? It is National Origin discrimination isn't it?

Good question. Anyone have any updates on this?