Republicans Reconsider Immigration Laws
November 8, 2012, 7:21 p.m. ET
Republicans Reconsider Immigration Laws
After Hispanic Voters Helped Propel Obama's Win, GOP Legislators Rethink Party's Stance; Skeptics See an Uphill Battle
By PETER NICHOLAS
House Speaker John Boehner and other Republicans in Congress said Thursday that they want to consider broad changes to immigration laws next year, after an election in which Hispanic voters turned out in force to help President Barack Obama win a second term.
Lawmakers and the White House said their most immediate goal was averting the so-called fiscal cliff, the budget cuts and tax increases set to kick in next year. Once that is done, the White House and its allies in Congress have said, a major objective in 2013 is an immigration overhaul that was one of the president's promises in his first campaign for the White House.
Republican leaders say they are also ready to take up the issue. "We understand that we can't keep kicking this can down the road,'' an aide to House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R., Va.), said Thursday. Legislation, the aide said, must include a broader plan for the estimated 11 million people living in the U.S. illegally. "We're going to address the 11 million people," the aide added.
Mr. Boehner, in an interview Thursday with ABC News, said an immigration overhaul was on his agenda. "This issue has been around far too long," he said. "A comprehensive approach is long overdue, and I'm confident that the president, myself and others can find the common ground to take care of this issue once and for all."
A House Republican leadership aide said lawmakers had absorbed the election results and believe that Republican Mitt Romney's tough stance on illegal immigration cost him Hispanic votes in the presidential election. "But the details are very important and are going to be very hard,'' the aide said about potential legislation. "It's going to take a big commitment from both sides to try and resolve them.''
White House officials have made quiet overtures to Republican senators, hoping to find allies in what may prove to be a major legislative battle of 2013. Advocates for revamping the immigration system are trying to arrange meetings with lawmakers, who return to Washington next week for the lame-duck session. They have asked to meet with GOP figures likely to influence the debate, including Mr. Cantor, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.).
One question is whether Republicans would support a process to grant legal status or citizenship to those in the country illegally, a move backed by most Democrats but which many Republicans criticize as amnesty. The Republican Party platform, adopted at the GOP convention this summer, opposes "any form of amnesty'' for people who intentionally violate immigration law, saying that it "rewards and encourages more law breaking'' and puts those seeking to enter the country legally at a disadvantage.
Immigration proposals never advanced in the last Congress, with some Republicans saying they were waiting for Mr. Obama to show leadership and others saying they didn't want to take up the issue. Democrats said they couldn't find enough Republicans willing to work with them. Republicans have often said that Congress should shore up border security before writing new laws concerning those in the country illegally.
Some Republican figures outside Washington have urged GOP lawmakers to soften their tone on immigration and get behind a legalization plan. Mark Shurtleff, the Republican attorney general in Utah, told reporters Thursday that for Republicans to succeed nationally and to be "relevant," they must "stop the pandering to the extreme right" on immigration.
Conservative talk show host Sean Hannity said on his radio program Thursday said he had "evolved" on the issue of illegal immigration when it comes to people who don't have criminal records. "It's simple for me to fix it," he said. "I think you control the border first. You create a pathway for those people that are here. You don't say, 'You've got to go home.' "
Exit polls of Tuesday's election showed that Mr. Romney won less than 30% of the Hispanic vote, a factor in his defeat in Colorado, Virginia and likely in Florida, where he trailed by a margin small enough that the Associated Press on Thursday hadn't yet declared a winner.
Mr. Romney had presented himself as an advocate of legal immigration but staked out a position to the right of his rivals during the Republican primaries, criticizing Texas Gov. Rick Perry for supporting in-state college tuition benefits for illegal immigrants and Newt Gingrich for saying some longtime illegal immigrants should gain legal status. He also called for "self-deportation'' of illegal immigrants.
Given the partisan divisions in Congress, a strategy that relies on passing a large bill might be doomed, some conservatives warned. A more promising alternative might be taking up smaller pieces of an immigration overhaul that enjoy bipartisan support.
Alfonso Aguilar, executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles and a former official in George W. Bush's administration, said: "People are asking me, 'Can we get to full comprehensive immigration reform?' I don't think so. I think there are big policy differences. Some people just can't swallow a path to citizenship."
Whit Ayres, a Republican pollster, also was skeptical that the will existed to pass changes to immigration laws as a single package. A "widespread sense'' has grown within the party that it must change its policy and tone on some Hispanic-related issues, he said. But he added, "That's a far cry from saying the Republican Party is going to get behind some massive bill that tries to solve all the problems at once. That's a mistake."
"We've seen with comprehensive health-care reform, for example, the incredible difficulty of forging anything remotely resembling a majority coalition behind a massive bill that tries to fix several thousand things at once," Mr. Ayres said.
—Carol E. Lee and Corey Boles contributed to this article.
Write to Peter Nicholas at peter.nicholas@wsj.com
Republicans Reconsider Immigration Laws - WSJ.com
Boehner faces backlash on immigration overture
By Stephen Dinan
The Washington Times
Friday, November 9, 2012
http://media.washtimes.com/media/ima...d2c5ef89877976
House Speaker John A. Boehner's overture to Democrats and President Obama on immigration reform is already drawing fire from within the GOP, where lawmakers say he's writing checks that his fellow House Republicans won't cash for him.
"I'm concerned that Speaker Boehner is getting ahead of House Republicans when he commits to getting a 'comprehensive approach' to immigration taken care of 'once and for all,'" Rep. John Fleming, Louisiana Republican, said in a statement late Thursday, telling Mr. Boehner to "pull back" on his comments.
In an interview with ABC on Thursday, two days after his party saw Hispanics vote overwhelmingly for Democrats, Mr. Boehner said the time had come to address immigration.
"This issue has been around far too long and while I believe it's important for us to secure our borders and to enforce our laws, I think a comprehensive approach is long overdue, and I'm confident that the president, myself, others, can find the common ground to take care of this issue once and for all," he said.
His use of the word "comprehensive" set off alarm bells within the GOP, since that is the term immigrant-rights advocates use for legislation that would legalize most of the 11 million illegal immigrants now in the U.S., as well as rewrite the legal immigration system.
A number of prominent conservatives have said the election should prompt a rethink of the GOP's stance on immigration. Radio show host Sean Hannity said Thursday that he now supports a pathway to citizenship, and columnist Charles Krauthammer said Republicans should unapologetically embrace amnesty.
"Yes — amnesty. Use the word," Mr. Krauthammer wrote Thursday in his election analysis.
Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican and vice chairman of the House subcommittee that handles immigration, took to Twitter to reject that rethink, saying the GOP shouldn't get into a bidding war with Democrats to try to buy Hispanics' allegiance, because they will never bid high enough.
"Obama voters chose dependency over Liberty. Now establishment R's want citizenship for illegals. You can't beat Santa Claus with amnesty," Mr. Kind tweeted Thursday evening.
Friday morning, at his weekly press conference, Mr. Boehner clarified his intentions on the issue.
"I'm not talking about a 3,000-page bill," he said. "What I'm talking about is a common-sense, step-by-step approach that secures our borders, allows us to enforce our laws and fix our broken immigration system."
He also repeatedly demanded that President Obama take the lead on the issue.
But he declined to say whether he would push the House to accept a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, or what else would be on the table specifically.
"I'm not going to get into any details of how you would get there, it's just time to get the job done," he said.
Mr. Boehner also saw criticism for saying he was open to "new revenue" as a way to close the deficit.
On Wednesday, and again on Friday, Mr. Boehner said he would be willing to accept a deal to avert the looming tax increases and spending cuts if that deal cleaned up the tax code — which he said would produce a stronger economy and therefore more revenue to the government. Fellow Republicans said that, too, should have been discussed within the House Republican Conference first.
Asked whether he would be able to sell any revenue deal to Republicans, Mr. Boehner was confident.
"When the president and I have been able to come to an agreement, there's been no problem getting it passed here in the House," he said.
Boehner faces backlash on immigration overture - Washington Times
