Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member cvangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,450

    Permanent residency permits to flow w/o all background check

    Permanent residency permits to flow without all background checks
    By Marisa Taylor | McClatchy Newspapers
    Posted on Sunday, February 10, 2008 email | print tool nameclose
    tool goes here

    WASHINGTON — In a major policy shift aimed at reducing a ballooning immigration backlog, the Department of Homeland Security is preparing to grant permanent residency to tens of thousands of applicants before the FBI completes a required background check.

    Those eligible are immigrants whose fingerprints have cleared the FBI database of criminal convictions and arrests, but whose names have not yet cleared the FBI's criminal or intelligence files after six months of waiting.

    The immigrants who are granted permanent status, more commonly known as getting their green cards, will be expected eventually to clear the FBI's name check. If they don't, their legal status will be revoked and they'll be deported.

    The decision to issue green cards demonstrates how federal agencies are struggling to keep up with surging immigration applications while applying stringent post-Sept. 11th background checks.

    About 150,000 green card and naturalization applicants have been delayed by the FBI name check, with 30,000 held up more than three years.

    DHS officials are determining exactly how many are affected, but confirmed that tens of thousands of people could be eligible for the expedited procedure. The new policy was outlined in an internal memo obtained by McClatchy Newspapers. Officials said the policy will be posted this week on the department's website.

    Attorneys who represent immigrants applauded the new policy and predicted green cards would be issued faster.

    However, advocates of stricter immigration enforcement accused DHS of creating security loopholes, rather than solving the backlog problem.

    "It's a decision driven by the bureaucratic imperative to move the line along rather than addressing national security concerns," said Mark Krikorian, the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies. "It defies the imagination that you can require a security check only to decide that you're going to ignore it."

    DHS officials said the new process does not pose any new security risks because green card applicants have been allowed to remain in the country while they wait to be screened.

    "We will do nothing that cuts corners or compromises national security," said Chris Bentley, a spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Services, the DHS agency that processes green cards and citizenship. "This is something that we're doing to get benefits to people who deserve them as quickly as possible."

    Immigrants seeking U.S. citizenship will continue to be required to clear the name checks before being naturalized. Officials said the requirements remain in effect for naturalization because U.S. citizenship is more difficult to revoke than a green card.

    The backlog of background checks for both naturalization and green cards swelled in the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks after immigration officials resubmitted 2.7 million names to the FBI.

    At the same time, the bureau tightened its background check requirements. The FBI not only runs applicants' names against lists of suspects in criminal and intelligence files but also looks for names of applicants that have surfaced during the course of an investigation or any associates of suspects.

    "It's a very complicated process," said Bill Carter, a FBI spokesman. "It involves dozens of agencies and databases and often foreign governments."

    Adding to the backlog, a surge of applications flooded Citizenship and Immigration Services last year, prompted partly by the announcement of fee increases.

    Although the FBI clears about 70 percent of the name checks within 72 hours, the bureau struggles to keep up with more than 74,000 requests per week, roughly half arising from immigration applications.

    Slowing the process even more, many of the applicants who don't immediately clear are flagged for extra scrutiny merely because their names are similar to those of suspects.

    Hundreds of people caught up in the backlog have sued the government to force the agencies to initiate background checks. Some of the plaintiffs have found the FBI inexplicitly clears them soon after a lawsuit is filed.

    Michael Baylson, a federal judge in Philadelphia overseeing six of the lawsuits, recently expressed frustration with the government for what he described as "a strategy of favoring delay by litigation, instead of developing an orderly and transparent administrative resolution."

    "Congress certainly did not intend for the process to become tortuous, expensive, mystifying and delayed, but it has," the Bush appointee wrote in January when ordering the government to explain the delays.

    Critics have charged the naturalization delays could unfairly shut potential voters out of the upcoming presidential election. Last month, Emilio Gonzalez, director of Citizenship and Immigration Services at DHS, pledged to hire 3,000 new and retired employees to reduce the backlog.

    Immigrant advocates question why applicants waiting for naturalization couldn't be approved before the FBI clears their names, too. Many people who apply for naturalization are green card holders who have lived in the United States for at least three years and have undergone similar background checks before.

    "These people already have been scrutinized," said Daniel G. Anna, an immigration lawyer.

    Two of Anna's clients, a Pennsylvania psychologist and a doctor who works at a New York veterans' hospital, have waited years to become U.S. citizens even though they have green cards. The doctor, who is from Pakistan, recently cleared the name check after she filed a lawsuit, but the psychologist, who is from Nigeria, is still waiting.

    "If you're going to speed it up for green cards, then it makes sense you would do the same thing for naturalization," Anna said.

    Krikorian said the better solution would be for Congress and the administration to earmark more money for both agencies to conduct the complete background checks or to reduce the number of people who are eligible for green cards or citizenship.

    "The demands we've placed on the FBI for security checks is greater than their resources," Krikorian said. "We have such a tsunami of legal immigration that our infrastructure can't keep up."


    McClatchy Newspapers 2008
    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/27280.html

  2. #2
    Senior Member butterbean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    11,181
    Krikorian said the better solution would be for Congress and the administration to earmark more money for both agencies to conduct the complete background checks or to reduce the number of people who are eligible for green cards or citizenship.
    IT MAKES SENSE TO ME!

    RIP Butterbean! We miss you and hope you are well in heaven.-- Your ALIPAC friends

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,070
    And why do we need these people here? Isn't unemployment on the rise? Wont they be competing with Americans for jobs?

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member cayla99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
    Posts
    4,889
    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie
    And why do we need these people here? Isn't unemployment on the rise? Wont they be competing with Americans for jobs?

    Dixie
    Well, I can speak for one who came here years ago, he is here because he makes me smile and I like to be spoiled a bit. And sorry boys, IMHO he is the best man on the entire planet for that job.

    What gets me is we had to pay for 5, count them 5 separate checks from 5 separate agencies costing hundreds per check. After clearing the fingerprint check, they issue a temporary card good for 6 months, why do they need to issue the permanent ones before the checks are completed???? I smell something more rotten than normal here.
    Proud American and wife of a wonderful LEGAL immigrant from Ireland.
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,753
    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie
    And why do we need these people here? Isn't unemployment on the rise? Wont they be competing with Americans for jobs?

    Dixie
    I agree

    Who monitors all these apps in regard to quotas also

    If 5 million apply , do all 5 million get the deal ?

    Who is watching demographics ? How is our system fair
    if we are highly favoring one demographic

    I think the whole set up is nuts , besides , like you say , we are
    in an economic down turn , immigration should be cut in times like this to protect Americans

  6. #6
    Senior Member tencz57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    2,425
    Quote Originally Posted by usanevada
    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie
    And why do we need these people here? Isn't unemployment on the rise? Wont they be competing with Americans for jobs?

    Dixie
    I agree

    Who monitors all these apps in regard to quotas also

    If 5 million apply , do all 5 million get the deal ?

    Who is watching demographics ? How is our system fair
    if we are highly favoring one demographic

    I think the whole set up is nuts , besides , like you say , we are
    in an economic down turn , immigration should be cut in times like this to protect Americans
    If your speaking of Illegal Mexicans ? Then NO to competing with Americans for jobs . The IM will get the job every time due to his low wage issue . They work so hard , They built this country . MSM can kiss my grits
    Nam vet 1967/1970 Skull & Bones can KMA .Bless our Brothers that gave their all ..It also gives me the right to Vote for Chuck Baldwin 2008 POTUS . NOW or never*
    *

  7. #7
    Senior Member cayla99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
    Posts
    4,889
    I know this is dry, but here are the countries that ARE NOT in the green card lottery.

    The following countries are excluded from the lottery program (subject to change):

    * China (mainland only)
    * Russia
    * Vietnam
    * South Korea
    * Philippines
    * Brazi
    * Peru
    * Pakistan
    * India
    * Mexico
    * Jamaica
    * United Kingdom (except N.Ireland)
    * Canada
    * Dominican Republic
    * Colombia
    * Haiti
    * El Salvador
    * Poland

    Natives from all other countries may register. If you were born in one of the non-qualifying countries you can still participate based on the country of birth of your parents.
    http://www.usagcls.com/Req.asp

    It looks like any country that has had more than 50,000 immigrate here in the previous 5 years is off the list.

    My guess is Latin Americans can legally apply in the year 2525
    Proud American and wife of a wonderful LEGAL immigrant from Ireland.
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •