Thread: Roll Call Acknowledges Efforts of NumbersUSA and its Members

Is stories like this just a smoke screen to make us sit back and get comfortable instead of taking action....just my immediate feelings as I read this.

Roll Call Acknowledges Efforts of NumbersUSA and its Members
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusab ... mbers.html

By Chris Chmielenski, Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 3:14 PM

In media coverage -- from cable news programs to newspaper editorial boards to YouTube videos- -- , immigration appears to be taking a backseat only to the struggling economy and late night talk show appearances by President Obama.

But Senate Minority Whip John Kyl said yesterday that immigration is not a high priority issue right now in Congress.

"If you've picked any subject that isn't really on the front burner right now, you've picked it," said Kyl, who also serves on the Judiciary Committee, when asked if immigration reform might be taken up soon.

-- Congress Daily (3/25)

This comes just one week after Obama promised the Hispanic Caucus to pursue comprehensive immigration reform, a.k.a. Amnesty, and in the midst of pro-immigration, anti-American worker advocate and Illinois Rep. Luis Guiterrez’s nationwide immigration tour. Just last week, the Californians for Population Stabilization released the video of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi calling immigration law enforcement actions un-American once again forcing the issue into the limelight.

NumbersUSA members responded to both Obama and Pelosi with a massive fax response. Even early this week, our fax machines were still churning. Americans ordered more than 400,000 faxes through our website since the middle of last week. Not to mention, more than 3,500 new members who joined NumbersUSA over the last five days, sending faxes to their elected officials.

Immigration may be on the back burner for Congress, but it’s front and center for the millions of Americans impacted daily by the federal government importing 138,000 foreign workers a month.

New Jersey residents responding to a poll conducted by Gannett papers overwhelmingly oppose rewards granted to illegal aliens such as driver’s licenses and in-state tuition benefits. Yet, the New York Times, which serves the northern half of the Garden State, just yesterday criticized Obama for pulling back on his nomination of attorney Thomas Saenz to head the civil rights division of the Justice Department. The person who was nominated is also a key pro-amnesty leader but doesn’t have as aggressive of a profile as Saenz. The Times and others saw this as a big set-back.

Mr. Obama may have avoided a nasty fight this time. But if he is ever going to win the battle to put 12 million illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship, he will to have to confront and dismantle the core restrictionist argument: that being an illegal immigrant is an unpardonable crime, one that strips away fundamental protections and forgives all manner of indecent treatment.

-- New York Times Editorial (3/24)

So far in March, the Times has pumped out six editorials/op-eds supporting the Amnesty argument. Newspapers across the country are printing sob stories about illegal aliens negatively impacted by the souring economy and worksite enforcement.

Every once in a while, immigration-reduction advocates get a quote here and a paragraph there, but there is little coverage to an issue that places millions of Americans out of work while reducing the quality of life for millions more.

On Monday, Roll Call, a specialty publication that ranks No. 1 in total readership with Congress, gave us some substantial ink. “Sealing Off the Borders; Anti-Immigration Groups Gear Up for Actionâ€

And the newspapers wonder why they are going belly up? Here's the answer:

So far in March, the Times has pumped out six editorials/op-eds supporting the Amnesty argument. Newspapers across the country are printing sob stories about illegal aliens negatively impacted by the souring economy and worksite enforcement.

Every once in a while, immigration-reduction advocates get a quote here and a paragraph there, but there is little coverage to an issue that places millions of Americans out of work while reducing the quality of life for millions more.

Time to get ready to Rumble!

The tremendously biased coverage of the MSM is why we need to engage with the new media such as talk radio even more forcefully now.

Best start urging your family, friends, coworkers to start getting involved now.

Also, NumbersUSA has provided a good response to the "why don't we have a mass march on Washington" plea. They said a visit to your Reps local office with a few family members and/or friends will have a powerful impact (in addition to the usual phoning and faxing).

I have spent a lot of words relaying to the NYT the stupidity of their pro-illegal stance. But I have plenty of words left and a very big dictionary.