Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    722

    SHOCK: House passes Tancredo measure to deny emergency funds

    Shock: House passes Tancredo measure to deny emergency funds to sanctuary cities

    It's about time for some good news.

    [quote]He’s offered similar proposals at least seven times in the past three years and they’ve always failed by big margins. Today? 234-189, with no fewer than 49 Democrats voting in favor. The Rocky Mountain News says all sides are “stunnedâ€

  2. #2
    GeneralZod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    24
    Looks like the House has sent a huge message to the senate.

    (I guess one's outlook is much different when re-election is every two years as opposed to 6 years)

  3. #3
    Senior Member CCUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    7,675
    I enjoyed the picture and comment: Did Tancredo slay the dragon?

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072

    No aid for sanctuary cities

    No aid for sanctuary cities

    WASHINGTON, June 15 (UPI) -- The House amended the Homeland Security funding bill Friday to withhold emergency aid from U.S. "sanctuary cities" that shelter illegal immigrants.
    The 234-189 majority was a victory for U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., who has failed to win passage for similar measures seven times, The Rocky Mountain News reported. Fifty Democrats voted for the amendment.

    "The issue has come to fruition," Tancredo told the newspaper immediately after the vote. "The people of the country really have spoken. It's a really good indicator of just how much closer to the people the House is than the Senate is."

    Senate leaders have said debate on immigration reform will resume next week.

    Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., didn't elaborate on the deal they struck to revive debate but said ongoing debate on an energy bill would take up the next few days. Reid pulled the bill last week when Republicans blocked efforts to advance the bill to a vote.

    That means the Senate can consider more amendments, including one that would use penalties paid by illegal immigrants to fund border security, The New York Times reported.

    http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2 ... ties/6475/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    722

    Tancredo wins surprise immigration vote

    Tancredo wins surprise immigration vote

    By Chris Barge, Rocky Mountain News
    June 15, 2007

    Washington, D.C. – The U.S. House of Representatives this morning voted to withhold federal emergency services funding for "sanctuary cities" that protect illegal immigrants.

    Anti-immmigration champion Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., sponsored the measure, which he says would apply to cities such as Denver and Boulder. He was elated by its passage, which stunned critics and supporters alike.

    The Littleton Republican's amendment to the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill appears to have no language specifically defining a sanctuary city. Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper has long disputed giving the city that label.

    "The issue has come to fruition," Tancredo said by cell phone after the vote. "The people of the country really have spoken. It's a really good indicator of just how much closer to the people the House is than the Senate is."

    The House passed the amendment, 234 to 189, with 50 Democrats voting in favor.

    Tancredo and his staffers hooted and cheered from his office across the street from the Capitol immediately after the vote.


    Tancredo has introduced similar amendments at least seven other times since 2004, but each has failed — often by wide margins.

    The Homeland Security appropriations bill faces a vote tonight in the House, then later in the Senate. It must also be signed by the President before it becomes law.

    A year ago, Tancredo and other immigration foes unveiled billboards in Denver, including one with a mock declaration: "Welcome to SANCTUARY CITY . . . Relax, you made it! Brought to you by Executive Order 116."

    The billboard was referring to a 1998 order issued by former Denver Mayor Wellington Webb that outlines the city's anti-discrimination stance regarding immigrants.

    "There are no ordinances, executive orders or regulations that establish a 'sanctuary policy' in Denver," the mayor's spokesperson, Lindy Eichenbaum-Lent, said at the time.

    "Denver's policies comply with federal law, and Denver law enforcement officers cooperate with federal officials on immigration matters. Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have said Denver is not a sanctuary city, so merely erecting a misleading billboard doesn't make it true."

    A call for comment from Hickenlooper had not been returned immediately after the House vote.

    The amendment comes as the Senate is poised to take up debate again next week on an immigration reform plan that some opponents criticize as giving amnesty to illegal immigrants.

    President Bush, who supports the Senate's reform plan, sweetened the deal this week by agreeing to include $4.4 billion for border security. The Senate had put the reform bill on ice because it lacked enough support to bring to a vote.

    Tancredo said he thinks his amendment is an indicator that the House would crush the reform plan if it passes in the Senate.

    "If I were (Speaker of the House) Nancy Pelosi, I'd be asking if she could pass a vote on amnesty on the House side," Tancredo said. "If she lost 50 Democrats on this one, and she says she needs 70 Republicans to pass the immigration plan, this is an interesting indicator of things coming down the pike, and that the times, they are a-changing."

    bargec@RockyMountainNews.com or 303-954-5059

    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/l ... 55,00.html

  6. #6
    daggul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    319
    This 'acting tough on illegals' may just be a trick to get the Republicans pass the immigration bill in the Senate thinking it wont pass in the House. . then the House Liberals can turn around.

  7. #7
    Senior Member blkkat99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    El Paso TX
    Posts
    382

    "Dragon Slayer Tancredo" I like it

  8. #8
    April
    Guest
    Tancredo, a true patriot and a force to reckoned with!

  9. #9
    Senior Member americangirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,478
    Quote Originally Posted by daggul
    This 'acting tough on illegals' may just be a trick to get the Republicans pass the immigration bill in the Senate thinking it wont pass in the House. . then the House Liberals can turn around.
    I agree. I smell a rat here somewhere.
    Calderon was absolutely right when he said...."Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico".

  10. #10
    Senior Member Rockfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    From FLA to GA as of 04/01/07
    Posts
    6,640
    THIS IS HUGE!! if it is genuine.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •