Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    Supreme Court ruling in favor of immigrant clarifies automat

    Supreme Court ruling in favor of immigrant clarifies automatic-deportation law
    The Texas man was ordered deported for possession of a marijuana cigarette and one Xanax pill. But justices says only serious crimes warrant the removal of legal immigrants from the country.

    By David G. Savage, Tribune Washington Bureau
    June 14, 2010 | 9:11 a.m.

    Reporting from Washington — The Supreme Court blocked the government Tuesday from deporting legal immigrants for minor drug possession charges, ruling that only serious or violent crimes called for removing otherwise law-abiding people from this country.

    In a 9-0 decision, the justices stopped the deportation of a Texas man who had pleaded guilty at different times to having a marijuana cigarette and a single Xanax pill, a prescription anti-anxiety drug.

    Based on these convictions, an immigration judge and the U.S. Court of Appeals slated Jose Carachuri-Rosendo for deportation to Mexico, where he was born. At age 4, he had come to Texas with his parents and had become a lawful permanent resident with a wife and four children.

    His case illustrates the potentially harsh effects of a 1996 federal law that requires the deportation of non-citizens who are guilty of an "aggravated felony." Congress did not carefully define this term, however, and some immigration judges have said that a second drug-possession conviction could qualify as an aggravated felony.

    The Supreme Court rejected that view in Tuesday's opinion in Carachuri-Rosendo vs. Holder. "We do not usually think of a 10-day sentence for the unauthorized possession of a trivial amount of a prescription drug as an 'aggravated felony,' " wrote Justice John Paul Stevens.

    The 1996 law and its automatic-deportation rule applies to all non-citizens who are living in the United States.

    david.savage@latimes.com

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... 9198.story
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    So why wasn't automatic deportation being used on any and all illegal aliens caught??? Why punish legal residents who've become US citizens?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  3. #3
    Senior Member LawEnforcer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,219
    The court decision applies only to legal immigrants, who have to respect our laws or face deportation. This decision just draws a line in the sand of where legal immigrants have to stand if they want to prevent deportation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •