Thread: Surge In Immigrants Brings New Battles (CT)

http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-im ... ines-local

Surge In Immigrants Brings New Battles

Battle Brews Between Old, New
May 24, 2005
By MARK SPENCER, Courant Staff Writer From the state legislature to city halls to the streets, battle lines are being drawn on immigration in Connecticut in a way that was once confined to border states.

As the number of immigrants in the state has surged in recent years, issues such as education, jobs, housing and security have received increased attention, and cultural clashes between long-time residents and recent arrivals have become more frequent.

Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton threw a match into the tinder of the emotionally charged issue last month by calling for state police to enforce federal immigration law.

Since then, immigration activists as well as those who want tighter controls have organized new groups to mobilize their forces. Tonight they will face off in West Hartford.

The recently formed Connecticut Citizens for Immigration Control held its first meeting in Danbury three days after Boughton asked state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal to negotiate an agreement to allow state police to enforce immigration law.

Leaders of the group have testified before the legislature this year on immigration-related issues and, not long after the Danbury meeting, announced they would meet at 6:30 tonight at the Elmwood Community Center in West Hartford.

Darien resident Paul Streitz, one of the group's founders, said Connecticut is ripe for the positions his group is pushing. He said undocumented immigrants are taking more and more jobs in the state, particularly from low-income workers.

The group also says tighter immigration controls are needed as the country adjusts to the realities of a post 9/11 world.

"It's a problem that has to be fixed," Streitz said. "You can't have a country that doesn't have borders and you don't control who comes in."

In late April, Streitz participated in the controversial Minutemen Project, which sent volunteers to the Arizona-Mexico border to discourage illegal immigration. Some people accused the Minutemen of being vigilantes, an accusation that also has been leveled at Connecticut Citizens for Immigration Control.

Soon after the group announced it would come to West Hartford, more than a dozen organizations, including unions, religious groups and immigration advocates, formed the Ad Hoc Committee for Immigrant Rights.

The group will hold a demonstration tonight, meeting at Shields Plaza on New Britain Avenue at 5:30, then marching to the Elmwood Community Center to picket the meeting.

"We felt the need, as people who live in the area and are strong supporters of immigration rights, to go there and let them know," said West Hartford resident Peter Goselin, of the state chapter of the National Lawyers Guild.

Both sides have vowed tonight's meeting and demonstration will be peaceful. West Hartford Police Chief James Strillacci said his department would monitor tonight's events, but declined to discuss specific plans.

Streitz, who says he has no "great animosity" toward undocumented immigrants, dismisses allegations that his organization is a right-wing group or supports vigilantism.

"The other side slanders us and says we're vigilantes, we're this, we're that," he said. "But that's just slander. They don't want to deal with the problems."

He said his group, which now has a mailing list of about 100 people, simply wants to recruit members to help write letters to officials and lobby the legislature for stricter immigration laws. He said he does not advocate large-scale arrests and deportation of undocumented immigrants.

Streitz pointed to the recent defeat in the state legislature of a bill that would have granted in-state tuition rates at public colleges to some undocumented immigrants as an example of the political battles his group will fight.

Two other founders, Paul Breitzke and Mary Long, testified against the bill, which was defeated 77-65 in the House of Representatives.

Despite its defeat, some immigration advocates said they were pleased that three legislative committees approved the proposal. Werner Oyanadel, legislative analyst for the state Latino and Puerto Rican Affairs Commission, said the bill will be reintroduced next session and is emblematic of the state coming to terms with immigration.

"People were voting in fear," he said. "Fear of repercussions in their districts, fear of not understanding immigration law and fear of passing a law that would aid terrorism."

Boughton's request is still being reviewed by the state. Blumenthal has said he has "serious reservations" about it because it could discourage immigrants from cooperating with state police on criminal investigations.

Gov. M. Jodi Rell has asked Public Safety Commissioner Leonard Boyle to evaluate the request. State police spokesman Sgt. J. Paul Vance said Boyle recently met with representatives from the U.S. attorney's office and immigration and custom's enforcement, but no final decisions have been made.

According to the most recent information from the U.S. Census Bureau, from 2000 to 2004, Connecticut's foreign-born population grew by about 63,800. In 2003, Connecticut ranked 11th among the states in percentage of its population that was foreign-born, the Census Bureau said.

Streitz said the group chose West Hartford because it was close to the capitol and more likely to attract media attention.

Regardless of Streitz's contention that his organization is mainstream, Goselin sees a more ominous hue to it. He said the group wants to "place all the blame for every conceivable ill" on undocumented workers. He said Streitz's participation in the Minutemen Project and strident writing on websites belie his claims to mainstream status.

"When they talk about the nature of this society changing, what they're really talking about is they don't want to see black and brown and yellow faces around," Goselin said.

The increasing friction over immigration is one of the reasons the new immigrants rights coalition came together so quickly, he said. Another group in the coalition, Latinos Against the War, has been passing out leaflets on the counter demonstration during the past week in Hartford's Asylum Hill and Frog Hollow neighborhoods.

Micaela Cadena, a member of the group, said immigrants are increasingly frustrated by the restrictions they face.

Streitz said his group would continue to hold meetings across the state to provide information to those concerned about immigration.

In the short term, members of the Ad Hoc Committee for Immigrants Rights said they would start organizing a June 12 march in Danbury.

GO FOR IT CONNECTICUT!!

Hey, a brilliant idea....stop illegal aliens from entering your state and guess what...you may not have any "criminal investigations" you need their "cooperation" with.

How absurd.....allow illegal immigration to flood your state so you can have cooperation from illegal aliens in criminal illegal alien investigations.

Where do these people come from, where do they wear their souts, how in the world could a "Smart State" like Connecticut have people like this on their payroll?

GET TROOPS TO THE BORDER NOW!!

ENFORCE THE LAW....ITS NOT AN "OPTION"!!

BB, great piece!

"We felt the need, as people who live in the area and are strong supporters of immigration rights, to go there and let them know," said West Hartford resident Peter Goselin, of the state chapter of the National Lawyers Guild.

This says volumes about "who" is advocating destroying THE RULE OF LAW.

Despite its defeat, some immigration advocates said they were pleased that three legislative committees approved the proposal. Werner Oyanadel, legislative analyst for the state Latino and Puerto Rican Affairs Commission, said the bill will be reintroduced next session and is emblematic of the state coming to terms with immigration.

They'll keep hammering unless there's a powerful enough backlash!!

"People were voting in fear," he said. "Fear of repercussions in their districts, fear of not understanding immigration law and fear of passing a law that would aid terrorism."

Just WHAT LAWS is he referring to?? This is where I'm continually confused. What IMMIGRATION LAWS give validation to BREAKING THE LAW?

It's "immigration lawyer spin babble"!!

He's judging life in America through the mirror in his wallet!!

No immigration, no "fees".

No illegal immigration, no "fees".

Might have to represent real defendants with REAL LEGAL issues....and that would be too hard...more profitable for these "immigration lawyers" to make money off spin babble at Immigration Hearings where apparently, any babble will do!!

Originally Posted by Judy

It's "immigration lawyer spin babble"!!
He's judging life in America through the mirror in his wallet!!
No immigration, no "fees".
No illegal immigration, no "fees".
Might have to represent real defendants with REAL LEGAL issues....and that would be too hard...more profitable for these "immigration lawyers" to make money off spin babble at Immigration Hearings where apparently, any babble will do!!

Hey.
Is there a lawyer in the house? Judging by some of your comments, I get the impression that some of you are 'overly informed and knowledgeable of all the current immigration laws'. Much more than the average person. I'm not just talking about 'the boss'. You have the right to remain silent. But I was just curious.

Good Call Butterbean....I think there are some lawyers around....and we need some to come forward and help this cause! Not every lawyer in America belongs to the OBL-ACLU; not every lawyer in the US sides with foreign agents over the best interest of the USA and the American People; or:

Do they? Have we no American Lawyers left?

We'll see if any come forward eh Butterbean!