Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
07-03-2015, 10:03 PM #1
Darling: Texas decided not to reimburse McAllen for expense of immigration crisis
by Ashly Custer
Posted: 07.03.2015 at 2:59 PM
The state will not allocate money to McAllen despite promises to reimburse the city for their involvement in providing humanitarian relief during the immigration crisis, officials said.
Immigrants crossing the Texas-Mexico border shifted heavily into the Rio Grande Valley in 2014 with the number of unaccompanied minors also soaring.
The City of McAllen quickly responded by providing costly humanitarian relief.
The cost of humanitarian efforts in the Rio Grande Valley totaled an estimated $600,000, not including money invested by Catholic Charities through the Sacred Heart Church in McAllen.
An announcement made in April showed organizations on the border that provided humanitarian aid to immigrant families and unaccompanied minors would be eligible for reimbursement through federal funds due to a provision made to the Department of Homeland Security's funding bill.
McAllen Mayor Jim Darling thought the city would be reimbursed for stepping in to do “what the federal government should have done before they released the families.” The State of Texas is now saying there just isn’t enough of that money to go around.
Texas was given over $20 million in federal funds for its state Homeland Security Grant Program, according to Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-TX.
“We put the language where you could get the reimbursement,” Cuellar said. “What we do is we give federal dollars to the state and the state makes certain decisions.”
The state's Homeland Security Grant Program allocated $480,000 to the region, according to Darling. However, the money will go towards to local law enforcement agencies for communication expenses. Darling was told there was only $8.60 left in the account, which means there’s no money for reimbursement of expenses from the federal government.
“I thought the state was going to be in good faith effort use some of that money, and they haven’t done that,” Cuellar said. “Their priorities are a little different. I guess they don’t want to show they are using homeland security dollars to provide humanitarian care.”
Cuellar said the State of Texas decided to use the money elsewhere.
"They do have the money, and I emphasize they do,” he said. “I know the locals were told there was no money, but I’m on the appropriations committee. I talked to FEMA. They do have the money.”
The city will reevaluate its involvement if providing immigration relief becomes too much of a financial burden, Darling said.
For now, they will continue their humanitarian efforts to the best of their ability with as little impact as possible on municipal operations.
“We thought it was important that we show humanitarian response,” Darling said.
The relief effort is ongoing despite the costs of providing food, water, housing and other amenities rising.
The average number of daily guests at Sacred Heart Church last month was just over 56, but over the last ten days, the number has risen to 82.
Immigration relief has been ongoing in McAllen for over 380 days.
http://www.valleycentral.com/news/st...5#.VZc-REYYMSoSupport our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
07-03-2015, 11:10 PM #2
You can believe that 'Bama is loving this. He's thumbing his nose at regular Americans and making them pay for it, too.
Let's see if the regular folks figure out that 'Bama's Open Door policy is the reason for their distress.
*********************************************
Americans first in this magnificent country
American jobs for American workers
Fair trade, not free trade
-
07-03-2015, 11:11 PM #3
Well, there certainly is no reason to reimburse charity organizations. If the city thought it was appropriate to use their own money to reward illegal aliens invading their town with "humanitarian aid", then what they actually did was aid, abet and harbor illegal aliens. It's a short trip back into Mexico from whence they came, so you should have sent them home.
Yes, the city of McAllen needs to "re-evaluate" the preposterous notion of humanitarian aid to illegal aliens violating US immigration law.A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
Similar Threads
-
‘We Are Under Invasion’: Louie Gohmert Breaks Down Crisis at the Border After McAllen
By AirborneSapper7 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 07-03-2014, 11:02 PM -
A View From The Border: McAllen Locals Debate Child Immigration Crisis
By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 0Last Post: 07-02-2014, 01:51 PM -
Congressional committee to hold hearing in McAllen about immigration crisis
By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 1Last Post: 07-02-2014, 01:43 PM -
Rep. Larson wants Mexico to reimburse Texas for illegal aliens
By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 2Last Post: 04-06-2012, 12:13 AM -
Immigration plan would reimburse police
By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 0Last Post: 03-10-2006, 03:00 AM
Twitter just suspended Ad account on X
04-19-2024, 05:54 PM in illegal immigration Announcements