Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #11
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    There is already a bill introduced by the house and is in committee to stop anchor babies, everyone should look it up and keep their eye on it, it is HR 133.

    This is really a long shot, I can not imagine the supreme court being able to do anything for these children whose parents knowingly broke the law. The supreme court does not write or change laws, they interrupt them or the constitution and its pretty simple to interrupt what the immigration nationality act says and there is nothing in the constitution to protect children of illegals, you cross the border with out permisson and you are breaking the law pretty simple SORRY you lose!!


    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    GET INVOLVED NOW! TIMES RUNNING OUT!!
    .................................................. .................................................. .......
    COME ON EVERYONE WE NEED YOUR HELP NOW! "BILL 1369" STOP IT !!
    "JOIN OUR FOCUS CAMPAIGN"
    HELP SAVE OUR COUNTRY FROM THIS INVASION! OK LOOKIE LOU'S YES YOU!!
    join in on the CALLS, FAXES AND E-MAILS TO OUR SENATORS!!
    "FOCUS CAMPAIGN" DAILY INSTRUCTIONS AND POSTING THREAD LINK BELOW!
    Leave posts so we know what they are saying!
    http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... c&p=392574
    ALL CONTACT INFORMATION.....Senators, news, radio, ETC.
    http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=68216
    Your contributions are welcome to help keep ALIPAC afloat and fighting!
    http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=C ... page&pid=9
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  2. #12
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443
    Yes, good point sosad. That's probably why the federal courts threw the case out. Doubt if the Supreme Court will hear it either because they're asking for the law to be changed which they can't do. And if they do interpret the law they will loose so can't see this going anywhere, not this way.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,853
    Is there a source link to this news story please?
    Ooops, sorry.

    http://www.wbbm780.com/pages/600687.php ... tId=626556

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941
    boy would i like to be a fly on the wall if and when this gets to the supreme court..

    lets see them try to say the 14th amendment applies to them too

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,853
    Quote Originally Posted by jamesw62
    boy would i like to be a fly on the wall if and when this gets to the supreme court..

    lets see them try to say the 14th amendment applies to them too
    It really raises some interesting legal questions. If the Supremes rule that an anchor baby has a constitutional right to have her parents reside in the country, what about an anchor baby who is 25 years old and not dependent on her parents? The courts have seriously over-reached in immigration opinions.

  6. #16
    Senior Member lunarminer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tucker, GA
    Posts
    161

    Surprise

    These people might be in for a very rude awakening. Remember Elian Gonzales?
    Lunarminer
    Thar's gold in that there moon!

  7. #17
    Senior Member WhatMattersMost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Illegal Sanctuary, Illinois
    Posts
    2,494
    We all know that Elvira Arellano is behind this they tried it at a local level and it was thrown out.

    The suit claims the deportation of undocumented immigrant parents violates the constitutional rights of their U.S. citizen children. The suit says the law subjects the citizen children to de facto deportation.
    They should be suing their pathetic,worthless excuses for parents for pimping, pandering and child prostitution.
    It's Time to Rescind the 14th Amendment

  8. #18
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443
    Elvira Arellano case to go to Supreme Court
    Author
    CIMC - Jimmy Johnson
    Date Created
    21 Jun 2007

    The Centro Sin Fronteras and Adalberto United Methodist Church announced the filing of petition to the US Supreme Court to stop the deportation of Elvia Arellano.
    20 June 2007
    A 12 June 2007 New York Times article stated that nine Republican Senators sent a letter to President Bush asking him to enforce current border regulations. At the heart of their request is an admission that the United States has many immigration policies; it simply does not enforce them to a large degree. This selective enforcement, and the consequences thereof, form a key part of new class action litigation filed today with the US Supreme Court on behalf of 6-year-old Saul Arellano and others. In their filing the lawyers argue the US government has purposefully ignored and selectively enforced its immigration and border regulations for so long that it should be held responsible for the outcome. Arellano’s mother is Elvira Arellano, an undocumented immigrant from Mexico who ten months ago took sanctuary against pending deportation, and separation from her US-citizen son, in Adalberto United Methodist Church in Humboldt Park. The church released a statement at a press conference announcing the filing:

    This nation has operated a system of undocumented labor for decades to its own benefit and must now take responsibility for the families that were formed here and the children who were born here. To do less is an abdication of responsibility, an attack on basic family values…and the continuation of unspeakable cruelty and suffering for children and families.

    Director of Sin Fronteras Emma LozanoEmma Lozano, the director of the Centro Sin Fronteras,, said that there are over five million childrenm “larger than some entire countries,â€
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  9. #19
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    Well good luck with that one bud, ICE should go to that church and say fine we are coming in after you since you are a known felon!! I am sick of these people using these kids. Nows the time for the supreme court to stop anchor babies, that will put an end to that. 5 Million I had know Idea!!
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  10. #20
    HOTCBNS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    668

    The Child Citizenship Act of 2000

    WE SHOULD BE FIGHTING THIS B.S. THE GOVERNMENT UNLAWFULLY HAS GIVEN CITIZENSHIP TO CHILDREN OF ILLEGALS AGAINST THE LAWS.............


    In this country parents are responsible for their children reguardless of how poor decisions are.. they make....... we need to call child services on these people who are subjecting their children to all sorts of criminal acts and putting their safety at risk...living in unsafe conditions...hording criminals.........


    Child Citizenship Act of 2000
    http://travel.state.gov/family/adoption ... 457.html#9

    under adoption laws


    Child Citizenship Act of 2000


    Overview
    The Child Citizenship Act of 2000 allows certain foreign-born, biological and adopted children of American citizens to acquire American citizenship automatically. These children did not acquire American citizenship at birth, but they are granted citizenship when they enter the United States as lawful permanent residents (LPRs).

    What Are the Requirements of the Child Citizenship Act of 2000?

    The child must meet the following requirements
    :
    Have at least one American citizen parent by birth or naturalization;
    Be under 18 years of age;

    Live in the legal and physical custody of the American citizen parent; and

    Be admitted as an immigrant for lawful permanent residence.
    In addition, if the child is adopted, the adoption must be full and final.

    What Is the Effective Date of the Child Citizenship Act?

    The effective date of the Child Citizenship Act is February 27, 2001. Children who met these requirements on that date automatically became American citizens. Children who were 18 years of age or older on that date did not acquire American citizenship from the Child Citizenship Act of 2000.
    <div>If a squirrel goes up a politician's pants... You can bet...he'll come-back down hungry.....



    </div>

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •