Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,457

    Warming, population hit Colorado River

    Warming, population hit Colorado River

    MSNBC : February 22 , 2007

    Population growth in the Colorado River watershed is overwhelmingly the result of post-1970 immigration increases.

    Everybody who lives in those states is going to see reductions in quality of life, in individual freedom and in disposable income because of the hardships imposed by continuing mass immigration that is far above traditional levels.

    PHOENIX - The 25 million Americans who rely on the Colorado River for water should expect continued -- and even worsening -- drought spells and water shortages as rising temperatures and growing populations create a double whammy, experts warned in a new report.

    The experts, convened by the National Research Council, based their concerns on climate models and recent studies that found a cycle of droughts in the region over time. The studies used tree-ring histories to reconstruct local climate patterns over the last 500 years.

    "These reconstructions, along with temperature trends and projections for the region, suggest that future droughts will recur and that they may exceed the severity of droughts of historical experience, such as the drought of the late 1990s and early 2000s," the experts wrote in the report released Wednesday.

    The report said the region should expect higher temperatures that melt snow too early and allow too much runoff to evaporate.

    "Temperature records across the Colorado River basin and the western United States document a significant warming over the past century," the experts noted. "These temperature records, along with climate model projections that forecast further increases, collectively suggest that temperatures across the region will continue to rise for the foreseeable future."

    More than 25 million people in seven states -- Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming -- rely on the Colorado River for water and power. The river also supports a diverse riparian system that has suffered as flows dropped.

    'Trade-off choices' necessary

    The report said the combination of threats could overwhelm the seven river states, which have struggled to produce a short-term drought plan.

    The scientists did not propose specific policy changes, but urged Western water managers to work together on new ideas and prepare to make difficult decisions about how water is used.

    "The basin is going to face increasingly costly, controversial and unavoidable trade-off choices," said Ernest Smerdon, a former dean of engineering at the University of Arizona and one of the report's authors. "Our hope would be that the community and the decision-makers will have planned before crises occur."

    The experts noted that population pressure has added to the problem. Arizona's population grew by 40 percent in the 1990s, they noted, while Colorado's grew by 30 percent.

    Water conservation measures have helped somewhat, but consumption has boomed in certain areas. For example, Nevada's Clark County, which includes Las Vegas, saw water use double from 1985 to 2000.

    "The combination of limited water supplies, rapidly increasing populations, warmer regional temperatures, and the specter of recurrent drought point to a future in which the potential for conflict among existing and prospective new water users will prove endemic," the research council said in a statement that accompanied the report.

    The report was commissioned by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the Southern Nevada Water Authority and two California water agencies.

    No panacea

    Growing cities will force states to strike more deals with farmers for water rights, but even that supply is limited, according to the scientists.

    In addition, the report ruled out the idea of a solution built around conservation or water-saving technologies.

    "Technological and conservation options for augmenting or extending water supplies -- although useful and necessary -- in the long run will not constitute a panacea for coping with the reality that water supplies in the Colorado River basin are limited, and that demand is inexorably rising," the experts wrote.

    Much of the region has seen severe drought since the late 1990s, with 2002 and 2004 being among the 10 driest years on record in the upper basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.

    Water storage in basin reservoirs dropped sharply during that time due to very low streamflows, the experts noted. For example, 2002 water year flows into Lake Powell were roughly 25 percent of average.

    www.msnbc.com

  2. #2
    Senior Member sippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Posts
    3,798
    Water storage in basin reservoirs dropped sharply during that time due to very low streamflows, the experts noted. For example, 2002 water year flows into Lake Powell were roughly 25 percent of average
    Lake Powell is still down about 60 ft. from full capacity due to the 7 years of drought UT has faced. It is slowly coming back up, but we need about 5 more winters with lots of snow fall. I hate to say that because I hate winter! but I want Lake Powell back also.
    "Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results is the definition of insanity. " Albert Einstein.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •