Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: White House: Trump would accept less money for border wall

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006

    White House: Trump would accept less money for border wall

    White House: Trump would accept less money for border wall

    December 23, 2018



    WASHINGTON (AP) — A top White House official signaled Sunday that President Donald Trump is willing to accept less money than he’s been demanding to build a U.S.-Mexico border wall, but a senior congressional Democrat said that, while their own offer could be sweetened, they still will not agree to a wall.

    The back and forth across the television airwaves did little to inspire hope that a Christmas season closure of some federal government operations would end later this week, when the House and Senate are scheduled to meet again.

    In fact, acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney warned that the shutdown could stretch into January, when a new Congress is seated.

    Mulvaney, who also runs the White House budget office, said he’s awaiting a response from Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York after the administration on Saturday presented Schumer with a counteroffer in the long-running dispute over funding the wall.

    Mulvaney withheld specifics but placed the offer at between Trump’s $5.7 billion request and $1.3 billion Democrats are offering.

    “We moved off of the five and we hope they move up from their 1.3,” Mulvaney said.

    The director’s comment about the president’s softening stance came less than 24 hours after a senior administration official insisted to reporters on Saturday that Congress give into Trump’s demands, highlighting the unpredictable nature of Trump’s negotiating style.

    Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., argued instead for increasing the use of technology along the border instead of building “some medieval wall.”

    Asked whether he’s willing to increase the price tag as long as the money is not spent on a wall, Durbin responded: “Absolutely.”

    A stalemate over the wall led parts of the government to shut down Saturday after funding for numerous departments and agencies expired. The closure, affecting hundreds of thousands of federal workers across the country, was expected to last at least through late this week after the House and Senate, which each met in a rare weekend session, adjourned until Thursday.

    Monday and Tuesday, Christmas Eve and Christmas, respectively, are federal holidays, meaning the federal government would already be closed. Wednesday is the first day the public could begin to feel the effects of a shutdown, Mulvaney said.

    He predicted it could extend into January, when Democrats will assume control of the House based on their midterm election gains.

    “It’s very possible that this shutdown will go beyond the 28th and into the new Congress,” Mulvaney said.

    Justin Goodman, a spokesman for Schumer, countered: “If Director Mulvaney says the Trump Shutdown will last into the New Year, believe him, because it’s their shutdown.”

    Democrats held firm Sunday in opposition to a wall, which Trump promised his political base would build. Mulvaney said that “the president’s not going to not accept money for a border wall.”

    Trump faced resistance from some Republicans. Retiring Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, who has criticized Trump on other issues, called the battle for border wall funding a “made-up fight so the president can look like he’s fighting.”
    “This is something that is unnecessary. It’s a spectacle. And, candidly, it’s juvenile. The whole thing is juvenile,” Corker said in arguing for real measures that he maintains will secure the border better than a wall.

    Trump tweeted Sunday, the shutdown’s second day, that what’s needed is “a good old fashioned WALL that works,” not aerial drones or other measures that “are wonderful and lots of fun” but not the answer to address drugs, gangs, human trafficking and other criminal elements entering the country.

    Across the country, the shutdown played out in uneven ways. The Statue of Liberty remained open for tours, thanks to New York state, and the U.S. Postal Service, an independent agency, was still delivering mail.

    But the routines of 800,000 federal employees were about to be disrupted. More than half are deemed essential and are expected to work without pay, through retroactive pay is expected. Another 380,000 were to be furloughed, meaning they will not report to work but would be paid later. Legislation ensuring that workers receive back pay was expected to clear Congress.

    Trump was staying in Washington for Christmas because of the shutdown, the White House said.

    With Democrats set to take control of the House on Jan. 3, and House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., retiring from Congress, the shutdown provided a last gasp for the conservative majority before the new Congress.

    Trump had savored the prospect of a shutdown over the wall. He recently said he’d be “proud” to close down the government and has gone back on his pledge to not blame Democrats for the closure.
    He had campaigned on the promise of building the wall and forcing Mexico to pay for it. Mexico has refused.

    Schumer and Pence met Saturday at the request of the White House, according to Schumer’s office. But the senator’s spokesman said they remained “very far apart” on a spending agreement.

    Schumer said the “Trump shutdown” could end immediately if the president abandons the wall.

    Democrats said they were open to proposals that didn’t include the wall, which Schumer said was too costly and ineffective. They have offered to keep spending at existing levels of $1.3 billion for border fencing and other security.

    Senators approved a bipartisan deal earlier in the week to keep the government open into February and provide $1.3 billion for border security projects, but not the wall. But as Trump faced criticism from conservatives for “caving” on a campaign promise, he pushed the House to approve a package temporarily financing the government but also setting aside $5.7 billion for the border wall.

    The impasse blocked money for nine of 15 Cabinet-level departments and dozens of agencies, including Homeland Security, Transportation, Interior, Agriculture, State and Justice.

    Those being furloughed included nearly everyone at NASA and 52,000 workers at the Internal Revenue Service. Many national parks were expected to close.

    The Pentagon and the departments of Veterans Affairs and Health and Human Services are among that Congress has fully funded and will operate as usual. Also still functioning were the FBI, the Border Patrol and the Coast Guard.

    Transportation Security Administration officers continue to staff airport checkpoints and air traffic controllers were on the job.

    Mulvaney appeared on “Fox News Sunday” and ABC’s “This Week.” Merkley also appeared on ABC. Durbin spoke on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

    Associated Press writers Alan Fram, Mary Clare Jalonick, Jill Colvin, Lisa Mascaro and Kevin Freking contributed to this report.
    Follow Darlene Superville
    Last edited by GeorgiaPeach; 12-23-2018 at 08:35 PM.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Though Mick Mulvaney, Jared Kushner, and Vice President Pence are negotiating on behalf of President Trump and the Whitehouse as it regards border wall funding, they are all amnesty supporters. In my opinion these men may find a much lower number than five billion (it should be the 25 billion) for the wall acceptable and try to persuade the president that this is the case.

    Is amnesty for anyone a bargaining chip? More visas for foreign citizens and cheap labor?

    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    GeorgiaPeach, the $25 billion was the cost of the broad-based immigration reform bill that became part of the DACA deal, it was funding for the President's 70 point plan to fix and fund our immigration system, included tens of thousands of new employees to enforce the law and all their expenses and operating requirements, new software programs to track and deport visa overstays, employee verification system like E-verify or something similar, it included funding for 10,000 to 15,000 new ICE agents, 5,000 more Border Patrol Agents, 1,000 immigration prosecutors and 500 more immigration judges plus all their support personnel, equipment, real estate, and services. The wall was a major portion of that, but probably around 10 to 11 billion of it. I think it included the repair, replacement and installation of 1100 miles of barriers, fence, wall, roads, and other border security measures. The $5 billion is 2 years of $2.5 billion per year, $1.6 billion for actual wall, fence, barrier and $900 million that could be used either for in whole or in part for additional barrier expense or other border security measures.

    The actual wall funding needed for FY 2019 is $1.6 billion. There's $1.3 billion in the proposed budget now for "fencing". The CR maintained that, but didn't approve any expenditures until after the full remainder of the budget was finalized. There were other issues the House and Senate versions of the appropriations bill that needed to be worked out to finalize it, unrelated to to border wall funding.

    The House Freedom Caucus told Trump they could get him the $1.6 billion versus the $1.3 billion plus the flex funds of $900 million and get him at least 2 years worth so we wouldn't be in this boat again during 2020 over the border wall, fence, barriers. "We have your back, Mr. President". "The American people have your back." -- Mark Meadows.

    All of this fiasco, so the House could have a vote on the record to prove Nancy Pelosi lied about Republicans in the House not supporting Trump's Wall, because they do support Trump's Wall or some version of it. They proved that with a big vote and it was rejected by the Senate as they knew it would be.

    Everyone is gone for the holidays at home with their families enjoying our most important holiday, tradition, celebration in our country, no one is answering their phones in Congress, no one is reading emails or faxes, because no one is there, everyone is home celebrating this holiday as they should be, except .... our dear President who is Home Alone in the White House, his family all together in .... Florida ..... waiting for the American people to "have his back" over $300 million of wall funding.

    Like I said, this isn't a fight, it's suicide.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

Similar Threads

  1. White House suggests it could back down on $5 billion border wall demand
    By MW in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-19-2018, 12:42 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-29-2018, 10:08 PM
  3. White House seeks $18B to extend border wall over next 10 years
    By European Knight in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-06-2018, 01:58 AM
  4. Breaking down the back-and-forth on DACA, border wall after the White House dinner
    By Judy in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-14-2017, 03:50 PM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-07-2017, 10:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts