Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266

    Corn Fed Fascists: They Want Your Keys So The City Can Enter

    Corn Fed Fascists: They Want Your Keys So The City Can Enter at Anytime

    06-13-2011 • Market-ticker.org

    Why no, we now have a city that is simply demanding the keys to all commercial property be made available to them. No, I'm not kidding. This is respect for the 4th Amendment? It seems to me that the citizens of Cedar Falls (Iowa) have a handful of legal responses to this: "**** you." (Let them try to enforce it, which will lead to....) Sue them under 42 USC 1983 (Deprivation of civil rights under color of law or authority) or.... Tell them to get ****ed and move your business outside of city limits, depriving them of the tax revenue they would otherwise receive. That such a plan would even come under consideration is an outrage.
    Read Full Story
    Reported by Jack Gregson


    Video at link below



    We Don't Need No Steenking Warrant!
    The Market Ticker ® - Commentary on The Capital Markets
    Posted 2011-06-13 09:00
    by Karl Denninger
    in Liberty
    Ignore this thread
    We Don't Need No Steenking Warrant!


    Why no, we now have a city that is simply demanding the keys to all commercial property be made available to them.

    No, I'm not kidding.

    This is respect for the 4th Amendment?

    It seems to me that the citizens of Cedar Falls (Iowa) have a handful of legal responses to this:

    "**** you." (Let them try to enforce it, which will lead to....)

    Sue them under 42 USC 1983 (Deprivation of civil rights under color of law or authority) or....

    Tell them to get ****ed and move your business outside of city limits, depriving them of the tax revenue they would otherwise receive.

    That such a plan would even come under consideration is an outrage. You can tell them what you think of them through these links:

    Tom Hagarty
    1st Ward Council Member
    809 Franklin Street
    Cedar Falls, IA 50613
    Ph: (319) 266-1321

    Susan deBuhr
    2nd Ward Council Member
    1713 Continental Access Street
    Cedar Falls, IA 50613
    Ph: (319) 277-8974

    John Runchey
    3rd Ward Council Member
    Mayor Pro Tem
    920 Columbine Drive
    Cedar Falls, IA 50613
    Ph: (319) 277-1053
    Ph: (319) 415-9350

    Kamyar Enshayan
    4th Ward Council Member
    1703 Washington Street
    Cedar Falls, IA 50613
    Ph: (319) 266-5468
    Ph: (319) 273-7575

    Frank Darrah
    5th Ward Council Member
    1915 Greenhill Drive
    Cedar Falls, IA
    Ph: (319) 277-2801
    Ph: (319) 290-0381

    Nick Taiber
    At Large Council Member
    221 W. 13th Street
    Cedar Falls, IA 50613
    Ph: (319) 610-8370

    David Wieland
    Council Member at Large
    4201 Heritage Road
    Cedar Falls, IA 50613
    Ph: (316) 266-4300

    Discussion below (registration required to post)

    Video at the site

    http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=188025

    better link

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFCLiij0 ... r_embedded



    Kathyet

  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266
    Uploaded by CrushingBastards on Jun 7, 2011

    **UPDATE** 6/13/11
    Ordinance #2740( An unfunded city-wide mandate) was passed with a resounding 6 to 1 vote, and it allows for the citizens of Cedar Falls to forcefully give the government keys to their comercial properties through universal 'lock boxes'. The intent of the program is to provide increased safety and protection to personal, private property which include businesses, apartments and some rental houses-- which by the way-- comes at the expense of furthering wayward erosion of fundamental constitutional rights.

    **UPDATE** The plights and concerns of the citizens have fallen on deaf ears as the City of Cedar Falls has voted to pass the final ruling on mandatory lock boxes, again, with a 6-1 decision. Read more at:

    http://wcfcourier.com/news/local/articl ... c4c002e0...

    UPDATE: Cedar Falls City Council OKs controversial lock box ordinance

    Story
    Discussion
    Image (5)

    By JON ERICSON, jonathan.ericson@wcfcourier.com | Posted: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:45 am | (14) Comments

    Font Size:
    Default font size
    Larger font size

    buy this photo John Dutcher a landlord in Cedar Falls discusses his opposition to the key box at the Cedar Falls Council meeting Monday, June 13, 2011, in Cedar Falls, Iowa. (MATTHEW PUTNEY / Courier Photo Editor)

    061311mp-cf-council-1
    061311mp-cf-council-4
    061311mp-CF-lockbox-1
    061311mp-cf-council-2

    (1) More Photos
    Related Galleries

    Photos: Lock Boxes in Cedar Falls.
    Photos: Lock Boxes in Cedar Falls.
    (9) Photos

    Related Stories

    Controversial lock box ordinance on Cedar Falls City Council agenda
    Cedar Falls City Council backs lock box rule despite resistance

    CEDAR FALLS, Iowa --- What a difference a few years and an online revolution makes.

    Seven years ago the Cedar Falls City Council passed an ordinance requiring lock boxes on commercial buildings and larger apartment complexes. Hardly a soul made a peep about it.

    On Monday the council voted 6-1 on a third and final reading to expand the ordinance to include more apartment buildings. In the days leading up to the vote, they received hundreds of phone calls and e-mails from people all over the country from people upset about the issue.

    Some calls came in the middle of the night. Some writers threatened them and called them scumbags, or worse.

    The issue had blown up on the Internet in recent days with message boards, primarily those tilting toward conservative and tea party viewpoints, spreading the story nationwide.

    The council was voting to update its fire code from the 2003 International Fire Code to the 2009 version. Cedar Falls had required lock boxes since 2004 for firefighters to access keys to apartment buildings with six or more units and commercial buildings with sprinkler systems or unsupervised alarm systems. The new ordinance will also require the key boxes for apartment buildings with three or more units.

    The vote is identical to the first two votes, with Nick Taiber opposing the ordinance and the rest of the council supporting it.

    About 55 people attended the meeting Monday night, most opposed to lock boxes. A dozen spoke out against the ordinance, while just one citizen voiced support for it.

    After the council made its vote, Judd Saul, an organizer of the opposition, uttered "thanks for ignoring the citizens" as he left the council chambers.

    Saul had produced a video opposing the ordinance and paid to run a television advertisement. Following the vote, he said he's not sure what comes next, but believes a lawsuit is likely and he's already been contacted by four organizations willing to fund it.

    Councilman Frank Darrah made a motion to table the issue, which failed by a 5-2 vote. He later proposed creating a study group or task force to review the ordinance, a move that gathered council support by consensus, but was not established by vote.

    "A lot of people have spoken pretty eloquently about it tonight. This is an important ordinance. I feel it deserves more discussion," Darrah said.

    Many of those opposed to the issue questioned why it should apply only to businesses and apartment buildings. If it is safer to have keys in lock boxes, they said, why shouldn't they be required for all buildings?

    Carol Hanson doesn't support lock boxes and thinks people will look to have the decision reversed.

    "Since this seems to be a political hot-button issue, why not allow the citizens of Cedar Falls to vote on this?" Hanson asked the council.

    Many of the opponents pleaded for the council to heed the requests from those speaking against the ordinance.

    "It's not the job of the mayor or the council to judge the merit of an issue, it's the job of the people. It's the job of the council and the mayor to listen to the people," said Travis Biggs.

    The only citizen to speak in favor of the ordinance was Justin Kaleas, doesn't believe the lock box requirement to be unconstitutional or dangerous.

    "At the end of the day you can disagree about the ordinance, that's your right. You can protest the ordinance, that's your right ..." Kaleas said. "But when you're fear mongering on the issue, you're just plain wrong."

    Several of the council members said the city's building and fire codes exist to protect the safety of citizens. Their votes indicated they believe the key boxes further that goal.

    Copyright 2011 wcfcourier.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    http://wcfcourier.com/news/local/articl ... 002e0.html

    Kathyet

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •