Results 11 to 20 of 42
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
07-16-2007, 10:09 PM #11
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes
48% 1282 votes
No
51% 1349 votes
Total Votes: 2631
RELATED LINKS
• Anti-287(g) hair salon hit with graffiti
• Calls for immigration enforcementI stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)
-
07-16-2007, 11:31 PM #12
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes
48% 1375 votes
No
51% 1482 votes
Total Votes: 2857Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
07-16-2007, 11:34 PM #13
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 551
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes 48% 1375 votes
No 51% 1487 votes"You tell 'em I'm coming...and hell's coming with me, you hear!?"
-
07-17-2007, 12:45 AM #14
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Illinois
- Posts
- 684
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes 44% 1390 votes
No 55% 1740 votes
Total votes 3130"Calling an illegal alien an undocumented immigrant is like calling a burglar an uninvited house guest."
-
07-17-2007, 11:53 AM #15
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes
57% 2686 votes
No
42% 2023 votes
Total Votes: 4709Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
07-17-2007, 04:06 PM #16
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes
45% 2766 votes
No
54% 3363 votes
Total Votes: 6129I stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)
-
07-17-2007, 04:50 PM #17
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- Wilmington, NC
- Posts
- 81
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes- 39%- 2770 votes
No- 60% - 4304 votes
Total Votes: 7074
July 17, 2007
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/newssun/index.html
-
07-17-2007, 05:46 PM #18
Guys, the Opposition is working on this poll.
Take a moment to vote and to share this poll with others.
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes 42% 3226 votes
No 57% 4338 votes
Total Votes: 7564
RELATED LINKS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
POLL RESULTS ::
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes 43% 3417 votes
No 56% 4385 votes
Total Votes: 7802Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
07-17-2007, 05:54 PM #19
Should Waukegan drop plans to obtain 287(g) status?
Yes
44% 3555 votes
No
55% 4390 votes
Total Votes: 7945Matthew 19:26
But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
____________________
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
07-17-2007, 05:58 PM #20
bttt
Matthew 19:26
But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
____________________
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Oklahoma House passes bill making illegal immigration a state...
04-19-2024, 05:14 AM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports