Thread: ‘Is Not About Health Insurance, It’s About Liberty’

Nothing about Obama Care is about HealthCare..2000 something pages of it..If it were, the people wouldn't be complaining....It is about our Freedom and loss of it. It is all about directives that are in it, that have more to do with their control of you and your life.....

It is all about forcing us to get it and letting corporations get rid of it for the employees, all at our expense, just like the corporations a let pensions and 401ks die a slow death by chipping away at those benifits.....Interestingly enough you all do notice that the government workers, and union workers need not comply, they are exempt!!!!!!



Q&A With Virginia Attorney General: State's Lawsuit Against Obamacare

‘Is Not About Health Insurance, It’s About Liberty’


Monday, November 15, 2010
By Terence P. Jeffrey

Ken Cuccinelli

Then-state Sen. Ken Cuccinelli addressing the Virginia State Republican Convention in May 2009, where he was nominated for state attorney general. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

Virginia Atty. Gen. Ken Cuccinelli told CNSNews.com that the lawsuit his state has filed against the health-care reform law signed by President Barack Obama in March is about preserving the liberty of individual Americans against a federal government that is over-reaching its legitimate constitutional authority.

“One thing people need to realize about this case: It’s not about health insurance, it’s about liberty,â€

What they should argue is that as part of forcing you to buy a product against your will, Obama Care invades the protected privacy of Americans. The federal government has no right to force you to purchase health insurance because in doing so they invade your medical personal and private life. No one is forced to sign up for Social Security or MediCare. It's purely optional. We already know that the income tax law used to extract the funds for it from paychecks is also unconstitutional without the 16th Amendment which is soon to be repealed because it was never actually ratified to begin with, and in the meantime, we're going to repeal the IRC provisions that apply to all income and earnings based federal taxes when we pass the FairTax, which funds Social Security and MediCare through a split of the rate of tax with 8.09% earmarked to fund SS and MediCare, which is constitutional in my view.

Using the Commerce Clause in any fight against personal freedom, liberty and privacy of US citizens can not and will not fly. If this Commerce Clause which allows the federal government to regulate an industry or business to protect the public, not allow mandates on the personal medical decisions of citizens, should fly through the US Supreme Court, then the precedent exists for the US government to force you to buy all kinds of crap you don't want from food to drinks to automobiles to homes and clothing and any and all other products ending free enterprise in the US and replacing it with Communism straight up.

Using the Commerce Clause in any fight against personal freedom, liberty and privacy of US citizens can not and will not fly. If this Commerce Clause which allows the federal government to regulate an industry or business to protect the public, not allow mandates on the personal medical decisions of citizens, should fly through the US Supreme Court, then the precedent exists for the US government to force you to buy all kinds of crap you don't want from food to drinks to automobiles to homes and clothing and any and all other products ending free enterprise in the US and replacing it with Communism straight up.

That is exactly what they are attempting to get away with, and if it goes to the US Supreme Court well with the majority of Justices on it today, guess which way that will go....


Kathyet