Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895

    Palin's Rumored New Home in Arizona Revives 2012 Speculation

    National Journal
    By Ujala Sehgal

    Palin's Rumored New Home in Arizona Revives 2012 Speculation

    Sarah Palin has deliberately left the question as to whether or not she will run in 2012 open. For those who believe a bid for the GOP nomination is still a possibility for her, The Arizona Republic provides some further evidence: after months of rumors, Palin may have purchased a house in Scotsdale, Arizona. A deal on a secluded, 8,000-square-foot home in far north Scottsdale was recently closed by Safari Investments LLC for $1.695 million cash. The terms of the deal hide the identity of the owner, and when the attorney listed on the property records, Alan Kierman, was asked if Palin was the buyer, his response was an intriguing "no comment."
    http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics ... yet/37907/
    http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/ ... a-brk.html

    According to the Republic, Palin has been rumored to be considering headquartering her 2012 White House campaign in Scottsdale, if there is a campaign. A anonymous source from her camp also told Ben Smith at Politico that she would base a potential presidential campaign in Scottsdale, near where Bristol Palin recently bought a house in Maricopa. Palin has also been mentioned as a possible candidate for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Senator Jon Kyl.
    http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... sdale.html

    But there are many reasons why Palin might leave Alaska that have nothing to do with a bid for 2012 or a run for a seat in the Senate. Joshua Green described in The Atlantic that Palin's popularity in her home state is rapidly dwindling. A rumored Democratic poll showed her to be less popular in Alaska right now than Barack Obama. Green writes that though Palin, "still lives in Alaska, she has all but withdrawn from its public life, appearing only seldom and then usually to film her reality-television show, Sarah Palin’s Alaska."
    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc ... alin/8492/

    If Alaska "has moved on" from Palin, as Green suggests, she may very well be ready to move on from Alaska. As a public figure, no doubt it is difficult for her to fly back and forth from Alaska to appearances around the country, and Arizona would be a more convenient location. There seems to be little keeping here in state. Her son Track is still in Alaska, but he recently married his high school sweetheart, People reports. Palin may also want to keep an eye on Bristol in Maricopa. Or maybe she's just sick of the cold weather.

    In any event, buzz surrounding Palin's supposed purchase were enough to prompt Public Policy Polling, a Democratic company based in North Carolina, to ask Arizona voters in an automated survey whether they would like Palin to move to their state. Fifty-seven percent said no, 27 percent said yes, and 16 percent were not sure. Just like in the political polls, Palin has her work cut out for her.

    Source: http://nationaljournal.com/dailyfray/pa ... n-20110521
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by ALIPAC
    Another Amnesty Supporter Like McCain will Reelect Obama

    "Send us another amnesty supporter like McCain and you will walk Obama back into the White House"
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-235284-0-da ... rasc-.html
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    The 'NEW' GOP is the same as the 'OLD' GOP ..
    The 103rd and 104th Congress was led by "Republicans." With G.W. Bush at the other end of the whipping post, more damage was done to our national sovereignty through NAFTA and CAFTA than in the history of the "Republican" party.

    FINAL CAFTA VOTE ROLL CALL - How did your Congressman Vote?
    http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll443.xml

    CAFTA vote story
    http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ar ... ul29c.html


    "Twist some Republican arms until they break in a thousand pieces." That statement by Representative Jim Kolbe (R-Arizona) describes the Republican leadership's rabid determination to get the U.S. House to pass the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) -- no matter what."
    NAFTA, CAFTA, and the WTO
    http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45521



    The New GOP Betrays America
    http://www.newsmax.com/archives/article ... 1400.shtml
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    Every regime change (election cycle) we get the same old promises, and then get the same OLD BOHICA.

    The 103rd and 104th Congress was led by "Republicans." With G.W. Bush at the other end of the whipping post, more damage was done to our national sovereignty through NAFTA and CAFTA than in the history of the "Republican" party.

    It is what these professional politicians *DON'T SAY* that tells you where their real interests lie - THEMSELVES.

    Take Sarah Palin and John McCain for example in the last pitiful excuse for a president willing to elevate the interests of the average American first.

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/02/ ... ranscript/

    The Three Major National Issues Completely Ignored During Palin/Biden Debate

    Moderator Gwen Ifill created each question for the Vice Presidential national debate and did not disclose them to anyone prior to the actual debate when they were first heard by the two candidates.
    Gwen Ifill deliberately steered away from asking what positions the two Vice Presidential candidates Sarah Palin and Joseph Biden held on these three important national issues:

    Illegal Alien Immigration
    The National Trade Deficit With China
    The Outsourcing of American Jobs Overseas
    In addition, these words relating to those issues were never mentioned during the entire debate by either Gwen Ifill, Sarah Palin, or Joseph Biden:

    Immigration
    Border
    Amnesty
    Illegal Aliens
    Sovereignty
    Trade Deficit
    Trade Imbalance
    Outsourcing
    Losing Jobs
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by HAPPY2BME
    Quote Originally Posted by ALIPAC
    Another Amnesty Supporter Like McCain will Reelect Obama

    "Send us another amnesty supporter like McCain and you will walk Obama back into the White House"
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-235284-0-da ... rasc-.html
    I thing so

  6. #6
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    Quote Originally Posted by Verner
    I thing so
    ===========================

    Welcome to ALIPAC, Verner!
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  7. #7
    Senior Member PaulRevere9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,032

    Why

    Why we need legitimate alternatives. They are all loyal to the Globalist regime...Either Democrat or Republican will move us gradually closer to a North American Union, the destruction of our sovereign nation, and the death of our beloved Constitution...

    Unless we find an alternative or begin a Revolution our Republic is as good as finished. Kiss it goodbye forever.

  8. #8
    Senior Member LuvMyCountry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    694
    Im not ready to count her out , I need to hear her views in immigration. I know they have not been great in the past but would like her to answer some questions before I write her off. The RINO rep own AZ but that is fading as Tea Party members are becoming Precinct committeemen.

  9. #9
    Senior Member nomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    NC and Canada. Got a foot in both worlds
    Posts
    3,773
    After hearing her time and time again come out for CIR not a chance I'd trust her. If my vote goes for a woman it will be Michelle Bachman, here's her view on ILLEGAL Immigration:


    Immigration

    The United States is a nation founded by immigrants and prides itself on the principles of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Obtaining the “American Dreamâ€

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    In the water
    Posts
    1,235
    Palin the half term governor could buy a house in Washington D.C. then she could see the White house from her front door,thats as about as far as she will come to occupieing it.Unless she goes for a tour.Her daughter Bristol bought a 2 million home in Cal.For the money she and her mother made out of her stupid show which i never watched she can buy a home.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •