Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

    Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame

    Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame

    Michael Snyder April 23, 2014
    166 Comments

    Why is the federal government so obsessed with grabbing more land? After all, the federal government already owns more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states. Why are federal bureaucrats so determined to grab even more? Well, the truth is that this all becomes much clearer once you understand that there is a very twisted philosophy behind what they are doing. It is commonly known as “Agenda 21″, although many names and labels are used for this particular philosophy. Basically, those that hold to this form of radical environmentalism believe that humanity is utterly destroying the planet, and therefore the goal should be to create a world where literally everything that we do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development”. In their vision of the future, the human population will be greatly reduced and human activity will be limited to strictly regulated urban areas and travel corridors. The rest of the planet will be left to nature. To achieve this goal, a massive transfer of land from private landowners to the federal government will be necessary.
    So the conflict between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the BLM is really just the tip of the iceberg. The reality is that the BLM has their eyes on much bigger prizes.

    For example, Breitbart is reporting that the BLM is looking at grabbing 90,000 privately-held acres along the Texas/Oklahoma border…
    After the recent Bundy Ranch episode by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Texans are becoming more concerned about the BLM’s focus on 90,000 acres along a 116 mile stretch of the Texas/Oklahoma boundary. The BLM is reviewing the possible federal takeover and ownership of privately-held lands which have been deeded property for generations of Texas landowners.
    Sid Miller, former Texas State Representative and Republican candidate for Texas Agriculture Commissioner, has since made the matter a campaign issue to Breitbart Texas.
    “In Texas,” Miller says, “the BLM is attempting a repeat of an action taken over 30 years ago along the Red River when Tommy Henderson lost a federal lawsuit. The Bureau of Land Management took 140 acres of his property and didn’t pay him one cent.”
    Needless to say, officials down in Texas are not pleased about this. In fact, just check out what the attorney general of Texas is saying
    Gen. Abbott sent a strongly-worded letter to BLM Director Neil Kornze, asking for answers to a series of questions related to the potential land grab.
    “I am deeply concerned about the notion that the Bureau of Land Management believes the federal government has the authority to swoop in and take land that has been owned and cultivated by Texas landowners for generations,” General Abbott wrote. “The BLM’s newly asserted claims to land along the Red River threaten to upset long-settled private property rights and undermine fundamental principles—including the rule of law—that form the foundation of our democracy. Yet, the BLM has failed to disclose either its full intentions or the legal justification for its proposed actions. Decisions of this magnitude must not be made inside a bureaucratic black box.”
    In an exclusive interview with Breitbart Texas, General Abbott said, “This is the latest line of attack by the Obama Administration where it seems like they have a complete disregard for the rule of law in this country …And now they’ve crossed the line quite literally by coming into the State of Texas and trying to claim Texas land as federal land. And, as the Attorney General of Texas I am not going to allow this.”
    Does the federal government actually need more land?
    As I mentioned above, the feds already own more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states
    Nevada: 84.5 percent
    Alaska: 69.1 percent
    Utah: 57.4 percent
    Oregon: 53.1 percent
    Idaho: 50.2 percent
    Arizona: 48.1 percent
    California: 45.3 percent
    Wyoming: 42.4 percent
    New Mexico: 41.8 percent
    The federal government does not need more land. But there is an obsession to grab more so that the dictates of Agenda 21 can be implemented.
    The map that I have posted below is a simulation of what the endgame of Agenda 21 might look like. If these radical environmentalists get their way, the only areas that will be allocated for normal human use will be the areas in green…
    The map was created by Dr. Michael Coffman to
    show the United States Senate what the U.N. Convention on Biological
    Diversity was really designed to do. It so stunned the Senate that the
    treaty's debate was withdrawn on September 29, 1994, one hour before the
    cloture vote to ratify the treaty. The treaty never came up again. Get a copy of the map here.

    If you do not go along with the “sustainable development” agenda, you risk being labeled a “threat” to be dealt with.
    For example, Senator Harry Reid has used the label “domestic terrorists” to describe those that showed up to support Cliven Bundy at his ranch.
    Reid could have used lots of other labels. But he specifically chose to call them terrorists. And considering what the law allows the feds to do to “terrorists”, that is quite chilling.
    And don’t think that if you just stay quiet that you won’t get labeled as a “terrorist”. In fact, there is a very good chance that you already fit several government criteria for being a terrorist. Just check out the list below. It comes from my previous article entitled “72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered ‘Potential Terrorists’ In Official Government Documents“…
    1. Those that talk about "individual liberties"
    2. Those that advocate for states' rights
    3. Those that want "to make the world a better place"
    4. "The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule"
    5. Those that are interested in "defeating the Communists"
    6. Those that believe "that the interests of one's own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations"
    7. Anyone that holds a "political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful, or undesirable"
    8. Anyone that possesses an "intolerance toward other religions"
    9. Those that "take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals"
    10. "Anti-Homosexual"
    11. "Anti-Immigrant"
    12. "Anti-Muslim"
    13. "The Patriot Movement"
    14. "Opposition to equal rights for homosexuals and lesbians"
    15. Members of the Family Research Council
    16. Members of the American Family Association
    17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States "are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the 'North American Union'"
    18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
    19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
    20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
    21. Members of the Christian Action Network
    22. Anyone that is "opposed to the New World Order"
    23. Anyone that is engaged in "conspiracy theorizing"
    24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
    25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
    26. Anyone that "fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations"
    27. The militia movement
    28. The sovereign citizen movement
    29. Those that "don't think they should have to pay taxes"
    30. Anyone that "complains about bias"
    31. Anyone that "believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia"
    32. Anyone that "is frustrated with mainstream ideologies"

    33. Anyone that "visits extremist websites/blogs"
    34. Anyone that "establishes website/blog to display extremist views"
    35. Anyone that "attends rallies for extremist causes"
    36. Anyone that "exhibits extreme religious intolerance"
    37. Anyone that "is personally connected with a grievance"
    38. Anyone that "suddenly acquires weapons"
    39. Anyone that "organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology"
    40. "Militia or unorganized militia"
    41. "General right-wing extremist"
    42. Citizens that have "bumper stickers" that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
    43. Those that refer to an "Army of God"
    44. Those that are "fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)"
    45. Those that are "anti-global"
    46. Those that are "suspicious of centralized federal authority"
    47. Those that are "reverent of individual liberty"
    48. Those that "believe in conspiracy theories"
    49. Those that have "a belief that one's personal and/or national 'way of life' is under attack"
    50. Those that possess "a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism"
    51. Those that would "impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)"
    52. Those that would "insert religion into the political sphere"
    53. Anyone that would "seek to politicize religion"
    54. Those that have "supported political movements for autonomy"
    55. Anyone that is "anti-abortion"
    56. Anyone that is "anti-Catholic"
    57. Anyone that is "anti-nuclear"
    58. "Rightwing extremists"
    59. "Returning veterans"
    60. Those concerned about "illegal immigration"
    61. Those that "believe in the right to bear arms"
    62. Anyone that is engaged in "ammunition stockpiling"
    63. Anyone that exhibits "fear of Communist regimes"
    64. "Anti-abortion activists"
    65. Those that are against illegal immigration
    66. Those that talk about "the New World Order" in a "derogatory" manner
    67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
    68. Those that are opposed "to the collection of federal income taxes"
    69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
    70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag ("Don't Tread On Me")
    71. Those that believe in "end times" prophecies
    72. Evangelical Christians
    Do any of those criteria apply to you?
    If so, then you are a “potential terrorist” according to the U.S. government.
    We live at a time when the federal government is becoming increasingly oppressive. Just consider the following excerpt from a recent article by John W. Whitehead
    It’s not just the Cliven Bundys of the world who are being dealt with in this manner. Don Miller, a 91-year-old antiques collector, recently had his Indiana home raided by the FBI, ostensibly because it might be in the nation’s best interest if the rare and valuable antiques and artifacts Miller had collected over the course of 80 years were cared for by the government. Such tactics carried out by anyone other than the government would be considered grand larceny, and yet the government gets a free pass.
    In the same way, the government insists it can carry out all manner of surveillance on us—listen in on our phone calls, read our emails and text messages, track our movements, photograph our license plates, even enter our biometric information into DNA databases—but those who dare to return the favor, even a little, by filming potential police misconduct, get roughed up by the police, arrested, charged with violating various and sundry crimes.
    This was not what our founders intended.
    Our liberties and freedoms are being eroded a little bit more with each passing day, and most Americans don’t even seem to care.
    In the end, we will pay a great price for our apathy.
    Source
    Take a look at the future of America: The Beginning of the End.

    Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/ag...ZWitkToqdXO.99




  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    michael powers originally shared:

    . We must now stand together against the Bureau of Land Management which is being reported to have a secret plan to take Texan's land! COMMENT with "NO WAY" if you agree: there's NO WAY that a bureaucratic Obama entity is going to have its way in our state.





  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    UN Agenda 21 Explained
    "Behind the Green Mask"



    From our friends at the Corbett Report
    Rosa Koire is author of "Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21"

    What is Agenda 21? Where did it come from? Who is behind it and what's their real agenda (the one behind the unicorns and rainbows facade)? How is Agenda 21 actually being implemented and what can you do to stop it?

    NOTE: Because of technical difficulties, the third part of this program is not available on video, but you can get it on mp3 or download from corbettreport.com.

    The notes from the show are available here: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=5950


    UN Agenda 21 Exposed with Rosa Koire


    corbettreport·993 videos

    Published on Oct 20, 2012
    SHOW NOTES AND MP3: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=5950

    Corbett Report Radio #241

    Tonight we talk to Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21 about the ideology and people behind Agenda 21. Topics discussed include: What is Agenda 21? What is communitarianism? What is the history of this agenda? How is it being implemented? And what can people do to combat it?

    *NOTE: Due to technical difficulties, the third segment of this broadcast was not recorded on video. It is available on the mp3 audio version of the broadcast, available for download from corbettreport.com.



    So many sinister movements in "green" clothing...

    Agenda 21 is one of the big ones.

    This is a topic we haven't given much time to,
    but that changes tonight with an extended treatment
    of the movement to turn private property (except the
    corporate exempt) into public property.

    Video:

    http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/26442.html

    - Brasscheck

    P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
    videos with friends and colleagues.

    That's how we grow. Thanks.

    It totally amazes me that people still don't understand that this is happening!!!! Wake up America! I brought this over a verylog time ago and thought it was time to bring it over here again!

    michael powers originally shared:

    See the difference? If not let me break it down for you. Pic on the left, you are a subject and the government does not fear you in which they will treat you as they wish which is usually BAD! Pic on the right, you are an armed citizen which your government is forced to respect or fears bloodshed and revolution. Take your pick. I choose to side with those in the pic on the right!


    Last edited by kathyet2; 04-25-2014 at 08:06 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •