IT WAS ALL A DEMOCRAT PLOT: Christine Ford Adviser Told Democrats in July Call About

IT WAS ALL A DEMOCRAT PLOT: Christine Ford Adviser Told Democrats in July Call About Plot to Take Down Kavanaugh (AUDIO)


September 21, 2018

Jim Hoft


In a July conference call to Democrat leaders, Ricki Seidman – a Democratic operative, former Clinton White House official and current advisor to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford – laid out a strategy to defeat the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...an-600x315.jpgRicki Seidman

Democrats knew they had nothing on squeaky-clean Judge Kavanaugh so they devised a plot to take him down in July.

But Ricki Seidman spoke about her plot to destroy Kavanaugh on the July call.

Ricki Seidman: Over the coming days and weeks there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee.

This was at the same time anti-Trump protester Christine Blasey Ford sent her letter to Senator Feinstein.

Senator Feinstein has still not released the unredacted letter. Democrats are hiding facts from the public. And Seidman is advising Christine Ford in the party’s disgusting hit on Judge Kavanaugh.

This was all a Democrat plot to take down Judge Kavanaugh.

Via GOP War Room:


https://youtu.be/zRttpJxj59A

https://youtu.be/zRttpJxj59A



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...vanaugh-audio/

Ricki Seidman

Ricki L Seidman is the Executive Director of Rock the Vote. Previously, Ms. Seidman worked in the Clinton White House as Assistant tot he President, Director of Scheduling and Advance and as Deputy Assistant to the President, Deputy Communications Director. She was Deputy Communications Director for the Transition and of the “War Room” for the Clinton-Gore Presidential Campaign Transition. Before joining President Clinton's team, Ms. Seidman was chief investigator for the Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee, a senior investigator for The Investigative Group, and worked on five political campaign, including the Dukakis-Bentsen campaign in 1988 and Mondale for President in 1984.


http://iop.harvard.edu/fellows/ricki-seidman

Was Kavanaugh Accusation An Orchestrated Hit Involving Fmr Anita Hill Adviser?

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defa...?itok=5o_dWFjs

"...whether or not it ultimately defeats the nominee, it will help people understand why it's so important that they vote and the deeper principles that are involved in it."

Fri, 09/21/2018 - 14:04
174 SHARES

An audio recording purportedly from a July conference call suggests that Christine Blasey Ford's sexual assault accusation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh wasn't simply a reluctant claim that Diane Feinstein sat on until the 11th hour.
The recording features Ricki Seidman - a former Clinton and Obama White House official and Democratic operative who advised Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas hearings, and who was revealed on Thursday as an adviser to Ford by Politico.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defa...es/seidman.png

Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were both teenagers, is being advised by Democratic operative Ricki Seidman.
Seidman, a senior principal at TSD Communications, in the past worked as an investigator for Sen. Ted Kennedy, and was involved with Anita Hill’s decision to testify against Supreme Court Nominee Clarence Thomas. -Politico

"While I think at the outset, looking at the numbers in the Senate, it’s not extremely likely that the nominee can be defeated," says Seidman. "I would absolutely withhold judgement as the process goes on. I think that I would not reach any conclusion about the outcome in advance."
What's more, the recording makes clear that even if Kavanaugh is confirmed, Democrats can use the doubt cast over him during midterms.
"Over the coming days and weeks, there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee... whether or not it ultimately defeats the nominee, it will help people understand why it's so important that they vote and the deeper principles that are involved in it."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRttpJxj59A

youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRttpJxj59A


(h/t 100percentfedup)


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...iser-new-audio

Very interesting that she was the reported first person Anita Hill told her story. And her association to Ted Kennedy. Sickening.

(Please excuse me if posted previously)

Kavanaugh accuser leans on Democratic operative for advice

September 21, 2018

Annie Karni




Democratic operative Ricki Seidman confirmed her role advising Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's accuser Christine Blasey Ford Thursday, saying, “I believe her and I think she’s very courageous for coming this far." | John Shinkle/POLITICO


Christine Blasey Ford is looking to Ricki Seidman, who helped prepare Anita Hill, to help her navigate a potential hearing.



Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were both teenagers, is being advised by Democratic operative Ricki Seidman.


Seidman,, a senior principal at TSD Communications, in the past worked as an investigator for Sen. Ted Kennedy, and was involved with Anita Hill’s decision to testify against Supreme Court Nominee Clarence Thomas.

“I believe her and I think she’s very courageous for coming this far,” Seidman said in a brief interview, confirming her role advising Ford.

She also worked as Joe Biden’s communications director during the 2008 general election campaign, after he was named Barack Obama’s running mate. In 2009, according to her online biography, she helped the White House manage the confirmation of Obama's Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. Before that, she worked in the Clinton White House as deputy communications director.

Democratic operatives in Washington, D.C. have been cautious about linking Ford and her claims to partisan activists working on her behalf over concerns about further politicizing an already complicated case. “[Ford] didn't come at this through anyone political and needs to keep her distance from it," said one Democratic operative.

Seidman was brought in to offer personal advice to Ford, a California-based psychologist who has no experience living in the spotlight of a national story, or in the crosswinds of Washington politics.

It is not yet clear whether Ford plans to testify in front of Congress. A source familiar with her thinking said she is still making up her mind.
Her attorney Debra Katz has said she wants to wait until the FBI completes its investigation into her claims. But Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has given Ford a Friday deadline to submit her testimony.

For now, Ford is not actively preparing for what would be a high-stakes public testimony akin to Hill’s hearings during Thomas’ confirmation, which gripped the entire country almost 30 years ago, according to a person familiar with her activities this week.

While Kavanaugh has been huddling with a team at the White House every day for the past week, a source familiar with Ford’s prep said she has not been participating in moot hearings or other mock proceedings.

Even though Democrats have purposefully proceeded cautiously with Ford, the news that she is working with an experienced political operative was interpreted by Republicans close to the process as a sign that Democrats are trying to leverage the accusation to derail the Kavanaugh confirmation process.

“This feels more like a Democratic super PAC than a legal effort to get at the truth,” said a senior Republican official of Seidman’s role working with Ford.

“If you’re concerned about an appearance of partisanship, hiring a Democratic operative with a history of smearing conservative judges doesn't exactly mitigate that,” said Cassie Smedile, press secretary for the Republican National Committee.

Seidman says she does not currently do political work.



https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...00&nlid=630318

Trump Challenges Kavanaugh Accuser To Produce Actual Evidence Of Assault

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defa...?itok=QT_Q7zts

"Why didn’t someone call the FBI 36 years ago?"

Fri, 09/21/2018 - 15:45
189 SHARES

In what will, we are sure, now become the liberal media's focus for the next 24hr news cycle, President Trump appears to have weighed in on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's accuser's credibility.

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Judge Brett Kavanaugh is a fine man, with an impeccable reputation, who is under assault by radical left wing politicians who don’t want to know the answers, they just want to destroy and delay. Facts don’t matter. I go through this with them every single day in D.C.
8:56 AM - Sep 21, 2018

• 84.4K
• 45.2K people are talking about this

Trump appeared to set the scene for his latest tweet by noting earlier that "Judge Brett Kavanaugh is a fine man, with an impeccable reputation, who is under assault by radical left wing politicians who don’t want to know the answers, they just want to destroy and delay. Facts don’t matter. I go through this with them every single day in D.C."

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defa...lasey-Ford.jpg

Which led to the following tweet, questioning the fact that if the attack was as bad we are led to believe, why did she or "her loving parents" not file with local law enforcement?
" I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!"

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!
9:14 AM - Sep 21, 2018

• 75.6K
• 75.5K people are talking about this

And cue the outraged accusations that he is attacking a poor woman who was too afraid to come forward at the time, because when it comes to this kind of crime accusation, as Trump says "facts don't matter" and you're guilty, period, or something.
However, Trump was not done. He doubled-down on his questioning of Ford's recollection of events, asking "Why didn’t someone call the FBI 36 years ago?"

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump

The radical left lawyers want the FBI to get involved NOW. Why didn’t someone call the FBI 36 years ago?
9:29 AM - Sep 21, 2018

• 57.1K
• 35.6K people are talking about this

Why indeed?



https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...idence-assault

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOcoV0Tz47Q

Youtube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOcoV0Tz47Q