It all falls apart: Kavanaugh accusers recant | history of lies and “psycho” behavior

It all falls apart: Kavanaugh accusers recant and are exposed for history of lies and “psycho” behavior

(Natural News) It's a full-in circus at the United States Senate as truly desperate Democrats throw every accusation they can come up with at Brett Kavanaugh in a last-ditch attempt to halt his Supreme Court confirmation. In an operation that should probably be called Fast and Furious, Democrat operatives are grasping at any allegation, … [Read More...]

Wednesday, September 26, 2018 by: Mike Adams
Tags: accusers, allegations, Christine Blasey Ford, hoax, kavanaugh, left cult, Lunacy, lunatics, psycho, Supreme Court

260 Views

https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-conte...s-fox-news.jpg

(Natural News) It’s a full-in circus at the United States Senate as truly desperate Democrats throw every accusation they can come up with at Brett Kavanaugh in a last-ditch attempt to halt his Supreme Court confirmation.
In an operation that should probably be called Fast and Furious, Democrat operatives are grasping at any allegation, no matter how despicable or disreputable the source. They’ve even resorted to third-hand anonymous “eyewitnesses” who say they know someone who saw something involving someone who might have been with Kavanaugh some years ago, but they’re not completely sure.
Seriously.
But the stories are all collapsing, and some of the allegations now being desperately catapulted in the direction of Kavanaugh appear to have been made by truly “psycho” individuals. Other allegations are rapidly being recanted. Here’s a taste of what’s breaking on all this just today:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1XHIAAidx8

Youtube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1XHIAAidx8


From The Gateway Pundit: Ex-Boyfriend [of Julie Swetnick] Filed Restraining Order: ‘Julie Threatened to do Harm to My New Wife and Baby’
Creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti revealed Brett Kavanaugh’s 3rd accuser Wednesday morning–A woman named Julie Swetnick who has brought forth allegations of gang rape.
Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend says he had to file a restraining order against Swetnick after they broke up–she continued to harass him after he got married to another woman.
Swetnick’s former boyfriend told Politico she threatened to harm his new wife and baby!

From PJ Media: “Woman Who Partied with Georgetown Prep Football Team Disputes Gang Rape Allegations“
Lisa Miller, who graduated in 1981 from Georgetown Visitation Preparatory School, a private Roman Catholic college-preparatory school for girls, spoke to PJ Media about the new allegations from Julie Swetnick. According to Miller, such activity described by Swetnick did not happen. She said such activities would have been widely known.

From All News Pipeline: Liberals Scrape The Bottom Of The Barrel With New Kavanaugh Accuser -Less Credible Than The Others And Might Have Admitted To Her Own Crimes
Swetnick claims she witnessed the two drink excessively, engage in high inappropriate conduct and fondling and grabbing girls without consent. She also claims that during 1981 – 1982 she witnessed both men cause girls to become inebriated so they could be gang-raped in a side bedroom.
Swetnick, again according to her own declaration, attended more than 10 house parties between 1981-1983, when she was 18, 19 and 20 years old respectively, stating that she was aware, as an adult attending these parties, that men at these parties, which she specifically names Kavanaugh and Judge were “spiking” the punch at house parties with drugs and grain alcohol to cause the girls to lose their inhibitions. She also claims that as an adult, since we have already established her age, she witnessed those girls being taken to rooms to be “gang” or “train” raped.

From TownHall.com: Lindsey Graham Just Took The Latest Kavanaugh Accusation To The Woodshed
…so, do we have any witnesses? Uh, apparently we do not. Like the two other allegations hurled at Kavanaugh, there’s no further evidence to corroborate that Kavanaugh was a master ring leader in this alleged debauchery. Should we be shocked? Probably not, what else would you expect from a grandstanding, opportunistic porn lawyer? Also, she kept going to these parties where rape was occurring? Yes, it’s all suspect.

From The Daily Caller: MAN APOLOGIZES FOR CLAIMING KAVANAUGH SEXUALLY ASSAULTED HIS FRIEND, SAYS HE ‘MADE A MISTAKE’
A Rhode Island man who accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting his friend apologized on Wednesday and said he “made a mistake.”
The man called Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse’s office and claimed that Kavanaugh and Mark Judge, a high school friend of Kavanaugh, drunkenly sexually assaulted one of his friends, according to interview transcripts released by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
After Catalan started getting attention on Twitter, he publicly stated that he had recanted the accusation.

From Breitbart.com Third-hand anonymous eyewitness accounts show desperation of Democrats
6:49 PM — NBC News reports that the Senate Judiciary Committee is investigating a fourth accusation — that Kavanaugh “physically assaulted a woman he socialized with in the Washington, D.C. area in 1998 while he was inebriated.”
The letter, sent to Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO), is anonymous. The author is not the alleged victim but claims to be the parent of a woman who claims to have witnessed Kavanaugh “[shove] her friend up against the wall very aggressively and sexually.”
So wait… it’s the anonymous parent of a woman who says she saw someone with Kavanaugh in 1998? Now we’re engrossed over third-hand anonymous accounts?

From The Gateway Pundit: Judiciary Committee Asks for Audio-Video of Christine Ford’s Polygraph – Her Atty’s Refuse, Saying “It’s Not Important”
Wilkinson told CBS the lawyers for Dr. Ford have not turned over the results of her lie detector test or her therapist’s notes to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Senate Judiciary Committee asked for audio-visual from Ford’s lie detector test. Ford’s team responded that “it wasn’t important.”

From The Daily Caller: FORD’S POLYGRAPH PRESENTS ANOTHER INCONSISTENCY IN WHO ATTENDED ALLEGED PARTY
Ford’s claim that there were “4 boys and a couple of girls” at the party contradicts Ford and her lawyer’s other accounts of how many people were present.
In her letter to Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Ford claimed that there were “four others” present. She also told The Washington Post that there were “four boys at the party” and two — Kavanaugh and his friend, Mark Judge — in the room where the assault allegedly occurred.
Since Ford’s allegations were first made public, there have been three different accounts of how many people were at the party she claims to have been assaulted at: four boys, four boys and one girl, and four boys and a couple of girls.

#ConfirmKavanaughNow

Video at the page link

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-...-behavior.html

Latest Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick graduated high school in 1980, so why was she partying with minors in 1982?

(Natural News) On Wednesday sleazy lawyer Michael Avenatti revealed the identity of a third woman who is accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct while both were in high school. The woman, Julie Swetnick, says in a sworn statement that she was the victim of a “rape train” after being drugged or given grain alcohol engineered … [Read More...]

Wednesday, September 26, 2018 by: JD Heyes
Tags: Brett Kavanaugh, denial, fake news, False Allegations, false charges, false-flag, hoax, Julie Swetnick, lack of evidence, Michael Avenatti, no corroboration, President Donald Trump, rape train, sexual assault allegations, Supreme Court nominee, Trump, White House

350 Views

https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-conte...reme-Court.jpg
(Natural News) On Wednesday sleazy lawyer Michael Avenatti revealed the identity of a third woman who is accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct while both were in high school.
The woman, Julie Swetnick, says in a sworn statement that she was the victim of a “rape train” after being drugged or given grain alcohol engineered by Kavanaugh and some of his high school friends.
In particular, Swetnick says she was given “Quaaludes or something similar,” causing her to black out (or nearly so) thus making her vulnerable to be gang-raped by…who knows who.
In her statement, Swetnick says that she met Kavanaugh and his classmate, Mark Judge, in after being introduced to them at a house party in the Washington, D.C., area in the early 1980s.

https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-conte...er-300x241.jpg
Image: Julie Swetnick/Twitter

“During the years 1981-1982 I became aware of efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh, and others to ‘spike’ the ‘punch’ at house parties I attended with drugs and/or grain alcohol so as to cause girls to lose their inhibitions and their ability to say ‘no,’” she says in paragraph 11 of her statement made under penalty of perjury, The Gateway Pundit reports.
She goes on to say she “witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to ‘target’ particular girls so they could be taken advantage of; it was usually a girl that was especially vulnerable because she was alone at the party or shy,” she claimed.
But there’s just one problem with her sworn testimony – the age difference. (Related: Kavanaugh STILL not implicated in actual sex abuse by third accuser.)
Swetnick is 55; that’s two years older than Kavanaugh, who is 53. TGP reported that she graduated high school three years before Kavanaugh did.
What was she doing at parties with boys and girls who were legally minors at the time?
The New York Times, which reported that none of what Swetnick is saying could be corroborated and that Avenatti would not make her available for an interview, pointed out:
Ms. Swetnick grew up in Montgomery County, Md., graduating from Gaithersburg High School in 1980 before attending the University of Maryland, according to a résumé posted online. Judge Kavanaugh graduated from Georgetown Prep in 1983.
So just going by the numbers, she’s saying she was partying as an 18-year-old with boys (and girls?) who were anywhere from 15-to-17-years-old, which meant they were minors and she was considered an adult (who was attending college).
‘No one is stopping him’

What’s more, she claims in her statement that she knew about these “rape trains” and that drugging of girls was taking place, but she continued going to the parties until it allegedly happened to her.
And while she says Kavanaugh was exhibiting “abusive and physically aggressive behavior toward girls, including pressing girls against him without their consent, ‘grinding’ against girls, and attempting to remove or shift girls’ clothing to expose private body parts,” she never said that he was abusive towards her.
She said in 1982 she “became the victim of one of these ‘gang’ or ‘train’ rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present,” adding that she “witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could then be ‘gang-raped’ in a side room or bedroom by a ‘train’ of numerous boys.”
Really? So, what has Avenatti done about these alleged crimes? A lawyer for Kavanaugh, Beth Wilkinson, told CNN that he should have gone directly to the police if he believed the allegations to be true, the Times reported.
“There must be a reason, as a lawyer, that he didn’t take these allegations to the police himself. No one is stopping him,” she said.
There’s no indication in the Times article that the reporters understood that a huge age difference (and there is a big difference between 15 and 18-year-olds, mentally and physically) because it wasn’t mentioned.
But the discrepancy is just the first in what will likely be many others regarding Swetnick’s allegations.
Read more about how the Trump administration is handling this at Trump.news.
Video at the page link

Sources include:

TheGatewayPundit.com
TheNationalSentinel.com

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-...th-minors.html

“Corroborating” signed statements against Kavanaugh are a media hoax; no corroboration is found in any of the statements

(Natural News) One of the “mainstream” media’s claims regarding a mounting series of allegations of sexual abuse by three women against POTUS Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh is that the claims are credible because they’ve been corroborated or substantiated by others who were said to be present when the abuse took … [Read More...]

Wednesday, September 26, 2018 by: JD Heyes
Tags: Brett Kavanaugh, Christine Blasey Ford, democrats, fake news, False Allegations, false-flag, hoax, insanity, Journalism, lack of evidence, lack of proof, lies, no corroboration, President Trump, propaganda, Sexual assault

270 Views

https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-conte...s-fox-news.jpg

(Natural News) One of the “mainstream” media’s claims regarding a mounting series of allegations of sexual abuse by three women against POTUS Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh is that the claims are credible because they’ve been corroborated or substantiated by others who were said to be present when the abuse took place.
There’s just one problem with those claims: They’re not true.
As Townhall noted on Wednesday, the day before Kavanaugh’s first accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, was scheduled to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee along with the accused, her legal team has released a series of witness statements meant to serve as evidence against the nominee, but would really be better used “serving as place mats” on a table.
The site noted:
Ms. Ford has alleged that a drunken 17-year-old Brett Kavanaugh tried to rape her at a high school party, for which she has no recollection of key details, specifically how she got to this party, who hosted it, and who organized it. Ford penned a letter detailing this allegation, which she sent to Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) office in July. DiFi sat on it for weeks, keeping it from her Senate colleagues until zero hour when it looked like Kavanaugh was going to get a smooth confirmation. The theatrics at the hearings were over. Of course, this allegation cannot be verified. And that’s the point: it’s all designed to run out the clock.
In an article regarding the statements, USA Today maintained that they constitute admissible evidence to back up her initial allegations.
Nothing could be further from the truth. All the signed statements indicate is that Blasey Ford told the four who signed them about the allegations. That’s not the same as offering proof or evidence the abuse actually took place or that Kavanaugh was the one who committed the abuse.
Jim Hanson, president of Security Studies Group, noted on Twitter that the statements “are not corroboration. They are statements that 30 years later [Ford] mentioned this to them. Narrative over truth I guess.” (Related: Did plot to accuse Brett Kavanaugh begin with Mitt Romney nomination in 2012?)

Telling someone something happened isn’t proof of anything

NBC News’ national correspondent Peter Alexander tweeted out images of the signed statements using the word “corroborate.”
“NEW: @NBCNews has obtained sworn and signed declarations from 4 people who corroborate Christine Blasey Ford’s claims of sexual assault against Kavanaugh, sent to Senate Cmte,” he wrote.
Apparently this college-educated mainstream media journalist doesn’t know what the word corroborate really means in the context of this story, which is, that the signed statements don’t prove any allegations against Kavanaugh and don’t attest to anything other than they say Ford told them about the allegations (and even then, how are we supposed to really know given that nothing she’s said has been truly – wait for it – corroborated?).
As for the judge himself, he has repeatedly stated that he not only is innocent but that he doesn’t even know the accusers, including the latest one, Julie Swetnick, who is represented by bottom-feeding ‘porn star’ attorney Michael Avenatti.
One of those who has signed a sworn statement supporting Ford is Adela Gildo-Mazzon, who said her friend told her about the alleged assault in June 2013 at a Mountain View, Calif., restaurant (who could remember that date five years later – seriously?). Another is Keith Koegler, who said Ford told him about the alleged assault in 2016.
These two and the others, however, noted further that Ford only mentioned the alleged attacker was a “federal judge” – she never mentioned Kavanaugh by name.
“This is not corroborating Ford’s accusation,” Townhall notes. “It’s merely confirmation that she told a lot of people about this alleged, still-evidence-free, and witness-lacking allegation of attempted sexual assault that occurred during high school some 30-plus years ago, but that’s all.”
These corroborators aren’t witnesses; they weren’t around when the alleged assault took place, so they can’t testify whether or not it ever happened.
Democrats vowed to stop Kavanaugh’s nomination any way they could. That’s what all of this nonsense is really about.
Read more about the media propaganda surrounding this hoax at Propaganda.news.

Sources include:

Townhall.com
USAToday.com
NewsTarget.com

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-...edia-hoax.html

Dianne Feinstein the “fixer” – Same Democrat who may have forged Kavanaugh accusation letter hosted a Chinese spy for decades

(Natural News) Earlier this week additional allegations of sexual assault dating back three decades were lodged against POTUS Donald Trump’s latest Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, by Deborah Ramirez, who claims he exposed himself (or a dildo) to her in a drunken stupor during a frat party in a Yale University dorm room. It … [Read More...]

Wednesday, September 26, 2018 by: JD Heyes
Tags: allegations, Beijing, China, Chinese spy, Chinese spy front, Christine Blasey Ford, Dianne Feinstein, espionage, hoax, letter, Ministry of State Security, Senate office, Sexual assault

430 Views

https://www.naturalnews.com/wp-conte.../feinstein.jpg

(Natural News) Earlier this week additional allegations of sexual assault dating back three decades were lodged against POTUS Donald Trump’s latest Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, by Deborah Ramirez, who claims he exposed himself (or a dildo) to her in a drunken stupor during a frat party in a Yale University dorm room.
It didn’t take long before those charges – contained in a New Yorker magazine piece – were being refuted by former students (including Kavanaugh) who Ramirez claimed were in the room at the time.
But the allegations that turned the Kavanaugh nomination into a perverted circus allegedly came from Palo Alto Prof. Christine Blasey Ford in the form of a letter passed along to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., over the summer. A closer examination of that letter by two experts — Dannielle Blumenthal, Ph.D., and Natural News Network founder/editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger – found more than a dozen examples of how the letter could not have been written by someone of Ford’s intellect (she also has a Ph.D.).
“Ph.D. writers are highly trained in writing. In fact, it is an essential part of their education. Yet the letter released by Sen. Dianne Feinstein is riddled with simple errors that point to a writing level that barely qualifies as ‘high school’ composition skills,” Adams wrote.
Among the errors discovered include grammatical and formatting mistakes that a highly qualified writer (masters and Ph.D. programs require much research and a lot of highly advanced writing) would never make were found in the letter (differences in font size for emphasis; ‘1980’s’ instead of ‘1980s’; use of numbers between 1-9 rather than writing out the numbers; etc.). (Related: Jimmy Kimmel becomes king of the late-night gutter, as his Kavanaugh ‘penis’ comment sets a new low standard for “comedy.”)
All of which begs the question: Is this a real letter or did some low-level staffer in Feinstein’s office – say, a Chinese spy perhaps – generate it?
Though the Democrat-friendly “establishment” media tried their level best to ignore or otherwise downplay the story, some weeks in early August, local media including KPIX in San Francisco reported that a “mole” working on behalf of the Chinese government worked in Feinstein’s office for two decades.
“The Bay Area is a hotbed for Russian and Chinese espionage,” the local CBS affiliate reported, noting that in late 2017, the Trump administration ordered the Russian consulate in San Francisco shuttered.
The station went on to to note that the San Francisco Chronicle expounded upon a small blurb in a Politico report noting that five years earlier Feinstein was notified by the FBI that her office had been “infiltrated” by Chinese intelligence – the Ministry for State Security, in particular.
Writing in the New York Post, investigative reporter Paul Sperry said Feinstein was an “easy mark” for Chinese intelligence:
In June 1996 — after the staffer had begun working for Feinstein — the FBI detected that the Chinese government was attempting to seek favor with the senator, who at the time sat on the East Asian and Pacific affairs subcommittee of the Foreign Relations Committee, which oversees US-China relations. Investigators warned her in a classified briefing that Beijing might try to influence her through illegal campaign contributions laundered through front corporations and other cutouts.
The warning proved prescient.
Feinstein was a supporter of China – publicly and in the Senate – which helped to extend the country’s favored trade status and also led to its ascension into the World Trade Organization, both of which the Chinese government has used to extend economic and foreign policy influence around the globe. Favored trade status is, in large part, responsible for the massive U.S.-China trade deficit that POTUS Trump is attempting to lower.
Between the suspicious Ford allegations letter and Feinstein’s shilling for the Chinese, it seems as though the senior senator from California is quite the expert at deception, whether as a practitioner or a victim.
Read more about the Kavanaugh allegations hoax at Hoax.news.
Video at the page link

Sources include:
TheNationalSentinel.com
NaturalNews.com
NYPost.com

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-...r-decades.html

the NEW Democrat Socialist Party needs to re-named and Linked to the Porn-Hub Website

These Democrats are despicable people and need to be voted out along with every RINO in office!

They are truly disgusting people. How in the world to you sit down and look at them in they eye and conduct ANY business or policies for this country? Oh that's right...they do not work, have done nothing for 2 years but advocate for illegal aliens, open borders, horrible healthcare, more taxes and destroy this nation!

They push to let criminal illegal aliens out of jail to rape, rob and murder us!

All the while, they collect their paychecks, benefits and take their recess all paid for by the taxpayers THEY work for!

This is much more than a swamp...it is a septic tank!

Throw the RINOS out in the primaries, NOT THE GENERAL ELECTION IN NOVEMBER. You can not vote against the Republicans and expect to help our country at all on any level, in my opinion.

VOTE REPUBLICAN IN NOVEMBER!!!

Christine Ford Is the Product of a Democrat Party Operation

Sep 27, 2018

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-cont.../Listen247.pnghttps://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-cont...6/09/Watch.png





RUSH: I want to get observations of mine on the record so they will be at RushLimbaugh.com now and forever into posterity. In no particular order here, earlier on in the day Dr. Ford kept referring to her “beach friend.” I said, “What the hell is a ‘beach friend’?” Her beach friends told her to do this, her beach friends told her to get the Washington Post, beach friends sent her to the New York Times, beach friends said get a lawyer, beach friends said, “Don’t pay for it yourself.”
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-cont...y-Ford-009.jpgIt turns out that “beach friends” are her buddies in Santa Cruz, California. This woman who can’t afford to pay lawyers has a home in Santa Cruz, California, and a home in Palo Alto, California. Those are two of the most highly expensive real estate areas in the country, not just California. If you live in Santa Cruz, your buddies are beach buddies. You’re beach friends. Santa Cruz is the most radical left community in the country, maybe a smidgen. And if it isn’t, it is. And everybody there is political active radical left!
It has now become clear to me what the Republican prosecutor is attempting to do here! The Republican prosecutor asking questions of Dr. Ford instead of Republican senators is attempting to establish that Christine Ford has come forward because the Democrat Party has brought her forward. She is attempting to establish that she’s not who she says she is. I mean, it may have happened. But that all of this is happening because the Democrat Party is behind it. Democrat Party political operatives and hacks are behind this! That’s what the prosecutor is attempting to establish.
People say, “What does this matter who paid for your lawyers?” It’s part of the attempt to establish… Remember who the audience for this is. The audience for this is a couple or three Republican senators, folks, not you and me. Well, you and me in a sense, but in trying to establish that all of this is not an aggrieved woman who because of her heart and her conscience has come forward. She’s being dragged forward and put in the public eye by the Democrat Party who may have instigated this from the get-go!
That’s the attempt that is being made. Whether it’s effective yet or not, I don’t know. But I think that is one of the objectives, shall we say, of the woman conducting the interrogation or the interviews of Dr. Ford for Republican senators. Now, both of her lawyers that we see here… She’s got four. There are two prominently on display here, Michael Bromwich and the Soros lawyer. That would be Debra Katz. Anyway, they just admitted that they are both working pro bono.
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-cont...7-Playbook.jpgThis woman has the money to pay them, but they’re working pro bono, and Bromwich — are you ready for it? — is also Andrew McCabe’s lawyer! So this guy, one way or the other, is determined to frustrate Donald Trump, to get Trump, one way or the other. Now, I personally — as a man of great decency and compassion — am glad that Dr. Ford will not have to sell her two houses in Santa Cruz and in Santa Fe in order to pay for her lawyers and legal bills.
Unlike Michael Flynn and Michael Caputo, who have had to sell everything in order to pay their legal bills because of Robert Mueller’s investigation, Dr. Ford here is free and clear because her lawyers are pro bono. Democrats continue to make a big deal out of the fact that there was no FBI investigation and that Kavanaugh has refused to call for one. (chuckles) Kavanaugh’s undergone — SIX! — FBI investigations.

---

Related Links

• RushLimbaugh.com: Democrats Planned Every Piece of the Kavanaugh Attack - 09.26.18
• RushLimbaugh.com: Remember This: Everything Ford Alleges Remains Uncorroborated - 09.26.18
• Washington Examiner: Andrew McCabe's Attorney Says He's Representing Brett Kavanaugh Accuser for Free
• National Review: How Today’s Hearing Is about the Lessons From 2016

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2...rty-operation/