America: Future of Freedom or Future of Tyranny?

America: Future of Freedom or Future of Tyranny?

“LOOK AT WHAT YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS DONEâ€

Letter To Senators Regarding SB 679


Sen. Coburn, Sen. Inhofe, May 9, 2011

I am writing about S.679, introduced by Charles Schumer on March 30, 2011 and co-sponsored by 15 other senators, including the Republican leader and six other Republican senators. This is another case of the Chavezization of the United States of America. Our founding fathers wrote the Constitution the way they did for a reason. They didn’t want this nation to become a third world banana dictatorship. These great men of thought and courage wrote the Constitution to give us a system of checks and balances to prevent one person or a small group of people from taking absolute control of our nation.

With the passage of this piece of dictatorial legislation, Congress will essentially vote themselves, and We the People into a state of irrelevancy. We already have too many czars who owe their allegiance to Obama rather than to the Constitution as designed. But it isn’t only Obama I am concerned about. I don’t want any president to have this much unchecked authority to do as he wishes without any congressional approval.

It may be easy for you to just pass this off as a “streamlining of the systemâ€

PS these were links from the original post I brought overAmerica: Future of" Freedom or Future of Tyranny?"





Anyone But Obama? Be Careful What You Ask For

I find it fascinating that the Republican establishment, including the talking head brigade, is pushing Mitt Romney and Rick Perry as our only hope of defeating Barack Obama in 2012. No one else has a chance according to people of the party machinery, including Bill Kristol, and the other talking heads who are supposedly on our side. Wasn’t it Kristol who called the TEA Party radical and out of touch, not part of the Republican mainstream? John McCain, Rick Perry and Mitt Romney, today’s “mainstream Republicansâ€