Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

    American troops going back to Iraq

    American troops going back to Iraq



    Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki of Iraq met with President Obama in the White House on Friday and they came up with several solutions. Though the President has claimed that Al Qaeda was done with, al-Maliki has requested help in combating them, as they have picked up attacks since the withdrawal of US troops. This is a sharp reversal of both these men’s stances.




    The statements

    “The two leaders noted that it has been nearly two years since the final American troops departed Iraq and the United States and Iraq entered a new phase of their relationship, based on mutual respect and a shared commitment to build a strategic partnership between two sovereign nations. They recalled the thousands of Americans and Iraqis who have given their lives in our common fight against terrorism and extremism in Iraq. The President and Prime Minister renewed their determination to honor the memory and sacrifice of those killed by strengthening our joint long-term strategic partnership across the fields covered by the SFA, including security, diplomacy, trade, education, energy, culture, science, and justice. “
    This is what was said with the meeting between al-Maliki and Vice President Biden: “Prime Minister Maliki outlined his efforts to pursue a holistic strategy to combat threats to Iraqi security, building on the lessons our countries have learned fighting terrorist groups together. In this regard, the Prime Minister emphasized the importance of enlisting local leaders and the Sons of Iraq to isolate terrorist networks. The two leaders discussed how additional U.S. cooperation might help Iraq advance this strategy. The Vice President underscored America’s commitment to Iraq’s success in defeating al Qaeda and protecting its people.
    Comments on Iraq
    “We had a lot of discussion about how we can work together to push back against that terrorist organization that operates not only in Iraq, but also poses a threat to the region and to the United States,” Obama said.
    All of this is looking like we have troops headed to a place that was murky the first time, with complaints on the actions of our troops and liberals screaming that we were being there for the oil. This means more American troops will die on an issue that helped polarize the nation.



    http://misguidedchildren.com/foreign-affairs/2013/11/american-troops-going-back-to-iraq/5988


    Hopefully it will be another attempt of war that no ones comes too!!!!



    Stephen Green writes: "Obamacare’s numbers paint a bleak picture of broken promises and outright lies."







  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Ron Paul: What Was Not Said About Iraq

    November 4, 2013



    By Ron Paul | Dr. Paul is a New York Times bestselling author and a twelve-term congressman from Texas who ran as a 2012 Republican Presidential candidate. He is author of The School Revolution: A New Answer for Our Broken Education System , Pillars of Prosperity: Free Markets, Honest Money, Private Property and End The Fed and other titles.

    Opinions from Liberty Crier contributors and members are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of The Liberty Crier.



    October was Iraq’s deadliest month since April, 2008. In those five and a half years, not only has there been no improvement in Iraq’s security situation, but things have gotten much worse. More than 1,000 people were killed in Iraq last month, the vast majority of them civilians. Another 1,600 were wounded, as car bombs, shootings, and other attacks continue to maim and murder.
    As post-“liberation” Iraq spirals steadily downward, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki was in Washington last week to plead for more assistance from the United States to help restore order to a society demolished by the 2003 US invasion. Al-Qaeda has made significant recent gains, Maliki told President Obama at their meeting last Friday, and Iraq needs more US military aid to combat its growing influence.

    Obama pledged to work together with Iraq to address al-Qaeda’s growing presence, but what was not said was that before the US attack there was no al-Qaeda in Iraq. The appearance of al-Qaeda in Iraq coincided with the US attack. They claimed we had to fight terror in Iraq, but the US invasion resulted in the creation of terrorist networks where before there were none. What a disaster.
    Maliki also told President Obama last week that the war in next-door Syria was spilling over into Iraq, with the anti-Assad fighters setting off bombs and destabilizing the country. Already more than 5,000 people have been killed throughout Iraq this year, and cross-border attacks from Syrian rebels into Iraq are increasing those numbers. Again, what was not said was that the US government had supported these anti-Assad fighters both in secret and in the open for the past two years.
    Earlier in the week a group of Senators – all of whom had supported the 2003 US invasion of Iraq – sent a strongly-worded letter to Obama complaining that Maliki was far too close to the Iranian government next door. What was not said was that this new closeness between the Iraqi and Iranian governments developed under the US-installed government after the US invasion of Iraq.
    Surely there is plenty of blame that can be placed on Maliki and the various no-doubt corrupt politicians running Iraq these days. But how was it they came to power? Were we not promised by those promoting the war that it would create a beach-head of democracy in the Middle East and a pro-American government?
    According to former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, in early 2001 as the new Bush administration was discussing an attack on Iraq, then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said, “Imagine what the region would look like without Saddam and with a regime that’s allied with US interests. It would change everything in the region and beyond it. It would demonstrate what US policy is all about.”
    We see all these years later now how ridiculous this idea was.
    I have long advocated the idea that since we just marched in, we should just march out. That goes for US troops and also for US efforts to remake Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and everywhere the neocon wars of “liberation” have produced nothing but chaos, destruction, and more US enemies overseas. We can best improve the situation by just leaving them alone.
    The interventionists have unfortunately neither learned their lesson from the Iraq debacle nor have they changed their tune. They are still agitating for regime change in Syria, even as they blame the Iraqi government for the destabilization that spills over. They are still agitating for a US attack on Iran, with Members of Congress introducing legislation recently that would actually authorize US force against Iran.
    It looks like a very slow learning curve for our bipartisan leaders in Washington. It’s time for a change.
    Source

    http://libertycrier.com/ron-paul-sai...3d23-284711521

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •