Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: A new amigo who creates jobs; Both sides get to claim victory.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    61,618

    A new amigo who creates jobs; Both sides get to claim victory.

    A new amigo who creates jobs

    Both sides get to claim victory.

    August 31, 2018

    A new amigo who creates jobs

    By Silvio Canto, Jr.

    We have not seen the details of the U.S.-Mexico trade agreement. So let's wait for the text to make a final conclusion.
    Nevertheless, we can say a couple of things.
    First, it could be better for U.S. workers than NAFTA, as Vox points out:
    So far, the new United States-Mexico Trade Agreement seems a lot like NAFTA, though Canada has yet to opt in as it continues negotiations. Agricultural products would remain tariff-free under the new deal, and there is still no required renegotiation every five years (which Trump wanted).

    It would be harder, however, for businesses to claim harm from unfair trade practices.
    But there is one striking difference from NAFTA: The new pact includes several labor rules meant to benefit workers on both sides of the border.
    For example, Mexico has agreed to pass a law giving workers the right to real union representation, and to adopt other labor laws that meet international standards set forth by the United Nations.
    American auto companies that assemble their cars in Mexico would also need to use more US-made car parts to avoid tariffs, which would help US factory workers.
    And about 40 percent of those cars would need to be made by workers earning at least $16 an hour -- three times more than Mexico’s minimum wage.

    My translation: Both sides got to claim victory. President Trump and incoming Presidente Andrés Lopez-Obrador will both claim that they are protecting their workers. Please remember that both men ran against NAFTA because it was a lousy deal! Both men are also strong nationalists.
    Also, what I hear from Mexican businessmen is that everyone south of the border wants President Trump to stick it to China.
    My second point is that this deal shows significant pragmatism on the Mexico side. They may not like President Trump's style but they love what he is doing for the U.S. economy. It's obvious that a U.S. economy growing at 4% or better is "muy bueno" for Mexico.
    So what happened? The Mexicans love their new "amigo" up here or the one who is creating jobs and allowing U.S. citizens to buy more avocados and lots of other things "Hecho en Mexico".

    PS: You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.


    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...ates_jobs.html

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    Just be patient, details will be out soon, if it wasn't good for the US, Lighthizer and Trump wouldn't have agreed to it. Trump is a money and numbers guy, if the numbers weren't great for the US from the new deal, there would be no new deal.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member stoptheinvaders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    3,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Judy View Post
    Just be patient, details will be out soon, if it wasn't good for the US, Lighthizer and Trump wouldn't have agreed to it. Trump is a money and numbers guy, if the numbers weren't great for the US from the new deal, there would be no new deal.
    Trump pushed for DACA and that wasn't good for the country. He also stopped the separation of the children, and that enabled the invaders and wasn't good for the country, he also said Hillary had suffered enough and didn't want equal justice and that wasn't good for the country.
    You've got to Stand for Something or You'll Fall for Anything

Similar Threads

  1. Victory For Citizen Journalism: Court Sides With Bloggers In 1st Amendment Challenge
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-17-2014, 09:09 PM
  2. Feds claim victory on non-deportation policy, activists say it’s not enough
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-15-2013, 01:52 PM
  3. McCain's amigo Hernandez disliked on both sides of border
    By legalatina in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-16-2008, 11:14 PM
  4. Two sides claim victory in immigration fight
    By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-28-2006, 11:21 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •