Christine Blasey Ford Published Eight studies about “Abortion Pill” and Works for Com

Christine Blasey Ford Published Eight studies about “Abortion Pill” and Works for Company that Produces It

by Jim Hoft September 20, 2018 232 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...sey-ford-2.jpg

Professor Christine Blasey Ford, while working for Stanford University, was also affiliated with Corcept Therapeutics (2006 – 2011). Her new Wikipedia page describes her as “director of biostatistics at Corcept.” Corcept Therapeutics Inc. (CORT) has a $1.66 billion market cap (worth), with current annual sales of $216 million.

Liberals and feminists are very worried that Judge Brett Kavanaugh may participate in reversing Roe v. Wade. Christine Blasey wants to stop Kavanaugh from reaching the country’s highest court.
According to an article at Philly.com, “ Alan Schatzberg, a Stanford University psychiatrist and scientist, co-founded Corcept Therapeutics in 1998 to explore whether mifepristone could help treat major depression.” He left the company in 2007, when the company changed direction (but continued to explore uses for mifepristone).

Corcept Therapeutics has only one product: Korlym (mifepristone). The “abortion pill”, otherwise known as RU-486 or “Mifeprex” (brand name), is mifepristone.
From Wikipedia:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...rtion-pill.jpg
Christine Blasey Ford participated in 8 published studies, which researched uses for the “abortion pill” or mifepristone. In five of these studies, Professor Ford is listed as affiliated with Corcept Therapeutics (as well as Stanford University). See study descriptions below. Several list her email address.
Korlym is approved by the FDA for individuals with Cushing’s syndrome who also have type 2 diabetes (not diabetes only). Cushing’s Syndrome is a rare disease. Based on 2002 prevalence data, it was extrapolated (estimated) that there were 587 individuals with Cushing’s Syndrome in the USA. The article mentioned above describes 5000 individuals might be eligible for Korlym.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...wo-495x600.png
Although Korlym is only approved for Cushing’s Syndrome and diabetes ONLY, it is widely available online as an “abortion pill” or “Emergency Contraceptive and Abortifacient”. See attached screenshots:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...pe-584x600.jpg
Descriptions/screen-prints of published studies shown on the following pages, more recent studies first. Christine Blasey was an author listed in the following studies.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...1--572x600.jpg
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...-2-581x600.png
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...-3-573x600.png
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...-4-600x555.png

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...-5-536x600.png
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...-6-550x600.png
Hat tip Christine



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...t-produces-it/

What Is She Smoking?… Christine Blasey Ford Attorney Wants to Bring in ‘Witnesses’ to Alleged Crime with No Known Date or Place

by Jim Hoft September 19, 2018
372 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...ks-600x422.jpg

Here are the facts about Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh:

— She doesn’t know when it was.
— She doesn’t know what year it took place
— She doesn’t know what month it took place
— She has no idea where it took place
— She doesn’t know if 4 boys were there
— It could have been 2 boys?
— Three of the accused boys deny the charges
— She doesn’t think any females were there
— Wait, maybe there was a female there?

Judge Kavanaugh already stated this week that he wasn’t even at the party in question.

Senator Feinstein will not release the original letter she received from Christine Ford.
And as Cristina wrote earlier — Christine Ford’s attorney Lisa Banks wants to bring in multiple witnesses.

THERE WERE NO WITNESSES!

Ford does not even know when or where it took place!
How could there be any witnesses.

And Christine Blasey Ford told the Washington Post she NEVER TOLD ANYONE about the abusive incident.

But this Hillary supporting attorney believes she can shut down the US senate to bring in witnesses to a 36-year-old crime at an unknown place at an unknown time?

What is this loon smoking?


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...date-or-place/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...87-360x188.jpg
SENATE JUDICIARY CONTACTED the 3 Male Witnesses at Party Named by Accuser Ford — ALL DENIED ACCUSATIONS Under Penalty of Felony!

September 20, 2018, 3:54 pm by Jim Hoft 285 Comments

The Senate Judiciary account went on a tweetstorm regarding their investigation on the 36-year-old allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford.

These tweets were posted this afternoon on Thursday after a weeklong media frenzy against Judge Kavanaugh.
Blasey Ford now says she wants to testify but doesn’t know when.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...N3o_normal.jpg Senate Judiciary ✔ @senjudiciary

· 12h
Replying to @senjudiciary
Democrats sat on Dr. Ford’s allegations for MONTHS & did nothing. They STILL haven’t turned over the original letter they received from Dr. Ford. Why would Dems sit on allegations for months and then not even participate in the Committee’s investigation?https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/scotus_ranking-member-refuses-to-disclose-secret-allegations-even-after-dr-ford-goes-public …
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/10407...g&name=600x314

SCOTUS | Ranking Member Refuses to Disclose Secret Allegations Even After Dr. Ford Goes Public

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
judiciary.senate.gov

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...N3o_normal.jpg Senate Judiciary ✔ @senjudiciary

On Monday, staff interviewed Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony. Democratic staff was invited and could have asked any question of Judge Kavanaugh. They declined to participate.
1:18 PM - Sep 20, 2018
3,677

2,415 people are talking about this

The committee interviewed Judge Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth — the three men accused by Christine Blasey Ford.
ALL THREE OF THE MEN under penalty of a felony DENIED THE ACCUSATIONS By Ford!

On Monday, staff interviewed Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony. Democratic staff was invited and could have asked any question of Judge Kavanaugh. They declined to participate… Staff contacted Mark Judge and obtained a statement under penalty of felony. Staff contacted third person allegedly at party described by Dr. Ford and obtained a statement under penalty of felony. Staff contacted fourth person allegedly at party.
On the other hand the Senate Judiciary Committee contacted a woman and schoolmate who claimed on social media that she had info on the alleged assault.
That woman has not yet responded to the committee’s request.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...N3o_normal.jpg Senate Judiciary ✔ @senjudiciary

· 12h
Replying to @senjudiciary
Staff contacted Mark Judge and obtained a statement under penalty of felony. Staff contacted third person allegedly at party described by Dr. Ford and obtained a statement under penalty of felony. Staff contacted fourth person allegedly at party.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...N3o_normal.jpg Senate Judiciary ✔ @senjudiciary

Staff have contacted a schoolmate who claimed on social media this week to have info related to Dr. Ford’s allegations. Committee has not yet heard back.https://www.npr.org/2018/09/20/649787076/kavanaugh-accuser-classmate-that-it-happened-or-not-i-have-no-idea?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_ campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20180920 …
1:19 PM - Sep 20, 2018

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/10427...g&name=600x314


Kavanaugh Accuser Classmate: 'That It Happened Or Not, I Have No Idea'

After saying on social media that the incident "did happen," a former classmate of Christine Blasey Ford tells NPR she does not have first-hand knowledge of it.
npr.org
1,544 931 people are talking about this

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...lty-of-felony/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoOB0ncydMA

Youtube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoOB0ncydMA

Judiciary Committee's Lindsey Graham: "I'm Not Going To Ruin Judge Kavanaugh's Life

Insiders claim Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer are set to report a late twist in Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation... MORE...
NEW YORKER to publish account of a new woman and a 'dildo'...
She is 'Never Trump', says a source. But best friend will say 'She never told me!'... Developing...


https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2676/4...a170d77e_b.jpg

ANOTHER WOMAN?

https://drudgereport.com/i/logo9.gif

BREAKING. Kavanaugh Accuser’s Third Witness Is Located and Her Testimony Is a Game Changer

Posted at 9:57 pm on September 22, 2018 by streiff

So far, Christine Ford, the California professor who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of groping her 37 years ago, has been less than forthcoming with anything that approaches a verifiable detail of her experience. She doesn’t know what year it happened. She doesn’t know what month it happened. She doesn’t know where the house was or whose parents it belonged to. She doesn’t know how she got home. Those are huge, gaping holes in any account of anything and yet, Ford’s supporters shamelessly contend that this is a natural reaction to this simulacrum of a trauma. One bit of information she has provided, oddly enough, are the names of the other three teens in the house at the time.
Two of them are male. Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth have both provided letters, via their attorneys, to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of any party such as the one Ford describes.
There is a third witness, the young woman that accompanied her to the alleged party and who the young Christine Blasey abandoned in a house filled with drunk males who, according to Ford, had rape on their minds. Now the young woman has been located. And she has provided a statement, by way of her attorney:

CNN has learned that the committee has reached out to a longtime friend of Ford named Leland Ingham Keyser.
On Saturday night, her lawyer, Howard Walsh, released a statement to CNN and the Senate Judiciary Committee..
“Simply put,” Walsh said, “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”
The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford’s.
Keyser is the latest person alleged to be at the party to say she has no recollection of it.
“I understand that you have been identified as an individual who was in attendance at a party that occurred circa 1982 described in a recent Washington Post article,” a committee staffer wrote Keyser earlier this week.

https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status...73765157199872

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...65_normal.jpeg Jonathan H. Adler ✔ @jadler1969

Well, this is interesting.
Worth noting that false communications to SJC are punishable under 18 USC 1001 https://twitter.com/keithcrc/status/1043663681245143046 …
9:31 PM - Sep 22, 2018

• 99
• 70 people are talking about this

So now we have three witnesses, plus Brett Kavanaugh, agreeing that this party never happened, much less the incident. And all have done so under penalty of prosecution for providing a false statement to Congress. This means the only person not on the record is Christine Ford.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...dX7_normal.jpg https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f1fa-1f1f8.png BuildingTrumpmore @k_ovfefe

· 22h

From CNN: lifelong friend of Dr Ford who she claimed was at the mythical party doesn't know Kavanaugh & doesn't remember being at a party with him pic.twitter.com/8myQTitA9w
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dnvf7RzX...jpg&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...ZDv_normal.jpg Bama Mom @Tav144
Interesting that she was formerly married to liberal former FOX personality Bob Beckel...https://heavy.com/entertainment/2017/01/leland-keyser-bob-beckel-ex-wife-ingham-golf-kids-family-the-five-fox-news-married/ …
9:43 PM - Sep 22, 2018
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/10436...name=144x144_2


Leland Keyser, Bob Beckel’s Ex-Wife: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Leland Keyser, a former pro golfer, was married to The Five co-anchor Bob Beckel from 1992 to 2002. Here is a look at her life and career.
heavy.com

• 8
• See Bama Mom's other Tweets

What makes this so sweet is that Ms. Keyser seems to have once been Mrs. Bob Beckel.
It seems that Ford can add one additional symptom to her unique variety of sexual trauma…no one else remembers anything about the event either.

Kavanaugh Round-Up

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/09/22/breaking.-arent-going-believe-senate-gop-just-did…or-maybe-will
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...sley-just-foad
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...naughs-accuser
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ted-kavanaugh/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...legation-land/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ett-kavanaugh/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ett-kavanaugh/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...cans-back-fold
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...telling-truth/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...litical-smear/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ans-far-behind
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...nd-gain-story/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...serial-killer/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ndays-hearing/


https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...y-game-changer

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn0AEhvW0AMA5Hh.jpg

THURSDAY: HER TURN...

Second Kavanaugh Accuser Materializes Alleging Sexual Misconduct At Yale

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defa...&itok=yLKBqSdb

"I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married"

Sun, 09/23/2018 - 21:28
8 SHARES

A second woman has come forward to accuse Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct - this time while he was a Yale university during the 1983-1984 academic year, according to a new report by Ronan Farrow of the New Yorker.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defa...ges/kavan3.jpg

The woman, Deborah Ramirez, 53, claims that Kavanaugh waved his penis in her face during a drunken dormitory party and "caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away."

For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty. After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said.

Specifically, Ramirez recalls "a penis being in front of my face," and that despite being incredibly inebriated, someone encouraging her to "kiss it."
Despite acknowledging "significant gaps in her memories of the evening" due to being incredibly drunk, Ramirez then recalls someone yelling down a hallway "Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Debbie's face!" since kids talk like that.

She recalled that the party took place in a suite at Lawrance Hall, in the part of Yale known as Old Campus, and that a small group of students decided to play a drinking game together. “We were sitting in a circle,” she said. “People would pick who drank.” Ramirez was chosen repeatedly, she said, and quickly became inebriated. At one point, she said, a male student pointed a gag plastic penis in her direction. Later, she said, she was on the floor, foggy and slurring her words, as that male student and another stood nearby. (Ramirez identified the two male onlookers, but, at her request, The New Yorker is not naming them.)
A third male student then exposed himself to her. “I remember a penis being in front of my face,” she said. “I knew that’s not what I wanted, even in that state of mind.” She recalled remarking, “That’s not a real penis,” and the other students laughing at her confusion and taunting her, one encouraging her to “kiss it.” She said that she pushed the person away, touching it in the process. Ramirez, who was raised a devout Catholic, in Connecticut, said that she was shaken. “I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married,” she said. “I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated.” She remembers Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his pants. “Brett was laughing,” she said. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.” She recalled another male student shouting about the incident. “Somebody yelled down the hall, ‘Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Debbie’s face,’ ” she said. “It was his full name. I don’t think it was just ‘Brett.’ And I remember hearing and being mortified that this was out there.” -New Yorker

Meanwhile, lawyer Michael Avenatti - best known for representing adult entertainer Stephanie Clifford, said on Twitter that he represents a woman "with credible information regarding Judge Kavanaugh," and that his client is not Ramirez.
In a statement, Kavanaugh wrote, "This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple. I look forward to testifying on Thursday about the truth, and defending my good name—and the reputation for character and integrity I have spent a lifetime building—against these last-minute allegations."
Meanwhile, White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said in a statement: "This 35-year-old, uncorroborated claim is the latest in a coordinated smear campaign by the Democrats designed to tear down a good man. This claim is denied by all who were said to be present and is wholly inconsistent with what many women and men who knew Judge Kavanaugh at the time in college say."

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...isconduct-yale

I had no idea DemoQuacks were such prudish straight and narrow drunks in the 80's.

I'm from a few years earlier, the Magnificent and Wild 70's, when naked male students streaked the campus, and we all ran out to watch and cheer them on and this was in a pretty middle of the road "conservative" state no matter what political party you voted for.

I'm getting weary of these DemoQuack stories and tales from high school and college private parties, and I have no respect for any woman who wants to talk about anything like this to try and ruin someone's career decades later.

Here's where I stand, I support Brett Kavanaugh, even if everything that's been told in true. Stuff happens when you're young, you do stuff especially when you've been drinking a lot, that you wouldn't otherwise do, and only do at that age and in those circumstances. So this Republican supports Kavanaugh even if he did try and fail to make out with Blasey or even if on a dare he dropped his pants and waved his pecker at Ramirez. No, I don't support the actions, no boys and young men shouldn't do these things, but the fact is they do when they're young, drunk and stupid, and then they grow up and become wonderful, hard-working men who deserve what they have earned without reference, taint or tarnish from what they did as teenagers.

What kind of people want to destroy someone's life over something they did or probably didn't even do to begin with when they were kids? I don't get it. DemoQuacks are prudes, hypocrites, and phonies.

Confirm Kavanaugh and shut this nonsense down.

She’s Lying

The Blasey Ford case is only the tip of the iceberg.

September 24, 2018
By Apolo Villalobos

Kavanaugh’s accuser is lying.
Her story has so many holes, it looks like Swiss cheese. Her ever-increasing demands, made through her feminist attorney -- a ringer for Skeletor -- and her whiny excuses for not attending (she says she’s afraid of flying -- a psychologist who has never received therapy for this very easily treatable phobia?) are simply a transparent tactic to delay, if not derail, the confirmation until the blue wave of the election paralyzes all future nominations. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure this out. Needless to say that Da Sisters are behind her in full shrieking mode.

https://www.americanthinker.com/imag.../209151_5_.png And, of course, the shrieking feminists insist that she should be automatically believed, she should not be “bullied” (i.e., questioned, or doubted). “The poor rape victim” meme has totally saturated society, to the point that it is considered to be the height of boorishness to question the veracity of an accusation of rape. In this day and age, accusation is simply enough to derail careers, especially since the leftist media is complicit. The accuser must not be doubted. After all, women are incapable of lying. Or manipulation.
Here are a number of instances where a so-called rape victim lied through her teeth, whatever her motivation might have been:

• A story from across the pond involved a young Brit whose girlfriend frequently emailed him for casual sex, but when he rejected her, she cried rape. The defense was able to obtain the emails at the last minute, which the prosecutor had suppressed from discovery. Another, almost identical case, again from Britain, also surfaced.
• A Coast Guard officer was convicted of rape. The appeal overturned the conviction, noting that the trial had been saturated with politically-correct zealots hellbent on conviction.
• A student got only (of course!) one year in jail after pleading guilty to making false rape allegations against two Sacred Heart University football players.
• Musician Drake was accused of sexual assault by a porn star. He’s suing her.
• A woman was engaged in a sexual threesome. When it began to be filmed she became irate and left, then told her boyfriend that she had been raped. The boyfriend, with some friends, visited one of the men and killed him.
• Remember Roe vs. Wade? It was based on the lie that the victim had been gang-raped.

Occasionally, such false accusations blow up in the faces of both the accusers and the accompanying propagandist media. We saw this in the infamous Rolling Stone hoax, and the equally infamous Duke lacrosse team case (where the prosecutor and the police deliberately -- yes, deliberately -- falsified facts. See the excellent documentary, Fantastic Lies).
This is to leave out the accusations by ex-wives that the husbands whom they are divorcing molested their children.
Actually, cases like those above are commonplace, they just do not get the publicity that they deserve, simply because they go against the politically-correct dogma that all men are rapists and that we live in a rape culture. Their numbers are far from few, running easily into the hundreds. And not only are fraudulent accusations rampant, but what is worse, much, much worse, are the hundreds of wrongful convictions, based of hoaxes. And no one takes up their cause.

Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...hes_lying.html

Vote and move forward with Judge Kavanaugh

It does not take a lot to destroy a man these days.

September 24, 2018
By Silvio Canto, Jr.

We were hit on Sunday night by new allegations that Judge Brett Kavanaugh has a woman problem. The allegations are brand new and it may take a day or two to clear the dust.
It appears that another woman remembers something from his college days.

https://www.americanthinker.com/imag.../209153_5_.png I guess that we know now what the delay for Christine Braley Ford to testify was all about. She was buying time to allow the other story to develop. Maybe I'm too cynical but it smells like the delay was planned to give others more time.
The GOP was trying to show respect for Ford. On the other hand, Ford was being told to delay, like the coach who goes to the mound to give the guy in the bullpen a little bit more to get ready.
According to Power Line, the whole point is to feed the narrative that Judge Kavanaugh was a repeat offender. They want to turn Judge Kavanaugh into a Bill Cosby or Harvey Weinstein character. Didn't he pass several FBI background checks?
Now, it 's up to the GOP. They can continue the farce and invite the new accuser or take a vote and move on. If they take a vote, they will have to count on every GOP vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh. If they delay this, then they run the risk of losing the Senate and never putting this good man in the court.
At the same time, my instincts tell me that there are a lot of women watching all of this Kavanaugh show and wondering: Is my husband next? Or my son? Or my father?
In other words, it does not take a lot to destroy a man these days. In fact, just accuse him of something that can't be proven and you have a friendly media willing to carry the accuser's water.
This is why I continue to believe that this overreach will explode in the Democrats' faces. Add to all of this the names of Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Senator Tom Carper of Delaware, and DNC # 2 Keith Ellison and the party may regret the whole thing.
Worst of all, whatever happened to justice for the accused? I guess that it does not apply to any conservative who believes that abortion should be settled by states rather than justices.
I repeat: There is a woman out there wondering if her husband is next. She will not be voting for the Democrats in a few weeks.

PS: You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.

Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...kavanaugh.html

Keyser would have remembered the party

There is every reason to believe that if Ford, Kavanaugh, Judge, PJ, and Keyser had been at a party together Keyser would have remembered it.

September 24, 2018
By Tom Trinko

As of this moment, four of the five people Christine Blasey Ford says were at the party where she claims she was sexually assaulted have denied there ever being such a party. Only Ford herself, also the only person not to speak under oath, says that this party occurred, and only she says that she was sexually assaulted.
The most recent witness, Leland Keyser, has no recollection of the party and has never met Kavanaugh.
This is very compelling in that not only doesn’t she have any reason to lie, she’s actually a lifelong friend of Blasey Ford and a staunch liberal who doesn’t want Kavanaugh on the court.
Ford’s lawyer responded to this bombshell saying:

“It’s not surprising that Ms. Keyser has no recollection of the evening as they did not discuss it. It’s also unremarkable that Ms. Keyser does not remember attending a specific gathering 30 years ago at which nothing of consequence happened to her”

https://www.americanthinker.com/imag.../209271_5_.pngIt can be shown that this statement is not in fact logically plausible.
According to Ford, after she managed to escape from Kavanaugh she fled to a bathroom where she locked herself in. At some unspecified later time she left the party.
That means there are three options about how Ford and Keyser interacted after the alleged assault:

1. Keyser encountered Ford locked in the bathroom and very upset
2. Keyser encountered a very upset Ford as she left
3. Keyser discovered that Ford had left after the fact

Every one of these options involve memorable events which would give Keyser a strong memory of the party.
In option one Keyser would find her good friend locked in a bathroom and seriously traumatized. Furthermore, Ford, according to her own account, didn’t tell anyone about the assault, which means that when Keyser asked about what the problem was Ford wouldn’t answer.
Given that Keyser was a good friend of Ford, the fact that Ford was distraught enough to lock herself in a bathroom and refuse to share the problem would be a pretty memorable event for Keyser especially since Ford, according to her account and her lawyer’s statement, didn’t ever give Keyser an explanation.
The fact that Keyser would have presumably pursued the matter next time she saw her good friend Ford and have been rebuffed would also be a good reason for Keyser to remember the party.
In option two, Keyser would see her good friend rushing out of the house visibly distraught. But once again, according to Ford’s account, Ford would provide no explanation to Keyser.
Here, Keyser would certainly consider a good friend rushing out of a party while being clearly upset and unwilling to talk about it, then or later, as a very memorable event.
In option three, Keyser would suddenly find herself alone with three boys. Finding out that her good friend left without even talking to her and refused to answer questions about it later would be good reason for Keyser to remember the party.
There is no scenario where Ford’s actions, as she describes them, would not have created a memorable situation for her good friend Leland Keyser.
Hence, contrary to the lawyers claim, there is every reason to believe that if Ford, Kavanaugh, Judge, PJ, and Keyser had been at a party together Keyser would have remembered it.

You can read more of Tom's rants at his blog, Conversations about the obvious, and feel free to follow him on Twitter.

Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...the_party.html

“We were sitting in a circle,” she said. “People would pick who drank.” Ramirez was chosen repeatedly, she said, and quickly became inebriated. At one point, she said, a male student pointed a gag plastic penis in her direction.

----------------------------

So this woman was drunk as a skunk, in a room with a bunch of drunk males and a plastic penis? She could have walked out and left the room at any time. She put herself in this situation and no one raped her. Women show their stuff...are men going to come forward traumatized by seeing boobies?

A bunch of drunk teens do this at parties. It has gotten worse and look at what they do at Spring Break. Do we now go after every high school teenager who drank and did this stuff? There are hundreds of thousands of them!

What about the women...I have know some raunchy woman in my life that are just as bad.

Look at Mardi Gras what they do!

Ford and feminism

Have feminist attempts to criminalize all men succeeded?

September 24, 2018
By Alan Bergstein

There's more to Professor Ford's accusation of sexual harassment by Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh than merely an obvious Democratic attack on a Trump appointee. It signals that 50 years of radical feminism's unending attempts to bash men as the "less than" sex have succeeded. The claims of any woman, no matter how maniacal, how berserk, how unbelievable, regarding her treatment at the hands of any man at whom she decides to point an accusatory finger, will now be given new "female" credibility. Women cannot lie, and men cannot tell the truth.
Hawaiian senator Mazie Hirono told the men of this nation to "Shut up!" And she got away with it. Neither the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Chicago Tribune editorialized on this sexist bashing by one of the most important elected officials in the land. Our own senator, Kirsten Gillibrand stated that: "Forcing her into a sham hearing is silencing her!" So, according to our own brainless congresswoman, just asking for a woman to testify under oath against a man she hazily claims assaulted her over 36 years ago is actually silencing her.
And yet Gillibrand, who regrettably represents close to 20 million New York staters, tells us that there is no need to have an accuser render a sworn account of her claims. Well, no.... if she's accusing a man of whatever, even if her unfounded charges cause him to lose his job, destroys his future, family, and life. So we're being bashed over the head by our progressive leaders and their media right hands that "women don't lie about being sexually assaulted." Tell that to the young men on https://www.americanthinker.com/imag.../209272_5_.pngthe Duke University lacrosse team who were thrown out of the school, denounced and debased on false allegations of raping a woman at a party. Years later she was proven to have lied, they were exonerated and won huge lawsuits against the school. But still today, "Women don't lie," is the watchword for the movement.
Just how will this affect our judicial system when women jurors, in a courtroom run by progressive woman judges, are told by defense attorneys that to find female defendants guilty based on the testimony of men would be a violation of their human rights as women? And what scenes can we imagine taking place in secure jury rooms where men are attacked by women wearing pussy hats for declaring their intentions of violating women's rights by voting thumbs up to convict women? Sadly, the next generation will have to muddle through this challenge to our democracy. Perhaps it's time for men to seriously start thinking of wearing the pants once again in their families, communities, in Congress... and do so proudly.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...#ixzz5S1OxQ0UG
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog..._feminism.html