Thread: Christine Blasey Ford Published Eight studies about “Abortion Pill” and Works for Com

Christine Blasey Ford Published Eight studies about “Abortion Pill” and Works for Company that Produces It

by Jim Hoft September 20, 2018 232 Comments



Professor Christine Blasey Ford, while working for Stanford University, was also affiliated with Corcept Therapeutics (2006 – 2011). Her new Wikipedia page describes her as “director of biostatistics at Corcept.” Corcept Therapeutics Inc. (CORT) has a $1.66 billion market cap (worth), with current annual sales of $216 million.

Liberals and feminists are very worried that Judge Brett Kavanaugh may participate in reversing Roe v. Wade. Christine Blasey wants to stop Kavanaugh from reaching the country’s highest court.
According to an article at Philly.com, “ Alan Schatzberg, a Stanford University psychiatrist and scientist, co-founded Corcept Therapeutics in 1998 to explore whether mifepristone could help treat major depression.” He left the company in 2007, when the company changed direction (but continued to explore uses for mifepristone).

Corcept Therapeutics has only one product: Korlym (mifepristone). The “abortion pill”, otherwise known as RU-486 or “Mifeprex” (brand name), is mifepristone.
From Wikipedia:


Christine Blasey Ford participated in 8 published studies, which researched uses for the “abortion pill” or mifepristone. In five of these studies, Professor Ford is listed as affiliated with Corcept Therapeutics (as well as Stanford University). See study descriptions below. Several list her email address.
Korlym is approved by the FDA for individuals with Cushing’s syndrome who also have type 2 diabetes (not diabetes only). Cushing’s Syndrome is a rare disease. Based on 2002 prevalence data, it was extrapolated (estimated) that there were 587 individuals with Cushing’s Syndrome in the USA. The article mentioned above describes 5000 individuals might be eligible for Korlym.

Although Korlym is only approved for Cushing’s Syndrome and diabetes ONLY, it is widely available online as an “abortion pill” or “Emergency Contraceptive and Abortifacient”. See attached screenshots:

Descriptions/screen-prints of published studies shown on the following pages, more recent studies first. Christine Blasey was an author listed in the following studies.







Hat tip Christine



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...t-produces-it/

What Is She Smoking?… Christine Blasey Ford Attorney Wants to Bring in ‘Witnesses’ to Alleged Crime with No Known Date or Place

by Jim Hoft September 19, 2018
372 Comments



Here are the facts about Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh:

— She doesn’t know when it was.
— She doesn’t know what year it took place
— She doesn’t know what month it took place
— She has no idea where it took place
— She doesn’t know if 4 boys were there
— It could have been 2 boys?
— Three of the accused boys deny the charges
— She doesn’t think any females were there
— Wait, maybe there was a female there?

Judge Kavanaugh already stated this week that he wasn’t even at the party in question.

Senator Feinstein will not release the original letter she received from Christine Ford.
And as Cristina wrote earlier — Christine Ford’s attorney Lisa Banks wants to bring in multiple witnesses.

THERE WERE NO WITNESSES!

Ford does not even know when or where it took place!
How could there be any witnesses.

And Christine Blasey Ford told the Washington Post she NEVER TOLD ANYONE about the abusive incident.

But this Hillary supporting attorney believes she can shut down the US senate to bring in witnesses to a 36-year-old crime at an unknown place at an unknown time?

What is this loon smoking?


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...date-or-place/

SENATE JUDICIARY CONTACTED the 3 Male Witnesses at Party Named by Accuser Ford — ALL DENIED ACCUSATIONS Under Penalty of Felony!

September 20, 2018, 3:54 pm by Jim Hoft 285 Comments

The Senate Judiciary account went on a tweetstorm regarding their investigation on the 36-year-old allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford.

These tweets were posted this afternoon on Thursday after a weeklong media frenzy against Judge Kavanaugh.
Blasey Ford now says she wants to testify but doesn’t know when.

Senate Judiciary ✔ @senjudiciary

· 12h
Replying to @senjudiciary
Democrats sat on Dr. Ford’s allegations for MONTHS & did nothing. They STILL haven’t turned over the original letter they received from Dr. Ford. Why would Dems sit on allegations for months and then not even participate in the Committee’s investigation?https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/scotus_ranking-member-refuses-to-disclose-secret-allegations-even-after-dr-ford-goes-public …


SCOTUS | Ranking Member Refuses to Disclose Secret Allegations Even After Dr. Ford Goes Public

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
judiciary.senate.gov

Senate Judiciary ✔ @senjudiciary

On Monday, staff interviewed Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony. Democratic staff was invited and could have asked any question of Judge Kavanaugh. They declined to participate.
1:18 PM - Sep 20, 2018
3,677

2,415 people are talking about this

The committee interviewed Judge Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth — the three men accused by Christine Blasey Ford.
ALL THREE OF THE MEN under penalty of a felony DENIED THE ACCUSATIONS By Ford!

On Monday, staff interviewed Judge Kavanaugh under penalty of felony. Democratic staff was invited and could have asked any question of Judge Kavanaugh. They declined to participate… Staff contacted Mark Judge and obtained a statement under penalty of felony. Staff contacted third person allegedly at party described by Dr. Ford and obtained a statement under penalty of felony. Staff contacted fourth person allegedly at party.
On the other hand the Senate Judiciary Committee contacted a woman and schoolmate who claimed on social media that she had info on the alleged assault.
That woman has not yet responded to the committee’s request.

Senate Judiciary ✔ @senjudiciary

· 12h
Replying to @senjudiciary
Staff contacted Mark Judge and obtained a statement under penalty of felony. Staff contacted third person allegedly at party described by Dr. Ford and obtained a statement under penalty of felony. Staff contacted fourth person allegedly at party.

Senate Judiciary ✔ @senjudiciary

Staff have contacted a schoolmate who claimed on social media this week to have info related to Dr. Ford’s allegations. Committee has not yet heard back.https://www.npr.org/2018/09/20/649787076/kavanaugh-accuser-classmate-that-it-happened-or-not-i-have-no-idea?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_ campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20180920 …
1:19 PM - Sep 20, 2018




Kavanaugh Accuser Classmate: 'That It Happened Or Not, I Have No Idea'

After saying on social media that the incident "did happen," a former classmate of Christine Blasey Ford tells NPR she does not have first-hand knowledge of it.
npr.org
1,544 931 people are talking about this

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...lty-of-felony/

Youtube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoOB0ncydMA

Judiciary Committee's Lindsey Graham: "I'm Not Going To Ruin Judge Kavanaugh's Life

Insiders claim Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer are set to report a late twist in Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation... MORE...
NEW YORKER to publish account of a new woman and a 'dildo'...
She is 'Never Trump', says a source. But best friend will say 'She never told me!'... Developing...

ANOTHER WOMAN?

BREAKING. Kavanaugh Accuser’s Third Witness Is Located and Her Testimony Is a Game Changer

Posted at 9:57 pm on September 22, 2018 by streiff

So far, Christine Ford, the California professor who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of groping her 37 years ago, has been less than forthcoming with anything that approaches a verifiable detail of her experience. She doesn’t know what year it happened. She doesn’t know what month it happened. She doesn’t know where the house was or whose parents it belonged to. She doesn’t know how she got home. Those are huge, gaping holes in any account of anything and yet, Ford’s supporters shamelessly contend that this is a natural reaction to this simulacrum of a trauma. One bit of information she has provided, oddly enough, are the names of the other three teens in the house at the time.
Two of them are male. Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth have both provided letters, via their attorneys, to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of any party such as the one Ford describes.
There is a third witness, the young woman that accompanied her to the alleged party and who the young Christine Blasey abandoned in a house filled with drunk males who, according to Ford, had rape on their minds. Now the young woman has been located. And she has provided a statement, by way of her attorney:

CNN has learned that the committee has reached out to a longtime friend of Ford named Leland Ingham Keyser.
On Saturday night, her lawyer, Howard Walsh, released a statement to CNN and the Senate Judiciary Committee..
“Simply put,” Walsh said, “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”
The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford’s.
Keyser is the latest person alleged to be at the party to say she has no recollection of it.
“I understand that you have been identified as an individual who was in attendance at a party that occurred circa 1982 described in a recent Washington Post article,” a committee staffer wrote Keyser earlier this week.

https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status...73765157199872

Jonathan H. Adler ✔ @jadler1969

Well, this is interesting.
Worth noting that false communications to SJC are punishable under 18 USC 1001 https://twitter.com/keithcrc/status/1043663681245143046 …
9:31 PM - Sep 22, 2018

• 99
• 70 people are talking about this

So now we have three witnesses, plus Brett Kavanaugh, agreeing that this party never happened, much less the incident. And all have done so under penalty of prosecution for providing a false statement to Congress. This means the only person not on the record is Christine Ford.

BuildingTrumpmore @k_ovfefe

· 22h

From CNN: lifelong friend of Dr Ford who she claimed was at the mythical party doesn't know Kavanaugh & doesn't remember being at a party with him pic.twitter.com/8myQTitA9w

Bama Mom @Tav144
Interesting that she was formerly married to liberal former FOX personality Bob Beckel...https://heavy.com/entertainment/2017/01/leland-keyser-bob-beckel-ex-wife-ingham-golf-kids-family-the-five-fox-news-married/ …
9:43 PM - Sep 22, 2018



Leland Keyser, Bob Beckel’s Ex-Wife: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Leland Keyser, a former pro golfer, was married to The Five co-anchor Bob Beckel from 1992 to 2002. Here is a look at her life and career.
heavy.com

• 8
• See Bama Mom's other Tweets

What makes this so sweet is that Ms. Keyser seems to have once been Mrs. Bob Beckel.
It seems that Ford can add one additional symptom to her unique variety of sexual trauma…no one else remembers anything about the event either.

Kavanaugh Round-Up

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/09/22/breaking.-arent-going-believe-senate-gop-just-did…or-maybe-will
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...sley-just-foad
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...naughs-accuser
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ted-kavanaugh/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...legation-land/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ett-kavanaugh/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ett-kavanaugh/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...cans-back-fold
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...telling-truth/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...litical-smear/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ans-far-behind
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...nd-gain-story/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...serial-killer/
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ndays-hearing/


https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...y-game-changer

THURSDAY: HER TURN...

Second Kavanaugh Accuser Materializes Alleging Sexual Misconduct At Yale



"I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married"

Sun, 09/23/2018 - 21:28
8 SHARES

A second woman has come forward to accuse Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct - this time while he was a Yale university during the 1983-1984 academic year, according to a new report by Ronan Farrow of the New Yorker.



The woman, Deborah Ramirez, 53, claims that Kavanaugh waved his penis in her face during a drunken dormitory party and "caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away."

For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty. After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said.

Specifically, Ramirez recalls "a penis being in front of my face," and that despite being incredibly inebriated, someone encouraging her to "kiss it."
Despite acknowledging "significant gaps in her memories of the evening" due to being incredibly drunk, Ramirez then recalls someone yelling down a hallway "Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Debbie's face!" since kids talk like that.

She recalled that the party took place in a suite at Lawrance Hall, in the part of Yale known as Old Campus, and that a small group of students decided to play a drinking game together. “We were sitting in a circle,” she said. “People would pick who drank.” Ramirez was chosen repeatedly, she said, and quickly became inebriated. At one point, she said, a male student pointed a gag plastic penis in her direction. Later, she said, she was on the floor, foggy and slurring her words, as that male student and another stood nearby. (Ramirez identified the two male onlookers, but, at her request, The New Yorker is not naming them.)
A third male student then exposed himself to her. “I remember a penis being in front of my face,” she said. “I knew that’s not what I wanted, even in that state of mind.” She recalled remarking, “That’s not a real penis,” and the other students laughing at her confusion and taunting her, one encouraging her to “kiss it.” She said that she pushed the person away, touching it in the process. Ramirez, who was raised a devout Catholic, in Connecticut, said that she was shaken. “I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married,” she said. “I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated.” She remembers Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his pants. “Brett was laughing,” she said. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.” She recalled another male student shouting about the incident. “Somebody yelled down the hall, ‘Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Debbie’s face,’ ” she said. “It was his full name. I don’t think it was just ‘Brett.’ And I remember hearing and being mortified that this was out there.” -New Yorker

Meanwhile, lawyer Michael Avenatti - best known for representing adult entertainer Stephanie Clifford, said on Twitter that he represents a woman "with credible information regarding Judge Kavanaugh," and that his client is not Ramirez.
In a statement, Kavanaugh wrote, "This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple. I look forward to testifying on Thursday about the truth, and defending my good name—and the reputation for character and integrity I have spent a lifetime building—against these last-minute allegations."
Meanwhile, White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said in a statement: "This 35-year-old, uncorroborated claim is the latest in a coordinated smear campaign by the Democrats designed to tear down a good man. This claim is denied by all who were said to be present and is wholly inconsistent with what many women and men who knew Judge Kavanaugh at the time in college say."

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...isconduct-yale

I had no idea DemoQuacks were such prudish straight and narrow drunks in the 80's.

I'm from a few years earlier, the Magnificent and Wild 70's, when naked male students streaked the campus, and we all ran out to watch and cheer them on and this was in a pretty middle of the road "conservative" state no matter what political party you voted for.

I'm getting weary of these DemoQuack stories and tales from high school and college private parties, and I have no respect for any woman who wants to talk about anything like this to try and ruin someone's career decades later.

Here's where I stand, I support Brett Kavanaugh, even if everything that's been told in true. Stuff happens when you're young, you do stuff especially when you've been drinking a lot, that you wouldn't otherwise do, and only do at that age and in those circumstances. So this Republican supports Kavanaugh even if he did try and fail to make out with Blasey or even if on a dare he dropped his pants and waved his pecker at Ramirez. No, I don't support the actions, no boys and young men shouldn't do these things, but the fact is they do when they're young, drunk and stupid, and then they grow up and become wonderful, hard-working men who deserve what they have earned without reference, taint or tarnish from what they did as teenagers.

What kind of people want to destroy someone's life over something they did or probably didn't even do to begin with when they were kids? I don't get it. DemoQuacks are prudes, hypocrites, and phonies.

Confirm Kavanaugh and shut this nonsense down.