Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)

    Coal Shortages in China Will Spark More Foreign Takeovers of

    Monday, July 21st, 2008

    How Coal Shortages in China Will Spark More Foreign Takeovers of U.S. Assets

    By Jason Simpkins
    Associate Editor

    The recent buyout of Alpha Natural Resources Inc. (ANR) by Cleveland Cliffs Inc. (CLF) could ignite more than $50 billion worth of M&A deals in the U.S. coal industry over the next few years as Mainland China rushes to solve a major energy shortfall.

    "In the next 12 months there will be an unprecedented amount of both domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions," Wilbur Ross, chairman of International Coal Group Inc. (ICO), told Bloomberg News. "U.S. reserves are undervalued relative to those in the rest of the world."

    Ross, the billionaire investor who helped consolidate the U.S. coal and steel industries, considers this the start of a round of mergers that will prove Cleveland-Cliffs prescient in its Alpha bid.

    The top eight U.S. coal producers, which are worth more than $50 billion, are possible takeover targets for a country desperate for resources. And compared with China, American coal companies are bargains.

    China Shenhua Energy Co., Asia’s biggest coal company is valued at $15.52 for every ton of coal it holds, compared to $2.11 a ton for Peabody Energy Corp. (BTU), and $1.76 for International Coal, Bloomberg reported.

    At a point when the U.S. economy is slowing under the weight of a growing financial crisis, and spiking food-and-energy prices, escalating growth in the developing economies around the world has ignited a bull market for coal that analysts believe could last for at least 10 years.

    And that’s going to lead to a major shift in the ownership of coal-related assets. Enter the Red Dragon: China’s Coal Crisis

    China, home to 1.3 billion people and the world’s fastest-growing economy, counts upon coal for 80% of its energy needs. Indeed, it’s the world’s largest coal producer, as well as its largest consumer. Coal demand in China jumped nearly 9% last year - meaning the Eastern power now accounts for a full quarter of the world’s annual coal consumption. So it’s no surprise at all that the growing global discrepancy between supply and demand is most acute in China.

    Vic Svec, a senior executive at Peabody Energy, the world’s largest private-sector coal producer, referred to China’s ability to influence the price of commodities as a "butterfly effect." In other words, "demand from Beijing can ripple back to Queensland, Australia, or Gillette, Wyoming," Svec told The Wall Street Journal.

    Svec’s right. Five years ago, China exported 83 million metric tons more coal than it imported. But last year, the nation’s surplus dropped to a meager 2 million metric tons. That means more than 80 million metric tons of coal (about 12% of the internationally traded market)has been taken out of global circulation.

    That’s a big reason why the highly coveted low-sulfur coal from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana has climbed from less than $10 a ton last year, to nearly $15 a ton - a price gain of 50%. And why thermal coal prices at Australia’s Newcastle port, a benchmark for the Asian market, have more than doubled this year.

    Ironically, the high prices demand and China helped create, have left the country on on the brink of a potentially disastrous energy shortfall. Overseas coal has simply become too expensive for China to import.

    The Asian nation imported just 21.55 million metric tons of coal in the first six months of this year, down 20.4% from the same period last year, according to China’s customs bureau.

    Now, the county is suffering through its worst power shortage in decades because of soaring demand and inadequate supplies.

    Nearly half of China’s provinces have started to ration electricity. Last month, the government raised electricity tariffs by 5% but prices are still 30% lower than current coal prices would imply, according to BNP Paribas SA (OTC ADR: BNPQY) estimates. And that has forced many smaller energy producers out of business.

    The government in Beijing tried to deal with the matter by imposing price controls on electricity that make it impossible for energy suppliers to raise their prices, even as they pay more for natural resources that have skyrocketed in price. But that measure is driving smaller producers out of business.

    "Large state-owned power companies have no choice but to keep operating and we have seen strong power generation growth from them so far this year despite the high coal prices," Daisy Zhang, an analyst with BNP Paribas in Shanghai, told the Financial Times. "But smaller power plants have been shutting down because the more they operate, the more [money] they lose."

    Figures from the China Electricity Council for the first five months of this year show that out of a total of 4,800 power plants, 1,800 suffered net losses over the period. The overwhelming majority of the losers were fueled by coal.

    The government has also capped the price of coal but that hasn’t alleviated the pressure energy suppliers either.

    "If a coal company wants to raise prices it just issues a notice and that’s it. There’s no way [to refuse] even if you don’t agree," one coal purchaser with a power plant told the Shanghai Securities News last week.

    The newspaper also cited industry officials as saying that coal companies have been refusing to honor contracts, thereby forcing power firms to buy from the spot market, where prices are considerably higher.

    While previously around 80% of contracts were honored, the figure has dropped to 60%, the Shanghai Securities News said.

    Another problem is the growing number of coal exports. Beijing has capped the price of coal sold in its home market, but global prices continue to rise, which makes exporting coal far more profitable. The difference between domestic and global coal prices was about $54.70 per metric ton in the week ended on July 4, China Business News reported.

    China exported 25.49 million metric tons of coal in that time, a 10.2% increase from the year prior. In fact, China’s coal exports soared 83.5% year-over-year in June to 6.99 million metric tons, the highest monthly total since March 2005, even as the nation suffered through a shortage of the fuel that has resulted in blackouts across the country and a multitude of energy providers being shut down.

    While many in the industry anticipate Beijing will raise energy tariffs further after the Olympic games, few believe that will be enough. It seems apparent that the solution for China’s coal crisis is to get more coal, and many believe it will through cross-border acquisitions.
    China Ready to Pounce on U.S. Coal Suppliers

    The total volume of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) dropped by 36% in the first half of 2008, the slowest start since 2005, according to Dealogic. But while deal volume in the United States tumbled 40%, transaction volumes jumped 5% in Asia.

    The pickup in Asian transactions is largely attributable to Chinese companies, which announced plans to buy a combined $42 billion in foreign assets. That’s more than five times the amount Chinese companies spent on M&A in 2007, according to Dealogic. It’s also equivalent to the combined volume of all the foreign takeovers by Chinese companies from 2000 to 2006.

    Also, while deal volume was down in most every sector, takeovers of energy and mining companies shot up 33% in the first six months of 2008. And that is only a small indication of things to come.

    The recent buyout of Alpha Natural Resources Inc. by Cleveland Cliffs Inc. could pave the way for more than $50 billion worth of M&A activity in the U.S. coal industry over the next few years, Bloomberg News reported.

    "People will look back on this as the first major U.S. event, not as overpriced," International Coal’s Ross said.

    Another factor to consider is the weakness of the dollar, which makes U.S. assets even more affordable for foreign companies.

    Cross border activity represented 40% of the $1.6 trillion in first-half deals and, according to Thomson Financial, "was aided by emerging economies with cash to spend and favorable exchange rates in the U.S."

    Chinese interests have already displayed an aptitude in acquiring resources vital to their growth. This was evidenced earlier this month, when Sinosteel won its hostile bid for Midwest Corp. Ltd., an Australian iron ore producer. Iron ore, the other key ingredient in steel production, has more than doubled in price over the past year.

    Also, in February, Aluminum Corp. of China (ADR: ACH) teamed up with Alcoa Inc. (AA) to buy a 12% stake in Rio Tinto PLC (RTP) hoping to thwart an unsolicited takeover from BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP) that would have give the Australian powerhouse control over a third of the world’s iron ore.

    So far, all but one of the 10 unsolicited hostile bids launched by Chinese firms on foreign targets since 2005 have focused on natural resources, according to The New York Times.

    "Working on China-related deals two or three years ago, I once gave a presentation to an interest group in which I said Chinese investors did not yet have the appetite for hostile takeovers," a Chinese lawyer working for an international law firm told China Economic Review. "But I am sure we will see a lot of more of these over the coming months and years. Chinese investors are increasingly sophisticated."

    The attorney went on to say that he was currently working on two commodities-related investments by Chinese firms in Australia - one of which could well end with an aggressive takeover bid. ... s.-assets/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Back in 2001 I was briefly in the coal industry news. I saw a press announcement from the KCA Kentucky Coal Association that there was a shortage of coal miners. I was in touch with a Ukrainian engineering firm WMG about acquiring land for a new language school in vinnicia. After I contacted the KCA it got written up in the news it even got into the New York Times. The Ukrainian miners the engineers had proved ineligible for use in underground as few spoke English. The KCA however used the threat to keep wages low. The miners unions wanted to make sure the Ukrainians were members and felt that the Americans could be recruited if they were offered enough money. An opportunity for Ukrainians still exists in above ground equipment repair and in used equipment export. A number of small doghole mines are using Mexican illegals as miners now.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts