Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member American-ized's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Monroe County, New York
    Posts
    3,530

    NV-OPINION: Letting the looters vote on who's for lunch

    Letting the looters vote on who's for lunch

    Las Vegas Review-Journal (Nevada)
    July 5, 2009 Sunday
    By Vin Suprynowicz

    A recent column on the euphemisms used by proponents of illegal-immigrant amnesty brought some irate buzzing from all seven members of the Young Anarchists' League.

    As near as I can figure, I'm "not allowed" to call for the enforcement of current immigration laws - or possibly of any laws, even those few (like the immigration laws) enacted within the powers delegated to Congress under the Constitution - because any such enforcement of the law amounts to some kind of "collectivist police state fascism" against people who have "not initiated force or fraud."

    I'm not sure how you cut through a border fence without "initiating force," or how you rent an apartment, register a car and go to work every day using someone else's Social Security number without "initiating fraud."

    I'm further "not allowed" to cite the cost to taxpayers of illegal alien trespassers swarming our public schools and hospitals, lest I be accused of somehow "supporting" tax subsidies for schools and hospitals.

    As it so happens, as a libertarian (not an anarchist) I do stand proudly and publicly against tax subsidies for schools and hospitals. People should pay their own way, and seek private charity if unable to do so. This would bring down costs for everyone. But that's not enough for my young anarchist friends. Instead, I am apparently obliged to pretend these current, swelling tax burdens do not exist.

    Perhaps this is an easier position to maintain if Mommy and Daddy still pay all your taxes, while allowing you to live in the basement, pounding your keyboard.

    I do remember hearing my friend Jackie Casey, former head of the college Libertarians at the University of Arizona, regaling me with tales of how she would join her mother to visit rental properties the family owned south of Tucson.

    Virtually every night, the human waves pouring north through the area would invade these residence units, using the sinks and other available surfaces for bodily activities which most of us reserve for actual toilets. Jackie and her mom would don elbow-length rubber gloves and go to work with their ammonia and bleach, cleaning up the human feces deposited by our noble wave of "harmless guest workers" who I'm "not allowed" to call trespassers because they "never initiative force or fraud" against anyone, merely going "where landlords and employers want them."

    "How does giving amnesty to a couple million knowing law-breakers not encourage the next set of knowing law-breakers, inviting them in no uncertain terms to 'Come on in and enjoy all the free stuff; after a few years you can get amnestied, too!'?" I asked in my June 14 column.

    "You say 'knowing law-breakers' like it's supposed to be a bad thing to knowingly break the law," objected one of my irate young correspondents. "Coming from someone who so vocally praises the American Revolution, this seems odd."

    Wow.

    Tara Cleveland was a lovely Las Vegas beauty pageant runner-up, an all-A student who wanted to go to law school and who sang at an annual "Spring Fling" employee party here at the Review-Journal 15 years ago. A short time later she was involved in a minor traffic accident in nearby North Las Vegas in which her car was struck by another car driven by two illegal Mexicans.

    These two honored Latino guest workers immediately thought, "What would brave freedom fighters like George Washington and Nathan Hale have done, in these circumstances?" So, of course, they ran away.

    Tara pursued and confronted the pair. At that point, channeling the spirits of brave patriots like John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, these two south-of-the-border freedom fighters shot Tara Cleveland in the face with a double-barrelled shotgun, which had the predictable effect of killing her. They then stole her car and ran away again, eventually reaching Mexico.

    It sure puts me in mind of the courage, the principles, the self-sacrifice of the men who risked their lives and their personal fortunes to fight the American Revolution, doesn't it you?

    One of the pair, Joseph Villezcas, was turned over by Mexican authorities in 2006, after they determined he was not actually a Mexican national. He was returned to Nevada and convicted of second-degree murder. But the other, now-33-year-old Fernando Garcia Valenzuela, received sanctuary in Mexico.

    Clearly a genius on the order of Ben Franklin, freedom-fighter Valenzuela was not about to stay home, though. He was arrested in California in 1998 and 1999, though authorities there did not link him to the outstanding Las Vegas warrant, possibly because he used fake ID and a fake date of birth - while somehow still not "initiating force or fraud," you understand.

    What an inspiration, that Fernando Garcia Valenzuela. They should put a flintlock in his hand and add his image to that statue of the Minuteman on Lexington green, don't you think?

    Valenzuela, who does not seem to be God's most brilliant criminal, was pulled over by police in Whiteville, Tenn., again last month, arrested on three felony drug charges, and - guess what? - finally linked to the 15-year-old warrant for the murder of Tara Cleveland.

    "I'm sure there are some individual illegal immigrants who are irresponsible," responded Buzz, one of the armchair anarchists who wrote to take me to task for my police-state leanings, last month. But "So what?" he continued. "I hear some native-born Americans are irresponsible, too."

    Where do these people live?

    The Federation for American Immigration Reform reports "criminal," criminal aliens now account for 29 percent of prisoners in federal Bureau of Prisons facilities. Even if there are now 30 million illegals in this country - sounds high to me, but who really knows? - that means they're overrepresented in our prisons by a factor of three. And none of those inmates is in there for their initial crime of violating the immigration laws, you understand.

    Taxpayers now spend more than $1 billion per year maintaining "criminal," criminal aliens in federal and state prisons, according to the U.S. Bureau of Justice.

    And ask those charged with collecting hospital bills how many illegal aliens make good faith efforts to pay the huge bills for the emergency rooms they use in lieu of paying a hundred bucks for a routine doctor visit.

    If there is no right to exclude looters from our midst; if we must allow free entry to anyone who wants to come to our community - and the smallest community is my house - and then allow them to decide how my stuff shall be redistributed "by majority vote," then freedom of a family of three can last only until four "guest workers" break down our front door and "vote" on how to divvy up the food in my refrigerator.

    I would wish Buzz a happy life in the Looters' Carnival he prescribes for all of us ... if only I were not forced at gunpoint to share it with him.

    Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Review-Journal and author of the books "The Ballad of Carl Drega" and "The Black Arrow." See www.vinsuprynowicz.com/ and http://www.lvrj.com/blogs/vin/

    http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/En ... 06&start=6
    Last edited by Jean; 09-28-2013 at 10:40 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    11,242
    I like this guy! And he is right on every point.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •