Thread: Drudge Report: APRIL FOOLS: 7 MILLION? Is the real Obamacare total just 858,000

Conservative Lady shared a link.




TRUTH BE TOLD: Matt Walsh to Obama, “Maybe Folks Are Mad Because You’re A Liar” - Conservative...
Getting 7.1 million people enrolled in Obamacare is no easy feat – because it is likely to be too good to be true. Matt Walsh points out the real reason why some people...

CONSERVATIVEINFIDEL.COM

TRUTH BE TOLD: Matt Walsh to Obama, “Maybe Folks Are Mad Because You’re A Liar”

Posted on Friday, April 4th, 2014 at 12:55 pm.
by: George Washington

Getting 7.1 million people enrolled in Obamacare is no easy feat – because it is likely to be too good to be true. Matt Walsh points out the real reason why some people might be so mad about this whole thing.

Dear Mr. Obama,
Congratulations on getting 7.1 million people enrolled in Obamacare before the March 31st deadline!
Not to muddy the festivities by harping on technicalities, but I thought I’d pass along just a few corrections, in case you plan on giving anymore speeches or anything:
Alright, by ‘March 31st’ you mean ‘sometime in April,’ and by ‘deadline’ you mean ‘suggestion which is subject to change.’
And, obviously, by ‘enrolled’ you mean ‘people who have filled some information out on a website.’
And by ’7.1 million’ you mean ‘probably like 858 thousand or something.’
In your speech on Tuesday, when you said that Obamacare is ‘the law’ and ‘it’s here to stay,’ you really meant that Obamacare is ‘a fluid and constantly adjusted set of unconstitutional decrees, which can be imposed or withdrawn by the Executive Branch at any point, for any reason, up to 21 times and counting.’ And by ‘here to stay,’ you actually meant to say that ‘most of it is neither here nor staying, because you don’t want America to feel the full brunt of it until after the midterm elections.’
You claimed that ‘more than 3 million young adults have gained insurance’ by staying on their parents’ plan. Even if that were true, it seems to take for granted that there’s anything remotely positive about the government forcing insurance companies to treat 25-year-old men and women like children. But, more importantly, it isn’t.
Indeed, when you said ‘more than 3 million,’ you really meant ‘extrapolations based on faulty estimates conjured up by Health and Human Services almost two years ago have brought us to the dubious conclusion that we can claim 3 million, because nobody will understand how we arrived at that figure, and most everyone will be too lazy to even attempt to check our numbers.’
You appeared to venture into the vicinity of truth when you stated that Obamacare is ‘doing what it’s supposed to do,‘ but then you forgot to stipulate what, precisely, that happens to be.
It has not, nor was it meant to, make insurance cheaper and more accessible – but it has strip

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/o...ad-youre-liar/

Drudge Report shared Conservative Outfitters's photo.




It's amazing what you can accomplish with fines...

http://is.gd/ux7DT8

April Fools...

DRUDGE REPORT


Maryland: 60,000 Obamacare Sign-Ups, 73,000 Lost Insurance...

Fear of penalty reason for late surge in CA...

NOONAN: Catastrophe Like No Other...

OPIE & ANTHONY: 'Don't Know Why We're Not Having Revolution'...

White House Misled: Private Health Insurance, Outside Obamacare Marketplaces, Still for Sale...



http://drudgereport.com/

Conservative Daily

7.1 million new enrollees? Let's check those numbers...



7.1 Million Enrollees? Think Again, Say The Number Crunchers

... meanwhile in realityville 45 million still lack health insurance.

IJREVIEW.COM

Americans for Prosperity

The President failed to mention how many of the 7.1M enrollees had lost their plans BECAUSE of ‪#‎Obamacare‬...



AFP Reacts to Obama’s Remarks on ACA | Americans for Prosperity

AFP Reacts to Obama's Remarks on ACA April 01, 2014 ObamaCare still a colossal failure by the...

AMERICANSFORPROSPERITY.ORG

WSJ Opinion


If ObamaCare is now such a success, why are Senate Democrats still fleeing?

http://on.wsj.com/Odj8sj




If the law is now such a success, why are Senate Democrats still fleeing?

The Wall Street Journal asks, if the law is now such a success, why are Senate Democrats still fleeing?

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL