Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Climate change scientists fret that doomsday scare stories aren't working on the pub

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Climate change scientists fret that doomsday scare stories aren't working on the pub

    Climate change scientists fret that doomsday scare stories aren't working on the public



    Friday, June 06, 2014 by: J. D. Heyes

    Tags: climate change, scare stories, public opinion
    (NaturalNews) Climate-change scientists are facing a conundrum of sorts, and they're not really sure what to do about it.

    On the one hand, when negative stories surface discounting claims that the earth is "warming" or that climate is "changing" the planet (for the worse), they have only a passing effect -- good news for them.

    On the other hand, however, stories promoting the theory of climate change don't move public opinion either, researchers from Princeton University have said in a new study. They write that this dynamic suggests that climate change scientists need to take a new look at how to be more effective in regularly engaging the public.

    Overall public interest in the topic has fallen since 2007, researchers said in a report published by the journal Environmental Research Letters, based on an examination of how often people search the Internet for information related to climate change.

    However, "the downturn in public interest does not seem tied to any particular negative publicity regarding climate-change science, which is what the researchers primarily wanted to gauge," ScienceDaily.com reported.

    William Anderegg, a post-doctoral research associate in the Princeton Environmental Institute who studies communication and climate change, and first author of the study, along with Gregory Goldsmith, a postdoctoral researcher at Oxford's Environmental Change Institute, looked specifically into what effect, if any, a pair of widely reported, nearly simultaneous, events had on public interest and opinion.

    Searches for 'global warming' and 'climate change'

    As reported by the website:

    The first involved the November 2009 hacking of emails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom, which has been a preeminent source of data confirming human-driven climate change. Known as "climategate," this event was initially trumpeted as proving that dissenting scientific views related to climate change have been maliciously quashed. Thorough investigations later declared that no misconduct took place.

    The second event was the revelation in late 2009 that an error in the 2007 Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) -- an organization under the auspices of the United Nations that periodically evaluates the science and impacts of climate change -- overestimated how quickly glaciers in the Himalayas would melt.


    Both researchers, in order to get a sense of public interest in climate change in general, searched through the Google Trends database for the terms global warming and climate change, then for all related terms searched by people around the world between 2004 and 2013. Google Trends receives more than 80 percent of the world's Internet search activity; it is increasingly used by researchers examining economics, political science and public health.

    Internet searches that were related to climate change climbed steadily following the 2006 release of former Vice President Al Gore's video documentary, An Inconvenient Truth (which was found by a British court to have contained a number of false claims); they continued to climb with the release of the IPCC's fourth report, according to researchers.

    They specifically looked at searches for climategate between Nov. 1 and Dec. 31, 2009. They found that the search trend had a six-day "half-life," meaning that frequency of searches fell by 50 percent every six days.

    After 22 days, they said, the number of searchers for climategate was just 10 percent of its peak. Information about climategate was searched for most in the U.S., Canada and Australia.

    'These bursts were short-lived'

    Researchers also tracked the popularity of the term global warming hoax to measure the overall negative effect of climategate and the IPCC error on what the public thought and believed about climate change. They discovered that searchers for the term were higher during the year before the events than the year afterward.

    "The search volume quickly returns to the same level as before the incident," Goldsmith said. "This suggests no long-term change in the level of climate-change skepticism.

    "We found that intense media coverage of an event such as 'climategate' was followed by bursts of public interest, but these bursts were short-lived," he added.

    Anderegg said that means that moments of great consternation for climate-change scientists seem to barely register in the public consciousness.

    The study goes on to say that independent polling data also indicate that the events had very little effect on U.S. public opinion.

    "There's a lot of handwringing among scientists, and a belief that these events permanently damaged public trust. What these results suggest is that that's just not true," Anderegg said.

    Sources:

    http://www.sciencedaily.com

    http://newsbusters.org

    http://www.naturalnews.com

    http://www.eurekalert.org

    http://science.naturalnews.com

    http://www.naturalnews.com/045455_cl...c_opinion.html
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

Similar Threads

  1. Green scientists debunk climate change myths Climate vanity will surely lead to mass
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-19-2014, 05:43 PM
  2. Consensus of climate scientists who believe in man made climate change is 75 people
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-21-2013, 12:35 AM
  3. Another Climate Change Scare Is On Thin Ice
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-02-2010, 03:31 PM
  4. Climate Change Scientists, Politicians Concocting Consensus
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-23-2010, 05:39 PM
  5. UK:Scientists Broke the Law by Hiding Climate Change Data
    By Texas2step in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-29-2010, 10:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •