Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
06-03-2018, 04:32 PM #1
Chris Christie: 'Outrageous claim' that Trump cannot obstruct justice
Chris Christie: 'Outrageous claim' that Trump cannot obstruct justice
By Veronica Stracqualursi, CNN
Updated 3:24 PM ET, Sun June 3, 2018
Washington (CNN) Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie knocked the claim from Donald Trump's legal team that, by nature of his office, the President cannot obstruct justice and could simply shut down the Russia investigation altogether.
"It's an outrageous claim, it's wrong," the former Republican governor said on ABC News' "This Week."
Christie, who was a former federal prosecutor before becoming governor, added that Trump's legal team "was trying to make a broad argument."
The argument from the President's lawyers, Jay Sekulow and then-Trump attorney John Dowd, came in a confidential January letter to special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election, including a related question of whether Trump has obstructed justice with regard to that probe.
The lawyers wrote in the 20-page letter that the President cannot illegally obstruct the Russia probe because he, as the top law enforcement officer, has authority over all federal investigations.
"It remains our position that the President's actions here, by virtue of his position as the chief law enforcement officer, could neither constitutionally nor legally constitute obstruction because that would amount to him obstructing himself, and that he could, if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon if he so desired," they wrote in the letter, which The New York Times published Saturday.
The two argued that "no President has ever faced charges of obstruction merely for exercising his constitutional authority" and that a president can "order the termination" of a Justice Department or FBI investigation "at any time and for any reason."
On Sunday, Christie pointed to Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani's comments earlier Sunday on ABC's "This Week," in which Giuliani appeared to downplay the argument from Sekulow and Dowd, who resigned in March, that Trump could shut down the Russia probe if he so chooses. Giuliani was not part of Trump's counsel when Dowd and Sekulow sent the letter to Mueller
"You'd have to ask John exactly what he's relying on for that," Giuliani told ABC News. "I would not go that far."
Giuliani added that Trump has no plans to pardon himself, but that he probably could.
"He has no intention of pardoning himself," Giuliani said. He added, "It would be an open question. I think it would probably get answered by gosh, that's what the Constitution says, and if you want to change it, change it. But yes."
Giuliani also said on NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday that Trump pardoning himself is "unthinkable" and "would lead to probably an immediate impeachment."
Former US attorney Preet Bharara said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that it "would be outrageous" for a sitting president to pardon himself.
"I think (if) the President decided he was going to pardon himself, I think that's almost self-executing impeachment," Bharara, a CNN legal analyst, said. "Whether or not there is a minor legal argument that some law professor somewhere in a legal journal can make that the President can pardon, that's not what the framers could have intended. That's not what the American people, I think, would be able to stand for."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/03/polit...ion/index.htmlA Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
06-03-2018, 04:42 PM #2
Christie is wrong and here's why.
Under the US Constitution, a President has immunity from prosecution, which means while he is President you can not charge him, you can not indict him, therefore any President can not be charged by the US Department of Justice under federal authority while he is in office. The reason we have this protection of our elected Presidents is to protect them from political enemies and the very type of Witch Hunt we see underway here.
If you can not charge or indict a President for any crime, while in office, then you can not obviously charge or indict him for Obstruction of Justice. Therefore, under the US Constitution, he can terminate any employee, any lawyer, any contractor, and obviously shut down any executive activity, including Special Counsel activities, and by doing so is completely innocent of Obstruction of Justice or any other crime they want to "allege".
Yes, Congress can pursue an impeachment if they have cause and the votes to back it up, but that's completely different than being charged and indicted for Obstruction of Justice. There would have to be some "high crime" even for impeachment to fly.
So Trump's lawyers are perfectly correct, because under our system of justice, you are presumed innocent until you are convicted of a crime, therefore, if you can't charge or indict a President, they are innocent of any crime under the law while they are in office including "Obstruction of Justice".
Furthermore, it is not Obstruction of Justice when you are taking an action that is within your Constitutional authority to take, and firing FBI Directors, Cabinet Members, Justice Department employees and contractors, and shutting down pointless investigations of non-crimes could never be "Obstruction of Justice" because a President has the clear authority to fire anyone and shut down their operations.
Congress can impeach a President, but that is not a criminal process, that is a purely political endeavor.A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
06-03-2018, 07:01 PM #3
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Location
- San Bernardino, CA
- Posts
- 1,810
It's kind of a gray area. The President CAN obstruct justice. He just can't be charged, and held accountable for it until he is out of office, by either impeachment, his leaving voluntarily, or at the end of his term.
Similar Threads
-
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Talks to Rita about Chris Christie and Predicts Trump Will Be One
By ALIPAC in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 08-30-2017, 09:02 PM -
Chris Christie: Donald Trump didn’t mean 'literal riots'
By Jean in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 03-18-2016, 03:39 PM -
Chris Christie Endorses Donald Trump
By JohnDoe2 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 12Last Post: 03-10-2016, 08:28 PM -
Donald Trump and Chris Christie Square Off Over Racial Profiling
By Judy in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 12-07-2015, 12:10 AM -
In A Chris Christie VS. Rand Paul War – Christie Will Lose, And Will Destroy The GOP
By kathyet2 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 08-08-2013, 09:22 AM
Mike Johnson betrays border security for more foreign aid
04-18-2024, 10:31 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports