Thread: FDIC to soften stance, luring private capital

FDIC to soften stance, luring private capital

Wed Aug 26, 2009
12:41pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. regulators are likely to back down from the tough stance they took a month ago on rules for auctions of troubled banks, which could clear the way for more private equity bidders to come back into the game.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC), voting on final guidelines on Wednesday, is still likely to make it hard for private investors to buy failed banks, but is seen rolling back some of the most controversial measures following vociferous complaints from the industry.

Regulators are trying to reach a middle ground with the private equity industry because it represents a crucial source of capital as the United States tries to resuscitate its struggling banking industry.

"The potential pool, from us and other private equity firms, could be a hundred billion dollars -- its a huge amount of money that's at stake," billionaire investor Wilbur Ross told Reuters. He estimates that up to 500 banks could fail between now and the end of 2010.

The biggest complaint from the industry has been that the proposed rules called for a Tier 1 leverage ratio -- the ratio of a bank's capital to its assets -- of 15 percent for three years, above 5 percent required of well-capitalized banks.

The FDIC may roll that back to 10 percent, two sources familiar with the process said. One of the sources said there were some questions about whether the level would be a fixed number or a range of perhaps 8 percent to 10 percent.

The sources declined to be identified because the rules are not public.

Some experts argue that even at 10 percent it will be more expensive for private equity to buy a failed bank than for a strategic bidder, such as a well-capitalized large bank.

"I don't think an imposition of 10 percent will keep people like us from bidding," BankUnited Chief Executive John Kanas told Reuters. "But having a higher level of capital like that would be reflected in our bid."

Kanas led a consortium that included private equity giants Blackstone Group, Carlyle Group and Ross to take over failed Florida lender BankUnited earlier this year.

Kanas did not expect the FDIC to want to change the terms of the BankUnited deal in light of the new guidelines, but hold them to the new standard in the future.

The FDIC, led by Chairman Sheila Bair, regulates more than 8,000 banks and insures their deposits. It has said it needs to issue tough guidelines to ensure that private equity groups are interested in nursing ailing banks back to health.

"The only way that private equity gets any bank ... is by bidding more than the commercial banks would bid," said Ross. "There's really no need to have draconian rules when the process already calls for competitive bids."

RULES ROLLBACK

Another guideline causing concern among the private equity industry says investors would be expected to serve as a "source of strength" for the bank they buy, which could put them on the hook for more capital if the institution struggles.

However, the FDIC may make it such that the holding company can raise capital, so that it doesn't necessarily have to come from the investors themselves, the first source said.
A cross-guaranty proposal -- meaning if a company owns more than one bank the FDIC can use the assets of the healthier bank to cut losses from the one that's faltered -- could also be modified, both sources said.

A guideline, which calls for a minimum holding period of three years for the investments, is less likely to change, both sources said.

FDIC spokesman Andrew Gray said, "We have taken the feedback of all stakeholders into account as we have worked to craft a final rule."

HEAVIER BURDEN

Despite a marked pull-back from the FDIC's initial proposals, the new rules will impose a heavier burden on private equity investors. But they may still find they can achieve high enough returns to make investments in U.S. banks worthwhile.

Indeed, the threat of tough rules did not stop private equity investors from bidding on FDIC-run auctions.

An auction for the assets of failed Texas lender Guaranty Financial Group this month drew a bid from at least one private equity consortium, which included Blackstone, Carlyle and TPG. A U.S. unit of Spain's BBVA won the auction.

The FDIC is correct in toeing a hard line, said John Chrin, a former JPMorgan Chase & Co investment banker who is now executive-in-residence at Lehigh University's College of Business and Economics

"They (FDIC) staked out a position that was probably overly conservative to start. The PE firms wanted to be where the industry is," said Chrin, referring to the lower capital requirements for well capitalized banks. "And you wind up settling in between."

(Reporting by Paritosh Bansal and Megan Davies, additional reporting by Karey Wutkowski in Washington; Editing Bernard Orr)

http://www.reuters.com/article/innovati ... 8D20090826

The sources declined to be identified because the rules are not public.

Must be top secret. Who funds the FDIC?

Originally Posted by roundabout

The sources declined to be identified because the rules are not public.

Must be top secret. Who funds the FDIC?

FDIC is an insurance fund paid for by the banks who's deposit it insures.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
is an independent agency created by the US Congress to maintain stability and public confidence in the U.S. banking industry . . .
www.fdic.gov/

JohnDoe2 wrote,

FDIC is an insurance fund paid for by the banks who's deposit it insures.

I sure hope they are better managed than AIG!

to maintain stability and public confidence in the U.S. banking industry . . .

Well now that I feel confident that my saved money is safe in one these FDIC insured bank accounts, I wonder if I can buy insurance against the inflationary policies of the Fed and government?

Insure your confidence,........sounds like something FDR would do.

Thanks for the post JohnDoe2.

U.S. regulators are likely to back down from the tough stance they took a month ago on rules for auctions of troubled banks, which could clear the way for more private equity bidders to come back into the game.

"Private Equity" sounds like a better idea than a taxpayer bailout.

JohnDoe2 wrote,

"Private Equity" sounds like a better idea than a taxpayer bailout.

Provided it is just that, private equity and not TARP monies laundered. Where are all of those bailout dollars anyway?

Should I have read your statement with the emphasis on "sounds like?"

Private equity still ready and able to gamble on the US is usually foreign equity. Plenty of them already have a major presence in this country, like HSBC which is Hong Kong Singapore Bank Corp., USB which is Swiss, and Deutsche Bank which is German. A few days ago a large Spanish bank took over one of our failures.
There is absolutely nothing that is not for sale in this country, including our children's and grandchildren's future.