Thread: Federal judge sides with House Democrats over subpoena for Trump's financial records

• BREAKING NEWS
• Federal judge sides with House Democrats over subpoena for Trump's financial records
  
  A Washington, D.C.-based federal judge has sided with House Oversight Committee Democrats seeking to enforce their subpoena of Trump accounting firm Mazars USA, in a major ruling that breathes new life into Democrats' ongoing efforts to probe the president's financial dealings.
  Click here for more.
• For more news, please go to FoxNews.com and watch Fox News Channel.

Published 11 mins ago
Last Update 1 min ago

Federal judge sides with House Democrats over subpoena for Trump’s financial records

By Gregg Re | Fox News

[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2)]Video

Trump tweet charges 'treason!'

Pundits rip language over FBI probe.

A Washington, D.C.-based federal judge has sided with House Oversight Committee Democrats seeking to enforce their subpoena of Trump accounting firm Mazars USA, in a major ruling that breathes new life into Democrats' ongoing efforts to probe the president's financial dealings.

Barack Obama-appointed judge Amit P. Mehta's 41-page opinion began by comparing President Trump's concerns over congressional overreach to those of President James Buchanan, asserting that Trump "has taken up the fight of his predecessor."

And Mehta acknowledged that he was "well aware that this case involves records concerning the private and business affairs of the President of the United States."

But, Mehta said, Democrats' subpoena fell within well-established congressional investigative powers. He said he would not stay his ruling pending appeal.

“It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct—past or present—even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry," Mehta wrote.

The president’s legal team, in a filing earlier this month, had asked the judge to prohibit Mazars from “enforcing or complying” with the subpoena, issued April 15.

DCD Trump Financial Records Ruling (1) by Fox News on Scribd

The subpoena seeks Trump financial documents dating back to 2011, and was issued after former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen testified to Congress that the president routinely and improperly altered financial statements.

Trump's lawyers had argued the subpoena to Mazars “lacks a legitimate legislative purpose,” and is an “unconstitutional attempt to exercise ‘the powers of law enforcement.’”

Trump’s lawyers also noted that the House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md., is leading several Trump-focused investigations.

“Chairman Cummings flat-out admitted that he wanted to ‘investigate whether the President may have engaged in illegal conduct before and during his tenure in office’ and ‘review whether he has accurately reported his finances to the Office of Government Ethics and other federal entities,’” Trump’s lawyers wrote in the filing.

The Trump team filing came after Cummings’ committee issued several subpoenas for Mazars Accounting in an effort to obtain financial documents and audits prepared for Trump and his businesses over the last decade. Cummings also sought independent auditor’s reports, annual statements and other documents related to Trump’s finances spanning from 2011 to 2018.

At the time, Mazars said it “will respect the legal process and fully comply with its legal obligations.”

Federal judge sides with House Democrats over subpoena for Trump's financial records

Deutsche Bank Staff Saw Suspicious Activity in Trump and Kushner Accounts

Based on news reports and videos, I think it would be more productive from a legislative purpose standpoint to subpoena 10 years of Hunter Biden's financial records.

Does Trump collect Social Security?

Deutsche Bank Can Release Trump Records to Congress, Judge Rules