Global Warming Alert! Scientists blame humans for warming, then admit there hasn’t be
Global Warming Alert! Scientists blame humans for warming, then admit there hasn’t been any
http://media.tumblr.com/4f20ba1bea67...eEC1qz4rgp.jpg
This is hilarious. The activists socialists scientists at the UN are like totally sure that so-called climate change (formerly global warming) is caused by humans, they just can’t explain why the Earth isn’t heating up.
From the UK Daily Mail:
Scientists are struggling to explain why global warming seems to have slowed down in the last decade in a leaked draft of the UN’s next big report on climate change.
The intergovernmental study claims scientists are 95 per cent sure that humans are to blame for climate change, but presently they have not come up with a unified reason for why global surface temperatures have not risen as predicted in the past 15 years.
According to the unpublished draft document, scientists believe volcanic ash, less heat from the sun and more heat being absorbed by oceans could explain the mystery.
Read the Rest
If this isn’t further evidence that the so-called science behind AGW alarmism is flawed, I don’t know what is.
Think about this for a second. Scientists know that AGW is caused by humans, yet there has been no evidence of global warming at all in the past 15 years, much less AGW. In other words, there’s no problem, but if there were, scientists are pretty sure humans would be to blame. Look, if the same Scientists that are collectively 95% sure that humans are causing global warming don’t know why the Earth isn’t heating up, why should I believe the 95% statistic? At best, their original predictions were wrong. They have even admitted it with their excuses:
According to the unpublished draft document, scientists believe volcanic ash, less heat from the sun and more heat being absorbed by oceans could explain the mystery.
In other words, they were wrong.
But even if scientists have now found and corrected their mistakes, I have another, more pragmatic question:
What’s the problem? Wouldn’t it be a good thing if the Earth is capable of absorbing much more heat than the scientists originally thought? Shouldn’t it allow us to refrain from the insane, end-of-the-world, meltdown garbage all the time?
But there’s one thing about this article that disturbs me more than anything else. The article states that these UN scientists are working feverishly to try and explain why the Earth isn’t warming.
And while I obviously I have no problem with scientists verifying and correcting hypotheses, the article implies that they’re huddling up to try and form yet another global warming “consensus.”
This tells me that it’s not about science, it’s about a political agenda. After all, scientific fact doesn’t require consensuses, it requires data and evidence.
Let me state for the record that we at PRN are not necessarily climate change “skeptics” as some might malign us. We simply believe that real science doesn’t have an agenda. And if you can’t see that the study of the climate has been completely taken over by those with the sole purpose of using it for political purposes, you are blind.
For more PRN global warming coverage, click here.
http://poorrichardsnews.com/post/589...ame-humans-for
