Thread: Who REALLY killed JFK??? This speech might qualify...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlghYpDx0f4

Man, I'm on a mission of discovery tonight!!!

Have any of you ever heard this speech?? I'd never heard it before tonight.

Now I have NO question as to why he was assassinated.

Stupid Mick spoke what he'd promised to keep secret!

This didn't help either.

Pinestraw

Go to www.infowars.com (Alex Jones) or

www.rense.com (Jeff Rense) and then every day you will be on a " mission of discovery".

UB

www.JFKII.com

Pine, I'm no expert on this but I am old enough to remember when he was killed, and I didn't believe their magic bullet theory back then.
Gerald Ford was a senator then and on the Warren commision, he came out and said in the 90's that they had to move "on paper" the entrance wound on JFKs back to make it work, this means there was another shooter down low, I have also seen enough people and animals shot to know that being shot in the head will not cause it to go in the direction of impact, to me this says another shooter was on the grassy knoll, and with other evidence that means three shooters at least.
Was it a cover up? I don't know.
But LBJ called the Dallas police chief and told him to stop any investigation they had going and when Oswald was in the ER after being shot there was a man there to take is dieing statement that he shot Kennedy.
Too many weird things happened for me to post on here but I never believed the Warren commission.

Originally Posted by MountainDog

Pine, I'm no expert on this...

Me neither, MD, but the connections and the corruptions should lead to convictions, not commendations.

The state of our Republic is poor indeed, IMHO.

Originally Posted by PinestrawGuys

Originally Posted by MountainDog

Pine, I'm no expert on this...

Me neither, MD, but the connections and the corruptions should lead to convictions, not commendations.

The state of our Republic is poor indeed, IMHO.

They're all dead now, Pinestraw. We may also conjecture who John Wilkes Booth was really working for, but it doesn't help us today except to make us understand how easy it is to fool enough people to pull off a massive crime (see: Mt. Carmel, Wanta Plan, Murrah Building, Mena, etc.)

Nothing wrong with healthy speculation.

MD,

I've stood in Dealy Plaza and walked up and down Elm St. It's very different than what film clips make it looks. The north/top of the knoll is elevated above street level. It's as high as the railroad bridge, which the JFK's limo went under, after the shooting. From that knoll, you have a very clear view of Elm St. All I can say is that it's possible.

Dixie

Oops, let me correct my above statement, I meant to say that being shot in the head will not cause it to go in the "opposite" direction of impact.
I think what they are trying to make us believe is what is known in medical terms as a "contra coup", if you hit your head in a car wreck your brain hits the inside of your skull and then can bounce back hard enough to damage the back of the brain but this only applies if the front of the skull remains intact.

Originally Posted by Dixie

Nothing wrong with healthy speculation.

MD,

I've stood in Dealy Plaza and walked up and down Elm St. It's very different than what film clips make it looks. The north/top of the knoll is elevated above street level. It's as high as the railroad bridge, which the JFK's limo went under, after the shooting. From that knoll, you have a very clear view of Elm St. All I can say is that it's possible.

Dixie

I'll go you one better. I have been on the Sixth Floor of the Schoolbook Depository. I have a pile of material on the assassination that you wouldn't believe. I am not saying that the Warren Commission Report is anything but pure fabrication. My own belief, based on the available evidence, is that Lee Oswald was not only not the lone gunman, but that he was not even among the shooters. There is plenty of good information on who the assassination team was and that the hit was originally supposed to occur in Miami, but the motorcade there was cancelled after law enforcement taped discussion of the hit while undertaking routine surveillance in an unrelated case.

My only point to Pinestraw was that trying to prosecute anyone for the crime now is about as valuable as trying to prosecute Julius Caesar's assassins. People need to understand what happened so that they can understand the ability for the people to be misled and for massive crimes and coup d'etats to be pulled off right under our noses, but we can no longer do anything about this specific crime.