Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Greenspan: Credit Tsunami to Have Severe Impact

    Greenspan: Credit Tsunami to Have Severe Impact

    Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:58 AM



    Greenspan said that a necessary condition for the crisis to end will be a stabilization in home prices but he said that was not likely to occur for "many months in the future."

    WASHINGTON -- Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan told Congress in prepared testimony Thursday that the current global financial crisis is a "once in a century credit tsunami" that policymakers did not anticipate.

    Greenspan was to be the leadoff witness at a House hearing lawmakers called to question past key financial players about what they felt caused the most grave financial crisis since the 1930s. The witnesses were also expected to be asked how they thought the government would deliver the nation from the economic turmoil.

    Greenspan was the chairman of the Federal Reserve for 18 1/2 years. In testimony prepared for the House Government Oversight and Reform Committee, he voiced shock over the present turn of events and called conditions deplorable.

    He said that he and others who believed lending institutions would do a good job of protecting their shareholders are in a "state of shocked disbelief." And Greenspan also blamed the problems on heavy demand for securities backed by subprime mortgages by investors who did not worry that the boom in home prices might come to a crashing halt.

    "Given the financial damage to date, I cannot see how we can avoid a significant rise in layoffs and unemployment," Greenspan said. "Fearful American households are attempting to adjust, as best they can, to a rapid contraction in credit availability, threats to retirement funds and increased job insecurity."

    He said that a necessary condition for the crisis to end will be a stabilization in home prices but he said that was not likely to occur for "many months in the future."

    When home prices finally stabilize, Greenspan added, then "the market freeze should begin to measurably thaw and frightened investors will take tentative steps towards reengagement with risk."

    Greenspan said until that occurs the government is correct to move forward aggressively with efforts to support the financial sector. He called the $700 billion rescue package passed by Congress on Oct. 10 "adequate to serve the need" and said that its impact was already being felt in markets.

    In his written testimony, Greenspan did not specifically address the criticism he is receiving now as being partly to blame for the current crisis.

    Greenspan's critics charge that he left interest rates too low in the early part of this decade, spurring an unsustainable housing boom, while also refusing to exercise the Fed's powers to impose greater regulations on the issuance of new types of mortgages, including subprime loans. It was the collapse of these mortgages and rising defaults a year ago that triggered the current crisis.

    In his testimony, Greenspan put the blame for the subprime collapse on overeager investors who did not properly take into account the threats that would be posed once home prices stopped surging upward.

    "It was the failure to properly price such risky assets that precipitated the crisis," he asserted.

    Meanwhile, Neel Kashkari, the interim head of the government's $700 billion rescue effort, and other government officials were going before the Senate Banking Committee to lay out their plans for implementing the massive program.

    Both hearings were expected to be contentious as lawmakers, already upset about having to vote for the biggest bailout in U.S. history, sought answers to what went wrong and try to determine why the government's rescue effort, which just cleared Congress on Oct. 3, already has undergone a radical overhaul.

    All the action in Washington was taking place against a backdrop of continued turbulence on financial markets around the world. The Dow Jones industrial average plunged by 514 points Wednesday amid fears that the government intervention will not be enough to prevent a serious global recession. Ahead of Thursday's market opening, the Dow was down 122 points at the 8,435 level.

    Asian stocks fell for a second consecutive day Thursday, with South Korea's market sinking 7.5 percent. Japan's Nikkei 225 stock average closed down 2.5 percent, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index was down 4.7 percent. European stock markets were modestly lower.

    Storm clouds were forming on the labor front, too. The government reported that new applications for unemployment benefits increased by more than expected last week as companies cut jobs due to the slow economy. New claims for jobless payments rose 15,000 to a seasonally adjusted 478,000, slightly above analysts' estimates of 470,000.

    While conducting major hearings so close to an election is unusual, House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., said the current crisis was so serious that Congress could not wait until a new administration arrives in January to find out "what went wrong and who should be held accountable."

    Democrats see the prime culprits as greedy Wall Street executives and lax government regulations under a Republican administration, a view that the administration and Republicans in Congress dispute strongly.

    Once praised as the "maestro" of the U.S. financial system during the 1990s economic boom, Greenspan, who was succeeded in 2006 by Ben Bernanke, was likely to find himself defending actions he took that are being blamed for contributing to the current crisis.

    Greenspan, true to his Republican free-market principles, successfully opposed attempts to impose tighter controls on complex financial contracts known as derivatives, which are largely unregulated and which some see as a contributing factor in the current problems.

    Greenspan recently described the current episode as the type of wrenching financial crisis that comes along only once in a century. He has defended the use of derivatives, so-named because their value is derived from the value of an underlying asset. He said they were useful in helping to spread risks.

    Lawmakers in particular want government officials to explain why the emphasis in the rescue package has switched from a program that initially was aimed at buying billions of dollars of troubled mortgage-related assets from banks as a way to spur them to resume more normal lending.

    A week ago, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced that the program now would have as a major component the purchase by the government of $250 billion in stock in hundreds of U.S. banks, including $125 billion that would go to nine of the largest institutions. Paulson has said that the fast-moving nature of the crisis convinced him that money needed to get out more quickly as a way to encourage banks to start lending again.

    But questions have been raised about whether the huge infusion of government money will actually spur more lending, especially after several banks have said they planned to employ the new capital to help finance purchases of weaker rivals.

    Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Jack Reed, D-R.I., and Robert Menendez, D-N.J., sent a letter to Paulson on Wednesday complaining that Treasury had failed to establish adequate standards "to assure that banks put this capital to good use in the lending markets.

    http://moneynews.newsmax.com/streettalk ... ode=6DF4-1
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Greenspan in 'Shocked Disbelief,' Admits Errors

    Greenspan in 'Shocked Disbelief,' Admits Errors

    WASHINGTON (Dow Jones) -- Grilled by lawmakers examining the causes of the financial crisis, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan Thursday admitted some mistakes in assumptions about deregulation while rejecting the idea that he is personally responsible for what he termed a "once-in-a-century credit tsunami."

    In testimony to the House Government Oversight Committee, Greenspan acknowledged that the crisis "has turned out to be much broader than anything I could have imagined. It has morphed from one gripped by liquidity restraints to one in which fears of insolvency are now paramount."

    "Those of us who have looked to the self-interest of lending institutions to protect shareholders' equity (myself especially) are in a state of shocked disbelief," according to Greenspan.

    The panel chairman, Henry Waxman, D-Calif., criticized Greenspan's approach to mortgage regulation while he was Fed chairman. The Fed "had the authority to stop the irresponsible lending practices that fueled the subprime mortgage market," Waxman said, but Greenspan "rejected pleas that he intervene."

    Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky., hit Greenspan even closer to home, calling the avid baseball fan one of "three Bill Buckners," a reference to the infamous Red Sox first baseman whose flubbed handling of an easy grounder cost the Red Sox the 1986 World Series. Former Treasury Secretary John Snow and SEC head Christopher Cox, who both testified along with Greenspan, also got tagged with that comparison.

    However, Greenspan said he raised concerns about the dangers of the "underpricing of risk" as early as 2005.

    But when Waxman pressed "were you wrong" about the benefits of deregulation, Greenspan responded, "partially." The "flaw" in the assumptions he had over four decades, Greenspan said, was that lending institutions themselves were best able to protect the interest of their shareholders.

    Thus what looked like a solid edifice to his thinking broke down, Greenspan said.

    Greenspan said there should be more regulation of credit default swaps, but also noted that excluding those instruments, the derivatives market is functioning well.

    Turning to the economic outlook, Greenspan suggested the financial crisis currently gripping the U.S. will take many months to improve, meaning higher unemployment and softer consumer spending is likely ahead.

    "Given the financial damage to date, I cannot see how we can avoid a significant rise in layoffs and unemployment," Greenspan said in the text of prepared testimony to the U.S. House Government Oversight and Reform Committee.

    That, in turn, "implies a marked retrenchment of consumer spending as households try to divert an increasing part of their incomes to replenish depleted assets, not only in their 401Ks but in the value of their homes as well," Greenspan said.

    While Greenspan assured lawmakers that "this crisis will pass" and that the U.S. will end up with a "far sounder financial system," he warned that it won't come quickly.

    Greenspan said a "necessary condition for this crisis to end is a stabilization of home prices in the U.S."

    "At a minimum, stabilization of home prices is still many months in the future," he said.

    -- Brian Blackstone, Dow Jones Newswires

    http://www.smartmoney.com/breaking-news ... 1023011845
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    11,242
    Watched quite a bit of that today on CSpan and CNBC. Greenspan nearly admitted that his 40-plus years of belief in government deregulation and self-regulation by financial institutions was wrong. And I find it amazing that his comments were mostly in reference to protecting shareholders, and nothing about protecting customers of the financial institution who are not necessarily shareholders.
    Shareholders want to see profits and the majority of them don't really care how those profits are made, as long as the shares go up in value and the dividends paid are not cut or eliminated.
    And didn't McCain, a few months ago, say he was the biggest deregulationist of all?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •