Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Holder Mum on Sestak Allegation

    Holder Mum on Sestak Allegation

    Thursday, 13 May 2010 11:58 PM

    Attorney General Eric Holder dodged GOP questions Thursday dealing with allegations that the White House illegally offered a job to Rep. Joe Sestak in exchange for him getting out of the Pennsylvania Senate race, according to Fox News.

    Sestak, a Pennsylvania Democrat, leveled the charge in February, telling a Philadelphia television anchor he was offered the federal job to drop out of the primary race against Sen. Arlen Specter.

    But Sestak did not withdraw and is still competing against Specter in Tuesday's election -- but the congressman has not elaborated on his charge publicly since the February interview.

    During a Capitol Hill hearing Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said the accusation would amount to "multiple felonies" and wanted to know what Holder was going to do about it. He said he was "deeply concerned," with the election just five days away.

    Issa grew visibly frustrated as the attorney general declined to respond to his questions.

    "It is the department's policy ... not to comment on pending matters," Holder said at the end of a tense back-and-forth. "That is not what we do."
    Issa suggested Holder's reluctance to answer meant there was no investigation.

    "You don't answer or apparently investigate. ... You're not investigating whether it's a false statement by a member of Congress or a crime by the White House. What are we to do?" he said.

    http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/hold ... ode=9E30-1
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member ShockedinCalifornia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,901
    Code:
    "It is the department's policy ... not to comment on pending matters," Holder said at the end of a tense back-and-forth. "That is not what we do." 
    Issa suggested Holder's reluctance to answer meant there was no investigation. 
    
    "You don't answer or apparently investigate. ... You're not investigating whether it's a false statement by a member of Congress or a crime by the White House. What are we to do?" he said.
    Glad that Issa asked this question. "Multiple felonies"? Could the White House be involved in an illegal cover-up?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •