Results 1 to 10 of 13
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
10-07-2017, 01:13 AM #1
ISIS is losing badly. Should Trump or Obama get the credit?
ISIS is losing badly. Should Trump or Obama get the credit?
by Jamie McIntyre | Oct 7, 2017, 12:01 AM
It is becoming increasingly clear that the Islamic State is on the ropes in Iraq and Syria, and its defeat is just a matter of time.
What is less clear is whose strategy produced the victory.
This week, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson announced that the group's "fraudulent caliphate in Iraq and Syria is on the brink of being completely extinguished," and credited "an aggressive new strategy led by the president." On Thursday, U.S. and Iraqi officials announced that troops had seized control of Hawija in Iraq, the last major town held by the terror group in that country.
The president himself declared Thursday that more progress in the campaign to defeat Islamic State had been made in the last eight months than in "many, many previous years, all combined."
But former Defense Secretary Ash Carter, in a lengthy essay published by Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, argued the Trump administration is crowing about the results of what is essentially Obama's strategy, in which the U.S. would work "by, with, and through," local partners forces, providing air support and intelligence, but not doing the heavy lifting of front line combat.
"It was not possible to complete the job on President Obama's watch, but I was confident as I departed the Pentagon that I was handing to my successor a military campaign plan capable of dealing ISIS a lasting defeat," Carter wrote. "And despite a presidential promise of a ‘secret plan,' the coalition campaign under the Trump administration is largely on the same track we laid out for it over Christmas of 2015."
Two months before the election, Trump said he would give his top generals 30 days to submit a new plan to "soundly and quickly" defeat Islamic State, which he codified in a presidential memorandum a week after his inauguration.
The Pentagon dutifully delivered the preliminary framework Feb. 27, meeting the 30-day deadline. But when the final plan was made public by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis in May, it sounded a lot like the old plan, albeit with a few new wrinkles, designed to speed the defeat of Islamic State.
In a Pentagon briefing April 11, Mattis gave all the credit to Trump.
"First, he delegated authority to the right level to aggressively and in a timely manner move against enemy vulnerabilities," Mattis said. "Secondly, he directed a tactical shift from shoving ISIS out of safe locations in an attrition fight to surrounding the enemy in their strongholds so we can annihilate ISIS."
What Mattis described as a change in tactics, did not amount to a whole new strategy, but rather a major refinement of the old strategy, says retired Col. Steve Warren, a former Pentagon spokesman who is now a CNN contributor.
"It was enough of a refinement that I believe it did make a difference in the speed with which we were able to finish off ISIS in Iraq, but they were doomed anyway," Warren said. "I think they took a good strategy and they improved it. They made it better."
One former senior military commander in the region, who spoke on condition of anonymity, argues the changes were subtle, but had a profound impact.
It's true, he said, that no new strategy was put in place, but he called the "tweaks" to the old strategy "very good ones in terms of instituting more realistic rules of engagement, and greater delegation of engagement authority."
"The Obama administration had centralized tactical level decision-making in the White House to the degree that it was just as bad, if not worse, than during the Johnson administration,
à la ‘They can't bomb an outhouse in Vietnam without my permission,' " the former commander said. "The adjustments made by the Trump administration were and are welcome by the warfighters."
"The most important thing is that he gave ground commanders the flexibility they needed to fight each battle in such a way that it was more effectively fought," Warren said.
Warren, who did a tour in Iraq as the chief U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad, said Mattis' other change — insisting the Iraqis surround and annihilate ISIS instead of allowing them to run away and fight another day — also made a significant difference.
"I think the Iraqis would have been more than happy to keep on going with their ‘surround it three-quarters of the way, and leave them a way out,' because that really is their way of war," Warren said. "When Mattis got on board that was just not OK with him, and he really pushed the Iraqis to employ the annihilation technique."
The former U.S. commander criticized Obama for what he called a "gradualistic approach" with "minimal U.S. military commitment," intended to take years not months to accomplish.
So, does the Trump team get credit for doing what Obama's did not?
"They can't take credit for defeating ISIS, no," Warren argued. "They can share credit certainly, and I think they can take credit for successfully speeding up the campaign."
But it is clear the military favored the Trump approach, as evidenced by the parting comments of Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend as he prepared to relinquish command of the counter-ISIS operation in August.
"We don't get second-guessed a lot. Our judgment here on the battlefield in the forward areas is trusted. And we don't get 20 questions with every action that happens on the battlefield and every action that we take," Townsend said. "I don't know of a commander in our armed forces that doesn't appreciate that."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/is...rticle/2636767A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
10-07-2017, 01:19 AM #2
Good!!!!
Trump runs ISIS out of Iraq in months instead of years. I'll take that as a win.
I noticed they didn't want to get into a discussion of who takes credit for running ISIS out of Syria. Funny. I guess there was no reason to debate that one. Trump won that one in 90 days.
Next up: Running illegal aliens out of the United States.A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
10-07-2017, 08:47 AM #3
Use the same strategy to get illegal aliens and Visa overstays deported and out of this country.
Divide CA, TX, FL, NY into sectors...send in ICE and Law enforcement full force into one State at a time and make a huge dent in getting them the hell out of here!
Picking them off 100 - 150 at a time will take forever...go in for the kill with 1,000s of agents and concentrate on one area at a time. Deploy National Guard to maintain law and order.
Put Beezer in charge...Bonus for every one caught and deported.ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE "BROKEN" OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM
DO NOT REWARD THEM - DEPORT THEM ALL
-
10-07-2017, 04:09 PM #4
The troops on the ground doing the actual fighting get all of the credit.
Politicians do nothing but talk about war.NO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
10-07-2017, 05:25 PM #5
Well, we've had troops on the ground in Iraq for 14 years, so I think Trump's talk made a difference and will get at least most of our troops out of Iraq years earlier.
A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
10-07-2017, 05:53 PM #6
Trump has never been in the military.
He has no military training.
He is a businessman
He is a civilian leader
He is not a military strategist.
He must rely on the generals for everything.NO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
10-07-2017, 06:25 PM #7
BARRY SOTERO WAS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER (OF MAL-CONTENT)
WAS BARRY SOTERO IN THE MILITARY?
DID HE LISTEN TO HIS GENERALS?
DID HE CIRCUMVENT OUR LAWS AND MAKE UP HIS OWN?
DID HE DRAW A LINE IN THE SAND? CREATE MASS ILLEGAL MIGRATION AND INVASION OF OTHERS COUNTRIES?
DID HE CONTRIBUTE TO 20 TRILLION IN DEBT BECAUSE HE IS NOT A BUSSINESS MAN, HAS NO BUSINESS SENSE?
DID HE RELEASE TERRORISTS OUT OF GITMO? RELEASE PRISONERS AND THEY CONTINUED TO COMMIT CRIMES?
DID HE DUMP ILLEGAL ALIENS AND MS-13 IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS?
DID HE DESTROY OUR HEALTHCARE AND WASTE BILLIONS OF OUR DOLLARS STEALING FROM OUR SS FUNDS TO GET IT GOING?
DID HE GIVE IRAN $400 BILLION DOLLARS AND MAKE THE WORST "DEAL" IN HISTORY?
DID HE BOW TO CUBA AND WE GOT NOTHING?
DID HE INVITE ILLEGAL ALIENS INTO OUR WHITE HOUSE?
DID HE HIRE PEOPLE TO INFILTRATE OUR GOVERNMENT OFFICES WITH INTENT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY?
DID HE VOTE FOR PARIS CLIMATE AGREEMENT TO RAPE U.S. TAXPAYER OF MORE OF THEIR MONEY?
DID HE FLY AROUNG THE WORLD, APOLOGIZING, AND GIVE OUR MONEY AWAY TO COUNTRIES WHO HATE US?
DID HE SHOVE DACA DOWN OUR THROATS AND CAUSE THE PROBLEM WE ARE FACING TODAY?
DID HE VOTE FOR TPS AS A BACKDOOR AMNESTY AND TRY TO BRING IN MORE 3RD COUNTRY WORKERS TAKING OUR JOBS?
WOW!Last edited by Beezer; 10-07-2017 at 06:29 PM.
ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE "BROKEN" OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM
DO NOT REWARD THEM - DEPORT THEM ALL
-
10-07-2017, 07:24 PM #8
I wasn't comparing Trump to Obama.
I pointed out that Trump has no military training and must rely on the generals to tell him what needs to be done.
Obama also had no military training, but that wasn't my point.
NO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
10-07-2017, 07:32 PM #9
And send them to Afghanistan?
Trump approves sending 4,000 more troops to AfghanistanNO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
10-08-2017, 12:28 AM #10
No, he doesn't have to rely on the generals for everything. Trump sets the stage, establishes the mission, posts the goal, and orders the time frame for the result. These generals are the same generals who under former Presidents have allowed these wars in these countries with populations smaller than Southern California to last for decades. That is just unacceptable and it looks like Trump is doing a good job turning that around.
A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
Similar Threads
-
China has badly misread Donald Trump
By lorrie in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 02-01-2017, 09:28 PM -
Donald Trump: I meant that Obama founded ISIS, literally
By Judy in forum General DiscussionReplies: 11Last Post: 08-12-2016, 05:29 PM -
Donald Trump Says ‘I Want to Debate Very Badly.’ But He Has Conditions
By lorrie in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 08-09-2016, 08:31 PM -
Trump to Savage: Maybe Obama doesn't want to defeat ISIS
By Jean in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 02-08-2016, 11:06 PM -
Men refuse to let evil win... After Escaping The Mountain & Losing Everything To ISIS
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 08-17-2014, 09:47 PM
Exclusive – Sen. Marsha Blackburn at Border: ‘Walls Work,’ Need...
03-28-2024, 09:54 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports