Thread: Is the Tea Party Losing Its Strength?

Is the Tea Party Losing Its Strength?
10 hours ago

David Corn
Columnist

What a surprise: The Tea Party is not as popular as it once was. That was part of the news contained in a Washington Post/ABC News poll released this week. (The other hardly shocking and bad-for-Democrats news: only 29 percent are inclined to vote for their current representative in Congress.) Fifty percent of the respondents said they hold an "unfavorable impression" of this conservative, anti-Obama, anti-government movement -- an increase from 39 percent in March (when the health care reform slugfest was under way). Those with a favorable view dropped from 41 to 36 percent, and those folks with no opinion fell from 20 percent to 14 percent. Put this all together, and it appears that the more Americans see of the Tea Party, the less they like it.

This makes sense. At first, the TP movement could be seen as a patriotic uprising with a time-tested and honorable moniker. And its original target was President Obama's health care overhaul -- a controversial move that many voters, independents especially, were wary of. But in recent weeks, the -- shall we say -- excesses of the Tea Party have been on display.

When Rand Paul won Kentucky's Republican Senate primary, he proudly declared, "I have a message from the Tea Party: we've come to take our government back." Paul, now the closest thing to a national spokesman for Tea Partyism, in the next few days proceeded to round out the usual Tea Party message by noting he did not support all of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and by saying that he believed Obama's pressure on BP, the despoiler of the Gulf of Mexico, was "un-American." Paul was simply sharing his true desire for small-government. But his remarks revealed the not-so-pretty libertarian underbelly of the leave-us-alone Tea Party movement and exposed its fundamental bias against using government to combat such wrongs as corporate pollution or racism. He looked like a John Bircher of the 1950s -- yet he was reflecting the current sentiments of his people.

In Nevada, the Tea Party darling and GOP Senate candidate Sharron Angle called for abolishing the EPA, the Department of Energy, the Department of Education, and other agencies, and she proposed privatizing Social Security. Talking Points Memo reports that Angle is a supporter of the Oath Keepers, a right-wing group of soldiers and police officers who say they don't have to follow orders they believe are unconstitutional. She's also questioned whether alcohol should be legal. On Tuesday, Angle defeated Sue Lowden, a more mainstream GOP candidate, who earlier in the campaign suggested that Nevadans could barter chickens for medical services. (This Tea Party victory may afford Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid a much better chance of winning reelection in Nevada this fall.) Elsewhere, Tea Party activists have been calling for repealing the 17th Amendment, which provided for the direct election of senators. (Originally, the Constitution granted state legislatures the power to appoint senators.) Why would TPers want to do away with voting for senators? Supposedly, returning this authority to state lawmakers would weaken the power of the federal government and special interests. In reality, state legislatures are just as susceptible to special-interest lobbying, if not more so, and permitting state legislators to anoint senators would lead to extreme cronyism and oodles of back-room dealing. In other words, what the heck are these people thinking? Still, dumping the 17th Amendment has become a central tenet of Tea Partyism.

So is it any wonder that more Americans are now tossing the Tea Party aside? This inchoate, unorganized movement still has the ability to influence certain elections -- such as GOP primary contests in Nevada and Kentucky. But its reach may be severely limited. In California, the natural Tea Party candidate, state Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, failed to ride any Tea Party wave. Instead, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina rebranded herself a true-blue (or red-hot) Tea Partier on the way to beating DeVore and former Rep. Tom Campbell in the Golden State's GOP Senate primary.

As Tea Party extremism becomes more obvious, its gravitational pull on the 2010 elections may lessen. (Scott Brown? Who's that?) The Tea Party label might even become a liability for Republican candidates looking to win over independent voters in the general election. (See Fiorina.) If there is low turn-out for the November elections, the Tea Partier could still pack a punch. An angry mob has the most potential in a smaller setting. Yet if the trend continues -- more Tea Party candidates saying more Tea Party things -- Republicans may not want a refill.

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/09 ... -strength/

Related
MNSBC Hit Piece Smears Tea Party as Neo-Nazis
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-202286.html

That's not what Ron Paul said.

He said there were parts of the bill he may not have supported when the bill was written.

Goofball said he did not support the Civil Rights Bill.


That is not true.


That's totally misleading which somehow doesn't surprise me one bit.

What else is new here in America?

I am a member of Oath Keepers, who are fine people who recognize the potential dangers, especially when Obama talks of a civilian armed forces with better weapons and better trained than our brave American soldiers.

I have lost interest in the Tea Party because of lack of including illegal immigration as a platform in their contract from America, and their fondness for people whom I find untrustworthy and unacceptable such as Sarah Palin, who has no problem campaigning for John McCain and Dick Armey. The movement has been hijacked before they had the safeguards in place, and the leaders who have stepped up are moving them in the wrong direction.

Unfortunately, many members are business people and welcome the slave labor provided by illegals, and I believe that is the main reason there is no interest in pursuing the crime of illegal immigration. It will just become a tool of the Chamber of Commerce disseminating false information to keep taxpayers subsidizing their labor force while they pay less taxes on their ill begotten income.

Video on this page...
Sarah Palin joins Arizona Governor Jan Brewer to defend immigration law

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin defended Arizona's new immigration law Saturday and announced the launch of a website to inform Americans about border security.

Palin said Arizona is "ground zero" for the nation's border-security issues during a news conference organized by Brewer's gubernatorial campaign.


"It's time for Americans across this great country to stand up and say, 'We're all Arizonans now,' " Palin said. "And in clear unity we say, 'Mr. President, do your job. Secure our borders.' "

Palin also said Arizona was an example for the rest of the nation to follow. She was in town to speak at the Arizona Sportsmen for Wildlife Conservation's annual banquet at the JW Marriott Desert Ridge Resort and Spa in north Phoenix.

Arizona is facing economic boycotts from dozens of cities and groups since Brewer signed the toughest immigration law in the country last month. It goes into effect July 29.

The law requires an officer engaged in a "lawful stop, detention or arrest" to ask about a person's legal status when reasonable suspicion exists that the person is in the U.S. illegally. Race, color or national origin cannot be considered "except to the extent permitted by the United States or Arizona Constitution."

About 60 protesters from the Dallas chapter of the League of United Latin American Citizens gathered outside the resort before Palin and Brewer arrived.

Earlier in the day, the self-titled "Freedom Riders" marched along Washington Street, chanting, waving American flags and holding signs that read "Repeal SB1070."

Later in the afternoon, Brewer chided President Barack Obama for joking about the new immigration law.

"It's fair to ask whether he intends to be the commander in chief or the comic in chief," Brewer said to loud cheers at the news conference, which was filled with Brewer re-election supporters.

The website announced by Palin and Brewer, SecuretheBorder.org, provides contact information for individuals and organizations that have called for an Arizona boycott. Visitors are also encouraged to sign a petition supporting Arizona, demanding a secure border and opposing a boycott. The website is paid for by Brewer's re-election campaign.

Jennifer Johnson, a spokeswoman for the Arizona Democratic Party, said Brewer failed to offer any new ideas on securing the border.

"Every word that was crafted today was done with her campaign in mind. Arizona was an afterthought," Johnson said.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/ ... z0qOmgUtfT

The wind seems to be blowing everything and everyone all over the place. But I like the tea party and the movement woke up a lot of people. They seem to want a Constitutional government back and that is the paramount issue for me. There is scantly one issue that would not be solved if the Constitutional light was used full force to view each issue. IMHO