Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005

    New York Times issues embarrassing correction after botching story attacking Trumpís

    New York Times issues embarrassing correction after botching story attacking Trumpís tax plan

    By Brian Flood
    2 hours ago

    The New York Times issued an embarrassing correction after a report that attacked President Donald Trumpís recently passed tax plan got the numbers about as wrong as could be.

    The lengthy Feb. 23 feature, headlined, ďGet to Know the New Tax Code While Filling Out This Year's 1040,Ē sought to detail how Trumpís tax plan would hurt middle-class families. A hypothetical couple -- christened Sam and Felicity Taxpayer -- would see their tax bill rise by nearly $4,000, according to the story.

    Then came the correction saying the family would actually see taxes go down.

    The Wall Street Journalís James Freeman mocked the Times piece before the Old Gray Lady issued the correction.

    ďEven perennial tax-increase advocate Warren Buffett is now acknowledging the economic benefit of the Trump tax cuts, but The New York Times newsroom still wonít concede the point,Ē Freeman wrote on Feb. 27. ďWill criticism from a liberal law professor persuade The Times to reconsider?Ē

    Well, The Times did reconsider -- but it may still not be 100 percent accurate.

    ďAn earlier version of this article incorrectly described the probable effect of the new tax law on a hypothetical coupleís 2018 tax bill. The TurboTax ĎWhat-If Worksheetí that generated the projection for their 2018 taxes failed to indicate that the couple would probably be entitled to claim a sizable deduction for income earned from consulting. As a result of that deduction, the amount they would likely owe on taxes would decline by $43, not rise by $3,896,Ē the correction states.

    The accounting error in The Timesí original piece is quite significant for the family, which reported a combined income of $183,911. Freeman wrote a followup piece, noting that ďa liberal law professor says The Times still doesnít have the story quite right.Ē

    Freeman pointed to University of Chicago tax law professor Daniel Hemel, who said Times editors still donít understand Trumpís tax cuts.

    ďStill donít see why Samuel & Felicity arenít claiming nonrefundable dependent credits of $500 for their children Luke & Heidi and their parent Sydney, for additional tax savings of $1,500 under the new law,Ē Hemel recently tweeted.

    In addition to Hemelís analysis, a spokesperson for TurboTaxís parent company issued a statement to The Journal explaining that The Times used a program for the misleading feature that was not yet updated with the latest tax laws.

    As much of the mainstream media looks for reasons to attack the president on a regular basis, the misleading feature on taxes provides some evidence that many Americans donít understand the benefits of tax reform or don't acknowledge positives because of political reasons.

    ďThe search continues for Americans who will not benefit from the Trump tax cuts on individual and corporate income,Ē Freeman wrote.

    The New York Times did not immediately respond when asked if it would issue another correction based on Hemelís analysis.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    LOL!! Funny! Stupid New York Times.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-15-2017, 08:11 PM
  2. The New York Times Fact Checks Trump: All True
    By Newmexican in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-02-2017, 06:59 AM
  3. NY Times Story on Trump 'Groping' Proven False
    By European Knight in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-16-2016, 02:30 AM
  4. New York Times: Trump is Right About Ginsburg
    By joe s in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-13-2016, 03:27 PM
  5. New York Times Prints Correction - Unlawfully Entering
    By Dixie in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-06-2009, 09:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts