Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Common Core Workbook Says the Constitution Only Permits the Right to Keep & Bear Regi

    Common Core Workbook Says the Constitution Only Permits the Right to Keep & Bear Registered Firearms

    Posted by Darla Dawald, National Director on March 25, 2014 at 11:22pm in Patriot Action Alerts

    View Discussions


    From Our Own Liberty News Network:

    Springfield Superintendent Says His Teachers Will Keep Using a Common Core Workbook that Says the Constitution Only Permits the Right to Keep & Bear Registered Firearms

    Last week, Liberty News reported that a school district in Illinois is using a Common Core sanctioned workbook to teach students that the Constitution allows gun owners to only keep and bear registered firearms.

    Now, Bob Hill, the Springfield School District Superintendent says seventh-graders at Grant Middle School will continue using the workbook despite Conservative parental objections, reports The Blaze.



    Mr. Hill claims the controversial text is valid because, the workbook “is not the only resource that provides a definition of the Second Amendment.”
    He further explains that he thinks the resource accurately places the Second Amendment in the “context of 2014.”
    During a recent interview with the local radio station, 970 WMAY, Hill states that he will not stop teachers from using the book because doing so would be “unfair” and “insulting” “micromanagement.”
    He even claimed “the material is not ‘proselytizing’ a certain political point of view” and argued, removing the material would be “pretty unfair relative to what the teacher has going on,” reports The Blaze.
    At no point did the superintendent ever comment on the Second Amendment’s original intent which has remained unchanged since its inception – giving the American people the right to defend themselves with force when challenged by armed adversaries.
    If you’re interested in hearing Hill’s radio interview concerning his position on the controversy, you can listen via mp3 here.



    Liberty News Network

    This quote makes me so angry:
    Mr. Hill claims the controversial text is valid because, the workbook “is not the only resource that provides a definition of the Second Amendment.”
    He further explains that he thinks the resource accurately places the Second Amendment in the “context of 2014.”
    These people are hell bent on reshaping America, our Constitution, our history, our future, and our children!
    Friends, we must push back! Show up in outrage at the school board meetings!!

    Darla Dawald

    Tags: 2nd, District, School, Springfield, Superintendent, amendment, common, constitution, core, mr.-Hill, More…

    http://patriotaction.net/forum/topic...sg_share_topic
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Listen to Superintendent Explain Why He Refuses to Remove Workbook With Outrageous Definition of Second Amendment

    Mar. 24, 2014 8:23pm Jason Howerton

    The superintendent of Springfield Public Schools told 970 WMAY on Monday that he doesn’t plan to remove a workbook that contains an outrageous definition of the Second Amendment, despite the outrage it has generated among parents.
    The workbook, currently being utilized by seventh-graders at Grant Middle School in Springfield, Ill., teaches students that the Second Amendment gives people the “right to certain weapons, providing that they register them and they have not been in prison.”
    Superintendent Bob Hill told 970 WMAY that the workbook is not the only resource that provides a definition of the Second Amendment and argued that the interpretation found in the material teaches students “what happens with the right to bear arms in the context of 2014.”
    He argued that “no place in the book does it portray that that is the Second Amendment — it’s a study guide summary of the Second Amendment and the impact of the Second Amendment on the lives of people today.” In “reality,” he added, some places do require the registration of firearms.
    Hill also claimed the material is not “proselytizing” a certain political point of view and said removing the material at this point in time is “pretty unfair relative to what the teacher has going on.” Micromanaging teachers in the district by reviewing all material they want to teach, he said, would be insulting to educators.
    The material was created by a teacher who is now retired, but it continued to be used. Hill said several parents have asked him to remove the material, “which I’ve told them I wouldn’t do.”
    Listen to Hill’s full interview with 970 WMAY here.
    The full “definition” of the Second Amendment found in the workbook states:
    This amendment states that people have the right to certain weapons, providing that they register them and they have not been in prison. The founding fathers included this amendment to prevent the United States from acting like the British who had tried to take weapons away from the colonists.
    Facebook
    The Second Amendment as written in the U.S. Constitution states: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
    The father who first brought attention to the workbook on Facebook confirmed to TheBlaze in a previous interview that his son made him aware of the inaccurate content. The parent met with his son’s history teacher and the head of the history department, where he was assured that his concerns would be addressed.
    He said on Friday that he expected the issue to be resolved “very soon.” That was before Hill addressed the controversy on Monday.

    (H/T: Illinois Gun Owners Rights)

    Other Must-Read Stories








    by Taboola
    Sponsored Content


    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...ond-amendment/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •