Obama Don’t Need No Stinkin Truth– Labels Life-Sustaining Co2 Pollution to Cripple US

[Watch] Obama Don’t Need No Stinkin Truth – Labels Life-Sustaining Co2 “Pollution” to Cripple US

Posted on 31 May, 2014 by Rick Wells

http://gopthedailydose.com/wp-conten...speech-610.png

The fabricator-in-chief has more lies for us, setting the stage for Monday’s economic EMP he has prepared for us.

His basic premise is founded upon a lie. Carbon Dioxide is a fundamental necessity for life on this planet. He repeatedly calls it a pollutant. It is as much of a pollutant as oxygen is. It’s easier to tax, though, because plants don’t vote and they don’t complain.
When he uses the term “carbon pollution,” he is deliberately lying. He knows it and his handlers know it.
Obama bemoans the fact that there are no carbon limits on power plants. There is a good reason why there are no limits. It is not a pollutant.
Attempting to vilify life-giving Co2, he names off several toxic substances which are regulated, as if that somehow has relevance to his argument. It is only relevant to the point we allow him to incorporate his false premise into the discussion.
He says not regulating Co2 is “not smart, not safe and doesn’t make sense.” Actually, his destructive global warming restrictions are what is not smart, not safe and don’t make sense.
He then describes his plan using a tired and worn the tired and worn out label of a “common sense solution.” Common sense would have us not listening to a communist who trained at the knee of Frank Marshall Davis. To expect anything beneficial to come from his illegitimate regime is beyond foolish.
He uses his customary props, this time generic children and old people, as the benefactors of our national regression to the stone-age. While nobody wants to their harm kids and grandparents, it’s hard to imagine the benefits they will realize from freezing in the winter and eating cat food. Maybe the all-knowing Barack will enlighten us.
In what is hard to believe was not intended as humor, Obama describes his upcoming dictates as being created in “an open and transparent way.” The only thing open or transparent about his five and a half years in office is his disdain for America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...;v=aQeqiV5mEcY

The Usurper describes having received input from the business community, states and local governments. He implies that he has the support of business and industry; that is just another lie. Input that may or may not have been incorporated into the final restrictive regulatory product, provided under duress, does not equate with concurrence.

He promises that the economy won’t be negatively impacted while simultaneously claiming that we will need to make hard choices. Those two arguments would seem to conflict.
Obama attempts again in his closing minute to equate acid rain and smog with his fake carbon “pollution.” Those were very real problems which needed to be and were dealt with. He exaggerates the claims of resistance to those endeavors to create a false equivalence and justify what he portrays as a similar, reasonable action today. There is no equality, two are completely different.


Rick Wells is a conservative author who believes an adherence the U.S. Constitution would solve many of today’s problems. “Like” him on Facebook and “Follow” him on Twitter.


http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/05/3...to-cripple-us/

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...42420566_n.jpgCFACT

Monday, EPA plans to roll out new rules which will strangle electricity production in America. 'This is a form of regulatory death for the nation and comes straight out of the Oval Office of the White House.'
Share the facts at CFACT.org: http://wp.me/p39tSj-5Fn
'Before President Obama took office in 2009, the amount of electricity being produced by coal-fired utilities was approximately 50% of the total. Today it is approximately 40% and, when the Environmental Protection Agency...


https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&cfs=1&upscale

The regulatory death of energy in the U.S.

Radical Greens invented the lie that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, the EPA picked up the lie, and the U.S. Supreme Court formalized the lie as official U.S. policy. The results, as noted by Alan ...
cfact.org

The regulatory death of energy in the U.S.

Green lies about carbon dioxide are now EPA policy, with help from the Supreme Court


http://www.cfact.org/wp-content/uplo...ng-600x353.jpg
May 29, 2014 by Alan Caruba, 0 Comments



Before President Obama took office in 2009, the amount of electricity being produced by coal-fired utilities was approximately 50% of the total. Today it is approximately 40% and, when the Environmental Protection Agency regulations take effect as of June 2, more such utilities are likely to close their doors. The basis for the regulations is utterly devoid of any scientific facts.

http://www.cfact.org/wp-content/uplo...weroutages.jpg

Environmentalism, as expressed by many of the organizations that advocate it, is, in fact, an attack on America, its economic system of capitalism, and its need for energy to maintain and grow its business and industrial base. Electricity, of course, is also the energy we all use daily for a multitude of tasks ranging from heating or cooling our homes to the use of our computers and every other appliance.
The EPA regulations are said to be necessary to reduce “greenhouse gas” emissions, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2) which the Greens deem to be a “pollutant” in our atmosphere. It is not a pollutant, despite a Supreme Court decision that identifies it as such, but rather a gas vital to all life on Earth, used by all vegetation for its growth. CO2 is to vegetation what oxygen is to all animal life. Humans, all seven billion of us, exhale CO2!
Viv Forbes, Chairman of the Carbon Sense Coalition and a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, notes that the Earth’s atmosphere “is not a greenhouse” and “does not have a glass roof. It uses convection to redistribute heat very quickly.” The claim for several decades has been that CO2 has an effect on the Earth’s surface temperature, but Forbes points out that “water vapor is a far more effective agent for insulating the Earth and preserving its warmth than carbon dioxide,” adding that “there is no evidence that man-made carbon dioxide is a significant cause of global warming.”
Indeed, even though the amount of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere has increased, Forbes points out that “Close examination of past records shows that temperature tends to rise before CO2 content rises, sometimes centuries earlier.” Significantly, at the same time Greens have been crying out against emissions of CO2 from coal-fired utilities and other sources, the Earth has been in a cooling cycle now verging on 18 years!
The EPA is lying to Americans regarding carbon dioxide and, worse, its proposed regulations will reduce the number of coal-fired utilities and drive up the cost of electricity for Americans.
One of the many Green organizations, Earthjustice, claims that “Climate change threatens the world as we know it—and the chief culprit is fossil fuel burning. To avert ecological disaster, Earthjustice is pushing for a shift from dirty to clean energy to stabilize our climate and build a thriving sustainable world.”

http://www.cfact.org/wp-content/uplo...pocalyptic.jpg

There is literally nothing that mankind can do to “stabilize” the Earth’s climate. While the Earth has been going through climate change for 4.5 billion years, there is no evidence that anything mankind does has any effect on it. The change the Earth has encountered, as mentioned, is a cooling, a far different scenario than the “global warming” claims of the past three decades or more.
Tom Richard, the editor of ClimageChangeDispatch.com, notes that “Arctic sea ice has rebounded to higher and higher levels each year. Antarctica is actually gaining in size and there has been no increase in droughts, tornadoes, hurricanes, wildfires, ‘extreme weather’, flooding, et cetera.”
Reducing CO2 would have zero benefits, while at the same time the EPA regulations would have a dangerous and totally unnecessary effect on CO2 emissions from plants producing electricity. Other nations around the world are actually abandoning “clean energy” — i.e., wind and solar power — in favor of building many more coal-fired plants to meet their need to provide energy for their populations and their economic growth. China and India are just two examples.
To support its claims of the forthcoming EPA regulations, EarthJustice is claiming that climate change “hits people of color the hardest” and that power plants “disproportionately impact Latino communities.” It noted “the moral obligation of faith community to act on climate change and support carbon pollution limits.” This has nothing to do with the actual facts of climate change and CO2 as noted here and is a blatant political campaign to secure support from these groups.
The reality, as noted by the Bipartisan Policy Center, a policy research organization founded by former Senate leaders from both parties, was quoted in the May 26 edition of The Wall Street Journal: “A 25% reduction (of CO2) with a 2015 baseline might make it impossible for some companies to operate.” The article notes that the cap-and-trade policies of emissions allowances that the EPA is putting in place “amounts to a hidden tax” on a whole range of electrical generation and industrial plants that produce CO2 emissions. The EPA will likely use the term “budget program” to avoid “cap-and-trade”, a proposal that was rejected by Congress.
Writing in Commentary, Jonathan S. Tobin, said that the new regulations on carbon emissions “will have a potentially devastating impact on America’s more than 600 coal-fired power plants,” noting that “the move was made possible by Supreme Court decisions that ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency had the right to regulate (CO2) emissions, giving the President virtual carte blanche to remake this sector of our economy without requiring congressional consent.”
In July, the Heartland Institute, a free market think tank, will hold its ninth international confereTher nce on climate change. Previous conferences have brought together some of the world’s leading authorities on meteorology and climatology to debunk the decades of lies Greens have told about climate change and global warming.
The President has put “climate change” high on his list of priorities and it is an attack on the nation’s ability to affordably and extensively provide the http://www.cfact.org/wp-content/uplo...guillotine.jpgenergy needed to meet current needs for electricity and reducing our capacity to meet future needs.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is on record saying that the President’s bogus “climate change” policy could cost the U.S. economy $50 billion a year and force more than a third of coal-fired plants to close by 2030. The Heritage Foundation says “The plan will drive up energy prices for American families and businesses without making a dent in global temperatures.”
This is a form of regulatory death for the nation and comes straight out of the Oval Office of the White House.

About the Author: Alan Caruba

http://www.cfact.org/wp-content/uplo...atar-80x80.jpg
Alan Caruba, a CFACT adjunct policy analyst, writes a daily blog at factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com.

http://www.cfact.org/2014/05/29/the-...gy-in-the-u-s/