Thread: PA-Muslim admits to attacking atheist over "Zombie Muhammad"; Muslim judge dismisses

Sharia in Pennsylvania: Muslim admits to attacking atheist over "Zombie Muhammad"; Muslim judge dismisses case, tells atheist he'd be killed in Muslim lands

This is enforcement of Sharia in a Pennsylvania court. The attacker supposedly got off because he "is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet."

Then, Judge Mark Martin, himself a Muslim, told the atheist, Ernest Perce V.:

“Having had the benefit of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things. Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it it makes you look like a dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society.

Travesty upon travesty. It should be noted that no Catholics were reported to have assaulted the atheists over "Zombie Pope." "Muslim Admits to Attacking Atheist; Muslim Judge Dismisses Case," by Al Stefanelli at Opposing Views, February 23:

The Pennsylvania State Director of American Atheists, Inc., Mr. Ernest Perce V., was assaulted by a Muslim while participating in a Halloween parade. Along with a Zombie Pope, Ernest was costumed as Zombie Muhammad. The assault was caught on video, the Muslim man admitted to his crime and charges were filed in what should have been an open-and-shut case. That’s not what happened, though.The defendant is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet.
The case went to trial, and as circumstances would dictate, Judge Mark Martin is also a Muslim.

What transpired next was surreal. The Judge not only ruled in favor of the defendant, but called Mr. Perce a name and told him that if he were in a Muslim country, he’d be put to death. Judge Martin’s comments included, “Having had the benefit of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things. Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it it makes you look like a dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society."

Judge Martin then offered a lesson in Islam, stating,
“Islam is not just a religion, it’s their culture, their culture. It’s their very essence their very being. They pray five times a day towards Mecca to be a good Muslim, before you die you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca unless you are otherwise told you can not because you are too ill too elderly, whatever but you must make the attempt. Their greetings wa-laikum as-Salâm (is answered by voice) may god be with you. Whenever, it’s very common when speaking to each other it’s very common for them to say uh this will happen it’s it they are so immersed in it."
Judge Martin further complicates the issue by not only abrogating the First Amendment, but completely misunderstanding it when he said,

“Then what you have done is you have completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very very very offensive. I’m a Muslim, I find it offensive. But you have that right, but you’re way outside your boundaries or first amendment rights. This is what, and I said I spent about 7 and a half years living in other countries. when we go to other countries it’s not uncommon for people to refer to us as ugly Americans this is why we are referred to as ugly Americans, because we are so concerned about our own rights we don’t care about other people’s rights as long as we get our say but we don’t care about the other people’s say”

Don't trash my essence, pal.

But wait, it gets worse. The Judge refused to allow the video into evidence, and then said,
“All that aside I’ve got here basically.. I don’t want to say he said she said but I’ve got two sides of the story that are in conflict with each other.”

And,

“The preponderance of, excuse me, the burden of proof… “
And,

“…he has not proven to me beyond a reasonable doubt that this defendant is guilty of harassment, therefore I am going to dismiss the charge”

The Judge neglected to address the fact that the ignorance of the law does not justify an assault and that it was the responsibility of the defendant to familiarize himself with our laws.

This is to say nothing of the judge counseling the defendant that it is also not acceptable for him to teach his children that it is acceptable to use violence in the defense of religious beliefs.

Instead, the judge gives Mr. Perce a lesson in Sharia law and drones on about the Muslim faith, inform everyone in the court room how strongly he embraces Islam, that the first amendment does not allow anyone ” to piss off other people and other cultures” and he was also insulted by Mr. Perce’s portrayal of Mohammed and the sign he carried.

This is a travesty. Not only did Judge Martin completely ignore video evidence, but a Police Officer who was at the scene also testified on Mr. Perce’s behalf, to which the Judge also dismissed by saying the officer didn’t give an accurate account or doesn’t give it any weight.

This video that includes the audio of the Judge during the trial.



Here’s coverage of the incident from the local ABC affiliate.


Jihad Watch

This judge is offensive...and warped.

WOMEN! Why You Should Never Vote for a Democrat

February 23, 2012 by Giacomo


11ShariaOBAMAI was talking with my wife and married daughter the other day about Muslims, Sharia law and the Obama administration’s support of them. We were talking about how Sharia law allows for physical and emotional abuse of women. It makes women a third class person, barely better than an animal or even a possession like a car. They can be abused, beaten and even killed.

Strict Sharia law does not allow a woman to receive an education, work in many industries, drive a car, walk alongside a man in public or even to speak to a man other than her husband or son in public. Women under Sharia law are no better off than the black slaves were before the American Civil War.

President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have had numerous opportunities to speak out against Sharia law and how it violates women’s rights. But to date, neither one of them have condemned the Muslim practice. They have readily condemned other human rights violations around the globe, but never have they done so with Sharia law.

Obama and Clinton claim to be all about women’s rights when it comes to things like abortion and health, but not when it touches on the President’s own faith.

So I can’t help but ask the question of why would any woman in America vote for Obama, Clinton or any of the other Democrats that remain silent about Sharia law and the treatment of women?

With the threat of Sharia law actively creeping into the American judicial system, why would any women vote for those that won’t stop it?

In a number of states, Republicans have been trying to stop Sharia law and the people have passed measures to stop it, but Democrats and liberal judges appointed by Democrats repeatedly block the anti-Sharia law measures. So why would any woman vote for any of these Democrats?

Women, when you go to the polls this year, ask yourself if you want to be under Sharia law or not. Do you want your husband, son or boyfriend to have the legal right to beat the dickens out of you or even kill you if he thought you dishonored him? If the answer is no, then think about who you are going to vote for before it’s too late.

Read more: WOMEN! Why You Should Never Vote for a Democrat - Godfather Politics WOMEN! Why You Should Never Vote for a Democrat - Godfather Politics