Thread: Rule change could allow sale of your tax return

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/n ... irs21.html


Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 12:00 AM

Rule change could allow sale of your tax return

By Jeff Gelles
Knight Ridder Newspapers
PHILADELPHIA * The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is quietly moving to loosen the once-inviolable privacy of federal income-tax returns. If it succeeds, accountants and other tax-return preparers, for the first time, will be able to sell information from individual returns * or even entire returns * to marketers and data brokers.

The possible change is raising alarm among consumer and privacy-rights advocates. It was included in a set of proposed rules that the Treasury Department and the IRS published in the Dec. 8 Federal Register, where the official notice labeled them "not a significant regulatory action."

IRS officials portray the proposed changes as house-cleaning measures needed to update outmoded regulations that were adopted before the IRS began accepting returns electronically. The proposed rules, which would become effective 30 days after a final version is published, would require a tax preparer to obtain written consent before selling tax information.

Critics call the proposed changes a dangerous new breach in personal and financial privacy. They say the requirement for signed consent would prove meaningless for many taxpayers, especially those hurriedly reviewing stacks of documents before a filing deadline.

"The normal interaction is that the taxpayer just signs what the tax preparer puts in front of them," said Jean Ann Fox of the Consumer Federation of America, one of several groups fighting the changes. "They think, 'This person is a tax professional, and I'm going to rely on them.' "

Criticism of the proposal also came from Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. In a letter last Tuesday to IRS Commissioner Mark Everson, Obama warned that once in the hands of third parties, tax information could be resold and handled under even looser rules than the IRS sets, increasing consumers' vulnerability to identity theft and other risks.

"There is no more sensitive information than a taxpayer's return, and the IRS's proposal to allow these returns to be sold to third-party marketers and database brokers is deeply troubling," Obama wrote.

The IRS first announced the proposal in a news release the day before the official notice was published, headlined: "IRS Issues Proposed Regulations to Safeguard Taxpayer Information."

The announcement did not mention potential sales of tax information. It said the proposed rules were guided by the principle "that tax return preparers may not disclose or use tax return information for purposes other than tax return preparation without the knowing, informed and voluntary consent of the taxpayer."

IRS spokesman William Cressman defended the proposal in similar terms.

"The heart of this proposed regulation is about the right of taxpayers to control their tax return information. The idea is to emphasize taxpayer consent and set clear boundaries on how tax return preparers can use or disclose tax return information," Cressman said in an e-mail response to questions.

Cressman said he was unable to explain "why this issue has come up at this time other than our effort to update regulations that date back to the 1970s and predate the electronic era."

Not all the proposed changes have drawn opposition.

Beth McConnell, director of the Pennsylvania Public Interest Research Group, said she welcomed a rule that taxpayer consent would be required for overseas processing of any portion of a tax return.

"That's a positive development, but I don't think it's worth giving up our tax returns' privacy for," said McConnell, who plans to testify on behalf of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group at an April 4 IRS hearing in Washington on the proposed rule changes.

McConnell accused the IRS of using the new limit on overseas processing to dress up changes that would chiefly benefit tax preparers, marketers and data brokers.

"That's a disturbing trend among Washington officials lately," McConnell said. "They'll offer a modest consumer protection in one area in exchange for dramatic weakening of consumer protections in another area, and then try to convince the public that it's all in our interests."

Critics of the proposal said it could do more than open up sales of tax information to data brokers and marketers, because it could undermine taxpayer confidence in the entire tax system.

"Privacy protections for tax information are especially critical given the largely voluntary nature of the U.S. tax system," said Chi Chi Wu, a tax-law specialist at Boston's National Consumer Law Center.

Wu and other critics said they were uncertain who or what was behind the proposed changes in IRS privacy rules, which now prohibit tax preparers from selling returns to third parties for marketing purposes, and require written consent if they want to use it for marketing.

Officials at H&R Block and Jackson-Hewitt, two of the nation's largest tax-preparation firms, did not respond to requests for comment. Cressman said, so far, the IRS has received only about a dozen comments on the proposal.

"I think this just flew under the radar screen for so many people," McConnell said.

sHOW ME A PICTURE OF A CLOWN AND i'LL TELL YOU HOW HE WON IN 2004

How much more lower will this administration go to destroy our basic freedoms and rights?

This could be a blessing in disguise.

Mass numbers of people might say, "Screw you", and not pay their taxes, because of this. While I am NOT advocating that, I am saying it's possible.

Maybe the Federal gov't going broke now, is better than being taxed into serfdom ,and slavery later.


-pa

I know of a guy who didn't file taxes for years. He worked the same job, a good job, a federal job! He always had returns coming but never filed for them until the IRS sent him letters saying he hadn't filed in x-number of years. Then he would file them all at once, get his return, and go about his business.

Several years ago, we changed our w-2 so that the least possible amount of our money is in the federal government's possession. But I'm still not willing to give them the rest of it and you can't legally work without signing a w-2 so they are going to get our money one way or another unless we are all self employed. Even then, it isn't fair to the employees who work for the self employed to have their money not sent it.

I don't forsee any way to stop paying taxes. And, face it, they sock it to us with excise taxes, utility taxes, use taxes, gasoline taxes and every other type of tax or fee they can dream up so that more than half of our paychecks winds up in their coffers one way or another.