Thread: Steve Hilton: Power to the people! Here's why we need a Convention of States

Steve Hilton: Power to the people! Here's why we need a Convention of States

By Steve Hilton | Fox News
2 hours ago

One of the things that first inspired me about America was the passion for localism, a driving force of the American Revolution and an idea enshrined in the Constitution.

After battling the centralizing zeal of the British bureaucracy from inside that nation’s government – and realizing that even the politicians on my own side who had promised to give away power preferred to hoard it once elected – I looked forward to living in a nation where power really was in people’s hands.

And then we actually moved to the U.S. six years ago. In most ways, America has exceeded my expectations. I am so inspired by everything from the people to the National Parks to amazing cities like New Orleans, where I recently spent some time. And one of my proudest moments was taking my children to the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia and really understanding the incredible vision of the Founders.

But the one area where I have been profoundly shocked and disappointed is the political system. I was amazed to discover the extent to which power in America, just like in Britain, has been centralized in the hands of an insular and arrogant ruling elite. The politicians in Congress. The bureaucrats in the administrative state. The big donors and big business lobbyists who grease the wheels and help keep the whole baleful show on the road. In a word, the Swamp.

The Convention of States is now a real and growing movement, with supporters in all 50 states and a clear focus on constitutional amendments that would “limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, impose fiscal restraints, and place term limits on federal officials.”

This is not what it was supposed to be like. From the beginning, power was enshrined with the states, not the central government. States have their own constitutions, after all, because in many ways they are sovereign.

Even the name – United States of America – speaks to the notion of a federation more than a monolithic country. That sentiment was codified in the 10th Amendment to the Constitution: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

How hollow that promise looks today. The federal government reaches down from Washington, imposing costly regulations and unfunded mandates and exerting jurisdiction over areas of policy from health care to housing to welfare to ... well, you name it ... that could and should be run by state or local government.

And since the 1970s, the federal judiciary has sided with the executive and legislative branches’ desire to acquire more power – a desire that is nonpartisan. Both Republicans and Democrats are guilty of centralizing power.

Power should be as close to people as possible. There has to be a very good reason for it to flow upwards from the people. A member of the Washington elite saying “I want it!” is not a good reason.

In 2016, I went back to Britain to campaign for Brexit – the withdrawal of Britain from the European Union – for precisely this reason. Why on Earth should a distant and unaccountable EU bureaucracy in Brussels have such a huge say over the laws that governed the British people’s lives? Against the odds – and the smug predictions of the elite – Brexit passed, and the populist revolution was underway.

Then came the big one later that year: Donald Trump’s election as president. The populist uprising had found its voice. But now we need the next revolution – and the beauty of it is that it’s all written down in America’s founding documents.

The United States Constitution is, in fact, a profoundly populist one. It includes built-in mechanisms to challenge power-hungry politicians and bureaucrats in the capital.

Article V of the Constitution allows state legislatures to initiate a Convention of States, at which amendments to the Constitution can be proposed without congressional initiative. It takes 34 states to call the convention and 38 to ratify any amendments proposed.

The Convention of States is now a real and growing movement, with supporters in all 50 states and a clear focus on constitutional amendments that would “limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, impose fiscal restraints, and place term limits on federal officials.”

A number of states have already passed resolutions or actual legislation. But the only way this will happen is if you get involved – and you can do that here.

I’ll be debating all this with “Fox & Friends” contributor Pete Hegseth, a big champion of the Convention of States, on “The Next Revolution” this Sunday at 9 p.m. EST on Fox News Channel. Hope you can join us!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/...on-states.html

No, Steve. I think it highly audacious for you to come to our country and think for some insane reason that you need to tell us what to think, how to live and God Forbid, how to run our country. You need to go back to Britain and effect your "change" there. We do not want nor do we need a "convention of states".

We have issues of our own making and we're in the process of fixing those mistakes, no "convention of states" required, thank you very much.

FOX, where do you dig up these people??!! Why would you ever approve a show entitled the "Revolution"?? We don't need a revolution, we need to fix our country. The power of the people has elected the President who can do that, no "convention of states" is required nor even desired.

We do not want or need our Constitution amended. For example, I do not approve of term limits beyond those already in the Constitution for President and Vice President. I do not approve of a "personhood amendment". I do not approve of bans on transgenders or gay couples or requirements for "family values" or changes that would give "religious liberty" even more dire influence on our country. I know what these "convention of states" people are up to, and this American whose family has been since before we were a nation, not only says "NO" but, "HELL NO"!!

So all you johnny-come-latelies, either enjoy the country we provide you or go back home,preferably the latter.

STOP MEDDLING IN OUR CONSTITUTION!!

Originally Posted by Steve Hilton

I’ll be debating all this with “Fox & Friends” contributor Pete Hegseth, a big champion of the Convention of States

Looks like a one-sided debate!

Originally Posted by Judy

We do not want or need our Constitution amended.

I wouldn't go that far. There are changes I would like to see, but a Convention seems to be starting from scratch to entirely replace what we have. This is the problem with so many political proposals, "comprehensive" changes. We need to make small changes. "One Amendment at a time!"