Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    In the U.S. Senate, talk of a splinter caucus to force compromise

    In the U.S. Senate, talk of a splinter caucus to force compromise

    Jon Ward Senior Political Correspondent
    ,Yahoo NewsMay 16, 2018


    Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, at the Capitol. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) More

    A former adviser to Evan McMullin’s independent presidential campaign in 2016 is now in talks with a small group of U.S. senators to form a new caucus that would influence who is chosen as majority leader in 2019.


    “This group could say to the Republicans, ‘We’ll caucus with you … [but] we will not do that unless it’s not Mitch McConnell. Instead we’d like to have Susan Collins,’” said Joel Searby, a political operative from Florida, in an interview on Yahoo News’ “The Long Game” podcast.


    The notion of pushing for Collins, a Maine Republican who is one of the most moderate members of the Senate, rather than McConnell, a Kentucky Republican who has held the majority leader post since 2015, would be to nudge the Senate toward bipartisan compromise rather than gridlock.


    Similarly, Searby said, the group of three to five senators could tell Democrats they would vote with them on most issues in exchange for the selection of a more moderate Democrat like Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado, rather than the current minority leader, Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York.


    “The grand idea is that it could change the culture of how the Senate works by saying there is now a third bloc that will stick together on nearly all issues,” Searby said.


    Issues such as health care, the national debt and infrastructure all require both Republicans and Democrats to work together to find solutions, Searby said, and such a caucus of independent-minded senators would insist that the Senate do so.


    “Of course they need to have freedom to break off on issues that matter to them personally,” he said. “They would probably be free to deal differently on social issues but they would stick together on those things and force both sides to come together.”


    Searby was active in Florida politics as a Republican consultant until the 2016 cycle, when his involvement with McMullin’s campaign thrust him into the national political game.


    Searby would not comment on which senators he and others are attempting to work with. But one chief of staff to a Democratic senator confirmed that he has had conversations with Searby.


    While many senators say they would like to see more bipartisanship, most are probably afraid of the consequences of going against their party leadership.


    Refusing to vote for a member of one’s own party for majority leader would be seen as a betrayal, subject to punishment in the form of a primary challenge.


    The next opportunity for any splinter caucus to try to force compromise in the Senate would be next January, after the midterm elections, when the first session of the 116th Congress will be convened and new leadership elections will be held. Any impact on those elections would require extensive planning and coordination that would begin weeks, if not months, before those leadership elections.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-s-senat...090056676.html
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    In closed-door meeting, Ryan tells Republicans not to sign DACA petition


    Ryan said he and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy met with President Donald Trump Tuesday on the issue, and they're working on a bill they believe could actually become law with the White House's backing, according to Flores and members.
    Quote Originally Posted by ALIPAC View Post
    Wow! That stinks! This means Trump is working on a new Amnesty for illegal aliens bill. What a traitor.
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. President Obama, Hispanic Caucus Members Talk Dream Act
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-16-2010, 10:57 PM
  2. New U.S. Senate amnesty compromise
    By MW in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-18-2007, 04:02 PM
  3. House-Senate Compromise?
    By WavTek in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-26-2006, 02:39 PM
  4. Possible Senate Compromise Floated
    By concernedmother in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-04-2006, 07:56 PM
  5. Georgia Senate OKs compromise on illegals
    By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-28-2006, 05:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •