Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    US Violates “Defense Zone” After Chinese Threat to Shoot Down Aircraft

    US Violates “Defense Zone” After Chinese Threat to Shoot Down Aircraft

    Asia on the verge of a full blown arms race

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Infowars.com
    November 26, 2013

    In a move designed to challenge China’s “air defense zone,” the US flew two B-52 Bombers over disputed islands in the East China Sea just days after Beijing implicitly threatened to shoot down aircraft entering the area.

    Image: B-52 Bomber (Wikimedia Commons).

    Over the weekend, China released a map which included the clustered Senkaku islands and warned that all aircraft entering the zone must immediately identify themselves to Chinese authorities and face “emergency military measures.”
    However, the US flew two B-52 bombers through the zone during a training mission today without notifying Beijing. There was no response from China. In conducting the mission, the Pentagon followed through on its promise that US pilots would not switch on their transponders and would defend themselves if attacked.
    “We have continued to follow our normal procedures, which include not filing flight plans, not radioing ahead and not registering our frequencies,” said US Colonel Steve Warren.
    Although the B-52 flyover was part of a pre-planned exercise, it has been characterized as a clear act of defiance against China’s territorial claims.
    Japan responded to the Chinese threat by accusing Beijing of engaging in “profoundly dangerous acts that unilaterally change the status quo,” adding that the defense zone was “not valid at all.”
    According to the Telegraph’s Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, the escalating crisis represents a “watershed moment for the world” and means “Asia is on the cusp of a full-blown arms race.”
    “Even if the immediate crisis can be defused, we are clearly sliding into a new Cold War,” writes Evans-Pritchard, adding, “One misjudgment by either side in the East China Sea could change our world entirely. If you are not concerned, perhaps you should be.”
    *********************
    Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
    This article was posted: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 at 3:18 pm

    Tags: foreign affairs, war

    http://www.infowars.com/us-violates-...down-aircraft/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Chinese Fighter Jets Tailed US Planes Over Disputed Islands

    Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, November 29, 2013, 10:49 AM



    Senkaku-Diaoyu Islands

    Chinese fighter jets tailed US jets over the disputed islands in the East China Sea.

    The BC News reported:


    China says it scrambled fighter jets to monitor US and Japanese planes as they flew in its newly declared air defence zone in the East China Sea on Friday.

    The zone covers territory claimed by China, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea.

    China said last week that all aircraft crossing through the zone must file flight plans and identify themselves or face “defensive emergency measures”.

    The US, Japan and South Korea say they have since defied the ruling and flown military aircraft in the area.

    The air defence identification zone (ADIZ) covers a vast area of the East China Sea and includes a group of islands which are claimed by Japan, China and Taiwan.

    South Korea claims ownership of a submerged rock, known as Ieodo, within the zone.

    The establishment of the ADIZ has caused widespread anger, with the US calling it a “destabilising attempt to alter the status quo in the region”.

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013...puted-islands/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Another American ally about to drag U.S. into war?

    For once, it's not Islamists threatening the peace.

    Powerful forces in both these countries are itching to go at each other ... they're taking provocative steps toward hostilities TODAY ... if they fight, America will fight.

    We'll have no choice.
    WND EXCLUSIVE

    Chinese sorties over disputed islands spark war fears

    U.S. could be drawn into regional conflict through pact


    Published: 4 hours ago
    Michael Carl

    The U.S. is monitoring increased international tensions in the disputed Senkaku Islands in the South China Sea after twice in three days China sent jet fighters to the “Air Defense Identification Zone” it has declared around the chain.
    The sorties came after both Japan and South Korea sent fighters into the area to challenge China’s exclusive claim to the uninhabited islands.
    Chinese Air Force Col. Shen Jinke claims his nation’s flights are routine and a “defensive measure and in line with international common practices.”
    The islands located about 250 miles east of the Chinese mainland have been a point of contention over the past year, because Japan and China, along with Taiwan and South Korea, all express claims to them.
    Clarion Project Intelligence and National Security analyst Ryan Mauro says the declaration is China flexing its muscle.
    “This is a way of China declaring military domination over the islands without officially taking them over. By saying it is an air defense zone, China is trying to dominate the airspace. It’s basically saying, ‘These are ours and if your aircraft trespass, we have the right to shoot them down,’” Mauro said.
    C. J. Burke, CEO of intelligence and consulting firm Burke and Associates, notes China’s long history of animosity toward Japan.
    “I think instead you’re seeing the outbreak of a war of ideals. China has had a major issue with Japan for the last 5,000 years or so, and World War II only exacerbated this,” Burke said.
    Burke says he believes many Chinese wouldn’t object to a war with Japan.
    “Large contingents of the Chinese population would relish a war with Japan (even if they haven’t thought out how that would actually turn out). So China makes inroads with these groups and simultaneously pressures Japan,” Burke said.
    Burke said people in both countries hold long-standing resentments toward the other.
    “China has a populace that would be happy to see Japan suffer. And Japan feels much the same way at a sociological level. So China pressuring this way costs the emperor and the Diet some infra-political coinage,” Burke said.
    A former CIA station chief who asked not to be identified said a war between China and Japan would “cost the U. S. economically big time.”
    However, he added that in reality, the war would evolve into a war between the U. S. and China.
    “It would not be a war between Japan and China. The U.S. has a mutual defense treaty with Japan, as well as our treaties with South Korea, Taiwan, Australia and the Philippines. So, it would be a war between the U.S. and China,” the former station chief said.
    A war would end trade between the U. S. and the Far East, he said, however, it also would erase the U.S.’s debt to China.
    “Some parts of the Japanese political scale really would enjoy lashing out at China,” Burke said.
    Analysts speculate on Taiwan’s interest in the dispute. Burke said Taiwan also claims the islands and any conflict would impact Taiwan’s economy. He added that Taiwan also sees the islands as a military asset.
    “The ownership of the Senkaku Islands puts some pressure on Taiwan as they can be used for staging, intelligence gathering, etc. A quick look at the map affirms this,” Burke said.
    Burke said the dispute may be reflected by Taiwan’s military hardware purchases.
    “This is the major focus of this dance. Watch for submarine purchases on the part of Taiwan, U.S. 7th fleet deployments and weird holidays or ceremonies in China that reaffirm patriotism,” Burke said.
    Analysts are mixed on whether they believe there will be a war in the region, but one result could be a Japanese military.
    “The dispute may push their increasingly nationalist government to push further to amend their constitution to allow for an actual military,” said one analyst who asked not to be named.
    Burke said he believes the U. S. will stick with Japan.
    “The U.S. has already affirmed that the Japanese Defense Treaty applies in the case of the Senkaku Islands, so there wouldn’t be a war between the PRC and Japan,” Burke said. “It’d be something with the U.S. involved. At this time, China doesn’t have the means to wage even tactical war with the U.S. and Japan. So this isn’t in the cards.”
    The mission sending Chinese jets to the area came three days after the U.S. flew two B-52s over the islands. The unarmed B-52s were flying from Guam to Okinawa to participate in the naval exercise with the Japanese navy.
    The Japanese government also ordered its two major airlines, Japan Air Lines and All Nippon Airways, to ignore China’s order.
    Both Japan and the United States say they will challenge China’s claim to 1 million square miles of the East China Sea, an issue analysts say is a test of Japanese Prime Minister Shintaro Abe’s government.


    http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/chinese-s...ark-war-fears/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •