WHY IS'NT MSM REPORTING ON THE escalating DANGERS of Radiation, UPDATED

April · 10-17-2014, 08:52 PM

Fukushima Plume Prediction

from Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst. Plus 4 days ago All Audiences

Radioactive contaminants from Fukushima are carried across the Pacific Ocean by currents, the strongest of which is the Kuroshio, and spread along the West Coast of North America by complex coastal processes. Models predict that radionuclides from Fukushima will begin to arrive on the West Coast in early 2014, mainly in the north (Alaska and British Columbia) and then move further south in coming years before appearing in Hawaii in small amounts. The concentration of contaminants is expected to be well below limits set by the U.S. EPA for cesium-137 in drinking water (7,400 Bq/m3) or even the highest level recorded in the Baltic Sea after Chernobyl (1,000 Bq/m3). - See more at: ourradioactiveocean.org

April · 10-17-2014, 08:53 PM

Current Results

» View full version
How We Analyze Samples and Report Data

Samples collected by scientists and citizens for Our Radioactive Ocean are analyzed in our labs at WHOI using a method that is capable of detecting extremely low levels of radioactivity produced by cesium isotopes in seawater. We report our data in units of Bequerels per cubic meter of seawater (Bq/m3), where one Bequerel is equal to one decay event per second.
Analysis

Once we receive a sample in the lab, we first weigh it and measure the salinity of the water. Then we add a known quantity of stable cesium (Cs) to the sample (see step 4 below) and slowly pass (1 ml/min) the sample through a 5 ml column of potassium-nickel-hexacyanoferrate composite ion resin beads. This resin is specifically designed to selectively separate cesium (stable or radioactive) from the sample and has been optimized here for use in seawater samples.¹
We dry the resin and transferred it to a plastic “counting jar,” which we then place in an expensive ($75,000), high-purity germanium well detector made by Canberra Industries² for between 24 and 72 hours (see 3:05 here). Every time a cesium atom decays, that event is registered in the instrument’s multichannel analyzer, which has the ability to discern energy given off by decay of two critical isotopes of cesium: ¹³⁴Cs and ¹³⁷Cs.³ By counting the decay events associated with each isotope, we calculate the total counts per second (cps) for a given sample.
By periodically analyzing standards samples with known levels of cesium, we can calculate the detector efficiency. With this information, the sample weight, the cps, and the number of cesium gamma events per decay (the so-called “branching ratio”), we can calculate the total activity of ¹³⁴Cs and ¹³⁷Cs in each sample.
By adding a known quantity of stable cesium to each sample at step 1, and then measuring how much passes through the resin column, we can determine a chemical yield for the extraction procedure. This stable cesium “yield monitor” is determined using an inductively coupled mass spectrometer. Extraction yields for the resin columns are typically 96 to 99 percent.

Accuracy

The result for each sample includes the total activity (Bq/m³) and an associated counting error, which is a measure of how precisely we can analyze for Cs isotopes: for example, 2.0 ± 0.2 Bq/m³. This number reflects a combination of uncertainties related to the number of decay events in a sample and are larger for a smaller cps), as well as uncertainties in the processing and calibration steps. To minimize these uncertainties, we regularly participate in proficiency tests with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to ensure that our results are not just precise, but extremely accurate when compared to international seawater standards.
Detection limit

Our current detection limit using this method is about 0.1 Bq/m³ for ¹³⁷Cs and 0.2 Bq/m³ for ¹³⁴Cs. Values below this are reported as “below detection,” but this detection limit will vary with the sample size, the methods and detector used, and the total time each sample spends on the gamma detector. In general, larger sample sizes (we process a relatively large 20 liter sample), longer counting times (we typically leave a sample on for 48 hours or more), and more efficient detectors (we use some of the world’s most sensitive gamma detectors) lead to the lowest possible detection limits.
Results

We expect samples from the surface waters of the western Pacific that have not been contaminated by the Fukushima source to have ¹³⁷Cs activity of between 1 and 2 Bq/m³ and for ¹³⁴Cs to be “below detection.” This is because the only significant source of cesium in the Pacific prior to Fukushima was nuclear weapons testing during the 1950s and 1960s, and with its shorter 2-year half-life, all of the ¹³⁴Cs from this source would have decayed by now, but because ¹³⁷Cs has a 30-year half-life, we still see about 25 percent of the amount that was released (50 percent lost in first 30 years, half again of the remaining 50 percent lost in the following 30 years).
By January 2014, about 40 percent of the original Fukushima ¹³⁴Cs remains in the environment compared to March/April 2011 when the disaster occurred, so we correct our data to account for decay of both cesium isotopes from the time of peak release directly to the ocean from the reactor complex in Fukushima: April 6, 2011. We do this to look for changes in the levels of cesium that result from ocean mixing and dilution, rather than just radioactive decay. For human health concerns, the activity at sampling may be of greater interest, and will be lower than the decay-corrected value we report.
¹Kamenik, J., Dulaiova, H., Sebesta, F., Stastna, K., "Fast concentration of dissolved forms of cesium radioisotopes from large seawater samples," Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 296(2012): 841-846.
²http://www.canberra.com/products/det...-detectors.asp
³We look at following energies: 661 keV for 137Cs; 604 and 795 keV for 134Cs.
⁴ cf., M. Aoyama, M., et al., "Cross equator transport of 137CS from the North Pacific Ocean to South Pacific Ocean (BEAGLE2003 cruises)," Progress in Oceanography 89(2011): 7-16.

Go here to view:

http://www.ourradioactiveocean.org/results.html

April · 10-19-2014, 11:27 AM

Gov’t: US, Canada hit with “high concentrations” of Fukushima nuclear material; Tremendous impact all over world, enormous public health consequences — West Coast plume was 500% of level requiring NRC be notified — UC Berkeley Prof.: “We did indeed see high… fairly… I mean… some… level of radiation” (AUDIO)

Published: October 17th, 2014 at 9:52 am ET
By ENENews
Email Article
773 comments

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, research project funded by the Korean gov’t, published 2014 (emphasis added): … even though almost three years have passed since the [Fukushima] accident, it is still having a tremendous impact not only on Japan but all over the world… [Fission products] are easily dispersed in the atmosphere [and] transported very easily by winds… [O]nce they are released into the atmosphere, their consequences are enormous from the viewpoint of the public health… [A] high concentration of 137Cs arrived in western North America on 17 March 2011… [The] release of large amounts of radioactivity into the environment poses a global risk… [F]ission products… can be easily transported to any places in the world [and] not just be deposited locally but globally… Recently, computer simulations revealed that on average only 8% of the 137Cs airborne particles are expected to deposit within an area of 50 km around the accident site and about

50% of the airborne particles would be deposited outside a radius of 1000 km… Due to this radioactivity release into the environment, the Fukushima accident has had a tremendous impact not only on Japan but all over the world as well… radioactive material knows no national boundary…
Martin Wright, Radiation Protection Sr. Engineer at Diablo Canyon nuclear plant, 21st Annual RETS/REMP Workshop

Air in San Luis Obispo (between LA & San Francisco), Mar 20-21, 2011: Iodine-131 @ 5.07 E-12 μCi/cc
Equivalent to 5.07 pCi/m³, over 5 times (563%) Nuclear Regulatory Commission reporting level of 0.9 pCi/m³
Equivalent to 187,590 microBq/m³, which would rank #5 out of 70 daily measurements at Japan’s only CTBTO monitoring station (Gunma Prefecture, bordering SW Fukushima)

Interview with Prof. Kai Vetter, UC Berkeley Department of Nuclear Engineering, Apr. 15, 2011 (at 3:30 in): Even for us, it’s not really clear what happened, and what is still ongoing. Overall the message is, indeed, it’s better… our information right now is it’s much better controlled than 3 weeks ago, when we did indeed see high… fairly… I mean… some… level of radiation, and since then, declining… There are still continued releases from the environment there — not as much 3 weeks ago — but there’s still some releases. >> Full interview here
See also: During worst Fukushima releases, region in California hit hard by plume had NO radiation monitors — Email reveals EPA ‘decided’ not to deploy RADNET to area — Only one that was working ‘broke’ as radioactivity began to spike — “No clue” about exposure levels

Published: October 17th, 2014 at 9:52 am ET
By ENENews

Related Posts

**kathyet2** · 10-20-2014, 09:01 AM

« Gov’t: US, Canada hit with “high concentrations” of Fukushima nuclear material; Tremendous impact all over world, enormous public health consequences — West Coast plume was 500% of level requiring NRC be notified — UC Berkeley Prof.: “We did indeed see high… fairly… I mean… some… level of radiation” (AUDIO)
PBS: Plague along West Coast has biologists fearing extinction of species — Experts: Take your kids to beach and see them before they’re gone; Worst outbreak ever known in the oceans; Catastrophic losses nearly everywhere we’ve been (VIDEO) »

Record Radiation at Fukushima after Vongfong: First tests since Tuesday’s typhoon show radioactive material continues rising near ocean — Officials: We can’t do anything more to stop this, ‘depth and scope’ of contamination flowing out are unknown

Published: October 16th, 2014 at 10:18 am ET
By ENENews
Email Article
194 comments

Japan Times, Oct 15, 2014: Radioactivity spikes in No. 1 reactor well water — [Tepco] said there has been a sharp spike in the radioactivity of water samples taken from an observation well built by the sea… located to the east of the damaged No. 2 reactor… The well is positioned close to an underground trench by the sea that is connected to the No. 2 reactor building. Speaking at a press conference on Tuesday, Tepco official Isao Shirai told reporters that the increased radioactivity in the water could be due to higher levels of groundwater caused by recent typhoons mixing with radioactive elements…
NHK WORLD, Oct. 15, 2014: Cesium in groundwater rises at plant after storm — [Tepco] says it has detected high levels of radioactive cesium in groundwater after last week’s heavy rainfall from a typhoon. Highly contaminated water… seeped into soil [and] likely caused radioactive substances in the soil to flow into the groundwater… The officials plan to increase the frequency of water sample tests… to every day to monitor the effects of the heavy rainfall. But they say it will be difficult to take drastic steps because they do not know how far the contaminated water seeped into the ground after the accident.

Yahoo News, Oct. 15, 2014: Radiation increases in Fukushima aquifers after typhoon — The level of radioactive contamination detected in the underground water of the damaged Fukushima nuclear plant has increased after torrential rain [TEPCO] said Wednesday… Rainwater seeped into the sub-soil and mixed with the contaminated fluid coming from the damaged reactors… Plant managers are expected to take samples of groundwater in the area more often to analyse the evolution of the radiation, according to TEPCO. For the moment, additional measures have been ruled out since the depth and scope of the contaminated water leaks are unknown… Large amounts of contaminated water, much of which flows into the Pacific Ocean, are one of the major challenges that are still unresolved in the nuclear power plant…
New test results are available for samples taken Wednesday, one day after Typhoon Vongfong passed over the plant (pdf). Record-high levels of radioactive cesium continue to increase.
See Monday’s results here: Agency: Fukushima workers urgently trying "to prevent groundwater from leaking into ocean" -- Levels of nuclear waste surge next to sea -- Strontium-90 shatters previous record by over 5 Billion Bq/m3 -- Now 25 million times EPA limit

Published: October 16th, 2014 at 10:18 am ET
By ENENews
Email Article
194 comments

Like ENENews on Facebook
Follow ENENews on Twitter
Subscribe to the ENENews RSS Feed
Sign up for daily email updates

Related Posts

October 16th, 2014 | Category: Fukushima Daiichi, Japan (Fukushima)

« Gov’t: US, Canada hit with “high concentrations” of Fukushima nuclear material; Tremendous impact all over world, enormous public health consequences — West Coast plume was 500% of level requiring NRC be notified — UC Berkeley Prof.: “We did indeed see high… fairly… I mean… some… level of radiation” (AUDIO)
PBS: Plague along West Coast has biologists fearing extinction of species — Experts: Take your kids to beach and see them before they’re gone; Worst outbreak ever known in the oceans; Catastrophic losses nearly everywhere we’ve been (VIDEO) »

194 comments to Record Radiation at Fukushima after Vongfong: First tests since Tuesday’s typhoon show radioactive material continues rising near ocean — Officials: We can’t do anything more to stop this, ‘depth and scope’ of contamination flowing out are unknown

« Older Comments 1 2

rogerthat
October 16, 2014 at 10:51 pm Log in to Reply
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/...-house-7946142
Capenhurst has been shortlisted to store waste from decommissioned nuclear submarines, the Ministry of Defence announced today.
The nuclear services site, which already holds tonnes of radioactive material, could also take waste from 27 Royal Navy subs.
A consultation process will launch in November, arriving in Chester on December 9, to determine which of the five proposed sites will be chosen.
Philip Dunne MP, Minister for Defence Equipment, Support and Technology, said: “When the submarines in the Royal Navy fleet reach the end of their lives we need to dispose of them in a way that is safe, secure and environmentally sound.
“This open and transparent public consultation process provides the opportunity to work closely with local communities near to potential sites to listen carefully to their views with the aim of delivering a solution that achieves these objectives.
“We value the views of those who have something to say about the Submarine Dismantling Project. All of them will be considered properly as part of our decision-making process. After consultation we will publish a report on our findings and after we have selected a site, we will explain why we reached that decision.”…
rogerthat
October 16, 2014 at 10:55 pm Log in to Reply
http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/loc...active-7945056
Atomic Weapons Establishment criticised for radioactive waste management
Oct 16 By Linda Fort
The Environment Agency has raised a ‘non-compliance intervention’ against the AWE after a site inspection in July revealed too few competent personnel were in place…
Earlier this year, the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) announced it is considering enforcement action against AWE for failing to comply with instructions for managing a growing backlog of radioactive waste.
AWE was issued with a licence in March 2007 ordering the company to reduce the volume and encapsulate 1,000 drums of intermediate level radioactive waste so that they could be stored safely in a passive form over the long term.
The licence expired at the end of February 2014 without its requirements being met…

http://enenews.com/highest-yet-new-t...ontamination-f

April · 10-20-2014, 08:42 PM

Japan TV Anchor: I couldn’t tell the truth about Fukushima — Shocking revelations kept secret from public — Nuclear Scientist: I have not trusted the information from beginning… “The worst scenario I predicted has happened” (VIDEO)

Published: October 19th, 2014 at 5:15 pm ET
By ENENews
Email Article
256 comments

PRI’s ‘The World’, Oct 17, 2014: Japan’s timid coverage of Fukushima led this news anchor to revolt — and he’s not alone — No one is telling [evacuee] Shiga Kamematsu the truth

Complaints about censorship… continue to this day… Evacuees don’t trust the gov’t or Tepco… they’re blaming the media for not holding them both accountable… Criticism goes beyond a lack of investigation. Journalist Jun Hori says his news agency prevented him from accurately reporting what happened… It restricted what he and other journalists could say about Fukushima [like] how much radiation was spreading.
Jun Hori. NHK news anchor: “I couldn’t tell the true story on my news program… It was very frustrating… A lot of people kept asking me, ‘Why didn’t you tell us earlier about what is happening?’… My superiors said NHK was getting complaints from politicians… They told me I had to stop… The Japanese thought someone was [giving them accurate information] — companies, the government, someone. But once you peeled back the cover, you saw that nobody was doing it.”

Jun Hori at TEDx Kyoto: ‘Do not create panic, do not fuel public anxiety, do not impair national interests, do not compromise the interests of our sponsors’… There is a plethora of information available on the web, one cannot learn the truth from watching TV or reading newspapers… Drastic changes need to be made… A man [wanted] to see what is really going on in the nuclear plants… The recordings he sent us a few

months later were shocking and overwhelming.
Asahi Reporter: “Tepco declined… access of the complete recordings… Footage has not yet been released… There are much more shocking parts… Workers have been told… they’d receive 100 millisieverts [a day] of radiation exposure.“
Dr. Uzi Even, nuclear scientist: “I do not trust the reporting system… In fact from the beginning of this crisis… Japanese authorities were trying to play down the danger… The worst scenario that I predicted happened… I claimed from the beginning that the information given to the public is either erroneous or misleading… The first few days they said, ‘Everything is under control, nothing will happen, you don’t have to be worried.’ I doubted it from the moment of the earthquake.”
Watch the interview here

Published: October 19th, 2014 at 5:15 pm ET
By ENENews

Related Posts

April · 10-20-2014, 08:46 PM

PRI’s ‘The World’, Oct 17, 2014: Japan’s timid coverage of Fukushima led this news anchor to revolt — and he’s not alone — No one is telling [evacuee] Shiga Kamematsu the truth

Complaints about censorship… continue to this day… Evacuees don’t trust the gov’t or Tepco… they’re blaming the media for not holding them both accountable… Criticism goes beyond a lack of investigation. Journalist Jun Hori says his news agency prevented him from accurately reporting what happened… It restricted what he and other journalists could say about Fukushima [like] how much radiation was spreading.
Jun Hori. NHK news anchor: “I couldn’t tell the true story on my news program… It was very frustrating… A lot of people kept asking me, ‘Why didn’t you tell us earlier about what is happening?’… My superiors said NHK was getting complaints from politicians… They told me I had to stop… The Japanese thought someone was [giving them accurate information] — companies, the government, someone. But once you peeled back the cover, you saw that nobody was doing it.”

And the beat goes on ......the lies continue and the dying will escalate.....while the governments think of other things to blame the radiation poisoning on....the useful idiots will of course believe and parrot the lies...

April · 10-21-2014, 05:59 PM

“Never heard of so much sickness & death in such a short period” says Fukushima evacuee — Writes about strange diseases in young people, deadly tumors and hemorrhages, pets missing hair, child losing all their fingernails, polydactyl baby — Doctor: My friends are dying of cancer, one after another

Published: October 21st, 2014 at 2:26 pm ET
By ENENews
Email Article
52 comments

Excerpts from message by a Fukushima evacuee, translated by World Network for Saving Children from Radiation, Oct. 15, 2014: Mrs. Junko Honda… was a successful beauty salon owner who ran two salons… She recently [compiled the] unusual symptoms that she had heard about over the past three years… whose veracity she has been able to ascertain.
“I had never heard of so much sickness and death in such a short period of time” -Honda

Babies, Children, Young Adults
Sep ’11: Child… had nosebleeds very often… many others at school who had nose bleeding
Jun ’12: Child had headaches and nausea since the accident
Apr ’13: Friend of an evacuee gave birth to a polydactyl child [birth defect, extra fingers/toes]
Jul ’13: Younger friend of an evacuee… got ill with cancer
Mar ’14: Relative [in] middle school… got ill with rheumatism [and] medicine doesn’t work
Lymph, Thymus, Thyroid Gland Problems
Apr ’11: I felt strange feeling in my lymph nodes… salon staff also felt the same
Sep ’11: My friend’s father died with a tumor in the lymph glands
Sep ’11: Gynecologist mentioned there was an increase of lymph tumors
Jan ’13: Child of an evacuee [had] unsubsidized thyroid exam… thymus gland was swollen
Jan ’13: Several children… from Fukushima [also diagnosed with swollen] thymus gland
Sep ’13: Child of an evacuee had an unsubsidized thyroid examination… they found many cysts
Oct ’13: Friend, an evacuee age 35, developed thyroid cancer
Mar ’14: Friend of an evacuee, in her 30s, had thyroid surgery
Unusual Skin, Hair, Nail Problems
Apr ’11: Hair of our pets [dog & cat] become uneven because of hair loss to an unusual degree
Apr ’11: Reddish eczema on my daughter’s face [which] stayed until we evacuated
Sep ’11: Hairdresser friend and her sister have suffered dermatologic eczema since the accident
Jun ’12: [Child's mother] experienced hair loss and… had sparser hair
Jun ’12: All the fingernails of a child evacuee from Sugakawa fell off after the accident
Adults Under Retirement Age
Sep ’11: Customer in her 40s got ill with a disease that cannot renew blood
Sep ’11: Woman in her 30s died from cardiac arrest
Aug ’12: My relative died suddenly of subarachnoid hemorrhage… in his 30s
Dec ’12: Resident in his 30s developed a tumor
Dec ’12: Resident in her 40s developed a tumor and died
Jan ’13: Doctor [said] his friends have been dying with cancer one after another
Mar ’13: Man in his 30s died suddenly
Mar ’13: 5 customers… had funerals of close family in very short period… 3 were in their 50s
Oct ’13: Male friend who was doing decontamination work died suddenly
See Video: ‘Hell of Fukushima in the immediate vicinity of the children’ (only in Japanese)

Published: October 21st, 2014 at 2:26 pm ET
By ENENews

Related Posts

October 21st, 2014 | Category: Fukushima Daiichi, Japan (Fukushima)

April · 10-22-2014, 09:30 PM

TV: Unprecedented catastrophe underway at Fukushima… Radioactive material will keep coming across to North America for centuries — Gundersen: Melted nuclear fuel to bleed into ocean for decades, perhaps centuries… Entire Pacific is being contaminated (VIDEO)

Published: October 22nd, 2014 at 9:57 am ET
By ENENews
Email Article
203 comments

Arnie Gundersen, nuclear engineer, Oct. 20, 2014 (at 13:30 in): Chronic and long-lasting radioactive releases are [ongoing]… Fukushima continues to bleed into the ocean, because those nuclear cores have melted down and are in direct contact with the groundwater. It will bleed for centuries perhaps, and certainly decades to come. So when you compare these nuclear accidents… [Chernobyl] didn’t hit groundwater… The bottom line is that accidents are getting worse… Chernobyl contaminated all of Europe –

Fukushima is contaminating the entire Pacific. >> Watch presentation here
Kevin Kamps, nuclear waste watchdog, Oct. 21, 2014 (at 46:00 in): It shows what’s really been expected, that the massive releases of radioactivity — both atmospheric, that fell out on the ocean, and liquid, that are still on a daily basis pouring into the ocean — are slowly, or not so slowly, making their way to the North American coastline… This is going to keep going on for years, decades, even centuries into the future… Everyday, it’s 300 tons of radioactive groundwater that flows into the sea – every single day for the past nearly 4 years now — 300 tons of radioactive groundwater, containing a toxic alphabet soup of radioactive poisons, cesium… strontium-90, plutonium isotopes. That’s each and every day, so it is an unprecedented catastrophe for the oceans… The significance is — that is open ocean sea water. The bioaccumulation, biomagnification — we’re talking about orders of magnitude concentration of these radioactive poisons. First plankton, then go up the food chain — we are at the top of that food chain. So that’s just going to get worse the further up the food chain you go. It’s a very significant issue that the US federal government and the state governments are not paying attention to. >> Watch broadcast here
See also: Fukushima nuclear waste detected off U.S. West Coast, from California to Canada -- "There is definitely offshore Fukushima cesium now" -- Test results will not be revealed to public for several weeks (VIDEO)

Published: October 22nd, 2014 at 9:57 am ET

Related Posts

October 22nd, 2014 | Category: Audio/Video Clips, Canada, US, West Coast

“Never heard of so much sickness & death in such a short period” says Fukushima evacuee — Writes about strange diseases in young people, deadly tumors and hemorrhages, pets missing hair, child losing all their fingernails, polydactyl baby — Doctor: My friends are dying of cancer, one after another »

**kathyet2** · 10-23-2014, 11:38 AM

Fukushima Radiation Alert: Something very strange is going on in California and New Mexico

Published on Sep 30, 2014
Breaking News! Something very strange is going on in California and New Mexico
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/...

http://enenews.com/leader-fukushima-s...

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Mid-Am...

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Mid-Am...

Radiation and Public Health Project
http://www.radiation.org/

Click here to view Joseph Mangano's presentation on the new article about the rising number of west coast newborns with hypothyroidism, after Fukushima
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-yh2...

28 Proofs: West Coast absolutely fried with Fukushima Radiation, Part I

by Leuren Moret, Christina Consolo and Jim Fetzer

“When they went to check again, the readings were completely offline, which they updates in the comments on that FB posting, stating ‘What a shocker!!! Just went to look at the numbers on San Diego California and hey did you all know you are GONE out of here . . . They are not showing your numbers at this time . . . . Gone gone”–Susan Duclos

Breaking News! Something very strange is going on in California and New Mexico right now. Susan Duclos asks, Is it just a coincidence that just days after a report is released by ENENews that the leader of the Fukushima study stated that “Intense” radiation exposure was headed towards the US west coast with a plume traveling very fast and that “high concentrations” would impact the west coast with a prolonged period of radioactive upwelling expected, the highest of readings in San Diego, California and Albuquerque, New Mexico, suddenly vanish, go totally offline, and when they reappear those numbers have dropped by hundreds of Counts Per Minute?
Mid America Land Restoration/Microbes/Probiotics has been documenting the radiation readings across America for quite a while now on their Facebook page, and thanks to them we have the images from 9/18 – 9/20, showing extremely high levels of radiation, via the Nuclear Emergency Tracking Center. Using those, with images from this morning, show that something very strange has been going on.
Susan raises the prospects of whether the NETC site was hacked or “coincidentally” these particular areas went offline and returned showing levels massively lower than right before they went offline. But under the circumstances, the likelihood that the numbers are being “fixed” to avoid alarming the public appears to be overwhelmingly greater than any mere coincidence. Consider the difference:
11 PM/CT, 19 September 2014:

7 AM/CT, 21 September 2014:

As Susan explains, the government makes the practice of taking down high readings to verify them and correct them if they are in error, where the presence of the nuclear carrier, the USS Ronald Reagan, in San Diego might be supposed to at least partially explain what’s going on here. But the situation is extremely disturbing, especially insofar as we have reports about the massive contamination of the West Coast dating from years before. Consider the following, which I personally have found alarming and speculate that this might be an alternative explanation for DHS arming itself. We should think of it as a “multitasking” agency.
West Coast absolutely fried with Fukushima Radiation: 28 Proofs

Broadcast 25 October 2013 on ”The Real Deal”
Host: Dr. James Fetzer Ph.D.
Guests: Leuren Moret and Christina Consolo

Editor’s Note: This transcription was prepared with “Editor’s Notes” by William B. Fox, Publisher, America First Books, who also helped organize this interview. He has a series, NUKED PACIFIC, which begins with Part 1,Embryonic effects of Fallout:

YouTube - Veterans Today -

The series incudes Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5,Part 6, Part 7 He has supplied additional text in brackets below.

Part 1 of 2

Dr. James Fetzer: This is Jim Fetzer your host on The Real Deal, continuing research on Fukushima. I have two experts with me today, I am very pleased to say. One is Christina Consolo, also known as “RadChick.” Also Leuren Moret from San Francisco, Oakland Bay area who is an independent geoscientist. Both of them have done extensive work on Fukushima. Christina, let me begin with you. You have had a radio show called “Nuked Radio” and you have a web site FukushimaFacts.com, how did you get drawn into research on this catastrophe?
Christina Consolo: Well I noticed early on after the reactors exploded we already had symptoms of possible fallout in my area of the country in southeast Michigan. I had the metallic taste. I noticed a few weeks after that a lot of the pine trees started turning red, and later on that summer I even noticed mutations in some of the plants and young trees that were growing around here. That is when I really started looking into atmospheric transport and seeing whatever I could find about past nuclear accidents to try to figure out what was happening with this one because there was just no news about it at all.
Dr. Fetzer: Had you done any research in this area? I mean was that anything you had ever studied in school or whatever?
Christina: Well, Chernobyl happened when I was a senior in high school and we spent quite a bit of time studying it back then and I was intrigued by it. And then I have friends and family who worked in the nuclear industry. So it has always been kind of part of my life, and I also was a big supporter of it for a while before I really knew the truth of how dangerous these plants were.
Dr. Fetzer: Well it looks to me like you have done quite a lot of research on it. Leuren, I know you have been noticing some signs of contamination along the Pacific coast and even in Berkeley and San Francisco. Can you tell us some of those indications that things are not going well?
L. Moret: Well, I really noticed it at Christmas, this past Christmas of 2012 when I was traveling on public transportation and also walking up and down the sidewalks, seeing people you don’t normally see and babies that don’t normally come out into the public view. What I noticed, which was really alarming, is that I saw many indications of birth defects in babies that were born just before or since the Fukushima disaster on March 11, 2011. I knew right away because I was seeing Down Syndrome babies and toddlers, babies with eye defects, birth defects. The brain and the eyes develop in the first month when an
embryo is exposed in that stage very often the brain and/or the eyes are damaged. I also noticed a toddler who had been born in the month, sometime in late February before Fukushima happened. She was about almost two years old, riding on a bus. I moved around from the seat I was in to be able to face her and her baby sitter and I looked at this baby, and the woman who was taking care of her, an older African American woman, noticed that and she said this baby is a dwarf. I love her, but she will never be taller than she is now. I said, “How old is she? When was she born?” She said, “Late February 2011.” So then I knew that radioactive iodine had affected the endocrine system, which is the pituitary, thyroid, and what is the one? Adrenal glands which control growth, organ function, everything in the body. I realized that it had to be Fukushima radioactive iodine that had damaged her. So that was particularly important to see these birth defects expressed already a year and a half after Fukushima because the babies and the unborn are the most susceptible to damage by the ionizing radiation. What Dr. [L. J.] LeVann said, he did a study on bomb testing in Alberta, Canada and other parts of Canada, but he was writing about the effects and researching the effects of the very large hydrogen bomb tests that the Soviets did in the Arctic. Hereported in this landmark paper that damage to a developing organism, an organism in the developmental stages has ten to a 100 million times greater damaging effects on that organism than after they are born or they are in later stages of their lives. So the litmus test for ionizing radiation of course is the unborn and the babies, and what we are seeing are increases in infant mortality across the U.S. as well as around the world. Decreases in fertility, and then very strange things like I have seen two cases in the last week of men reported with breast cancer. One man who lived in Massachusetts, who was in his early 40′s and an athlete, had breast cancer twice in both of his breasts. So these are just some of the indications. The environment is also contaminated. There have been reports about radiation levels in dried sea weed or they call it nori in Japan in the Chiba area which is between Tokyo and Fukushima and also in seaweed off of the West Coast. We will talk in more detail during the interview [about this] but we wanted to give you first an update on the Fukushima typhoons, this would be from Oct 15th to the present and then compare that to 28 signs we have now that the West Coast is absolutely getting fried. The West Coast of the Pacific Coastline of North America. We will just talk about biological effects and the effects on infants, also the environmental effects, and then we would like to cover this very alarming increase in nuclear power, who is getting involved now. It is China taking over the British system. Also the fact that Janet Napolitano who is head of Home Land Security has now been hired as President of the University of California which is the biggest weapon of mass destruction producer in the world, and that seems to be on the increase. No doubt they will be using many nuclear weapons on civilian populations not only in Iraq and Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza, but they are going to be using them in the developed super power countries as well.
Dr. Fetzer: Christina, before we go further, the latest results [voice echoes in background] and we are getting a lot of feedback, I don’t know why, but you have noticed some signs in Michigan already of radioactive contamination. Could you mention a word or two about those?
Christina:: Oh, absolutely. The first summer in 2011 I had been a gardener, an avid gardener, and grown my own produce for 17 years and I was always interested in mutations because that was my area of expertise was actually in genetics and retinal pathology in clinical research, but I never saw anything in nature. Pretty soon I started seeing it happening. Things that grew very fast, things that uptake a lot of water like dandelions and weeds and young trees and things of that nature. And then when I went back to the Chernobyl research I learned about the findings in tree leaves and flowers and then later in animals, I started a page on Facebook called Mutation Watch and I put out a call for images to see what people were noticing in their part of the country. You know I get emails every day saying I have been growing corn for 30 years and I have never seen anything like this, or I had these trees on my property my whole life and they have never developed triple and quadruple seedlings. Just all of these changes that are occurring are the same exact same thing that happened after Chernobyl and the same thing that happened after Three Mile Island. I made the acquaintance of a woman named Mary Osborn [Ouassiai]who is known as the mutation lady of Three Mile Island. Whenever anyone in that area notices something funny growing in their yard they call her and she comes over and takes a picture of it and she hascollected thousands of images over the years, and when you put our images next to each other, it is all the same thing. So in order for this correlation to be incontrovertible we need to test these plants, but there is no way to test them because the universities are not going to let you just walk in and use their very expensive equipment. Even to test just one small section of a plant would take hours to do, so we are kind of stuck with just collecting images for right now, making those images available to researchers who want to use them in any of the research that they are doing and just to keep asking the public for data and sourcing as much of that as we can through social media. In turn, getting the word out with social media as much as possible too since all of these agencies and organizations that have been set up to protect us and warn us about fallout or other contaminants are not really doing their job. At least from the evidence that we are seeing.
Dr. Fetzer: Well it is stunning, and the fact that these effects are being experienced clear across the country, I mean from San Francisco, Oakland Bay to Michigan is really stunning all by itself. Look Leuren, I know this new study includes a map showing where the contamination is the greatest in the West. The area of greatest concentration appears to be Chicago. And I wonder what that means? Have you got an interpretation about why Chicago or that area should be heavy among the many areas in the country that are being so strongly affected?
L. Moret: OK, you are referring to the contamination map from the article “28 Signs That the West Coast is Being [Absolutely] Fried…“?
Dr. Fetzer: Yes.
L. Moret: OK, first of all, that is a map of combined radiation contamination from different sources, so part of it is the radiation released that has been released every day from nuclear power plants across the U.S. So that is why there are more symbols on the eastern half of the U.S. Many of those are nuclear power plants which have been in operation since the ’60′s and 70′s. But also there is contamination from the military sources, depleted uranium and so forth on military bases and firing ranges and bombing ranges in the U.S. which are, that stuff is all over the U.S. Every base is contaminated with it, I think you could say. And of course then the rain out and fallout, it is the rainout of the military munitions radiological [effects] and mininukes that they have been using in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, not Syria, Lebanon and other places [Ed. Note: Actually there is strong evidence she had it right the first time, namely that the U.S.-Israel axis has used mininukes in Syria]. That comes across the ocean, believe it or not, all the way across the Eurasian continent over the Pacific and then it is rained out across the United States and Canada. So that is part of the cause of elevated radiation in the U.S. Then of course Fukushima is on top of that and I think that a lot of the radiation, particularly in the western states and the western slope of the Rocky Mountains — a lot of that is Fukushima. The very large alarming increase in death rates in the U.S., the highest increase is on the west slope of the Rocky Mountains where rain and snow rains out the radiation transported in air masses from west to east.
Dr. Fetzer: Christina, do you have that map in front of you as we speak, because
I want to get your take too on what the distribution shows and whether anything strikes you as especially interesting about this.
Christina: I don’t have that map. I saw that map, I don’t have it right in front of me but I do know from watching the atmospheric transport and I was doing a fallout forecast for the first year after the accident trying to predict where this rainout would occur and then seeing how it corresponded to these various geiger networks that had been set up. We were able to predict in about 90-95% of the time where the highest levels would occur. And something that I see that happened on a daily basis was higher levels around the Great Lakes region. Part of that is because of all of the humidity from the Great Lakes binds with these particles and they occur with rainout and so forth. In Michigan we have a lot of variance in the weather and in precipitation levels. As it is, being on the east coast of [the state of Michigan adjacent to] Lake Huron, I know that they get about four times the amount of precipitation on the west coast of [Canada bordering Lake] Ontario which is across the lake. So we have this lake effect that occurs, and we also see that with snow fall totals in the Grand Rapids regions which is on the western side of the state that anywhere around these lakes is going to have a greater potential for fallout because of the amount of humidity and increased precipitation. Most of the time it is entirely dependent on where the rain falls and where the snow occurs.
L. Moret: And then the Great Lakes watershed is a vast and enormous region with rain out and snow out of all this radiation flowing into the Great Lakes and increasing the levels there. Of course the water evaporates, it washes up on the shorelines. The radioactive particles are lofted into the air and we know that the highest cancer rates in studies from England and in the U.S. are along shorelines of lakes, coastlines of geographic areas and river banks.

Caption from “28 Signs That The West Coast Is Being Absolutely Fried With Nuclear Radiation From Fukushima” by Michael Snyder, on October 21st, 2013 “The map above comes from the Nuclear Emergency Tracking Center. It shows that radiation levels at radiation monitoring stations all over the country are elevated. As you will notice, this is particularly true along the west coast of the United States. Every single day, 300 tons of radioactive water from Fukushima enters the Pacific Ocean. That means that the total amount of radioactive material released from Fukushima is constantly increasing, and it is steadily building up in our food chain. Ultimately, all of this nuclear radiation will outlive all of us by a very wide margin. They are saying that it could take up to 40 years to clean up the Fukushima disaster, and meanwhile countless innocent people will develop cancer and other health problems as a result of exposure to high levels of nuclear radiation. We are talking about a nuclear disaster that is absolutely unprecedented, and it is constantly getting worse. The following are 28 signs that the west coast of North America is being absolutely fried with nuclear radiation from Fukushima…”

Dr. Fetzer: Let me just encourage everyone to pull up the article “28 Signs the West Coast is Being Absolutely Fried With Nuclear Radiation From Fukushima” [by Michael Snyder] since we are going to be discussing just as we are now not only the map but also the 28 signs where I am very keen on getting Leuren and Christina’s explanations as about why those are so significant. But Leuren, looking at the map, it seems to me some of the heaviest contamination seems to be at locations like, if I am not mistaken, Portland, Oregon, San Francisco, possibly it is Los Angeles, more inland it looks like Albuquerque, it looks like Denver, I don’t know if that is Austin, Texas. Then there is a real high contamination around what appears to be Orlando. Am I right about those locations?
L. Moret: Those are all either locations where either nuclear power plants, nuclear labs are located and I have collected baby teeth and done studies with the radiation and public health project around those regions in the Seattle [area], the Northwest area including Portland. The Hanford Nuclear Weapons Lab, which has produced plutonium for decades, has really contaminated the Columbia River with constant releases of radiation [so] that the fish populations are affected. The salmon in the Columbia River have increasing female populations and decreasing male populations which is happening globally in the human population due to the hormonal and other effects of ionizing radiation on glands. So we have much more intersex now. That is where male and female reproductive cells are mixed in the same organism. That shouldn’t be happening. So polar bears in the Arctic where the Soviets did nuclear bomb tests, the females look normal and they have cubs with them, but they also have vestigial penises as well as female reproductive organs. There has been a study done atSvalbard in the region of the nuclear bomb tests by the Soviet Union. But it is happening in the human population and intersex is being reported all over the world in humans.
Dr. Fetzer: Are you already to the first of the 28 points?
L. Moret: Oh, I was just –
Dr. Fetzer: Just asking there–
L. Moret: I did not actually look at that, but now we know that polar bears in the Arctic region and seals and walruses also have reported fur loss. They are losing their hair, their fur. They have open sores. The same thing is being reported in the moose population along the Canadian-U.S. border from the Pacific to the Atlantic. So this is radiation damage. Radiation exposure causes these things and it is also happening to flight crews for Alaska Airlines, to pilots flying through the contaminated air column. The whole sky, the atmosphere is contaminated all the way up into orbital space with this Fukushima [radiation]. Very dynamic, very mobile plumes and nanoparticles that are just spread all over the world. By 2020 the entire Pacific Ocean will be contaminated by Fukushima radiation.
Dr. Fetzer: It is just dumbfounding. What do you make of these sexual aberrations? Is that because sex chromosomes are particularly sensitive to radiation? Is it just one more manifestation on the order of the birth defects that you are observing showing up with greater frequency in public places? I mean it is all very profoundly disturbing.
L. Moret: Well it is because ionizing radiation, and particularly depleted uranium or uranium is a hormone and an estrogen disrupter. There was a very good study done at the University of New Mexico, very, very good study, and they exposed pregnant female mice to drinking water contaminated with depleted uranium, but at levels the government says are safe. It caused birth defects. It caused changes in abnormalities in the uterus, the lining of the uterus, and of course that is the main cause of endometriosis in women. It has grown, increased horrendously since bomb-testing, particularly around nuclear facilities. So when you change the messenger molecules in the reproductive system all kinds of strange things happen. This isn’t normal. It shouldn’t be happening, and men shouldn’t have female reproductive cells in them, and women shouldn’t have male reproductive cells in them. This is all new, and it is part of the miracle “ha-ha” of the nuclear age. It is a nightmare.
Dr. Fetzer: Christine, are you detecting or are there any indications of similar serious sexual abnormalities in Michigan or other areas with which you are acquainted?
Christina: Not that I have had time to look into. Of course it is difficult to find this information because it is not shared freely by the public health departments. But once you understand the way fallout affects populations from studies that have been done, there were some very good studies that were done in the UK in the 60′s about childhood leukemia that was very large in populations where women had x-rays done during pregnancy and they found that the earlier in the pregnancy that the pelvic x-ray was performed the greater likelihood of that baby just from one x-ray, that baby had a 50% increase in its chance of developing leukemia, kidney cancer, or brain cancer. The number actually got higher the more x-ray exposure that infant might have had. The study that was done, they tried to correlate this with fallout, and each bomb test that was done during peace time exposed people to approximately one x-ray, or the amount of radiation from one x-ray. But we know that just at that low level that it can be extremely damaging from studies that were done back in the 60′s. One in particular I am thinking of from the University of Michigan that correlated the effect of radioactive iodine in infants compared to adults and it was as Leuren had said ten to a thousand times higher for infants than adults. The exposure is greater for inhalation vs. external exposure too, so now we have this ongoing fallout that is coming out in our rains and getting in our food supply. You might only be getting a little bit here and a little bit there, but this is cumulative. This is going to be going on the rest of our lives and our children’s lives because there is no way to shut off what is going on at that plant.
L. Moret: Jim–
Dr. Fetzer: Yes, Leuren, yes
L. Moret: Go ahead. I have something to say when Christina finishes.
Christina: We have no way to clean up the three melted fuel cores that are in the ground and this endless pouring of water. What this plant has turned into is just a radiological generating machine and there is no way to turn it off.
Dr. Fetzer: This is just stunning. I am just blown away that Japan would go the direction of nuclear energy when it had suffered the nuclear bomb attacks at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I mean, you would have thought there would be a tremendous cultural revulsion against even doing that and yet they appear to have been sold a package of how beneficial it would be. Even Einstein said that he thought splitting the atom was a ridiculous way to heat a cup of coffee. I mean, to boil water. I really do think that the nuclear energy industry has abdicated its responsibility, and of course we all know about the terrible problem of nuclear waste which has never been resolved, and where Leuren you may have mentioned recently how the situation in Washington is catastrophic because there seems to be all of this nuclear waste that is heading towards an aquifer. It may have been Majia Nadesan in an interview we did just this past week whom I was discussing [this with]. But all of this is terribly disturbing.
L. Moret: Yes, well what I wanted to mention, to add to what Christina presented on these special effects of ionizing radiation, is that in September of 2007 the United States Geological Survey, the U.S.G.S., published a paper, peer-reviewed, and it was a fish study across the entire United States on intersex in fish populations. And what they did was they sampled rivers all over the U.S. and they took the male fish and investigated the reproductive tissues to see how many of the fish, what percentage in each particular population sample expressed intersex, and that is where the male and female reproductive cells are mixed in the same organism. What they reported was every sample –every sample that they collected in the United States had levels of intersex in the male fish population ranging from low levels up to 95% of the males in the sample. Across the entire U.S., there was only one river where the male fish did not express intersex at some level and that was the Yukon River in Alaska.
Dr. Fetzer: Christina, do you think that there is a political dimension to this that the government feels that there is nothing the government can do so it is not going to warn the population because it might generate hysteria? I mean is that the sort of reasoning that might be taking place at the highest levels? Because our government has to be aware of the scientific facts that Leuren is relating here. They are simply are not sharing them with the public.
Christina: Oh sure, I mean what has been suggested to me during bomb testing is that they knew what the explosions would do. What they wanted to find out is what it would do to the downwind populations. If you read books like Secret Fallout by Dr. Ernest Sternglass, he talks about how people in the areas where they were conducting nuclear weapons tests, the government would give the people free car washes and they would measure the cars for contamination before the wash and afterward, because they wanted to see how successful decontamination would be. You know, we are being experimented on. The only thing that is being controlled about this accident is us. Our government is well aware of the research. Back since the 1920′s we have known that even low levels of radiation greatly disrupts DNA. They have continued to introduce this into our environment whether it is to make a sick population that then the health care industry will be able to generate more revenue from, or if it is control reasons. I don’t know as much about that as Leuren does from the historical or political perspective.
Dr. Fetzer: But it is just so obvious that you are right, that we are being used as experimental subjects but without our consent, so this is a gross violation of the ethics for experimentation with human subjects which the government, of course its own agencies are supposed to be upholding but in fact the government itself is grossly violating.
L. Moret: Well 85% of the key positions in the U.S. Government are held by Skull and Bones men from Yale. Skull and Bones leads us directly to the London financiers and the Anglo-American permanent war crimes racketeering syndicate
Dr. Fetzer: So you are suggesting that Yale and Skull and Bones are really a conduit for producing intel operatives and corrupt officials for the American government to maintain its course in relation with DHS, Homeland Security, the CIA and so forth.
L. Moret: I think that there is plenty of evidence that has been out in the public venue that supports that. But I would like to go back to the bomb-testing effects. Now Christina said of course the government knew, and I would just like to provide some evidence that supports what she is saying. In the later 2000′s I was testifying in the Nevada legislature and working as a research staff scientist at the Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab. We were studying the metal canisters and doing pilot studies in New Mexico and in Nevada on storing nuclear waste in these special metal alloy cans. I met a woman who was actually a Rothschild, she told me secretly but not to tell anyone, and she was very impressed with the work I was doing so she went to all of the meetings there in Pahrump, which is a little tiny town near the Nevada Test Site. She found out that the EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency, actually had a secret dairy at the Nevada Test Site all through nuclear bomb testing. They were measuring the radiation in cows, in calves, and in their own workers who shoveled manure and fed the cattle in that dairy.
Dr. Fetzer: Oh my gosh.
L. Moret: They also had cattle herds, meat-producing herds that they were also testing. That was classified. But she went to town and she actually got the report declassified and gave it to me. Another piece of evidence is that cattle mutilation during bomb testing began to be reported and it really turned into a very big issue in the U.S.. What a radiation activist told me was that he walked into an office one day in the Midwest, another activist office, about this cattle mutilation. They had a stick pin map where they had put a stick pin for each cattle mutilation reported across the U.S. He said they were all down river or downwind from nuclear facilities and the sheriff in one county actually went up to a black helicopter that had landed at a very tiny airport down in the wildlands, the farmland and discovered it was Army personnel with samples of tissue from cattle, they had mutilated cattle in that area. It was the Army taking samples from horses, cattle, killing them, and then throwing them out of the helicopter after they had sampled them or leaving them on the ground smelling like formaldehyde. This has been a military operation the whole time to monitor the health effects, the radiation levels, and the samples were always taken in the cattle from the eyeballs, that usually has the lowest radiation level in the body, and from the rectum and different organs in the cattle. It was very systematic. We also know that what happened in the bomb test period is happening now to monitor the Fukushima radiation. What they are doing is there is a big effort by the military and the nuclear establishment to manipulate the vital statistics of the U.S. and other countries by secretly aborting, forcing women with defective fetuses to abort them, and then it is reported in the vital statistics to the Centers for Disease Control from each county as voluntary abortions by these women. That keeps the birth defects and so forth out of the vital statistics at the Centers for Disease Control. Of course these statistics are used globally. So they are fudging everything.
Dr. Fetzer: So these people are suffering serious genetic abnormalities but they are covering it by –
L. Moret: Yes, and they have special units set up now in county hospitals where they are sending poor women, native Americans, African American women, poor people and forcing them to have abortions because the food streams in the United States and in different populations and in different socioeconomic groups are all also contaminated with radiation. The highest levels are in the poor populations, the poor sector of minorities and poor people. The best food, the cleanest food, for instance, you can buy at Whole Foodswhether they are importing food from the Southern Hemisphere, and they always have been since they went into operation and became a corporation and a food provider for the U.S. So foodstreams are also being poisoned.
Dr. Fetzer: Well just stunning. There are those of course who surmise that this is actually something that is being allowed to happen in order to contribute to the depopulation of the world. One might think that presumes a rather cynical point of view but the government really doesn’t seem to be doing anything that it could do to protect the health and welfare of the population, the citizens of the United States in this instance.
L. Moret: Well it is hard to believe. It is really, really surreal. It is Orwellian. It is a nightmare. But a very, very interesting book has been published called political ponorology. And ponorology is the science on the nature of evil.This particular book is addressing political purposes, Political Ponorology. It is by Andrew M. Lobaczewski [and Laura Knight-Jadczyk] who died recently, but he and a group of scientists in Poland wrote this book about the evil politicians during the Soviet era. The book had to be burned by him because he was told that the Polish intelligence was coming to his house to take it, and he and some of the scientists moved to the Soviet Union, rewrote it, published it, the same thing happened there. He came to the U.S. and he finally published it in his late 80′s in the U.S. in about 1985 or 90, but Brzezinski blocked it from being published. It has finally been published and if people are interested in how things like this can happen to humanity and to the biosphere and to this planet, it is a very, very interesting book.
Dr. Fetzer: Leuren, on that note we are going to have to take our break. This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Real Deal, with my two very special guest experts on Fukushima, Christina Consolo and Leuren Moret. We will be right back.

Christina Consolo, also known as “RadChick”, has hosted a radio show called “Nuked Radio” and maintains a web site FukushimaFacts.com,
Leuren Moret, an independent geoscientist, from San Francisco/Oakland Bay, CA. She, like Christina, has done extensive work on Fukushima.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09...iation-part-i/