Will Al Gore be the world's first global warming billionaire?

https://scontent-a-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/...fd&oe=54B9679E


https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...1b579a2a2a780c CFACT

Will Al Gore be the world's first global warming billionaire?

Who's cashing in on green grants, subsidies, preferences, set asides and carbon credit schemes?

Share the facts at CFACT.org: http://www.cfact.org/?p=23341...

Paul Driessen and Ron Arnold have exposed 26,500 green groups in the U.S., and $80 BILLION flowing into them from elites out to "shred the free market" says far-left activist Naomi Klein of radical climate group 350.org.

They caught a Big Green donor on tape telling other donors, "It is true that the environmental movement is an upper class, white movement. We have to face that fact. It’s true. They’re not wrong that we are rich and they are up against us. We are the enemy as long as we behave in that fashion."

In "CRACKING BIG GREEN," they tell sixteen shocking stories that expose the dark side of the environmental movement and what you can do to shine a light on it.

Get your copy of CBG today! http://www.cfact.org/?p=23341

The Green-Left needs to be exposed before they can do more harm. Is there still time?

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.n...0921aeb9940b84


https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...1b579a2a2a780c CFACT

What green elitists forced African villagers out of their homes at gun point to cash in on a carbon credit scheme that will have no meaningful impact on the climate?

Share the facts and much, much more in CFACT's new book "Cracking Big Green" http://www.cfact.org/?p=23341

Ron Arnold and Paul Driessen focus their outstanding scholarship to reveal the true face of the Green movement and how they d...o not hesitate to harm people or nature to achieve their ends.

'Did you know that there are over 26,500 Green groups registered in the United States today?

Did you know that they’ve received well over $40 billion over the last decade or so? And that’s just from foundations. They’ve gotten billions more from lawsuits, government grants and individual donations.

How would you like to know which three Big Green pressure groups together fleeced the taxpayers for over half a billion dollars?

How would you like to know which Big Green campaigners used global warming as an excuse to send armed soldiers to evict Africans from their village in Uganda, then bulldozed their homes to enable them to cash in on millions from a carbon credit scheme?

We’ve gathered these and many more of the unbelievable facts you need to know about the green elite that wants to rule our lives in one electronic volume.

CFACT is proud to announce the release of our new book, Cracking Big Green.'

Share the facts at CFACT.org and get your copy of CBG today: http://www.cfact.org/?p=23341

Big Green has billions of dollars at its disposal and has full control of the UNFCCC, EPA and other crucial government agencies. The time to expose them is now!

How much more damage will Big Green do before people wake up to the threat they pose?

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.n...d365ee5f5fcdce



https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...1b579a2a2a780c CFACT

If global warming was settled, why would its proponents continually have to resort to propaganda?

Share the facts at CFACT's award-winning Climate Depot: http://www.climatedepot.com/

'Consensus is central to politics but irrelevant to science where logic and data prevail. A simple Internet search of “97 percent of scientists” finds a dozen articles that prove the oft-quoted “97 percent” claim is... an urban myth.

The primary source of this hoax comes from a report by John Cook of the University of Queensland. Cook claims to have reviewed over 11,000 climate science articles.

Cook’s report says 97.1 percent of the reviewed abstracts conclude “humans are causing global warming.” Well, by how much? Everyone agrees there is a very small effect. So this statement means nothing. Cook made the mistake of including in his 97 percent, papers by well-known skeptical scientists.

In 2013, David Legates and others published a recount of Cook’s data that shows only 64 out of 11,944 papers, or 0.5 percent, published since 1991 say “most” warming since 1950 was manmade.'

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.n...c71588eaf419f6

https://scontent-a-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/...7c&oe=54C045E7

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...1b579a2a2a780c CFACT

When government mandates the type of energy we use, the math does not add up.

Share the facts at CFACT.org: http://www.cfact.org/?p=23282

'Producing biofuels requires massive amounts of land, pesticides, fertilizers, fossil fuels and water. Current quotas require plowing an area larger than Iowa to grow corn for ethanol, instead of using it for food crops or wildlife habitat....

The Department of Energy says fracking requires about six gallons of fresh or brackish water per million British thermal units (BTUs) of energy produced. Corn-based ethanol requires up to 29,000 gallons of fresh water per million British thermal units, and soybean biodiesel consumes as much as 75,000 gallons of water per million BTUs.

In terms of carbon dioxide molecules consumed and carbon dioxide emitted over the planting, growing, harvesting, refining, shipping and fuel-use cycle, “green” fuels fare no better than conventional gasoline and diesel.'

https://scontent-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/...f2&oe=54BB420B


https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...1b579a2a2a780c CFACT

Will the failure of the globe to warm since the nineties prove to be a pause or a peak?

Share the facts at CFACT's Climate Depot:

'The possibility that the Pause is occurring because the computer models are simply wrong about the sensitivity of temperature to manmade greenhouse gases can no longer be dismissed.'...

'The Great Pause is the longest continuous period without any warming in the global instrumental temperature record since the satellites first watched in 1979. It has endured for a little over half the satellite temperature record. Yet the Pause coincides with a continuing, rapid increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration.'

'The spike in temperatures caused by the Great El Niño of 1998 is largely offset in the linear-trend calculation by two factors: the spike of the 2010 el Niño, and the sheer length of the Great Pause itself.'