Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: UTAH (2011)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #21
    whyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    10
    This is a letter sent to the ACLU of Utah asking for litigation against the spate of bills signed into law by the Utah Governor. I do not really expect the ACLU to initiate effective litigation against these bills/laws.

    I am looking for both funds and trail counsel with expertise in constitutional law and civil rights.

    Can anyone help?

    PM.


    From: withheld
    Re: Utah Immigration Laws

    ACLU:

    I have serious concerns in regard to the immigrations bills HB 116, HB 466, and HB 469 that Governor Herbert signed into law on 3-15-2011. If possible I will challenge those bills myself. Unfortunately, I am disabled and finances will prohibit a direct challenge unless I can find funding.

    HB 469 allows any Utah citizen to sponsor an illegal alien after paying a fee and attesting to being financially responsible for said alien. This bill does not place any requirement of workplace enforcement, safety requirements, housing requirements, health insurance requirements, or minimum pay if the alien is used in a work environment on the sponsor. If the immigrant alien does not perform to the sponsors expectations and the sponsor withdraws his/her sponsorship, then under HB 497 and the US immigration code the alien is subject to deportation. HB 469 creates a system in which people would be in violation of the human smuggling provisions of 8 USC 1324 and would unfairly place many people at risk of federal prosecution and also unfairly place many at unnecessary risk of deportation. In effect, HB 469 creates a system of slavery in the state in violation of amendment 14, US Const. HB 469 also violates federal preemption in immigration.

    HB 466 has the constitutional flaw of intruding into the United States rights to enter into foreign treaties and the exclusion of the states in this area. On its face, HB 466 is unconstitutional.

    HB 116 has several flaws, besides the preemption issues, this bill requires the state of Utah to collect federally owed taxes in the event that an illegal alien worker does not have a social security number or an ITIN, and remit those funds to the federal government, if and when the state chooses. This provision alone is in violation of federal tax code and sets the state up to deny the revenue to the federal government if the federal government were to pass a law the state disagreed with.

    HB 116 removes these provisions of the applicant of a foreign immigrant worker, H2 program, provided to the immigrant and places those burdens directly on the alien worker:
    â—

  2. #22
    working4change
    Guest
    Great letter Whyman. Welcome

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941
    Utah GOP bucks conservative trend on illegal immigration
    March 19, 2011
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-231829.html

    2 Kinds of Republicans -- Mean-Spirited Utah Keeps Jobs From
    March 17, 2011
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-231656.html

    ALIPAC: Mixed reaction on new immigration laws
    March 17, 2011
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-231608.html

    LDS Church takes public stance on immigration legislation
    March 15, 2011
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-231457.html

    Utah governor signs immigration reform bills
    March 15, 2011
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-231404.html

    ALIPAC: Utah governor under spotlight over immigration laws
    March 13, 2011
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-231194.html

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •