FOGBLOW!Quote:
Originally Posted by [url=http://forums.hannity.com/showpost.php?p=94432481&postcount=42544
As for focusing on what is an nbC, I find it not nearly so amusing that Obamanauts should offer us tactical directions as that they would expect us to follow our opponents' advice.
I appreciate your concern for our feelings, though, Jagergeist, and your efforts to keep people from laughing at us.
Jagergeist, wouldn't you just love to divide into two feuding camps those who support and defend the U.S. Constitution, who resist a phony pseudo-POTUS, a Constitutionally ineligible usurper, a fraudulent impostor, a man of lawlessness and a representative of all that is evil, the Conman-in-Chief, the enemy combatant in the Oval Office, the anti-America, anti-Christian, anti-Israel, anti-Jew anti-President. But our cause is one and our objective is one.
________________________________
One of the more convincing proofs that Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Obama II, was NOT born in Hawaii is the publishing of two (2) - not one, but two - counterfeit documents purporting to be proof of a birth in Hawaii. Imaging expert after imaging expert and counterfeiting inspector after counterfeiting inspector have shown that each of those documents is a forgery, with not one expert witness coming forward to risk his career and professional credibility to vouch for Barry's papers.
That Mr. Obama and his supporters have presented TWO FAKES as his bona fides is proof enough for most people that he has NO TRUE OR GENUINE Hawaii Certificate or Certification of Live Birth to present.
MissTickly points out that, on the sunlit COLB in the FactCheck photographs, the purported DOH seal, over the registrar's signature on the reverse side, is debossed (lowered), not embossed (raised). This makes it invalid according to Hawaii Public Health Regulations, Chapter 8b, 2.4 B. (1) (b).[size=117]Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawaii Public Health Regulations
In this FactCheck photo of the readable side of a purported Hawaii DOH seal, do you see a ‘raised’ seal? (Click on the images to enlarge; click on the links to view the huge originals.)
http://img23.imagevenue.com/loc54/th...8_122_54lo.jpg 11KB image: click to enlarge
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFil...tificate_8.jpg
The readable side of the seal on the back of the paper should be raised.
The mirror image of the seal on the front of the paper should be lowered, like so:
http://theobamafile.com/_images/HawaiiSealExample.jpg
http://www.wnd.com/images/110512hawaiibirthcertseal.JPG
But on the FactCheck COLB, it isn't. It is quite the opposite, in fact.
The mirror image of the seal on the front of the paper is raised.
The fake embosser had its embossed and debossed images reversed.
http://img266.imagevenue.com/loc562/..._122_562lo.jpg 7KB image: click to enlarge
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFil...tificate_1.jpg
This by itself invalidates the photographic images posted at FactCheck and proves them to be FAKES.
MissTickly's analysis:
http://obamasgarden.wordpress.com/ab...official-seal/
See also "Exposing The False Hawaii Department Of Health Seal" and
"The Polarik Investigation" at The Obama File.
_______________________________________________
The historically and legally accepted definition of natural born Citizen is:This is almost the same as the definition used by Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett (1875). Waite lifted it from The Law of Nations (1758), by Emmerich de Vattel. De Vattel did not coin or create that definition; rather, he codified in his law text the accepted international law of that day. “The natives, or natural-born citizens [indigenes], are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.â€
- "a citizen
born in the country
of parents who are citizens."