What happens on June 3?
Printable View
Off topic, but related to Mr. Obama's Kenyan Mus|im origins.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3Acijio5xg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3Acijio5xg
Is there any country where a U.S. citizen can participate in a bombing
that kills and maims people, then self-deport to avoid prosecution?
Is the U.S. literally a dhimmi or subject state of the Saudis?
April 20, 2013: Beck's Expose: Six Congressmen Verify;
We Will Not Sit Down; We Will Not Shut Up [about government coverup]
April 20, 2013: Atty. Orly Taitz report on Is|amist terror attack at Boston Marathon
Regarding immigration, June 3rd is the day when the House Gang of 8 is expected to introduce their so-called "comprehensive immigration reform bill," a.k.a. amnesty, to the U.S. House of Representatives. This is expected to include amnesty for illegal aliens, a.k.a. a 15 year path to citizenship, which rewards law-breaking illegal aliens unlawfully present in the country for their criminal conduct in violating U.S. immigration laws, 8 USC §§ 1101 - 1537. While rejecting the "amnesty" label, Democrats in the Senate say that a path to citizenship, a.k.a. illegal alien amnesty, is essential for any immigration reform bill to pass.
So call and tell your U.S. Representative that any path to citizenship for law-breaking illegal alien criminals and scofflaws is a NON-STARTER and OUT OF THE QUESTION. Deportation for illegal aliens is the law of the land, and the President, or in the absence of a lawful President, the next in succession, is constitutionally obligated to enforce the law (Art. ii, § 3, ¶ 4) ... not to refuse to enforce the law until he gets a law that he likes.
Quote Originally Posted by TexasBorn
June 3. Mark your calendars.
JohnDoe2
What happens on June 3?
======================
I was trying to figure out what June 3 had to do with this thread.
BREAKING! New Revelation! Mike Zullo - SNEAK PEEK What's Coming Next!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hnKZU-nJ-sw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=hnKZU-nJ-sw
May 23, 2013 BLOG ARTICLE LIVE LINK
June 3 ?
Amnesty bill vote in 3 weeks IT'S NOW OR NEVER! Your support needed TODAY, or else Senate will give away 33 million jobs to foreign workers . . .
June 3 ?5/28/2013 Numbers says "Vote in 3 weeks." ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION/AMNESTY is the issue. Everything else is a distraction.
Amnesty bill vote in 3 weeks IT'S NOW OR NEVER! Your support needed TODAY, or else Senate will give away 33 million jobs to foreign workers . . .
Bombshell! Cousin Takes Obama To Justice. Mike Zullo Vets Obama Cousin Linda Joy Adams
Saturday, April 20, 2013 16:38
?% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
http://image.b4in.net/google-plus-20.gif
http://image.b4in.net/linked-in-logo-20.gif
(Before It's News) http://i1010.photobucket.com/albums/...book_logo1.jpg
From Facebook https://www.facebook.com/LindaJoyAda...t=feed_commentYou’re the president’s cousin Linda, so you have that weight of convicton that none other can have, be it Orly, Joe Arpaio or even Judge Supreme Sanders. If you’re proven beyond doubt to be who you say, then you’re steamrolling cousin Barrack into hell. You’re a force of goodness. (Zullo can just run a background check on you and that’s basic simple cop-work. He never got back to say if he judged you to be legit or not; so that means he’s agreeing to approve of you. “No news is good news” as they say. Zullo’s never proven you to be legit or not.)Mike Zullo got information from Linda Joy Adams and was expected to vet Adams and verify the information (about who Obama’s real father is i.e. a black from Topeka, Kansas, murdered by the KKK, and Obama’s mother fled away from Topeka in fear..). Because it’s been three weeks now and that Zullo’s simply said he can’t verify the information… but also that he has neither said Adams was legitimate or not, so thus, Adams stands as an informer and is not disqualified. No one has proven she’s not Obama’s legitimate cousin be it Orly Taitz or Mike Zullo, they all have failed to prove Adams a fake.
This is bombshell breaking news, because Adams is advancing an ambitious, brave plan of defeating Obama and proving him to be a fraudulent fake. Unless, someone can prove Adams to be a liar and fake, this is breaking great news: Obama’s being brought to justice by his own cousin, Linda Joy Adams.
This is so much the greater news as, being Obama’s cousin Adams has incomparably higher standing in justice than Orly, Mike Zullo, Donald Trump, Joe Arpaio or anyone in government, or anywhere in the whole wide world.
Adams is the only person in the world, who can drag Obama to justice and force him to reveal the truth about his identity, birth certificate and documents.
http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2013/04/bombshell-cousin-takes-obama-to-justice-mike-zullo-vets-obama-cousin-linda-joy-adams-2459302.html
http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/tran2two.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by staff writer at beforeitsnews.com
The Univ. of Hawaii verified Stanley Ann Dunham's attendance in the fall of 1960. She started classes late, on Sept. 26th, and soon began a relationship with a graduate student in her Russian class, Barrack Hussain Obama from Kenya.
But she could have been in Topeka, Kansas, in November, 1960, having sex with a black man there who was subsequently murdered by the KKK, causing her to flee from Topeka. It would mean that the UH registrar's report was false. It would mean that the eye witness testimonies about SAD with BHO Sr. at UH in the fall of 1960 were specious and manufactured. It would also mean that everything else we know about SAD from the fall of 1960 was wrong.
But hey, we've been wrong before. Maybe Linda Joy Adams, being SAD's cousin and all, is right and everyone else is wrong. We can't rule anything out, now, can we.
The only person in the world? Methinks an anonymous writer at beforeitsnews.com overestimates the importance of his exclusive scoop and its subject.Quote:
Originally Posted by staff writer at beforeitsnews.com
WND EXCLUSIVE
Obama birth-certificate doubts head to Capitol
'Sheriff Arpaio wants this in Congress. That's where we intend to take it'
Published: 58 mins ago
2 Videos at the Page Link: Audible gasps, shock, outrage and support for a congressional investigation were the responses by law-enforcement officers, elected officials and attorneys to a presentation by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse of evidence that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent.
Arpaio’s lead investigator, Mike Zullo, made a public presentation Saturday at the annual convention of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association in St. Charles, Mo., then held a closed-door session for police officers, elected officials and others.
“Sheriff Arpaio wants this in Congress. That’s where we intend to take it,” Zullo said in an interview with Carl Gallups of PPSimmons Radio.
Zullo said he was amazed by the number of law-enforcement personnel and others at the conference who were not aware of the evidence that Obama’s birth documentation is fake.
He told Gallups the overwhelming response was “absolute shock,” noting “audible gasps” could often be heard during his presentation.
Zullo said one official came up to him afterwards and said: “I have been purposely ignoring this matter – until now. I will ignore it no longer.”
Several constitutional officers, public officials, attorneys, elected officials and others are now pledging full and personal support for moving the issue to a congressional investigation, Zullo said.
He said the virtual media blackout had kept many of the officials in in attendance uninformed and they are now outraged that they have seen the evidence that they should have seen from the beginning.”
Zullo said the media is being “side-stepped.”
“We are making inroads and contacts that we have never made before,” he said. “This conference is really going to pay off in moving things forward. Very important people are now beginning to see the amassed criminal evidence of perhaps the biggest fraud in American history. They are moved – they are shocked – and they are ready for action. Plans of action are now being laid at this very conference. This meeting could prove to be monumental.”
Obama’s birth certificate became an issue before the 2008 campaign — raised first by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — because of allegations he might not qualify for the presidency as a “natural born citizen.”
Though the Constitution provides no definition, many scholars believe the drafters of the Constitution understood it to mean someone who was born of citizen parents. Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen, and some critics suspect Obama was not born in the U.S.
Arpaio launched his Cold Case Posse investigation after Maricopa County constituents expressed concern about placing an ineligible candidate on the 2012 presidential ballot.
Zullo recently met with members of Congress concerning the evidence his team has gathered.
After examining the evidence, he said, “They’re looking … and saying, ‘My God, a fifth-grader can see through this.’”
Evidence from Arpaio’s investigation was entered in a legal case pending before the Alabama Supreme Court. It was brought by attorney Larry Klayman on behalf of 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish, who are seeking to force Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.
The case, dismissed at a lower level, is now before the Alabama Supreme Court, where strict constitutionalist Roy Moore was elected chief justice in November. The case becomes all the more intriguing because Moore is on record previously questioning Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president.
The affidavit in the Alabama case, written by Zullo,says his team “concluded that there was probable cause that forgery and fraud had been committed in respect of two documents: 1) the long-form or original birth certificate computer image presented by Mr. Obama, which contained multiple errors and anomalies, many of them serious and: 2) the selective-service document for Mr. Obama, which contained a two-digit year-stamp.”
“This was contrary to specifications issued by federal regulations to the effect that the year of issue should be expressed as four digits on the stamp, and also contrary to any other selective-service registration document that we had been able to examine,” Zullo wrote.
The evidence, he said, should be put before Congress.
Zullo said Arpaio “continues to recommend that the Congress of the United States open an immediate investigation, including the appointment of a select committee, as regards to the authenticity of Mr. Obama’s documentation, whether any crimes have been committed, and to determine Mr. Obama’s eligibility for the office of president of the United States.”
The Obama administration has dismissed questions about Obama’s eligibility with mockery and ridicule.
In a brief asking that the Alabama case be dismissed, Democrats quoted late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel.
Get Judge Roy Moore’s classic book about his battle for liberty, “So Help Me God: The Ten Commandments, Judicial Tyranny, and the Battle for Religious Freedom.”
The party insisted: “In order for one to accept the claim that President Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery [and that he is ineligible], one has to buy into a conspiracy theory so vast and byzantine that it sincerely taxes the imagination of reasonable minds.”
The brief scoffs at “birthers” as a “tiny cabal of zealots” and quotes Kimmel saying: “These people could have personally witnessed Obama being born out of an apple pie, in the middle of a Kansas wheat field, while Toby Keith sang the National Anthem – and they’d still think he was a Kenyan Muslim.”
But Arpaio is one of few law enforcement authorities to look into the issue, and although his work largely has been under the radar in recent months, it is continuing, Zullo’s affidavit confirmed.
In a 2010 interview with WND, Moore said he’d seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” – as the U.S. Constitution requires of presidents – and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.
“This is the strangest thing indeed,” he said. “The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law.”
More recently, when a majority of the state’s high court denied a 2012 petition filed by McInnish seeking to require an original copy of Obama’s birth certificate before the sitting president would be allowed on the state’s ballot, Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” were legitimate cause for concern.
Parker wrote: “Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
In his concurrence, Parker described McInnish’s petition: “McInnish seeks from this court a writ of mandamus, directly ordering Beth Chapman, as secretary of state for the State of Alabama, ‘to demand that [President Barack Hussein] Obama cause a certified copy of his bona-fide birth certificate be delivered to her direct from the government official who is in charge of the record in which it is stored, and to make the receipt of such a prerequisite to his name being placed on the Alabama ballot for the … November 6, 2012, general election.’”
Parker, who also wrote a concurrence in another case arguing Roe v. Wade should be overturned, agreed that Arpaio’s findings were legitimate cause to question Obama’s presented documents but nonetheless joined his fellow justices in denying McInnish’s petition.
“The Alabama Constitution implies that this court is without jurisdiction over McInnish’s original petition,” Parker explains. “The office of the secretary of state of Alabama is not a ‘court of inferior jurisdiction’ that this court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a petition.”
Now, however, the case is coming from a lower court, suggesting the Supreme Court may have some opportunity for action.
Zullo testifies that the White House computer image file of Obama’s birth certificate contained anomalies that were unexplainable unless the document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a genuine paper document.
“As of the date of this report, this investigation remains open and ongoing and additional forensic evidence continues to be uncovered, further validating the original investigational findings.”
His testimony continued, “Mr. Obama has in fact not offered any verifiable authoritative document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event.
“One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several unknown sources,” Zullo wrote.
Zullo also noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.
He said raising further questions is the fact Obama has refused to release: Original, long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate, marriage license between Obama’s father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change (Barry Sotero to Barack Hussein Obama), Obama’s adoption records, records of Obama’s and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens on return from return from Indonesia, Obama’s baptism records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii), Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, Obama’s record with Illinois State Bar Association, Obama’s files from career as an Illinois State senator, Obama’s law client list, Obama’s medical records and Obama’s passport records.
In action related to the same case, Klayman asked the court to strike the brief from the Alabama Democratic Party. He called in “frivolous and arrogant” and said “in addition to mocking in disrespectful fashion the seriousness of this case and the integrity of our judicial system, [Democrats] seek to improperly present new evidence not on the record for appeal.”
http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/obama-bir...ad-to-capitol/
WND Related Stories
Sheriff Joe to Congress: Investigate Obama's eligibility
Roy Moore making eligibility backers desperate?
Jury: Fraud put Obama on '08 ballot
Obama eligibility appeal in Roy Moore's court
Talk-radio host calls for 'birthers' to be killed
Obama ignores senator's dying wish
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/obama-bir...ApHmvjxJjeF.99
[ED.: Glory, glory, hallelujah! His truth is marching on.]
WND EXCLUSIVE
Obama birth-certificate doubts head to Capitol
'Sheriff Arpaio wants this in Congress. That's where we intend to take it'
Published: about 8 p.m. EDT, June 3, 2013
[Radio clip at link] http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/obama-bir..._3LeqbhPKAWLM5
Audible gasps, shock, outrage and support for a congressional investigation were the responses by law-enforcement officers, elected officials and attorneys to a presentation by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse of evidence that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent.
Arpaio’s lead investigator, Mike Zullo, made a public presentation Saturday at the annual convention of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association in St. Charles, Mo., then held a closed-door session for police officers, elected officials and others.
“Sheriff Arpaio wants this in Congress. That’s where we intend to take it,” Zullo said in an interview with Carl Gallups of PPSimmons Radio.
Zullo said he was amazed by the number of law-enforcement personnel and others at the conference who were not aware of the evidence that Obama’s birth documentation is fake.
He told Gallups the overwhelming response was “absolute shock,” noting “audible gasps” could often be heard during his presentation.
Zullo said one official came up to him afterwards and said: “I have been purposely ignoring this matter – until now. I will ignore it no longer.”
Several constitutional officers, public officials, attorneys, elected officials and others are now pledging full and personal support for moving the issue to a congressional investigation, Zullo said.
He said the virtual media blackout had kept many of the officials in in attendance uninformed and they are now outraged that they have seen the evidence that they should have seen from the beginning.”
Zullo said the media is being “side-stepped.”
“We are making inroads and contacts that we have never made before,” he said. “This conference is really going to pay off in moving things forward. Very important people are now beginning to see the amassed criminal evidence of perhaps the biggest fraud in American history. They are moved – they are shocked – and they are ready for action. Plans of action are now being laid at this very conference. This meeting could prove to be monumental.”
Obama’s birth certificate became an issue before the 2008 campaign — raised first by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — because of allegations he might not qualify for the presidency as a “natural born citizen.”
Though the Constitution provides no definition, many scholars believe the drafters of the Constitution understood it to mean someone who was born of citizen parents. Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen, and some critics suspect Obama was not born in the U.S..
Arpaio launched his Cold Case Posse investigation after Maricopa County constituents expressed concern about placing an ineligible candidate on the 2012 presidential ballot.
Zullo recently met with members of Congress concerning the evidence his team has gathered.
After examining the evidence, he said, “They’re looking … and saying, ‘My God, a fifth-grader can see through this.’”
Evidence from Arpaio’s investigation was entered in a legal case pending before the Alabama Supreme Court. It was brought by attorney Larry Klayman on behalf of 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish, who are seeking to force Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.
The case, dismissed at a lower level, is now before the Alabama Supreme Court, where strict constitutionalist Roy Moore was elected chief justice in November. The case becomes all the more intriguing because Moore is on record previously questioning Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president.
The affidavit in the Alabama case, written by Zullo,says his team “concluded that there was probable cause that forgery and fraud had been committed in respect of two documents: 1) the long-form or original birth certificate computer image presented by Mr. Obama, which contained multiple errors and anomalies, many of them serious and: 2) the selective-service document for Mr. Obama, which contained a two-digit year-stamp.”
“This was contrary to specifications issued by federal regulations to the effect that the year of issue should be expressed as four digits on the stamp, and also contrary to any other selective-service registration document that we had been able to examine,” Zullo wrote.
The evidence, he said, should be put before Congress.
Zullo said Arpaio “continues to recommend that the Congress of the United States open an immediate investigation, including the appointment of a select committee, as regards to the authenticity of Mr. Obama’s documentation, whether any crimes have been committed, and to determine Mr. Obama’s eligibility for the office of president of the United States.”
The Obama administration has dismissed questions about Obama’s eligibility with mockery and ridicule.
[Radio clip at link] http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/obama-bir...ded8-0hO3BOxsW
. . .
But Arpaio is one of few law enforcement authorities to look into the issue, and although his work largely has been under the radar in recent months, it is continuing, Zullo’s affidavit confirmed.
In a 2010 interview with WND, Moore said he’d seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” – as the U.S. Constitution requires of presidents – and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.
“This is the strangest thing indeed,” he said. “The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law.”
More recently, when a majority of the state’s high court denied a 2012 petition filed by McInnish seeking to require an original copy of Obama’s birth certificate before the sitting president would be allowed on the state’s ballot, Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” were legitimate cause for concern.
Parker wrote: “Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
In his concurrence, Parker described McInnish’s petition: “McInnish seeks from this court a writ of mandamus, directly ordering Beth Chapman, as secretary of state for the State of Alabama, ‘to demand that [President Barack Hussein] Obama cause a certified copy of his bona-fide birth certificate be delivered to her direct from the government official who is in charge of the record in which it is stored, and to make the receipt of such a prerequisite to his name being placed on the Alabama ballot for the … November 6, 2012, general election.’”
Parker, who also wrote a concurrence in another case arguing Roe v. Wade should be overturned, agreed that Arpaio’s findings were legitimate cause to question Obama’s presented documents but nonetheless joined his fellow justices in denying McInnish’s petition.
“The Alabama Constitution implies that this court is without jurisdiction over McInnish’s original petition,” Parker explains. “The office of the secretary of state of Alabama is not a ‘court of inferior jurisdiction’ that this court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a petition.”
Now, however, the case is coming from a lower court, suggesting the Supreme Court may have some opportunity for action.
Zullo testifies that the White House computer image file of Obama’s birth certificate contained anomalies that were unexplainable unless the document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a genuine paper document.
“As of the date of this report, this investigation remains open and ongoing and additional forensic evidence continues to be uncovered, further validating the original investigational findings.”
His testimony continued, “Mr. Obama has in fact not offered any verifiable authoritative document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event.
“One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several unknown sources,” Zullo wrote.
Zullo also noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.
He said raising further questions is the fact Obama has refused to release:
Original, long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate,
marriage license between Obama’s father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham),
name change (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama),
Obama’s adoption records,
records of Obama’s and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens on return from return from Indonesia,
Obama’s baptism records,
Noelani Elementary School [kindergarten in Honolulu,] (Hawaii),
Punahou School financial aid or school records,
Occidental College financial aid records,
Harvard Law School records,
Columbia senior thesis,
Columbia College records,
Obama’s record with Illinois State Bar Association,
Obama’s files from career as an Illinois State senator,
Obama’s law client list,
Obama’s medical records,
and Obama’s passport records.
In action related to the same case, Klayman asked the court to strike the brief from the Alabama Democratic Party. He called in “frivolous and arrogant” and said “in addition to mocking in disrespectful fashion the seriousness of this case and the integrity of our judicial system, [Democrats] seek to improperly present new evidence not on the record for appeal.”
_____________________________________________
On Dec. 14, 2010, LTC Terry Lakin, M.D., was court-martialed and convicted for failure to report for duty and for missing a movement, while challenging an otherwise legitimate order issued under the counterfeit, usurped authority of an ineligible pretender to the Office of President. Two weeks later, CDR Charles Kerchner (USN-ret.) called for a congressional investigation of Mr. Obama's ineligibility for office.
A congressional investigation can be commissioned by a few Representatives and has clout disproportionate to the number of those who call for it. It is hard to ignore and can hardly be swept under the rug. Exposure by congressional investigation often forces resignation(s) under fire, even with no further action taken. A congressional investigation has a very low threshold for occurrence, compared to the two-thirds of Senators present required to convict an impeachment. But the evidence obtained can be used in an impeachment or a Quo Warranto trial, and it can profoundly impact the outcome.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Unruh for WorldNetDaily.com on Dec. 29, 2010
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxAufGqca-0
C.I.A. Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial transcript (audio, 3 hours)
On May 14-18, 2010, the Rev. Dr. James David Manning's C.I.A. Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial conducted a thorough and rigorous investigation, with results written to be used as the basis for a Congressional investigation. Held at the Atlah World Missionary Church six blocks from Columbia University, the C.I.A. Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial uncovered information available and accessible only to local residents in the Harlem neighborhood of Columbia University.
Obama Classmate: No One At Columbia Class Reunion Ever Saw Obama AKA Soetoro
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HbnKR6Z5EhQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HbnKR6Z5EhQ
Youtube description:
Published on Jun 5, 2013
http://www.fiscalconservatives.com/v...nKR6Z5EhQ.html
Images for Obama prom date (Click any picture to enlarge.)
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...wXE6nmf8mQWvEA
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...tMKSJ6x8J0MugI
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...wthrv5U9XSqssM
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...wzf9nQ-Mj2Ipxr
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...xa3RhhJJYTVhVq
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...aW_xF26cslLeyA
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...zKmcUxLXP0zB5U
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...-kZSkurriSybv8
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...2w8ElcfE-9qbvs
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...RcdPKdvF2Kk6vz
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...Bmx-p00Q8MIaXB
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...ssdY-LdsBm3Agg
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...EwiJBrRPPJhqNg
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...KEslXWHgKBISqA
- https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...YKcpiLYX-FBtMA
www.washingtonpost.com/.../president-obamas-prom-night-photo-wow-ha...
May 23, 2013 – Read more at Time.com: President Obama's prom photos ... He was a handsome prom date, and she a pretty one.
POLITICS
BARACK OBAMA: THE GHOST OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
Jun. 4, 2013 1:31pm
WAYNE ALLYN ROOT
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...oto/571692.png Wayne Allyn Root is a Capitalist Evangelist, entrepreneur, and Libertarian-conservative Republican. He is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee. Wayne's latest book is out on April 15, 2013: "The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide: Secrets to Protecting Your Family, Your Finances, and Your Freedom."
Wayne Allyn Root’s book The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide is out now.
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...AM-620x412.png
President Barack Obama speaks to crowds along a rain soaked boardwalk on May 28, 2013 in Asbury Park, New Jersey. (Photo: Getty Images)
I just returned from New York, where I attended my 30th Columbia University reunion. I celebrated with my esteemed classmates. Everyone except Barack Obama. As usual- he wasn’t there. Not even a video greeting. Not a personalized letter to his classmates. Nothing. But worse, no one at our 30th reunion ever met him. The President of the United States is the ghost of Columbia University.
I’m certainly no “Johnny come lately.” For five years now (since 2007 when it became clear Barack Obama was running for President), I’ve been quoted in the media as saying that no one I’ve ever met at Columbia can remember ever meeting, or even seeing, our college classmate Barack Obama. Don’t you think the media should be asking questions? Isn’t this a very strange story?
Wayne Allyn Root joined us for the full hour on Tuesday’s BlazeCast with TheBlaze Editor-in-Chief Scott Baker:
I am a graduate of Columbia University, Class of 1983. That’s the same class Barack Obama claims to have graduated from. We shared the same exact major- Political Science. We were both Pre Law. It was a small class- about 700 students. The Political Science department was even smaller and closer-knit (maybe 150 students). I thought I knew, or met at least once, (or certainly saw in classes) every fellow Poly Sci classmate in my four years at Columbia.
But not Obama. No one ever met him. Even worse, no one even remembers seeing that unique memorable face. Think about this for a minute. Our classmate is President of the United States. Shouldn’t someone remember him? Or at least claim to remember him?
One of the speakers at the 30th reunion should have reminisced about “my days with the future President.” But no one did. You’d think Obama might have sent a video to tell us all how much he enjoyed his time at Columbia. You’d think he’d have sent at least a letter to be read aloud from one of his former college buddies. Right? But he didn’t. Because Obama has no former college buddies. No one that ever met Obama, let alone befriended him, was in attendence at our 30th class reunion.
Now you might argue this is all strange, but it’s possible. Afterall Columbia says he graduated. And I take my college’s word for it. Would one of the world’s greatest Ivy League institutions participate in a coverup, thereby risking their billion dollar reputation? And there is one single article written for the Columbia newspaper with Obama’s name on it. A single photo also exists of Obama in his Manhattan apartment with the man he claims was his college roommate- a Pakistani foreign student. And one single radical leftist Columbia professor who hates Israel also claims he remembers Obama.
That’s the sum total of Obama’s existence at Columbia University, Class of ’83.
So I asked every classmate I met at our 30th reunion, many of them Political Science majors, if they ever met, or saw, or heard of Obama. The answer was a resounding NO from every one of them. I asked if they found this strange, or worried how this was possible? They all answered YES. I asked if they thought it was possible to be a Political Science major and never meet a fellow major in our small classes? They all gave me a very strange look and answered NO. So I asked, “How could this be possible? Can you explain this?” No one had an answer.
Keep in mind these people I spoke to are all- to a man and woman- dedicated liberal Democrats who voted for Obama. I’m guessing 90% are major Democrat contributors. My Columbia classmates are the crème of the crop of American society. Lawyers, doctors, billionaire hedge fund members, stars of the media. They adore Obama. But they all admit they never met him in their four years at Columbia. I am proud of my classmates for their honesty and integrity.
One classmate told me he was present when one of the most honored professors in Columbia University history gave a speech to alumni a couple of years ago. The speech was followed by Q&A. This beloved professor was asked about Obama at Columbia. He said, “I have my doubts about the story.” The crowd was stunned. He immediately went onto the next question and never elaborated. So obviously I’m not the only one with doubts.
So here’s my take on this great mystery. I’ve never said Obama was not registered at Columbia. I’m sure he was. I’ve never said he didn’t graduate. If Columbia says he did, then I’m sure he did. But I’ve always said there is something wrong with the story. It’s rancid. It’s unbelievable. It’s impossible. It’s the story of a Manchurian candidate.
The question isn’t was he ever registered, or did he graduate. And it’s interesting that one photo, one professor, and one newspaper article exists- just enough to provide a thin cover. But the serious question the media should be asking is…What did Obama do for two full years in-between registration and graduation? Did he ever attend a class? Did he ever have a single friend other than a Pakistani national? Why is the only professor to ever come forward and claim he remembers him a radical leftist who hates Israel? What exactly was he doing when no one met him, saw him, or heard of him? Why are his college records sealed? What has he got to hide?
But my educated guess is he can’t, or won’t ever release those records. Because what we’d find would be shocking.
Now I know somewhere in America is an Obama defender that will accuse me of lying. But are all those classmates at our 30th reunion lying too? And if I wanted to lie, wouldn’t I better off saying I knew the future President well? If I wanted to malign the President, shouldn’t I be saying he was my close buddy and I witnessed all kinds of terrible things? But I can’t say that.
Because I never witnessed anything. Neither did any of my classmates. We didn’t know him. Never met him. Never saw him. My story is simply the truth- and it’s the same consistent story I’ve told since 2007.
There is something wrong with Obama’s story- that much I know. He is either the ghost of Columbia, or the perfect Manchurian candidate. But something smells rotten at Columbia.
http://www.theblaze.com/contribution...ia-university/
Ghost Student: Obama’s Columbia 30th Reunion and NO Classmate Remembers Seeing Him
05 Jun 2013
Barack Obama, students
by Wayne Allyn Root
http://joemiller.us/wp-content/uploa...ds-150x150.png Photo Credit: Getty Images
I just returned from New York, where I attended my 30th Columbia University reunion. I celebrated with my esteemed classmates. Everyone except Barack Obama. As usual – he wasn’t there. Not even a video greeting. Not a personalized letter to his classmates. Nothing. But worse, no one at our 30th reunion ever met him. The President of the United States is the ghost of Columbia University…
I am a graduate of Columbia University, Class of 1983. That’s the same class Barack Obama claims to have graduated from. We shared the same exact major- Political Science. We were both Pre-Law. It was a small class – about 700 students. The Political Science department was even smaller and closer-knit (maybe 150 students). I thought I knew, or met at least once, (or certainly saw in classes) every fellow Poly Sci classmate in my four years at Columbia.
But not Obama. No one ever met him. Even worse, no one even remembers seeing that unique memorable face. Think about this for a minute. Our classmate is President of the United States. Shouldn’t someone remember him? Or at least claim to remember him?
…Now you might argue this is all strange, but it’s possible. After all Columbia says he graduated. And I take my college’s word for it. Would one of the world’s greatest Ivy League institutions participate in a cover-up, thereby risking their billion dollar reputation? And there is one single article written for the Columbia newspaper with Obama’s name on it. A single photo also exists of Obama in his Manhattan apartment with the man he claims was his college roommate – a Pakistani foreign student. And one single radical leftist Columbia professor who hates Israel also claims he remembers Obama.
That’s the sum total of Obama’s existence at Columbia University, Class of ’83.
Read more from this story HERE.
http://joemiller.us/2013/06/obamas-c...rs-seeing-him/
HAHAHAHAHA ... no wonder he doesn't know CRAP about the Constitution
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Obama Did NOT Attend Columbia University According To Alumni!
The Following is a factual account by an Alumni of the Class of 1983 which would be the same year Barack Hussein Obama supposedly would have graduated in but no one including a Law Professor says he ever attended the school. This is just another reason for us to demand that his sealed records be unsealed! Call 202-224-3121 and demand his records be opened and also contact Donald Trump as this is now snowballing into the largest fraud ever! Here is the story according to Alumni Wayne Allyn Root Class of 1983 of Columbia University. Please Share this far and wide!
I just returned from New York, where I attended my 30th Columbia University reunion. I celebrated with my esteemed classmates. Everyone except Barack Obama. As usual- he wasn’t there. Not even a video greeting. Not a personalized letter to his classmates. Nothing. But worse, no one at our 30th reunion ever met him. The President of the United States is the ghost of Columbia University.
I’m certainly no “Johnny come lately.” For five years now (since 2007 when it became clear Barack Obama was running for President), I’ve been quoted in the media as saying that no one I’ve ever met at Columbia can remember ever meeting, or even seeing, our college classmate Barack Obama. Don’t you think the media should be asking questions? Isn’t this a very strange story?
I am a graduate of Columbia University, Class of 1983. That’s the same class Barack Obama claims to have graduated from. We shared the same exact major- Political Science. We were both Pre Law. It was a small class- about 700 students. The Political Science department was even smaller and closer-knit (maybe 150 students). I thought I knew, or met at least once, (or certainly saw in classes) every fellow Poly Sci classmate in my four years at Columbia.
But not Obama. No one ever met him. Even worse, no one even remembers seeing that unique memorable face. Think about this for a minute. Our classmate is President of the United States. Shouldn’t someone remember him? Or at least claim to remember him?
One of the speakers at the 30th reunion should have reminisced about “my days with the future President.” But no one did. You’d think Obama might have sent a video to tell us all how much he enjoyed his time at Columbia. You’d think he’d have sent at least a letter to be read aloud from one of his former college buddies. Right? But he didn’t. Because Obama has no former college buddies. No one that ever met Obama, let alone befriended him, was in attendence at our 30th class reunion.
Now you might argue this is all strange, but it’s possible. Afterall Columbia says he graduated. And I take my college’s word for it. Would one of the world’s greatest Ivy League institutions participate in a coverup, thereby risking their billion dollar reputation? And there is one single article written for the Columbia newspaper with Obama’s name on it. A single photo also exists of Obama in his Manhattan apartment with the man he claims was his college roommate- a Pakistani foreign student. And one single radical leftist Columbia professor who hates Israel also claims he remembers Obama.
That’s the sum total of Obama’s existence at Columbia University, Class of ’83.
So I asked every classmate I met at our 30th reunion, many of them Political Science majors, if they ever met, or saw, or heard of Obama. The answer was a resounding NO from every one of them. I asked if they found this strange, or worried how this was possible? They all answered YES. I asked if they thought it was possible to be a Political Science major and never meet a fellow major in our small classes? They all gave me a very strange look and answered NO. So I asked, “How could this be possible? Can you explain this?” No one had an answer.
Keep in mind these people I spoke to are all- to a man and woman- dedicated liberal Democrats who voted for Obama. I’m guessing 90% are major Democrat contributors. My Columbia classmates are the crème of the crop of American society. Lawyers, doctors, billionaire hedge fund members, stars of the media. They adore Obama. But they all admit they never met him in their four years at Columbia. I am proud of my classmates for their honesty and integrity.
One classmate told me he was present when one of the most honored professors in Columbia University history gave a speech to alumni a couple of years ago. The speech was followed by Q&A. This beloved professor was asked about Obama at Columbia. He said, “I have my doubts about the story.” The crowd was stunned. He immediately went onto the next question and never elaborated. So obviously I’m not the only one with doubts.
So here’s my take on this great mystery. I’ve never said Obama was not registered at Columbia. I’m sure he was. I’ve never said he didn’t graduate. If Columbia says he did, then I’m sure he did. But I’ve always said there is something wrong with the story. It’s rancid. It’s unbelievable. It’s impossible. It’s the story of a Manchurian candidate.
The question isn’t was he ever registered, or did he graduate. And it’s interesting that one photo, one professor, and one newspaper article exists- just enough to provide a thin cover. But the serious question the media should be asking is…What did Obama do for two full years in-between registration and graduation? Did he ever attend a class? Did he ever have a single friend other than a Pakistani national? Why is the only professor to ever come forward and claim he remembers him a radical leftist who hates Israel? What exactly was he doing when no one met him, saw him, or heard of him? Why are his college records sealed? What has he got to hide?
But my educated guess is he can’t, or won’t ever release those records. Because what we’d find would be shocking.
Now I know somewhere in America is an Obama defender that will accuse me of lying. But are all those classmates at our 30th reunion lying too? And if I wanted to lie, wouldn’t I better off saying I knew the future President well? If I wanted to malign the President, shouldn’t I be saying he was my close buddy and I witnessed all kinds of terrible things? But I can’t say that. Because I never witnessed anything. Neither did any of my classmates. We didn’t know him. Never met him. Never saw him. My story is simply the truth- and it’s the same consistent story I’ve told since 2007.
There is something wrong with Obama’s story- that much I know. He is either the ghost of Columbia, or the perfect Manchurian candidate. But something smells rotten at Columbia.
Courtesy of Wayne Allyn Root: Author’s Website
http://breakingobama.blogspot.com/20....html?spref=fb
Barack Obama: The Ghost Of Columbia University
June 6, 2013 by Wayne Allyn Root
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gWwGvvFeCPs
Hello, this is Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. I just returned from New York, where I attended my 30th Columbia University reunion. I celebrated with my esteemed classmates. Everyone except Barack Obama. As usual, he wasn’t there. Not even a video greeting. Not a personalized letter to his classmates. Nothing. But worse, no one I met at our 30th reunion ever met him. The President of the United States is the ghost of Columbia University.
I’m certainly no “Johnny come lately.” For five years now (since 2007 when it became clear Barack Obama was running for President), I’ve been quoted in the media as saying that no one I’ve ever met at Columbia can remember ever meeting, or even seeing, our college classmate Barack Obama. Don’t you think the media should be asking questions? Isn’t this a very strange story?
I am a graduate of Columbia University, Class of 1983. That’s the same class Barack Obama claims to have graduated from. We shared the same exact major; political science. We were both pre-law. It was a small class; about 700 students. The Political Science department was even smaller and closer-knit (maybe 150 students). I thought I knew, or met at least once, (or certainly saw in classes) every fellow poly sci classmate in my four years at Columbia.
But not Obama. No one ever met him. Even worse, no one even remembers seeing that unique memorable face. Think about this for a minute. Our classmate is President of the United States. Shouldn’t someone remember him? Or at least claim to remember him?
One of the speakers at the 30th reunion should have reminisced about “my days with the future President.” But no one did. You’d think Obama might have sent a video to tell us all how much he enjoyed his time at Columbia. You’d think he’d have sent at least a letter to be read aloud from one of his former college buddies. Right? But he didn’t. Because Obama has no former college buddies. No one that ever met Obama, let alone befriended him, was in attendance at our 30th class reunion.
Now you might argue this is all strange, but it’s possible. After all, Columbia says he graduated. And I take my college’s word for it. Would one of the world’s greatest Ivy League institutions participate in a cover-up, thereby risking their billion dollar reputation? And there is one single article written for the Columbia newspaper with Obama’s name on it. A single photo also exists of Obama in his Manhattan apartment with the man he claims was his college roommate — a Pakistani foreign student. USA Today described Obama’s roommate as a pot smoker, cocaine user and foreign student. Isn’t that lovely? And one single radical leftist Columbia professor who hates Israel also claims he remembers Obama. Quite a crew in the Obama camp, huh? Hard to even believe.
That’s the sum total of Obama’s existence at Columbia University, Class of ’83.
So I asked every classmate I met at our 30th reunion, many of them political science majors, if they ever met, or saw, or heard of Obama. The answer was a resounding “NO” from every one of them. I asked if they found this strange, or worried how this was possible? They all answered “yes.” I asked if they thought it was possible to be a political science major and never meet a fellow major in our small classes? They all gave me a very strange look and answered “no.” So I asked, “How could this be possible? Can you explain this?” No one had an answer.
Keep in mind these people I spoke to are all — to a man and woman — dedicated liberal Democrats who voted for Obama. I’m guessing 90 percent are major Democrat contributors. My Columbia classmates are the cream of the crop of American society. Lawyers, doctors, billionaire hedge fund members, stars of the media. They adore Obama. But they all admit they never met him in their four years at Columbia. I am proud of my classmates for their honesty and integrity.
One classmate told me he was present when one of the most honored professors in Columbia University history gave a speech to alumni a couple of years ago. The speech was followed by Q&A. This beloved professor was asked about Obama at Columbia. He said, “I have my doubts about the story.” The crowd was stunned. He immediately went onto the next question and never elaborated. So obviously I’m not the only one with doubts.
So here’s my take on this great mystery. I’ve never said Obama was not registered at Columbia. I’m sure he was. I’ve never said he didn’t graduate. If Columbia says he did, then I’m sure he did. But I’ve always said there is something wrong with the story. It’s rancid. It’s unbelievable. It’s impossible. It’s the story of a Manchurian candidate.
The question isn’t was he ever registered, or did he graduate? And it’s interesting that one photo, one professor, and one newspaper article exists — just enough to provide a thin cover. The kind of thin cover you might find created by the CIA or KGB. Really strange.
But the serious question the media should be asking is…What did Obama do for two full years in-between registration and graduation? Did he ever attend a class? Did he ever have a single friend other than a Pakistani national? Why is the only professor to ever come forward and claim he remembers him a radical leftist who hates Israel? What exactly was he doing when no one met him, saw him or heard of him? Why are his college records sealed? What has he got to hide? But my educated guess is he can’t, or won’t ever release those records. Because what we’d find would be shocking.
Now I know somewhere in America is an Obama defender that will accuse me of lying. But are all those classmates at our 30th reunion lying too? And if I wanted to lie, wouldn’t I better off saying I knew the future President well? If I wanted to malign the President, shouldn’t I be saying he was my close buddy and I witnessed all kinds of terrible things? If someone wanted to smear the President, wouldn’t they say they saw him snorting cocaine at a Columbia party? Anyone could make that claim. But I can’t say that. Because I never witnessed anything. Neither did any of my classmates. We didn’t know him. Never met him. Never saw him. He wasn’t at any Columbia parties. My story is simply the truth, and it’s the same consistent story I’ve told since 2007.
There is something wrong with Obama’s story, that much I know. He is either the ghost of Columbia, or the perfect Manchurian candidate. But something smells rotten at Columbia. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week same time, same place. God Bless America.
–Wayne Allyn Root
http://personalliberty.com/2013/06/0...ia-university/
No Wonder the Crack Head doesn't know Constitutional Law
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
a Broke Ass Fake from the Get Go
BTTT
2 Hours Ago by Tim Brown
BOMBSHELL: Document Examiner Tied To Obama Defense Attorney Says Birth Certificate Is 100% Fraud
1 Comment
http://cdn.freedomoutpost.com/wp-con...70-220x220.jpg Reed Hayes is a court qualified handwriting and document examiner whose business is located in Honolulu, Hawaii. He has nearly 40 years of handwriting related experience, and has worked as an international consultant and speaker. Never heard of him? Well, Hayes is the Certified Document Examiner (CDE) who produced the 40 page opinion referenced in the Mike Zullo affidavit that was submitted to the Alabama Supreme Court in the Obama eligibility case and his report concluded that the Obama birth certificate image, located at WhiteHouse.gov is a complete fabrication.
PPSimmons reports:The rabid followers of the “O” (Obots) have rushed to denounce Reed Hayes as a “quack.” However, one might be surprised to learn that one of Hayes’ clients listed in the Expert Witness Directory at this link is an attorney with Perkins-Coie Law Firm.It has been reported that Mr. Hayes has been hounded by Obama operatives to discover the details of his 40-page forensic analysis of the Obama pdf birth certificate. He has been referring them to Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse, who now legally own his report, for further information.
Perkins – Coie is the law practice whose partners have provided Obama’s personal defense against all birth certificate and natural born citizen litigation over the past five years. Hmmmmm. Very interesting indeed.
If it turns out that Sheriff Arpaio is successful in getting Congress to investigate the authenticity of Obama’s BC, the Perkins-Coie legal team, who will be defending Obama, will be hard pressed to simply dismiss Reed Hayes as a “quack.” This fact will be especially significant now that it is a revealed and proven truth that members of the Perkins – Coie firm have used Hayes as an expert witness! Their own prior cases, where Hayes was used as a witness, would be severely compromised if they use Saul Alinski-styled mocking attacks on Hayes.
I also found it interesting that someone sided with the Obama administration and attempted to bring up dirt on Hayes by pointing out that he was a homosexual with a “partner,” who is now deceased. Isn’t that interesting? Why would that be considered “dirt” from the Obama side? Isn’t he the one telling us that is “normal” and isn’t he the one helping to push the homosexual agenda along? Ah, the hypocrisy!
Mike Zullo responded to the revelation from Hayes, “This ought to serve as a warning shot across the bow to the naysayers of our criminal investigation in the Obama fraud case. The impressive credentials of Mr. Hayes, and the fact that he has testified in court cases for Perkins-Coie coupled with the fact that Mr. Hayes is a registered Democrat, demonstrates the integrity of our investigation and our conviction that we possess incontrovertible evidence to back our case. It must be emphasized that we possess much more evidence similar to this revelation that we have not yet released for public information.”
Attorney Orly Taitz, who has also been pursuing the Obama fraud, even to the Supreme Court, believes something else is going on. She writes:I contacted Mr. Hayes, he stated that he made a deal with Mike Zullo that he will not cooperate with anyone else….She then asked why the far left were attacking her, yet quoting Mike Zullo.
What is going on here?
To me this is like a Kabuki theater: great male song, dance and acting theater. Feds brought the law suit against Arpaio before he decided to become really hot on the issue of Obama’s birth certificate. When Brian Riley and 250 residents of AZ brought this complaint against Obama, Arpaio was already facing a federal law suit from Hispanics in his district, where they claimed that he violated their civil rights under the color of authority, that he does not investigate complaints of rape and sexual abuse in Hispanic enclaves. If convicted, Arpaio could get a prison term.
So Arpaio became very loud, very outspoken about Obama’s use of a forged birth certificate. Suddenly on August 31, 2012, right before the election, Obama dropped federal law suit against Arpaio and Arpaio never filed a criminal complaint against Obama. People donated millions of dollars, nothing came out of it. Arpaio never submitted his criminal complaint against Obama and Obama was reelected without a cinch.
…
What is the end result of this Kabuki dance? The whole country is still going down the drain, but Arpaio has an ace in his deck playing poker with Obama, while Obama has an ace in his deck against Arpaio. The country is still going down the drain, but as long as Arpaio does not file his criminal complaint against Obama and does not disclose the aforementioned affidavit, Obama will not file criminal charges against Arpaio on Hispanic drivers civil rights violation criminal case.
“The answer is, because I am very close to proving Obama to be a criminal, who absolutely has to be removed from the White House and send (sic) to prison,” she wrote.
Taitz recently had her docket denied by Judge Lamberth because she used a pen, instead of a black marker to perform redacting on a document. “Big deal!” she wrote on Friday. “Monday morning he will have the same motion staring at him with black marker and not pen redacting. Lamberth did not indicate any other reasons, which means that within a short period of time we will get the original application to this Connecticut Social Security number of Harrison J. Bounel 042-68-4425. Now Lamberth has zero justification to deny it, as I have proven that the owner of the Social Security number that Obama is using would be 123 years old today and by SSA’s own 120 year rule they are obligated to give me his application even without his consent and without any proof that he is deceased. We have Obama cornered, I have his tax returns with his signature under the stolen Social Security number, I do not tell witnesses not to testify for others, I do not hide important evidence and I cannot be bought or intimidated by anything or anyone.”
Last year Obama attorney Alexandra Hill, of the Newark-based law firm Genova, Burn and Giantomasi, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that it could not be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status.
Seems to me Taitz is laying all her cards out on the table and Arpaio and Zullo, while seeming to have massive amount of evidence may be suspect by not filing a criminal complaint, while the Obama administration dropped their federal lawsuit against him. I don’t know what to make of them at this point. I do know that the evidence of forgery and that we have a Manchurian President seem overwhelmingly clear to me.
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/06/bo...-is-100-fraud/
"Do not answer a fool according to his folly,Quote:
Originally Posted by Naysayer Obot "James" in a comment on WND
Or you will also be like him.
Answer a fool as his folly deserves,
That he not be wise in his own eyes." - Proverbs 26:4,5
I don't debate with proven liars, because when presented
with facts, they make up their own so-called "facts". I don't
waste my time arguing with self-deceived deceivers, who
lead others into the ditch along with them. James is told the
truth, which he then denies, spreading more confusion by
filling up more column inches with more lies. JUST
BECAUSE JAMES SAYS IT IS A FACT, IT MAY BE
TRUE OR IT MAY NOT BE TRUE. James still claims
that the counterfeit, forged Hawaii (long form) Certificate
of Live Birth is genuine, although he HAS to know, just by
examining it closely, that it is sloppily forged, and because
it is forged, it is therefore also fraudulent. So James is lying
about what his eyes tell him is fake, claiming it is genuine.
James is vouching for (lying about) what he knows is false;
how then can he be believed about what he doesn't know
but only claims to be true?
Army Maj. Gen. Suharto took control of Indonesia in 1966
and was "appointed" acting President in 1967. He resigned
the Presidency in 1998. His military regime was authoritarian,
totalitarian, virtual martial law under a Mus|im dictator in the
world's most populous Is|amic state. It was not a Shari'a law
type of totalitarian religious state like Saudi Arabia, Yemen,
Iran, or even like Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, or Afghanistan.
But under Gen. Suharto, Indonesia was definitely subject to
a totalitarian dictatorship - the kind of oppressive rule that
one can feel without even seeing it. Americans are even now
beginning to understand that kind of (almost) "nowhere
touching but everywhere felt" totalitarian dictatorship.
In 1967, when Barry Soetoro was living with Lolo and
Anna Soetoro in Jakarta, Indonesia was under martial
law (whether declared or virtual), and one had to carry
papers - official, government-issued ID - in Barry's case,
his Indonesian citizenship card, the "Kartu Tanda
Penduduk" or "KTP". Not now, and not in the 1960's
until 1967, but AT THAT TIME, under Maj. Gen. Suharto's
military dictatorship, ONLY CITIZENS could attend the
taxpayer-funded government schools. Non-citizen
internationals, such as the ARAMCO foreign employees'
children, attended the privately-funded International School
in Jakarta, as required by law. Barry did not. He attended
St. Fransiskus Assisi (Catholic) Elementary School through
grade 3, and the Mentang (Neighborhood) #1 government
school for the part of grade 4 before his return to Hawaii
in 1971 with his mother, Anna Dunham Soetoro, on her
passport. (He did not have his own passport.)
Barry WAS a citizen of Indonesia. The totalitarian military
regime AT THAT TIME (not now, not in or before 1966)
would not have TOLERATED "Calling yourself a different
name without legally changing it." That is not a fact but a
DEDUCTION, based not upon the flimsy premises and
pretenses of the Bill Ayers-ghosted DFMF narrative, but
upon the internationally infamous harsh nature of the
totalitarian Suharto regime, military rule under what
amounted to martial law, whether it was called that or not.
James can create his own "facts", so-called, he can even
write his own biography and then refer to it as a "history
text," but he can't change the history of the times. Those
were just the facts of life under the Suharto military junta
in Indonesia c.1967-1971.
("A military junta is a group of military officers who
have taken over the government of a country by force.
A military dictatorship where a single leader usually
has all the power. It is an example of an autocratic
dictatorship," from ask.reference.com.)
skwills, you are welcome to move to any other point you like.Quote:
Originally Posted by Obamapologist skwills commenting at WorldNetDaily
Barack Hussein Obama II was born to a Kenyan father, who was never a U.S. citizen or legal resident, just a visiting foreign student on a student visa.
Barack Hussein Obama II was born in the Lady Grigg Maternity Unit of Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. The Supervisor of Obstetrics was John Kwame Odongo, and the attending physician was Dr. James O.W. Ang'awa, who was a friend of BHO Sr. and later his neighbor in Nairobi. Barack Obama II's birthplace is not in doubt; he was born in Kenya, as was public knowledge (especially to the Hillary Clinton campaign) ... until 2007, when it was buried as political baggage.
The counterfeit, forged, computer-generated .pdf file depicting a State of Hawaii long form Certificate of Live Birth proves nothing and is indicative of nothing, because it is a fabricated fake document, as any law enforcement officer in a southern border state would readily recognize. It is not even a decent forgery - it's just BAD MONEY, and anyone can recognize that a $3 bill is fake from a picture of it, even from a hokey, nine-layer .pdf file that the inexperienced forger did not even remember to flatten to a single layer before publishing it. Bogosky beyond belief. Pathetic.
The INA of 1952, as it was written and in effect in 1961 when Barack Obama II was born, required for conferring U.S. citizenship that the citizen parent of a foreign-born child with an alien parent have been a resident of the U.S. for ten years, five of which were after the age of fourteen. But Anna Dunham Obama was only 18, 117 days short of the 19 years of age (five years after the age of fourteen) which the INA of 1952 then required of her in order to confer her U.S. citizenship to her foreign-born child with an alien. According to 8 USC 1401(h) as it was written at that time, she was incapable to make Barack Obama II a U.S. citizen by birth. At birth, Barack Obama II was NOT a U.S. citizen, but ONLY a British Protected Citizen (UKCC) by virtue of his birth in the British Protectorate of Kenya to a Kenyan citizen father. BTW, British citizenship does not cease when one becomes a citizen of another sovereignty.
HE WAS BORN A BRIT; HE'S ALWAYS A BRIT; AND HE'S NOT LEGIT!
[ED.: I do not advocate for impeaching Mr. Obama, for these and other reasons.
1. Only an actual office-holder can be impeached, not an impostor masquerading as such. Mr. Obama is a criminal intruder trespassing in the White House, an ineligible receiver in the field of presidential wannabes, an enemy foreign agent and a fraudulent impostor who should be removed from the Office by the Secret Service, SEAL Team Seven, the local Sheriff, or whatever appropriate law enforcement agency gets it done.
2. Were Mr. Obama to be impeached by the House, nothing he has done or could do, short of a personally initiated nµclεar attαck on the U.S. Capitol building, would cause two-thirds of the majority-Democrat Senate to convict him. Meanwhile, the legal motions and maneuvers could drag on for years, until impeachment becomes a moot point.
3. The most propitious angle of approach now is a House investigation, which does not require a majority of the House and does not involve the Senate at all. But it could break through both the media cone of silence and the threat of violence by the Chicago Mob and Dar al'Is|am. The results of a House investigation will make Mr. Obama's fraudulent usurpation of the Presidency public knowledge and force him to resign, just as public humiliation about the Watergate break-in and coverup forced then-Pres. Nixon to resign and made impeachment unnecessary.
However, because my opinion is just my opinion and no more, and because many are proposing that Mr. Obama be impeached, here are some of those voices calling for impeachment.]
_______________________________________________
Dennis Kucinich calls for impeachment of Obama over unauthorized cruise missile attacks against Libya
Dennis Kucinich | March 21, 2011 | By: Joe Newby
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...?itok=wYo8k9b7
[Spokane Conservative Examiner, March 21, 2011: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) calls for impeachment of Obama over cruise missile attacks against Libya without the authorization of Congress.]
Kucinich also sought the impeachment of both President Bush and Vice President Cheney over the Iraq War, but was blocked by Democratic leaders.
...
One Democratic lawmaker noted that while the [Obama] Administration consulted with the Arab League and the United Nations, "They did not consult the United States Congress."
...
Kucinich and other Democrats are technically correct when they say the Constitution does not give the President power to unilaterally initiate military action unless there is a clear and present danger to U.S. national security, a point made by then Senator Obama in 2007:
_______________________________________________
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."
GOP Rep: Obama should be impeached
if he tries to usurp Congress on debt
Tim Scott | July 7, 2011 | By: Joe Newby
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...?itok=lID3-qNM
While speaking at a Tea Party event in Charleston, SC, Rep. Tim Scott (R-SC) said that if President Obama tries to bypass Congress to borrow beyond the debt limit, he would consider it an "impeachable act."
Scott said it would be "catastrophic" if the President tried to "usurp the entire system set up by our Founding Fathers over something this significant."
...
"This president is looking to usurp congressional oversight to find a way to get it done without us," he said.
_______________________________________________
GOP Congressman says Obama should be impeached
Impeach Obama | August 9, 2011 | By: Joe Newby
http://images.politico.com/global/ne...ess_ap_605.jpg
On Monday, Texas Republican Michael Burgess said the impeachment of Barack Obama "needs to happen," according to an article at Politico.
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported:
When one attendee suggested that the House push for impeachment proceedings against President Barack Obama to obstruct the president from pushing his agenda, Burgess was receptive.
"It needs to happen, and I agree with you it would tie things up," Burgess said. "No question about that."
Burgess said later he was not sure if the proper charges were there, but he did not rule out pursing impeachment.
"We need to tie things up," he said. "The longer we allow the damage to continue unchecked, the worse things are going to be for us."
Burgess made the remark at a meeting with about 100 Tarrant County[, Texas,] Tea Party activists, most of whom were unhappy with his support of the debt ceiling deal.
He told the activists he didn't like the deal, but thought supporting it was the best thing to do under the circumstances.
Reid J. Epstein wrote at Politico:
Burgess, an obstetrician who is in his fifth term as a lawmaker, is the latest House Republican to call for the president’s impeachment. Last month, Iowa Rep. Steve King said Obama “would be impeached” if he allowed the nation to default.
Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) said it would be “an impeachable offense” for Obama to raise the debt ceiling without congressional approval. In April, former Reagan administration official Bruce Fein drafted articles of impeachment in hopes that House Republicans would introduce them.
Those articles of impeachment deal with Obama's unilateral actions in the Libyan war:
In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has usurped the exclusive power of Congress to initiate war under Article I, section 8, clause 11 of the United States Constitution by unilaterally commencing war against the Republic of Libya on March 19, 2011, declaring that Congress is powerless to constrain his conduct of the war, and claiming authority in the future to commence war unilaterally to advance whatever he ordains is in the national interest. By so doing and declaring, Barack Hussein Obama has mocked the rule of law, endangered the very existence of the Republic and the liberties of the people, and perpetrated an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor as hereinafter elaborated.
Even if the House successfully impeaches him, it is highly unlikely a Democratic-controlled Senate would actually convict him.
_______________________________________________
Sensenbrenner floats impeachment of Obama
admin. officials as ‘Fast and Furious’ response
http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-cont...3370054158.jpg
by Matthew Boyle, investigative reporter for the dailycaller.com
12:14 PM, Thursday, 12/08/2011: Wisconsin Republican Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, a former chairman of the House Judiciary Committee where Attorney General Eric Holder testified on Thursday, suggested that impeachment of administration officials involved with Operation Fast and Furious may be the only way to bring the scandal to a close.
In a heated exchange between Sensenbrenner and Holder during Thursday’s Judiciary Committee hearing, Sensenbrenner said impeachment is one option on the table if Holder and the Justice Department continue to withhold information from congressional investigators.
Sensenbrenner didn’t specify which administration officials he thinks could face impeachment proceedings, or if Holder is among them. But he did say the drastic measure would be a last resort.
“There is really no responsibility within the Justice Department,” Sensenbrenner said. “The thing is, if we don’t get to the bottom of this — and that requires your assistance on that — there is only [one] alternative that Congress has and it is called impeachment, where our subpoena powers are plenary and there can‘t be any type of legal immunity or privilege that can be asserted on that.”
“But if we keep on getting pushed down the road and the can keeps getting kicked, and we don’t get closure to this, what is Congress to do so that we don’t spend all our time in court arguing privilege?” Sensenbrenner continued. “That is not a way to get at the truth.”
by Joe Newby, reporter at the examiner.com who specializes in impeachment
Holder broadly asserted that no officials had intentionally deceived Congress, but Politico adds that the Attorney General conceded "that some assurances about Fast and Furious and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives policy that the department provided to Congress in February were not true."
Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh had a partial transcript of the exchange:
HOLDER: Lemme make something very clear and in response to an assertion that you made -- or hinted at -- nobody in the Justice Department has lied.
SENSENBRENNER: Why was the letter withdrawn?
HOLDER: The letter was withdrawn because information in th-there that was inaccurate. The Justice Department letter of February --
SENSENBRENNER: Okay, tell me what's the difference between "lying" and "misleading" Congress in this context?
HOLDER: Well, it -- uh -- eh -- um -- i-i-if you want to have this legal arg -- uh, conversation it all has to with your state of mind and whether or not you had the requisite intent.
"Riiiight, right. You can't lie unless you intend to. It's all about your state of mind!" Limbaugh exclaimed.
Holder acknowledged that as Attorney General, he is ultimately responsible for what happens in the Justice Department, while Sensenbrenner reminded him that misleading Congress is a felony.
Politico added:
“I don’t want to say that you have committed a felony, Mr. Attorney General, but obviously there have been statements so misleading that a letter had to be withdrawn,” Sensenbrenner said. “I think some heads should roll. … The assistant attorney general for the criminal division, Lanny Breuer, should be fired.”
“We have to find out where those mistakes were made, and then I’m going to hold people accountable in that regard,” Holder said during later questioning.
[ED: Eighteen months later, AG Holder has held no one accountable for "those mistakes" yet. However, some have been rewarded. Whistleblowers, not so much.]
__________________________________________________
Obama bypassing Congress on use
of military impeachable offense
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...?itok=l_H9wU3Q
March 10, 2012: Introduced by U.S. Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC), H.Con.Res. 107 reads in part:
[ED.: The cornerstone of the Republic might arguably be the honoring of Congress's exclusive power to declare war, but Congress was unwilling to "declare war" against Dictator Obama in order to protect that cornerstone of the Republic.]Quote:
Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
_______________________________________________
Sen. Kyl: Impeachment of Obama over immigration 'always a possibility'
Impeachment | June 26, 2012 | By: Joe Newby for the examiner.com
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...?itok=Q43lho1Z
[Today,] Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) suggested that President Obama could be impeached over his immigration policies.
"If the president insists on continuing to ignore parts of the law that he doesn’t like, and simply not enforce that law, the primary remedy for that is political," he said.
After the Supreme Court upheld a key provision of Arizona's immigration law, the administration responded by suspending its 287(g) agreements with Arizona, and issuing a directive telling federal authorities to decline many of the calls reporting illegal immigrants.
Worse yet, the Justice Department set up a hotline and an email address for people to report what they believe are potential civil rights violations.
[On his radio show, Bill] Bennett asked: "How do you make the feds cooperate [with state immigration efforts]?"
"Well, that’s the executive’s job and there are only a couple of ways to do it," the Senator said. "If the president insists on continuing to ignore parts of the law that he doesn’t like, and simply not enforce that law, the primary remedy for that is political. And you have it two ways: one is oversight through the Congress to demonstrate what they’re doing wrong and there are some potential criminal charges there for dereliction of duty. Although, I haven’t looked that up yet. And the other part of it is people need to react through the ballot box to turn out of office those people who are not doing their duty. Now if it’s bad enough and if there are shenanigans involved in it, then of course impeachment is always a possibility. But I don’t think at this point anybody is talking about that," he added.
Writing at MSNBC, Steve Frank called the suggestion reckless, but conservatives say Obama's actions are not those of a responsible chief executive.
[Today,] talk show host Rush Limbaugh said Obama's actions made Arizona law enforcement officials targets of the administration and left wing trial lawyers.
"Law enforcement is now the target, [with] the bull's-eye painted on their backs by Barack Obama. [He has] sided with people who are on the other side of the law."
[ED.: Except for adding the last four sentences, Joe Newby's article
is basically a quote of Igor Volsky's article at ThinkProgress.com .]
_______________________________________________
Obama campaign caught in lie over Joe Soptic,
possible violation of law
Stephanie Cutter | August 10, 2012 | By: Joe Newby
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...?itok=7V7ylPK3
Obama campaign caught in lie over Joe Soptic, the steelworker whose wife
died years after Romney left Bain. Credits: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
The Obama campaign has been caught in a lie over Joe Soptic, the man in the now infamous "Romney killed my wife" ad put out by Priorities USA.
After the real timeline of events caused scrutiny of the PAC, the Obama re-election team claimed to have had no knowledge of Soptic's story. Deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter told CNN she didn't know the facts behind Soptic's story.
“I don’t know the facts about when Mr. Soptic’s wife got sick or the facts about his health insurance,” she said.
Robert Gibbs echoed that sentiment when he told reporters on Air Force One that “we don’t have any knowledge of the story of the family.”
But an article posted Thursday at policymic.com says that Soptic was on a conference call with Cutter on May 4, 2012.
"Stephanie Cutter knew Joe Soptic, and heard the entire story well before the Priorities USA ad debuted over the airways. It’s now obvious that she lied when trying to deny it this week," Jesse Merkel wrote.
"It’s highly likely that Robert Gibbs and other high level Obama campaign advisers knew Joe Soptic and his story very well," he added, noting that it is "a violation of federal law" for a campaign to coordinate with a Super PAC.
Buzzfeed reported Thursday that the campaign also used Soptic's story in a slideshow posted on the internet earlier this year that also fails to mention that Romney was not at Bain when the worker lost his job.
(Continued...)
_______________________________________________
Rep. Trey Radel (R-FL):
Obama impeachment should be 'on the table'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-iB-uCaAyA#!
Jan. 13, 2013: Rep. Radel said that Americans “have completely lost our checks and balances in this country[. T]he Congress needs to hold the President accountable for the decisions that he’s making right now ..."
“What I would say to Democrats who are friends with President Obama right now is, ask yourself, what are you going to do when a Republican gets in, that you may not agree with or like very much, and begins doing the same thing?” he asked. [Or paraphrased, "I say right now to President Obama's Democrat friends, ask yourself what you will do when a Republican - someone you may not like very much and with whom you may not agree - becomes President and does these same things?”]
_______________________________________________
Rep. Stockman (R-TX) threatens impeachment
if Obama uses executive action for gun control
http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-cont...202016322.jpeg
The same day Stockman issued his threat, former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese told Newsmax that Obama could be impeached if he attempts to override the Second Amendment through executive orders.Quote:
Originally Posted by Caroline May for The Daily Caller
[Two days later, on Wednesday, Jan. 16th,] Obama signed 23 executive orders dealing with gun control while using children as props.
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...?itok=hFJwzJYT
[ED.: However innocuous the first 13 of these E.O.s sound, they will only affect law-abiding gun-owners, while not impacting criminals who disrespect and disregard gun laws anyway. Eight of the last ten E.O.s can be readily twisted and misconstrued to disarm dissident citizens first, on the way to disarming all law-abiding individuals, still without doing anything to reduce the use of guns in crimes. These eight E.O.s also threaten the carefully-maintained "ambulance-neutrality" which allows nurses, doctors, and healthcare workers to care for the sick and the wounded even in tense hostile-fire situations. At worst, these eight E.O.s potentially force already overworked medical personnel to perform double-duty as police snitches, turning caregivers into targets for violence.]
_______________________________________________Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Obama
Allen West agrees:
Impeachment of Obama should be an option
TEA Party | June 3, 2013 | By: Joe Newby
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...?itok=M0kJeN8P
Allen West talks impeachment of Obama. (Credits: thesharktank1)
In a video posted at the Shark Tank on Saturday, former Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., told Javier Manjarres that impeachment of Barack Obama should be an option.
Manjarres said that he referenced the January statement by Rep. Trey Radel that “all options need to be on the table,” in regards to Obama bypassing Congress on a number of issues. West agreed with Radel's statement.
"We did something that is the most heinous thing that could ever happen. We abandoned Americans while they were under attack. You know that’s right up there to ask someone, maybe you should not be the President. Guess what, Richard Nixon stepped down over breaking and entering," West said.
West noted that two weeks after the attack, Obama was still "talking about a video."
"He did so on Univision. He did so at the United Nations," West said, adding that Obama went so far as to say no one should defame Mohammed. But West said Obama knew at the time the attack was not the result of an online anti-Muslim video.
"We knew that was not the case. He knew that was not the case," he told Manjarres.
The idea of impeaching Obama has come up several times for several reasons in the last three years.
_______________________________________________
Sen. James Inhofe: Obama could face impeachment over Benghazi cover-up
Top GOP Senator Says Obama Could Be Impeached Over ‘Most Egregious Cover-Up in American History’
May. 10, 2013 5:38 pm | by Madeleine Morgenstern for The Blaze
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...?itok=2os58x2Y
May 10, 2013: The top-ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee said President Barack Obama could possibly be impeached over what happened in Benghazi.
Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) said in a radio interview Thursday that “of all the great cover-ups in history” — including the Pentagon papers, Iran-Contra and Watergate — Benghazi “is going to go down as the most serious, most egregious coverup in American history.”
“We may be starting to use the I-word before too long,” Inhofe said on the Las Vegas-based “Rusty Humphries Show.”
“The I-word meaning impeachment?” Humphries asked.
“Yeah,” Inhofe confirmed.
When Humphries questioned the likelihood of impeachment, Inhofe said it wouldn’t be immediate.
“I’m not talking about it now, this is something that could endure until after the ’14 election — this is not a short story, this is something that was re-discovered after eight months…this is clearly an orchestrated coverup,” he said.
Listen to the full interview here.
_______________________________________________
March 3, 2013
U.S. Releases $250 Million in Aid to Egypt After Sec. Kerry’s Meeting With Pres. Mohamed Morsi
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...i-620x402.jpeg
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, left, shakes hands with Egyptian President
Mohamed Morsi at the Presidential Palace in Cairo, Egypt on March 3, 2013.
[ED.: Left unmentioned is the U.S. forgiving $1 Billion of Egypt's debt so Egypt could purchase $1 Billion worth of German U-Boats, as well as U.S. military aid of 250 Raytheon cruise missiles, 20 F-16s, and 200 Abrams tanks to Egypt, ruled by the Mus|im Brotherhood, a sworn enemy of its neighbor, Israel, the primary U.S. ally in the Middle East. But perhaps someone in Washington can justify that conflict of self-interests - not tr__s_n, mind you - as merely restoring a balance of power in the region after the U.S. sold Saudi Arabia $30 billion worth of F-15SA fighter jets in Dec., 2011: 84 new jets and 70 upgrades to existing Saudi F-15 jets. Have to keep our Sunni Is|amic friends and masters armed to the teeth so they can protect themselvcs - not against Israel, of course, but against the Shi'a Is|amic Republic to their east.]
_______________________________________________
[ED.: On June 13th, White House officials met with Sheikh Abdullah bin Bayyah, a deputy of radical Egyptian cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi. The White House hosted this Israel-hating radical Mus1im, while ordinary U.S. citizens are not allowed to set foot in the White House.]
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/st...168/242840.jpg
White House under enemy occupation
Banned Cleric's Outspoken Deputy Visits White House
by Steven Emerson and John Rossomando
Exclusive for IPT News
June 26, 2013
Radical Egyptian cleric Yusuf Qaradawi is considered so radical that the United States bans him from entering the country.
Qaradawi, considered the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood movement, has called for the killing of Jews and Americans.
That history makes the June 13[th] White House meeting with Sheik Abdullah Bin Bayyah all the more inexplicable. Bin Bayyah is vice president of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), a group founded by and headed by Qaradawi. The IUMS has a long history of supporting Hamas – a top Hamas leader is an IUMS member – and of calling for Israel's destruction.
Bin Bayyah's website claims that he met June 13[th] with senior Obama administration officials at the White House.
Nonetheless, it was the Obama administration which sought the meeting with Bin Bayyah, his website's account said.
"We asked for this meeting to learn from you and we need to be looking for new mechanisms to communicate with you and the Association of Muslim Scholars (another name used for the IUMS)," Gayle Smith, senior director of the National Security Council, reportedly said.
Bin Bayyah's June 13[th] account placed other senior officials in the meeting, including: Rashad Hussain, the U.S. special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), National Security Adviser Tom Donilon and White House spokeswoman Jennifer Palmieri. But the account was later changed to delete the reference to Donilon's presence at the meeting.
Smith also thanked Bin Bayyah for "his efforts to bring more understanding amongst humanity" during the meeting, the Bin Bayyah account said.
The White House did not respond to repeated requests for comments between June 14 and Tuesday[, June 25].
Bin Bayyah lobbied the White House to "take urgent action" to help Syrian rebels. "We demand Washington take a greater role in [Syria]," Bin Bayyah told Al-Jazeera. President Obama later [the same day] announced plans to arm Syrian rebels.
http://www.investigativeproject.org/pics/840_large.jpg
Sheikh Abdullah Bin Bayyah posted this
photo of his June 13 White House meeting.
In granting Bin Bayyah a visa, White House officials ignored his radical statements as well as his close connection to Qaradawi. The IUMS's hostility toward Israel, and its support of terrorists, is well documented. Bin Bayyah falls comfortably in line with that view.
["IPT noted that al-Qaradawi, the founder of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), endorses Palestinian Authority Arab suicide bombers and supports Hamas in its fight against Israel. The report also said that bin Bayyah, like al-Qaradawi, also 'refuses to label the acts of groups such as Hamas, Hizbullah or the Islamic Jihad as terrorism.'” (JVIM Daily Update, http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/169349 )]
Continued at http://www.investigativeproject.org/4055/exclusive-banned-cleric-outspoken-deputy-visits
Anti-Morsi, anti-Mus|im Brotherhood protesters hung this banner for the June 30, 2013, protests in Cairo, Egypt. They view Mr. Obama as an enabler of the Mohamed Morsi / Mus|im Brotherhood regime.
http://minutemennews.com/wp-content/...6.44.06-AM.png
_______________________________________________
Levin (audio): If Obama sidesteps Congress
on debt ceiling, ‘no choice’ but impeachment
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Levin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Levin
_______________________________________________Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Newby at the examiner.com
[ED.: As if amnesty for illegal aliens were not a sufficient betrayal of American workers at the production site, Mr. Obama plans to further sell out American workers at the import dock.]
Obama trade dilemma: scant support from Democrats
http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/oXh...png_162613.png By TOM RAUM | Associated Press – Sat, Jun 15, 2013 12:18 PM EDT
http://l2.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/QF...70670066ef.jpg
In this May 2, 2013, file photo, President Barack Obama shakes hands with
Michael Froman, his nominee for U.S. Trade Representative, during a Rose
Garden ceremony at the White House. Obama is pushing to liberalize global
trade through the elimination of tariffs and other barriers, long the plague of
economic relations. The proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part-
nership with Europe will be a top item this coming week in Northern Ireland
at the Group of Eight summit of major Western democracies.
(AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)
WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Barack Obama pushes an ambitious agenda to liberalize global trading, political trade wars already are forming, and they're with fellow Democrats rather than with Republicans, his usual antagonists.
Obama is promoting free-trade proposals with Europe and Asia that could affect up to two-thirds of all global trade.
The ambitious deals would reduce or eliminate tariffs and other trade barriers. But there's trouble ahead for both the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership — at the negotiating table and from Congress.
_______________________________________________
Dean Chambers: Obama should be impeached over Benghazi, targeting conservatives, abuses of power
Government Topics | June 15, 2013 | By: Joe Newby
On Saturday, [June 15th,] Dean Chambers, the Examiner.com writer who caused a stir last November with a web site that said Obama won the [2012] election through voter fraud, said in an op-ed that Barack Obama should be impeached over Benghazi, the scandals involving the targeting of conservative groups, and what Chambers called a "pattern of exceeding" his Constitutional authority.
As the country has learned, some 500 conservative groups were targeted by the IRS for extra scrutiny when they filed paperwork to become tax-exempt organizations. Christian organizations were also targeted for scrutiny and abuse by federal bureaucrats, and the Examiner's Anthony Martin reported Friday that government operatives infiltrated churches "for the purpose of data collection."Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Chambers, editor of QStarNews.com
According to Martin, "government snoops" were looking for any criticism of Obama, "talk of Tea Party participation, conversations about gun ownership, and a number of other issues."
On Saturday, Chambers said in an exclusive interview that he did not believe the Democratic-controlled Senate would vote to convict Obama, but he believes that some Democrats would vote to convict if the public overwhelmingly supported it.
"I think they should make clear at every step that race is not an issue, and that it is unfortunate that America's first African-American President has committed impeachable offenses. But the integrity of the Constitution and the rule of law are more important, and the Members of Congress took an oath to uphold them," he said.
Chambers also said he does not believe Obama has the political skills to fight impeachment the way that Bill Clinton did, and he would probably opt to resign if the House voted to impeach.
But what about the possibility of Joe Biden stepping in to take Obama's place?
Chambers said he wasn't too concerned, since in his view, Biden would simply be a "caretaker president" with no mandate and very little ability to push his agenda.
The International Business Times said Saturday that with the growing scandals in Washington, D.C., campaigns calling for Obama's impeachment are "ramping up."
"Several Facebook pages are dedicated to Obama’s impeachment, with the largest having attracted more than 75,000 likes," Christopher Zara wrote.
[ED.: Even liberals and progressives are now calling for Mr. Obama's impeachment, in the wake of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden reporting warrantless wiretapping of the general public, especially in cases where federal investigators have been spying on those who are not suspected of any crimes. Because of his most offensive language, I'll not link to theamazingatheist on YouTube. However, his "Impeach Obama" video of June 7, 2013, is an example of the disgust on the left with their anointed dictator's turn for the worse, from the darkness to even darker still.]
Can You Guess Who I Am ? Shocker !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zcjw6MFgQuY
Published on Oct 24, 2012
CAN YOU GUESS WHO THIS IS 45 SECONDS BEFORE THIS VIDEO IS OVER ? This is a mirrored video.
Video Expose: Obama’s Lifetime of Photoshopped Pictures
Wednesday, June 19, 2013 8:02
(Before It's News)
We all know that Obama’s “Internet Birth Certificate” is fake and that all his past from school, politics etc is zipped up. Yet just one questions looms large: Just how far down does this fraud go? Watch the below video-what do you think?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dFzT3BsRDbk#!
Uploaded on Feb 15, 2011
Part 3 of my new mini eBook , soon to be released. Before 2004, the media had never heard of Barack Obama. They did not know about his birth place, his family, his education, his religion, his background, and his whereabouts.
They still do not know. Everything they thought they know about Obama was fabricated for their benefit from that point forward.
All of these photos "made available to the public" by the Obama Campaign and Obama's "family and friends" are forgeries created for the conspiracy to package, sell, and elect an illusion of the perfect Presidential candidate.
A conspiracy put Obama into politics. A conspiracy put him in office. A conspiracy is keeping him in power.
The Journolist conspiracy was one of hundreds of similar conspiracies to keep Americans from knowing they are being conned by the biggest criminal conspiracy in modern history.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=dFzT3BsRDbk#!
http://beforeitsnews.com/contributor...es/imaagge.JPG
http://beforeitsnews.com/obama/2013/06/video-expose-obamas-lifetime-of-photoshopped-pictures-2452830.html?utm_campaign=&utm_source=http%3A%2F%2 Fmail.centurylink.net%2Fzim bra%2Fmail&utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2 Fc84I&utm_medium=verticalresponse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-KJCMWcoms
The men behind Barack Obama part 2
Uploaded on Oct 29, 2008
Especially in politics it is of the utmost importance to try to look behind the facade: who makes up the team of the presidential candidate? The future president of the United States of America is for a large part dependent on and being fed by his team of advisors and future cabinet members. Webster Tarpley wrote a book on the men and women behind presidential hopeful Barack Obama. He argues that there is more to Obama than his charismatic appearance and that some of his advisors pose a danger to the US and the world in case Obama might be elected to become the next US president. Whether Tarpleys view is correct for now is a matter of opinion and remains to be seen, but for the public debate it is relevant to take note of his facts and arguments. Therefor DeepJournal interviewed Webster Tarpley on the topic of his recently published book Obama, The Postmodern Coup,The Making of a Manchurian Candidate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-KJCMWcoms
MURDERED Andrew Breitbart Discovered OBAMA Missing Link Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8t5k1OtQng4
Published on Mar 6, 2012
Was Breitbart murdered because he had found the Obama missing link? In this video I break down the real Obama and more. Thanks for watching.
MURDERED Andrew BREITBART held OBAMA missing Link Part 2/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcAyByVjVLs
Published on Mar 7, 2012
Thanks for watching. In this shocking video I breakdown how the globalist have allowed and funded radicals to take this country over. Obama is a Marxist Revolutionary that will seize total control when the time is right.
In immigration and nationality law, the "operative father" is the father of record, according to law, not according to biology. Barrack Hussain Obama, Sr., a Kenyan citizen in the U.S. on a student visa, is the father of record on the Certificate of Birth from Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya, as well as on all the various counterfeit birth documents claiming a birth in Honolulu, Hawaii. Legally speaking, the status of British Protected Citizenship passed from Obama Sr. to Obama II, regardless of the biological father.
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/ccbh/mxp/images/mxp.jpg http://timelifeblog.files.wordpress....27-1.jpg?w=325
Mr. Obama and Malcolm X (born Malcolm Little) share the same skull shape and noses and upper lips of similar size and shape. Malcolm X also had the same uncharacteristically thin lips and the same tall lankiness as Mr. Obama. Although Malcolm X was an inch or two taller than Mr. Obama, SAD, Barry's mother, was comparatively short and stout. But however striking the resemblance between the two, Malcolm X was not legally Barack Obama II's father. Conferring citizenship is a matter of law, not of genetics, personality, appearance, shared domicile, or religion.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ZtpvTc16rY...G+PRINCE+1.png
Saturday, June 22, 2013
EXPOSED!! OBAMA’S MOMMA ALSO HAS A FAKE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER; THEY ARE ALL FRAUDS !!! WE ARE BEING SNOOKERED.... WHO IS BEHIND THIS MASSIVE FRAUD?
OBAMA’S MOMMA ALSO HAS A FAKE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER; TIME FOR REVOLUTION. THIS IS WAY TO DEEP FOR ANY INVESTIGATION TO UNCOVER !
REVOLUTION NOW PATRIOTS! SHARE THIS !!
So not only does Obama not have a valid social security number and valid application, but hismother’s appears to be fraudulent as well. We have no idea who these people are. His mother does not have a valid social security number. She obtained her social security number using falsified forms, as evidenced by the notation at the bottom of the page where it gives a revision date of 7/55.http://www.hillarynme.com/wp-content...ER-300x181.jpg
What are the chances that Obama and his momma, Stanley Ann Dunham, would both have phony social security numbers? How ’bout slim, fat chance, and none, and yet they do!
Obama has MULTIPLE social security numbers. The one used most frequently belongs to a deceased man born in Connecticut…and yet no curiosity on the part of the cable networks (including FOX) or surprise ( not!) the MSM!
Fraud runs rampant in the Obama family! Who has multiple social security numbers unless they are in witness protection or we have elements within our government designing the hidden identity and agenda of Barack Obama and his momma!
Let us not forget Obama’s father. He is just as suspect as his “son”. Harvard wanted him out, deported! Politico reported Obama Sr. was forced out of Harvard!
The following is from Anti-Mullah.
FORGERY NOW SHOWN IN OBAMA MAMA’S SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION
FRAUD AND FORGERY RUNS IN THE OBAMA FAMILY!
Irrefutable Proof Obama’s Mama’s Social Security Application Fraudulent: 1965 Application Form Signed In 1959. Got A Time Machine?!
One wonders why would Stanley Ann Dunham’s Social Security card be forged?
To place a verifiable signature of hers into the public record.
Then you see it would match the signature on the recently provided (forged) LFBC (Long Form Birth Certificate) by Obama and in the forged book copy in Hawaii Department of Health.
Since Sarah Anne Dunham can’t sign any documentscreated since she died they would have to recreate her signature and a document history to verify it.
That is: someone alive is signing for her and placing this document into the record would be the way to authenticate her signature as an ‘existing’ sample.
Now at the bottom of Dunhams SS-5 form , it can clearly be seen that the form was Revised on 7/65 . That is quite a task as seeing that she signed the form in 1959. More on that below.
Comments added to the forms below are in bold red.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oMAQ0-xhyI...TEXTarrows.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-vEIppBG53l.../s640/2sa1.jpg
A REAL FORM FROM 1959
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OpwMrLgv9K...porary+sa3.jpg
The forms look almost the same. There are just a few minor differences. They are noted in red on the forms.
Basically what they did was just switch the locations of those two areas on the forms. Unless you were looking very closely, those 2 forms would look identical. Someone not paying attention would think the 1965 form was the 1959 form.
Want More? This is from BirtherReport.com.
Where does that leave us ?
1). The SS-5 form used in 1959 is a form that was revised in 1946
2). The Dunham form ( supposedly signed in 1959 ) is different from that used in 1959. In fact, it has the statement Revised 7/65 on the form. Short of using a time machine, there is no way she could have signed that in 1959.
3). It is obvious that the Dunham SS-5 form is a fake. The forger used a form that looked just like the one used in 1959, but he did not look close enough. He missed the layout change in those two fields.
What is more disturbing though is THIS FAKE WAS POSSIBLY PLACED INTO HER RECORD IN THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONS FILES. WHO DID THIS ?
For additional details concerning the letter and graph Orly Taitz received from the Social Security Administration under the FOIA read here.
FOR EVEN MORE DETAILED EVIDENCE SCRUTINIZING EVERY PART OF THE FRAUDULENT FORM
PLEASE CLICK HERE
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57873092/I...ion-Fraudulent
Posted by JOHN GAULTIER'S FEROCIOUSLY CONSERVATIVE ACTIVIST BULLETIN at 1:53 PM Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: barack obama, CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, fake in the white House, fraud and forgery,LEGAL ISSUES, MSM, OBAMA, Obama and his momma fraudulent social security numbers,Obamaland and tagged Barack Obama
http://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/20...-has-fake.html
MEDIA
YAHOO! NEWS SAYS OBAMA WAS BORN IN…KENYA!
Jun. 22, 2013 12:34pm Madeleine Morgenstern
Yahoo! News had to issue a correction Friday after publishing an article about President Barack Obama that called Kenya “the country of his birth.”
The article, about Obama’s upcoming trip to Africa, stated:
President Barack Obama makes the first extended trip to Africa of his presidency next week — but he won’t be stopping at the country of his birth.
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...oo-Obama2.jpegThe story was revised to say Obama “won’t be stopping in his ancestral homeland” and a correction was posted stating, “An earlier version of this story incorrectly identified the president’s birthplace.”Image source: Huffington Post
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...a-620x297.jpegThe so-called “birther” movement has repeatedly cast doubt on whether the president was born in the United States, despite confirmation from officials and the release of Obama’s birth certificate stating he was born in Hawaii.
Image source: Yahoo! News
–
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...born-in-kenya/
Bridgette's article at "We the People of the United States" dated July 6, 2011, with comments, is a most definitive discussion of the Stanley Ann Dunham fraudulent SSN, which her mother may have taken from a deceased person's documents at the Honolulu Co. Judge of Probate Office, where she worked as a volunteer.
Or maybe that entry was inserted into the Social Security Administration database more recently.
That seems to be the crux of the matter.Quote:
If [Mr.] Obama keeps giving our enemies arms, logistics, and money...
Treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy, but does arming the enemy of our ally (Israel) constitute treason, if that enemy of our ally has not officially declared war on the U.S.? Iran declared war on the U.S. in 1979 and continues to be at war with the U.S. to this day. Syria, whether under Assad or the M.B. rebels, is an enemy of Israel and an ally of Iran, but Syria has not officially declared war upon the U.S. as has Iran.
Syria is a destination on the State Dept. official weapons embargo list, which denies export (or import) of arms, munitions, defense articles, and defense services. The embargo specifies the sovereignty, "Syria", not the Assad government. This was meant to limit the firepower of the Assad regime, but the Syrian rebels of the Mus|im Brotherhood may be even more dangerous than Assad, both to Israel and the U.S..
Obviously Mr. Obama interprets the embargo differently, but I would argue that any U.S. weapons exported to Syria, even to rebels fighting Assad, would almost certainly fall into the hands of violent enemies of the U.S. who are equally as dedicated to the destruction of "the Great Satan" as they are to the destruction of "the Little Satan."
[ED.: Mr. Obama's attorneys reached a new low in displaying contempt of court, although their no-show before U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth is the same stunt they pulled before Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi in the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings a year and a half ago. The big difference is that Judge Malihi covered for their snubbing the court and Judge Lamberth did not.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atty. Orly Taitz
Quote:
Originally Posted by K,T,
Quote:
Originally Posted by I. BarKahn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atty. Orly Taitz
Don't leave America. Don't leave. Don't leave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qewv-l9G0K4
Investigator: Many Nationally Syndicated Radio Hosts Warned Not To Talk Obama Background
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=giuiuOJFQbc
http://patriotaction.net/video/video...sg_share_video
Don't know how many have seen the meeting minutes of the Kenyan Parliament in Nov 2008 but it has some very hair raising comments that everyone should know about. It starts on page two, and has very telling comments by parliament members throughout.
Title of the minutes:
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
OFFICIAL REPORT
Wednesday, 5th November, 2008
The House met at 9.00 a.m.
[Mr. Deputy Speaker in the Chair]
PRAYERS
NOTICE OF MOTION
ABILL TO AMEND THE NSSF ACT
TO PROTECT WORKERS' SAVINGS
3259
Dr. Khalwale: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. You have heard none other than the Leader of Government Business acknowledge that because of Obama's win in the United States of America(USA),the House is crippled. Could we allow him to move a Motion for Adjournment so that we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA? I humbly request!
Well, it looks like the discussion at ALIPAC about Obama's citizenship has now been viewed almost a half a million times! wow.
W
Quote:
Surprise! Obama's eligibility suddenly resurrected
After a yearlong virtual silence about the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president of the United States, the issue is suddenly breaking its way through the political mire and back into the light.
Look what the top investigator handling the probe is now doing with Congress ...
WND Exclusive
Eligibility resurrected: Congress pays attention
Investigator who has documented White House fraud says interest surging
Published: 3 hours ago
Bob Unruh
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/03/Oba...le-340x179.jpg The dispute over Barack Obama’s eligibility was headline material in his first term, as lawsuits reached as high as the U.S. Supreme Court and the president released his purported “original” birth certificate from Hawaii in an attempt to silence the doubters.
But there’s been a lot of silence over the past year, with the exception of a couple of diehard, truth-seeking individuals and websites.
That might change soon, according to the lead investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse in Arizona, which was assigned to do a thorough investigation of the document posted by the White House as Obama’s birth certification.
Lt. Mike Zullo told WND there is interest being expressed in Congress about the investigation’s conclusion that the White House document is fraudulent – an image created on a computer.
A contingent of citizens in Maricopa County had asked Arpaio to look into the issue because they were concerned an ineligible candidate would be on their 2012 presidential election ballot.
Zullo previously has contributed evidence to a court case – now pending before the state Supreme Court in Alabama – on the dispute. He has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a genuine paper document.
“Mr. Obama has in fact not offered any verifiable authoritative document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event,” he explained earlier.
“One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several unknown sources.”
Zullo also has noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.
See some of Zullo’s evidence:
1st Video at the Page Link: http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/eligibili...3yD5wuEZeGD.99
Most recently, Grace Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in eligibility cases.
“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,” Zullo told the World Tribune.
“Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used Mr. Hayes in their cases.”
The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and called almost immediately.
“There is something wrong with this,” Hayes had said.
Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from various sources.”
“In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,” he says in the report.
At the heart of the dispute is the constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen,” which at the time the nation was founded was considered to be the offspring of two citizens of the country.
But Zullo notes that the re-creation of an official document or the creation of an image represented as an official document is a crime itself. And the facts surrounding Obama’s case suggests there’s either no original or something in the original is being concealed.
Zullo told WND that there have been inquiries about the evidence from members of Congress, and he’s met with a few to answer their questions. His hundreds of pages of reports also are being forwarded to those who ask.
Carl Gallups, a former deputy sheriff in Florida and now a pastor and talk-show host, told the Tribune, “It was Barack Obama who said for 16 years, along with his publisher that he was ‘Kenyan born.’”
He was referring to the literary agency Dystel & Goderich, which published a brochure that said Obama was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia.”
When Obama ran for president, it was changed to say he was born in Hawaii.
Zullo also recently made a public presentation at the annual convention of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association in St. Charles, Mo. He then held a closed-door session for police officers, elected officials and others.
2nd Video at the Page Link: http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/eligibili...3yD5wuEZeGD.99
He elicited audible gasps and shock when he showed evidence that Obama’s document is fraudulent.
He later told Gallups that Sheriff Arpaio wants the issue investigated in Congress.
The argument over Obama’s eligibility first was raised by Hillary Clinton’s campaign when she was ran for the Democratic nomination for president in 2008.
Zullo said Obama has raised further questions by refusing to release the marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.
Christopher Monckton, who writes a column for WND, said Zullo’s sworn affidavit in the case provides much information, and a sworn mathematical analysis demonstrates the near-zero probability that the White House “birth certificate” is genuine.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/01/bar...ertificate.jpg
Monckton also noted the recalcitrant attitude on the part of authorities in Hawaii to the official law enforcement questions about the document’s validity.
And he cited the fact that in 1961, state law permitted Hawaiian parents of children born anywhere in the world to register them as Hawaiian-born, a legalized backdoor to U.S. citizenship.
“Neil Abercrombie, Hawaii’s governor, said he was present at Obama’s birth. Then he changed his story,” Monckton wrote.
“The posse has reported to the sheriff that two crimes have been committed:
first, fraudulently creating a forgery that the White House had characterized, knowingly or unknowingly, as an officially produced governmental birth record;
and secondly, fraudulently presenting to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery that the White House had represented as ‘proof positive’ of Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaiian long-form birth certificate.”
Zullo repeatedly has explained that if the records are there, and they show what the White House says they show, what could possibly be a reason for keeping them concealed?
And if they do not show what has been alleged publicly, he asks, what do they show?
Join in support of the critical investigation.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/eligibili...ing-attention/