Who is behind the Quashing of the Birth Certificate Issue?
	
	
		Who is behind Quashing of the Birth Certificate Issue
[posted] by DefendUSx August 25, 2009 19:41
By Joan Swirsky  
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Back in October of 2008, when the subject of Obama's Constitutional eligibility to be president of the United States was just a blip on the radar screen of public awareness, I wrote an article about how easy it was to find my then-92-year-old mother's birth certificate.
Frankly, I didn't think finding my mother's birth certificate was possible, given the fact that she had been born in a farmhouse in Storrs, CT, along with nine of her 10 siblings, to parents who didn't speak English. Despairing that she would never be "qualified" to receive the care she desperately needed, I set about to find the  document, which I was sure had vanished in the unreliable record-keeping  of 1913.
First I called an official in Hartford, the capitol of Connecticut,  who recommended that I call the Storrs record-keeping office.
That took two minutes.
Next I called the Storrs office and was told to call another number.
That took two minutes.
When I called the third number, I explained to the woman who answered  the phone that I was “asking something impossible.” I gave her my  mother’s first name and her father’s last name.
Within four minutes, she said, “Here it is!” She had found my mother’s  birth certificate, and it surprised me when I learned my mother’s “real”  first name and “real” last name had changed significantly as she and  her family became Americanized.
When I expressed my amazement, the woman said: “That’s nothing…we’re  routinely asked to find birth certificates from the 1800s, and we do  that all the time!”
Total time it took me to find my mother’s 1913, born-in-a-farmhouse birth certificate: 10 minutes!
  WHERE IS OBAMA’S?
  To this date, Barack Obama has refused – or been unable –to produce  an authentic birth certificate that attests to the fact he is an  American-born citizen. He has had more than the two-years of campaigning  for the presidency of the United States to do this, but failed.
Why is this important? Because the Constitution of the United States  expressly forbids anyone born on foreign soil to run for the highest  office in our land!
You would think that Obama would have volunteered the “proof” of his  eligibility within a nanosecond of entering the race. But here we are,  less than two weeks away from the election, and Americans still don’t  know if Obama is an American!
While Obama’s camp submitted a supposedly authentic birth certificate  to the far-left blog Daily Kos, it was found to have been a  photo-shopped version of the birth certificate of his half-sister, who  was actually born in Hawaii, as Obama claims he was.
While this glaring omission in Obama’s eligibility to become the most  powerful man on earth mystified some and rankled others, a few people –  clearly alarmed at what they considered a stealth candidate’s attempt  to dance his way around the Constitution and venture into the realm of  criminality– took action.
  SLEUTH #1
The first sleuth was lawyer Philip J. Berg, a Democrat from Pennsylvania and an undisguised Hillary fan.
Last August, Berg – a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania  and one-time candidate for both governor and senator –filed a lawsuit in  Federal Court (Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083) seeking a  Declaratory Judgment and an Injunction against Obama, alleging that the  first-term Illinois senator did not meet the qualifications to be  President of the United States.
Berg’s suit was based on Obama’s failure to answer satisfactorily the  question of where he was born. Was it in Hawaii, Kenya, or Indonesia?  Was his legal name Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro (his stepfather’s  surname), Barry Obama, Barack Dunham (his maternal grandparents’  surname), or Barry Dunham?
Among the other questions Berg raised were the authenticity of the  name Obama used on his Illinois Bar Application and his possible  allegiance to other countries.
Details of the case, including direct quotations, are found on Berg’s website: www.obamacrimes.com.
“Voters donated money, goods and services to elect a nominee and were  defrauded by Senator Obama’s lies and obfuscations,” Berg said. 
“He  clearly shows a conscience of guilt by his actions in using the forged  birth certificate and the lies he’s told to cover his loss of  citizenship. We believe he…supported this belief by his actions in  hiding his secret, in that he failed to regain his citizenship and used  documents to further his position as a natural born citizen…His very  acts prove he knew he was no longer a natural born citizen. We believe  he knew he was defrauding the country or else why use the forged birth  certificate of his half sister?...If the DNC officers and/or leaders had  performed one ounce of due diligence, we would not find ourselves in  this emergency predicament…from making a person the nominee who has lost  their citizenship as a child and failed to even perform the basic steps  of regaining citizenship through an oath of allegiance at age eighteen  [18] as prescribed by Constitutional laws!”
The net result of Berg’s efforts was that, on September 9, both Obama  and the Democratic National Committee filed a joint motion for a  Protective Order to Stay Discovery pending a decision on the Motion to  Dismiss his lawsuit. In other words, to make Berg’s lawsuit go away!
Berg said he was “outraged, as this is another attempt to hide the  truth from the public; it is obvious that documents do not exist to  prove that Obama is qualified to be President.” The joint motion, Berg  asserted, was a concerted effort to avoid the truth by attempting to  delay the judicial process, although legal, by not resolving the issue  presented: that is, whether Barack Obama meets the qualifications to be  President. He said it is obvious that Obama was born in Kenya and does  not meet the qualifications to be President of the United States. Simply  stated, Obama “is unable to produce a certified copy of his Birth  Certificate from Hawaii because it does not exist.”
An e-mail friend of mine, a lawyer, stated: “What has boggled my mind  about this case is that Berg simply waited for a court order to compel  the  production of the birth certificate, when he could just as easily  have served a subpoena on the Hawaii County Clerk or County Recorder –  or whoever is the custodian of records in Hawaii – to produce the  original birth certificate for examination by an expert  forensic-document examiner to produce certified copies to the Court, the  Plaintiff, and the Defendants, which would have shifted the burden to  Obama to quash the subpoena – and if he filed a motion to quash the  subpoena to produce his own birth certificate, that would sure as hell  tell us that he has a lot to hide.”
  SLEUTH #2
Also in August, longtime Obama nemesis Andy Martin – a Chicago  journalist, lawyer, author of the bestseller, “Obama: The Man Behind The  Mask,” and executive editor [of] www.ContrarianCommentary.com  – filed a suit in the Court of the First Circuit State of Hawaii   (08-1-2147-10) against the Republican governor, Linda Lingle, and the  director of the Department of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
Martin’s suit alleged that the defendants had refused to provide a  copy of the requested, certified copy of the birth certificate of  Senator Obama “attested to by the State and not a `certificate’ which is  posted on a website and which has been debunked as possibly having been  altered.”
“It is axiomatic,” Martin’s suit said, “that the birth certificate of  a presidential candidate is a document of crucial public concern and  significance.”
Failing both his petition and an initial “emergency motion,” Martin  filed his second emergency motion this month (-1-2147-10 BIA) “for an  Order to Show Cause (`OSC’) directing the defendants…on or before  October 22, 2008…at a hearing before this Court why the relief requested  by the Plaintiff should not be granted…This lawsuit does not involve  complicated or disputed facts.”
 “Why is Barack Obama obstructing access to his birth records?”  Martin asks. “Along with his obstructing access to college records and  other essential information about his past? I want to see a certified  copy issued by the State of Hawaii, not one issued by the State of  Obama… Interestingly, we think we also know now why he has virtually  imprisoned his white grandmother and refuses to allow her to appear in  public?”
Numerous conservative journalists, talking heads and bloggers have addressed Obama’s fitness to be president, questioning his:
 * Reed-thin résumé.
 * Stunning lack of concrete legislative accomplishments (both in the Illinois legislature and the U.S. Senate).
 * Long-time close relationships and associations with Marxists and  anti-American militants like Frank Marshall, Rev. Jeremiah Wright,  Father Michael Phleger, Khalid Rashidi, et al.
 * Failure to provide transcripts of his years at Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law School.
 * Failure to provide any more than a one-page “report” from his medical doctor about his health status.
* Rationale for flip-flopping on every major issue – economic policy,  domestic policy, foreign policy, et al – during this campaign.
 
The sleuthing continues. According to Berg, Martin, and a number of  other sources, Obama was really born in the Coast Provincial General  Hospital at Mombassa, Kenya at 7.24 PM on August 4, 1961, a birth that  was documented by a certificate with an embossed seal that displays the  name of the hospital, as well as witness signatures. In addition, if  these reports are accurate, his grandmother in Kenya, as well as his  brother and sister, claim they were present during Obama’s birth in  Kenya.
  GRAMMY DEAREST
 Now – belatedly – that the net is closing in on Obama, and the  suspicions, as many have alleged, are that he is a Trojan Horse for  Islamic interests, or a Manchurian Candidate, or a total fraud – Obama  has seemingly discovered an interest in his ailing grandmother. Yes,  that Grammy who he so facilely threw under the bus during the early days  of his campaign.
 
He is now so worried about Grandma Dunham – the woman who raised him but  strangely didn’t attend his nomination – that he is taking a few days  off from his intense campaign to visit this ailing widow.
 
Or could his strangely-timed trip to Hawaii really be to “clear up” the sticky case of his missing birth certificate?
 
I live in New York, where it is not uncommon for BIG payoffs to  influence people to come up with “the goods.” A half-a-million here, a  dire threat there, often influence people to do things – like perjure  themselves, produce phony documents, et al – that they would never do  under less “pressured” circumstances.
 
If the magic document doesn’t appear, it is possible, and entirely  legal, that Obama could be removed from the ballots in states that are  questioning his eligibility.
 
According to a recent article in The Daily Herald in Everett, WA, a  civil action was filed in Washington State Superior Court against Sam  Reed, Secretary of State, demanding that Illinois Sen. Barack Obama be  removed from the ballot in Washington unless he can provide verification  of his status as a United States citizen. The citizen who filed the  suit, Steven Marquis, asked that Reed verify – by looking at “original  or certified verifiable official documents” – that Obama is a  natural-born citizen of the United States and eligible to serve as  president, and that the office do so by Election Day.
 
Like others investigating the matter, Marquis said that answering the  unanswered questions about Obama’s citizenship and background would  “preclude a constitutional crisis and likely civil unrest” that would  arise if information about Obama’s ineligibility came to light after the  election.
  
EXPLOSIVE PRESS RELEASE
This week, on October 21, 2008, Mr. Berg released the result of his  investigation. In a startling press release, he has announced that  “Obama & DNC admit all allegations in Berg v. Obama.”
In his release, Berg explained that “by way of failure to timely  respond to Requests for Admissions… the DNC `ADMITTED’ that Obama is “NOT  QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately  withdraw his candidacy for President and the DNC shall substitute a  qualified candidate.”
 Berg stated that he filed Requests for Admissions on September 15,  2008 with a response by way of answer or objection had to be served  within thirty [30] days. No response to the Requests for Admissions was  served by way of response or objection. Thus, all of the Admissions  directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed “ADMITTED.” Therefore, Obama  must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.
According to Berg, Obama – by default – admitted to every charge the lawyer made., among them:
1. I was born in Kenya. 
2. I am a Kenya “natural born” citizen. 
3. My foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii. 
4. My father, Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. admitted Paternity of me. 
5. My mother gave birth to me in Mombosa, Kenya.
The list includes 56 admissions.
The DNC’s admissions, which number 27, include that:
1. They nominated Barack Hussein Obama as the Democratic Nominee for President. 
2. Have not vetted Barack Hussein Obama. 
3. They did not have a background check performed on Barack Hussein Obama. 
4. They did not verify Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States. 
5. Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya.
For the entire list, go to: www.obamacrimes.com.
  WHAT HAPPENS NOW?
  Interest in this case is understandably intense. Berg’s website has  already received over 55 million hits. But predictably, the  overwhelmingly liberal media has yet to pick up on this story, as if  ignoring a story that has profound implications for our Republic and for  the potential of a Constitutional crisis is less important than  discussing Sarah Palin’s wardrobe.
It’s possible that all the states that are working on obtaining  Obama’s birth certificate will simultaneously remove him from the ballot  at one time.
It’s also possible that, failing to produce the birth certificate,  Obama will voluntarily step aside, leaving a breach through which  Hillary will walk.
Meanwhile, as legal challenges proceed at warp speed, and Obama’s  lawyers scramble to avoid the Scandal of the Century, one thing remains  intractably the same: Obama still hasn’t produced proof of his U.S.  citizenship!
   Joan Swirsky -- Bio and Archives | Comments
	 
	
	
	
		Re: Who is behind the Quashing of the Birth Certificate Issu
	
	
		[quote="MinutemanCDC_SC"][size=117]Who is behind Quashing of the Birth Certificate Issue
[posted] by DefendUSx August 25, 2009 19:41
By Joan Swirsky  Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Back in October of 2008, when the subject of Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to be president of the United States was just a blip on the radar screen of public awareness, I wrote an article about how easy it was to find my then-92-year-old mother’s birth certificate.
Frankly, I didn’t think finding my mother’s birth certificate was possible, given the fact that she had been born in a farmhouse in Storrs, CT, along with nine of her 10 siblings, to parents who didn’t speak English. Despairing that she would never be “qualifiedâ€